Anti-SRP-positive necrotising myopathy concurrent with breast malignancy.

Anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP)-positive necrotising myopathy causes severe progressive proximal weakness with a propensity to involve pharyngeal, laryngeal and respiratory muscles. It is one of the aggressive inflammatory myopathies. First-line treatment is with high-dose steroids followed by other immunosuppressants, but this conventional therapy is often ineffective. Second-line treatment involves use of either rituximab or intravenous immunonoglobulin (IVIG). Anti-SRP-positive necrotising myopathy is frequently treated as refractory myositis due to its poor responsiveness to steroid monotherapy and conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Therefore, anti-SRP-positive necrotising myopathy differs from immune-mediated myopathy. Although anti-SRP autoantibody is found in only 4-6% of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, the actual proportion of patients with refractory anti-SRP-positive necrotising myopathy is unknown. We describe a patient with multiple comorbidities who had subacute-onset anti-SRP-positive immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM). After failing steroids, methotrexate and IVIG therapy, she made a considerable recovery with rituximab. She was later diagnosed to have breast malignancy. Malignancy-associated anti-SRP-positive IMNM is rarely reported.

Melioidosis as a Mystique Infection: A Study From Central India.

INTRODUCTION: Melioidosis is caused by the Gram-negative bacilli Burkholderia pseudomallei, which is found in contaminated water and soil and spreads via inhalation, inoculation, and ingestion. Melioidosis manifests diversely in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, ranging from asymptomatic to life-threatening respiratory distress, septic shock, localized tissue infection, necrotizing pneumonia, and soft organ abscesses.  Methods: An 18-month observational study was conducted at a tertiary center in central India among various confirmed melioidosis cases, with data gathered and analyzed. Aerobic culture and sensitivity were performed in all studied cases, either in blood/body fluid/localized collection - using blood agar media for the culture and disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar for sensitivity. Other tests, such as radiological imaging, were conducted according to symptoms and signs of localized infection. RESULTS: The melioidosis cases under study were compared on various clinical/presenting parameters. Melioidosis has a variety of risk factors, but we found that, in India, diabetic patients are at a higher risk of this infection, particularly fatal forms, as all of the patients in our study were diabetic. Melioidosis is known to have joint involvement, either as a source of infection or later in the course of the disease. All cases were successfully treated with antibiotics and surgical procedures, demonstrating the significance of determining disease etiology, early diagnosis, and rapid early management. CONCLUSION:  Melioidosis is a potentially fatal disease, particularly in diabetics, with a wide range of symptoms and complications. Physicians face a variety of challenges, including clinical symptoms resembling other chronic illnesses, such as tuberculosis, delays in laboratory confirmation, underdiagnosis, reduced reporting, and a lack of suspicion. Because there are very little data and it is a seldom reported infection from central India, we are publishing a study on seven melioidosis patients.