Photosensitive epilepsy and photosensitivity of patients with possible epilepsy in Chinese Han race: A prospective multicenter study.

Photosensitive is probably caused by multiple factors including gender, familiar, etc. We aim to study the clinical and EEG features of Chinese Han patients with photosensitivity. A total of 5482 consecutive patients with possible epilepsy from 3 center in China. Of the 73 patients with PPR to IPS, 48 were female. 69.9% patients were evoked by frequency ranged 8 Hz-25 Hz, with accompanying seizures in 13 patients. 6 of 9 patients with eyes closure sensitivity experienced epileptic seizures during IPS. We found some new features: 1) The patients with eyes closure sensitivity apt to experience electro-clinical seizures provoked by IPS; 2) Female epilepsy patients with PPR and ECS maybe difficult to be seizure free. Preventive measures for related seizures should be performed to the patients with generalized PPR, upper threshold evoking frequency, and eyes closure sensitivity when they received the IPS.

Electroclinical aspects and therapy of Han patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in northern China.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the electroclinical aspects and treatment of Han patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) in northern China. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six outpatients with JME from six epilepsy centers, between January 2011 and June 2012, were followed up for at least two years. They underwent twenty-four-hour video-EEG recording. Brain imaging was performed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Clinical aspects, electroencephalographic (EEG) features, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) received were reviewed. RESULTS: Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were found in 150/156 patients. Delay of diagnosis was 4.60±9.92years. Photosensitivity was more common in eye closure condition during IPS in patients with JME; in addition, patients with JME with myoclonic seizures (MS) and GTCS as seizure types were likely to present photoparoxysmal responses (PPRs). The 82 nontreated patients showed a median latency to first interictal or ictal generalized spike-wave discharge (GSWD) of 50min (IQR: 22-102min). The first GSWDs were recorded in 63%, 76%, 90%, and 98% patients within one, two, three, and 4h, respectively; only 2% of patients had first GSWDs after 4h. One hundred eleven patients (111/156) chose extended-release valproate (VPA) at daily doses ≤1000mg. The percentages of seizure-free patients among MS, GTCS, and absence seizure (AS) groups were 88.3%, 99.0%, and 94.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Photoparoxysmal responses were more common in patients with JME with MS and GTCS and rare in patients with JME with MS and AS in northern Chinese Han patients. Most patients with JME in northern China chose VPA as first therapeutic choice, and low dose (500 to 1000mg daily) of extended-release VPA may be an optimal choice for them. Video-EEG monitoring for at least 4h may be helpful in detecting the first interictal or ictal GSWD in patients with potential JME. Moreover, video-EEG monitoring performed at about 9 o'clock in the morning with patients in the awake state might be useful to find the first GSWD. For JME diagnosis, Class II criteria are more helpful than Class I counterparts, the latter yielding more missed diagnoses.