The Influence of Resilience on Outcomes After Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Resiliency is the ability to recover from stressful events and has been shown to correlate with patient outcomes following certain orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between resiliency and outcomes following TAA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing primary TAA between April 2015 and September 2022 was performed (N = 83). Data included demographics, comorbidities, complications, preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) functional scores, Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) scores, and surgical satisfaction. Patients were defined as having low resilience (LR), normal resilience (NR), or high resilience (HR) based on a BRS score of <3, 3-4.30, and >4.3, respectively. RESULTS: High resilience patients had significantly higher postoperative FAAM ADL, Sports, and Overall scores as well as a significantly greater increase from preoperative scores compared with LR and NR patients. Low resilience patients had significantly lower FAAM Sports and Overall scores compared with normal and high resilience patients. BRS scores positively correlated with postoperative FAAM scores. We found no difference in satisfaction or VAS between the 3 cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis identified BRS scores to be an independent predictor for greater changes in FAAM scores following TAA. CONCLUSION: Although functional improvements following TAA are expected, patients with higher resilience at baseline are more likely to experience greater improvements in functional outcomes following surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Foot and Ankle Patient Education Materials and Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: A Comparative Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of foot and ankle patient education material generated by the AI chatbots, as they compare to the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)-recommended patient education website, FootCareMD.org. METHODS: ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI were used to generate patient educational materials on 10 of the most common foot and ankle conditions. The content from these AI language model platforms was analyzed and compared with that in FootCareMD.org for accuracy of included information. Accuracy was determined for each of the 10 conditions on a basis of included information regarding background, symptoms, causes, diagnosis, treatments, surgical options, recovery procedures, and risks or preventions. RESULTS: When compared to the reference standard of the AOFAS website FootCareMD.org, the AI language model platforms consistently scored below 60% in accuracy rates in all categories of the articles analyzed. ChatGPT was found to contain an average of 46.2% of key content across all included conditions when compared to FootCareMD.org. Comparatively, Google Bard and Bing AI contained 36.5% and 28.0% of information included on FootCareMD.org, respectively (P < .005). CONCLUSION: Patient education regarding common foot and ankle conditions generated by AI language models provides limited content accuracy across all 3 AI chatbot platforms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Excisional Debridement for Chronic Achilles Insertional Tendinosis: A Novel Technique and Case Review.

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of chronic Achilles insertional tendinosis (AIT) involves tendon debridement, removal of the retrocalcaneal bursitis, and excision of the calcaneal exostosis, often followed by repair of the Achilles tendon and deep tendon transfer. The literature describes a variety of techniques without a single standard of care. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 57 patients treated with an excisional debridement of the central portion of the Achilles tendon. The novelty of this technique is that instead of complete detachment of the tendon from its insertion, only the central portion is debrided and excised. This allows for enhanced visibility of the calcaneal exostosis and increased healing with apposition of viable tendon during side-to-side repair. RESULTS: Patient-reported outcome scores and pain significantly improved from preoperatively to a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Complications were similar to those previously reported, with superficial wound breakdown being the most common. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of this reliable, reproducible, and effective technique for the treatment of patients with chronic AIT is encouraged because it provides both enhanced visibility and allows complete resection of all pathological tissue. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: Retrospective case series.

Opioid Consumption Patterns and Prolonged Opioid Use Among Opioid-Naïve Ankle Fracture Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature has demonstrated an association between acute opioid exposure and the risk of long-term opioid use. Here, the investigators assess immediate postoperative opioid consumption patterns as well as the incidence of prolonged opioid use among opioid-naïve patients following ankle fracture surgery. METHODS: Included patients underwent outpatient open reduction and internal fixation of an ankle or tibial plafond fracture over a 1-year period. At patients' first postoperative visit, opioid pills were counted and standardized to the equivalent number of 5-mg oxycodone pills. Prolonged use was defined as filling a prescription for a controlled substance more than 90 days after the index procedure, tracked by the New Jersey Prescription Drug Monitoring Program up to 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: At the first postoperative visit, 173 patients consumed a median of 24 out of 40 pills prescribed. The initial utilization rate was 60%, and 2736 pills were left unused. In all, 32 (18.7%) patients required a narcotic prescription 90 days after the index procedure. Patients with a self-reported history of depression (P = .11) or diabetes (P = .07) demonstrated marginal correlation with prolonged narcotic use. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that, on average, patients utilize significantly fewer opioid pills than prescribed and that many patient demographics are not significant predictors of continued long-term use following outpatient ankle fracture surgery. Large variations in consumption rates make it difficult for physicians to accurately prescribe and predict prolonged narcotic use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Burnout Rates Among General Orthopedic Surgeons and Subspecialists: A Pilot Study.

Burnout among physicians is a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, de-personalization, and reduced sense of personal accomplishment that can negatively affect personal relationships, physician well-being, and patient outcomes. Although burnout rates of up to 50% to 60% among orthopedic surgeons have been reported, no studies have evaluated burnout among orthopedic generalists and subspecialists. The primary goal of this study was to examine the prevalence of burnout among orthopedic disciplines. We conducted a multicenter study from March 2019 through December 2019 involving 149 orthopedists. An abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey was used to measure burnout. Demographic information, personal characteristics, professional characteristics, family life and spousal support, and depression were also assessed. The mean rate of burnout among all respondents was 62%, whereas 16.77% screened positive for depression. Subspecialties with the highest rates of burnout were oncology (100%), sports medicine (68%), and trauma (63%). Similarly, trauma (50.00%), oncology (40.00%), and general orthopedics (20.00%) had the highest positive depression screening rates. In contrast, shoulder and elbow (50%), pediatric (52%), and foot and ankle (54%) specialists had the lowest rates of burnout, whereas shoulder and elbow (0.00%), spine (0.00%), and sports medicine (6.50%) specialists had the lowest rates of positive depression screening. Older age, higher debt load, and oncology subspecialty were associated with increased burnout risk. This study sought to determine burnout rates within each orthopedic discipline, with a secondary aim of disclosing contributing factors. Trauma and oncology had the highest rates of burnout and positive depression screening. Because this study represents a small orthopedic cohort, larger studies are needed to appropriately manage burnout in the future. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):333-339.].

Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss for Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) affects the ability of an individual to communicate and can negatively impact quality of life. The risk to orthopaedic surgeons of developing NIHL as a result of occupational exposures in the operating room (OR) is currently unknown. Hearing protection is recommended for levels of >85 decibels (dB), irrespective of length of exposure. The primary goal of the present study was to determine whether orthopaedic surgeons are exposed to harmful noise levels in the OR that puts them at risk for developing NIHL. METHODS: A prospective review was conducted with use of intraoperative audio recordings across 6 orthopaedic subspecialties. Recordings were made in ORs prior to the surgical start time to serve as baseline controls. Decibel levels were reported as the maximum dB level (MDL), defined as the highest sound pressure level during the measurement period, and as the time-weighted average (TWA), defined as the average dB level projected over an 8-hour time period. Noise doses were reported as the percentage of maximum allowable daily noise (dose) and as the measured dose projected forward over 8 hours (projected dose). RESULTS: Three hundred audio recordings were made and analyzed. The average MDL ranged from 96.9 to 102.0 dB, with noise levels for all subspeciality procedures being significantly greater compared with the control recordings (p < 0.001). Overall, MDLs were >85 dB in 84% of cases and >100 dB in 35.0% of cases. The procedure with the highest noise dose was a microdiscectomy, which reached 11.3% of the maximum allowable daily noise and a projected dose of 104.1%. Among subspecialties, adult reconstruction had the highest dose and projected dose per case among subspecialties. CONCLUSIONS: The present results showed that orthopaedic surgeons are regularly exposed to damaging noise levels (i.e., >85 dB), putting them at risk for permanent hearing loss. Further investigation into measures to mitigate noise exposure in the OR and prevent hearing loss in orthopaedic surgeons should be undertaken. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthopaedic surgeons are at risk for NIHL as a result of occupational exposures in the OR.

Comparison Between Closed Suction Drainage and No Drainage Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of closed suction drains after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is associated with lower wound complications in the first postoperative year as compared to no drain usage. METHODS: A total of 324 TAA were reviewed and included for analysis. One hundred forty-four did not have a postoperative drain placed, whereas 180 did have a postoperative drain. Demographic data, including age, sex, tobacco or alcohol use, and various medical comorbidities, were obtained. Follow-up data were collected and reviewed at 2, 6, and 12 weeks; 6 months; and 1 year postoperatively for minor and major wound complications, as well as wound-related reoperations. RESULTS: At the 2-week mark, the use of a drain demonstrated a significant increase in wound complications. No significant difference in wound complications was found at each subsequent follow-up visit. Within the first postoperative year, a total of 46 patients (31.9%) without drains and 69 patients (38.3%) with drains had a wound complication. This was not statistically significant. Most wound complications were minor, and no significant difference in reoperation rates occurred between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A postoperative closed suction drain may increase wound complications in the first 2 weeks after TAA and should therefore be used with caution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Self-Reported Pain Tolerance and Opioid Pain Medication Use After Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons must consider their postoperative pain management strategies to minimize harm from prescription opioid use. Patients often reference their pain threshold to predict how they will tolerate surgical pain and the need for postoperative analgesia, but the direct relationship between these factors has not yet been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between patients' self-reported pain tolerance and prescription opioid usage after foot and ankle surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective follow-up of a prospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent outpatient foot and ankle surgeries. Patient and procedural demographics, opioid pills dispensed, and opioid pills consumed by the first postoperative visit were obtained. Patients were contacted at a mean of 13.1 ± 4.0 months postoperatively and asked to respond to the qualitative statement "Pain doesn't bother me as much as it does most people." Patients were also asked their quantitative pain threshold (0-100), with 0 being "very pain intolerant" and 100 being a "very high pain tolerance," as well other questions regarding past surgical and narcotic consumption history. RESULTS: Of the 700 survey respondents, the average age was 50.9 years and 34.7% were male. Bivariate analysis determined that predictors of lower postoperative opioid consumption included higher quantitative (P = .047) and qualitative (P = .005) pain tolerance scores. Multivariate analysis for the entire cohort demonstrated that higher qualitative pain threshold was associated with lower postoperative opioid consumption (P = .005) but this did not meet statistical significance as an independent predictor of the top quartile of pill consumers. CONCLUSION: Assessment of both qualitative and quantitative score of patients' pain threshold prior to surgery may assist the surgeon in tailoring postoperative pain control. Additionally, asking this question can create an opportunity for educating patients regarding responsible utilization of narcotic medication. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

High Prevalence of Degenerative Changes at the Metatarsal Head Sesamoid Articulation Found During Hallux Valgus Correction Surgery.

Background. Despite the absence of complications and a restoration of normal hallux alignment, some patients have suboptimal outcomes from hallux valgus correction surgery. One risk factor for persistent pain may be the presence of arthritic changes at the metatarsal head articulation with the sesamoids, an area not easily assessed with standard radiographs unless dedicated sesamoid views are obtained. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the metatarsal head for degenerative changes during hallux valgus correction surgery and identified preoperative risk factors associated with these changes. Methods. We prospectively evaluated 200 feet in 196 patients who underwent hallux valgus surgery intraoperatively for the pattern and severity of arthritic changes at the metatarsal head. Mann-Whitney U testing was implemented to compare differences in arthritic scores between preoperative deformity groups. The Spearman correlation test was used to determine the association between age and preoperative deformity with the severity of degenerative changes. Results. More than half of all feet assessed had severe arthritic changes at the plantar medial aspect of the metatarsal head and 40% of feet at the plantar lateral aspect. Age and intermetatarsal angle were found to be positively correlated with arthritis in this area. Conclusion. Our prospective study has demonstrated the high prevalence of arthritic changes at the metatarsal head sesamoid articulation and the positive influence of age and severity of deformity on metatarsal head arthritic changes seen during hallux valgus correction surgery. Furthermore, these arthritic changes were found to have no significant influence on preoperative functional and pain levels.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.