Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
2.
Med Educ Online ; 26(1): 1924350, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33960914

RESUMEN

Ultrasound (US)-guided central venous catheter (CVC) insertion is a procedure that carries the risk of significant complications. Simulation provides a safe learning atmosphere, but most CVC simulators are not available outside of simulation centers. To explore longitudinal trends in US-guided CVC insertion competency in internal medicine (IM) interns, we studied the use of a low-fidelity, gelatin-based, US-guided CVC insertion simulation model combined with a simulation curriculum. This prospective observational study of IM interns was performed over the course of one academic year. Interns (n = 56) underwent model-based, US-guided procedure simulation training program and a repeated training course prior to their intensive care unit (ICU) rotation. CVC insertion competency at different timepoints was recorded. Survey data about intern experience and attitudes were also collected. Out of the 56 interns initially trained, 40 were included in the final analysis. Across all outcomes, interns experienced skill atrophy between initial training and the beginning of their ICU month. However, by the end of the month, there was a significant improvement in competency as compared to initial procedural training, which then waned by the end of the intern year. Attitudes toward the model were generally positive and self-reported confidence improved throughout the course of the year and correlated with objective measures of competency. Over the course of their intern year, which included simulation training using a gelatin-based model, interns demonstrated consistent competency trends. The use of a gelatin-based CVC insertion simulation model warrants further study as an adjunctive aid to existing simulation training.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Femenino , Gelatina , Humanos , Masculino , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 77(23): 1961-1964, 2020 11 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780853

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Successful use of alteplase and argatroban to treat a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated massive pulmonary embolism with cardiac arrest is reported. SUMMARY: This case report describes a 42-year-old male with COVID-19 who developed a massive pulmonary embolism resulting in cardiac arrest after suspected failure of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for a deep venous thrombosis. Administration of two 50-mg doses of intravenous alteplase resulted in return of spontaneous circulation, and low-dose argatroban was used as follow-up anticoagulation therapy without complications. This is the first case report of use of argatroban in a patient with COVID-19 with cardiac arrest-associated massive pulmonary embolism after failure of previous anticoagulation efforts. CONCLUSION: Argatroban may be used as an alternate anticoagulation strategy in COVID-19 patients who fail low-molecular weight therapy. A risk versus benefit discussion should be had regarding appropriateness of therapy as well as dosing. More data is needed to understand the unique hypercoagulable condition in COVID-19 patients as well as research that further highlights the role of argatroban and bivalirudin therapy in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Ácidos Pipecólicos/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Embolia Pulmonar/etiología , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Adulto , Arginina/análogos & derivados , COVID-19 , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Sulfonamidas , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(11): 4171-4177, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30805726

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine if time to antibiotics (TTA) improves outcomes of hospital length of stay, admission to the intensive care unit, and 30-day mortality in adult patients with febrile neutropenia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of time to antibiotic, in the treatment of febrile neutropenia, on hospital length of stay, admission to the intensive care unit, and 30-day mortality. Cases included were patients 18 years or older hospitalized with febrile neutropenia from August 1, 2006 to July 31, 2016. To adjust for other characteristics associated with hospital length of stay, admission to the intensive care unit, and 30-day mortality, a multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 3219 cases of febrile neutropenia were included. The median hospital length of stay was 7.0 days (IQR 4.1-13.3), rate of intensive care unit admission was 13.6%, and 30-day mortality was 6.6%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated time to antibiotics was not associated with hospital length of stay but was associated with admission to the intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality. Delays in time to antibiotic of up to 3 hours did not impact outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A shorter time to antibiotic is important in treatment of febrile neutropenia; however, moderate delays in antibiotic administration did not impact outcomes. Further investigation is needed in order to determine if other indicators of infection, in addition to fever, or other supportive management, in addition to antibiotics, are indicated in the early identification and management of infection in patients with neutropenia.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril/tratamiento farmacológico , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 2(4): 359-369, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30560238

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To improve quality of life (QOL) in patients at risk for post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a mixed-method, prospective, observational, pre-post interventional study in an adult medical and mixed medical/surgical/transplant intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary academic hospital. Preintervention included patients admitted from October 1 through October 31, 2016, and postintervention included patients admitted from January 15 through February 14, 2017. First, a multidisciplinary team of stakeholders identified barriers associated with decreased QOL in patients at risk for PICS. Next, interventions were designed and implemented. The effect of interventions was assessed using a mixed-method analysis. The qualitative analysis used a modified grounded theory approach. The quantitative analysis included assessment of preexisting symptoms and risk factors associated with PICS. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36), which surveys physical and mental composite scores, was used to assess QOL. RESULTS: Barriers identified were lack of awareness and understanding of PICS. Interventions included educational videos, paper and online education and treatment materials, and online and in-person support groups for education and treatment. After interventions, the qualitative analysis found that patients who participated in the interventions after hospital discharge showed improved QOL, whereas education during hospitalization alone was not effective. The quantitative analysis did not find improvement in QOL, as defined by SF-36 physical or mental composite scores. CONCLUSION: Interventions targeted to patients after hospitalization may offer subjective improvement in QOL for those at risk for PICS.

6.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 93(12): 1739-1748, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30292426

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment of delirium affects outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016, was conducted. Patients with ICU delirium, defined by a positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU score, were included. Patients were stratified into 4 treatment groups based on exposure to melatonin and antipsychotic agents during ICU stay: no pharmacologic treatment, melatonin only, antipsychotics only, and both melatonin and antipsychotics. A time-dependent cause-specific hazards model with death as a competing risk was used to evaluate the effect of melatonin or antipsychotic drug use for delirium on duration of ICU delirium, length of ICU stay, and length of hospitalization. A logistic regression was used to evaluate 28-day mortality. Covariates significantly associated with exposure to melatonin and antipsychotics were included in the minimally adjusted model. Covariates significantly associated in the minimally adjusted model were included in a final adjusted model. RESULTS: A total of 449 admissions to the medical ICU were included in the analysis. Exposure to melatonin or antipsychotic agents did not reduce the duration of ICU delirium, ICU/hospital length of stay, or 28-day mortality. However, antipsychotic use only was associated with longer hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Antipsychotic drugs for the treatment ICU delirium may not provide the benefit documented in earlier literature. Further investigation on patient selection, type of antipsychotic, and dosing is needed.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Delirio/tratamiento farmacológico , Delirio/mortalidad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Melatonina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(5): 737-744, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29340940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Potentially preventable admissions are a target for healthcare cost containment. OBJECTIVE: To identify rates of, characterize associations with, and explore physician decision-making around potentially preventable admissions. DESIGN: A comparative cohort study was used to determine rates of potentially preventable admissions and to identify associated factors and patient outcomes. A qualitative case study was used to explore physicians' clinical decision-making. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted from the emergency department (ED) to the general medicine (GM) service over a total of 4 weeks were included as cases (N = 401). Physicians from both emergency medicine (EM) and GM that were involved in the cases were included (N = 82). APPROACH: Physicians categorized admissions as potentially preventable. We examined differences in patient characteristics, admission characteristics, and patient outcomes between potentially preventable and control admissions. Interviews with participating physicians were conducted and transcribed. Transcriptions were systematically analyzed for key concepts regarding potentially preventable admissions. KEY RESULTS: EM and GM physicians categorized 22.2% (90/401) of admissions as potentially preventable. There were no significant differences between potentially preventable and control admissions in patient or admission characteristics. Potentially preventable admissions had shorter length of stay (2.1 vs. 3.6 days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in other patient outcomes. Physicians discussed several provider, system, and patient factors that affected clinical decision-making around potentially preventable admissions, particularly in the "gray zone," including risk of deterioration at home, the risk of hospitalization, the cost to the patient, and the presence of outpatient resources. Differences in provider training, risk assessment, and provider understanding of outpatient access accounted for differences in decisions between EM and GM physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between EM and GM physicians around patients in the gray zone, focusing on patient risk, cost, and outpatient resources, may provide an avenues for reducing potentially preventable admissions and lowering healthcare spending.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/economía , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa
8.
Am J Med Qual ; 33(5): 523-529, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366330

RESUMEN

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to treat severe hypoxemic respiratory failure and as a rescue therapy for patients with cardiopulmonary arrest within a narrow window of time. A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to analyze the clinical and operational processes leading to delays in initiating ECMO. FMEA determined these highest-risk failure modes that were contributing to process failure: (1) ECMO candidacy not determined in time, (2) no or incomplete evaluation for ECMO prior to consult or arrest, (3) ECMO team not immediately available, and (4) cannulation not completed in time. When implemented collectively, a total of 4 interventions addressed more than 95% of the system failures. These interventions were (1) ECMO response pager held by a team required for decision, (2) distribution of institutionally defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, (3) educational training for clinicians consulting the ECMO team, and (4) establishment of a mobile ECMO insertion cart.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Análisis de Modo y Efecto de Fallas en la Atención de la Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida , Minnesota , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
9.
Mayo Clin Proc ; 92(11): 1636-1643, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29101933

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To study associations between extreme erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) elevations (≥100 mm/h) and diseases, age, sex, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 4807 patients with extreme ESR values examined at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. Independent variables included diseases (infection, autoimmune, malignancy, renal disease, or miscellaneous), subcategories of diseases, patient demographic characteristics (age, sex, and race), CRP level, and CCI. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess comparisons of ESR between patients with and without disease as well as relationships between extreme ESR values and demographic characteristics of patients within disease categories. Associations between ESR and CRP level were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The leading diagnosis associated with extreme ESR elevations (n [%]) was infection (1932 [40]), followed by autoimmune (1839 [38]) and malignancy (1736 [36]) (P<.01). Extreme elevations in ESR varied by sex, with higher ESRs in men (mean, 117±13.3 mm/h) than in women (mean, 115.9±12.5 mm/h) (P=.008). Extreme ESR elevations correlated inversely with the CCI (P=.008) and did not correlate with the CRP level. There were no correlations between extreme elevations in ESR and age or race. CONCLUSION: We found that almost all patients have an identifiable etiology for extreme ESR elevations and that infection is the most common disease association. Unlike previous research, we identified higher ESRs in men than in women and no associations with age, race, and comorbid illness. These findings may enhance the diagnostic evaluation of patients with extreme ESR elevations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Factores de Edad , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Comorbilidad/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 72(14): 1195-203, 2015 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26150569

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to analyze the clinical and operational processes leading to above-target International Normalized Ratios (INRs) in warfarin-treated patients receiving concurrent antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: The INRs of patients on long-term warfarin therapy who received a course of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, fluconazole, miconazole, or voriconazole (highly potentiating antimicrobials, or HPAs) between September 1 and December 31, 2011, were compared with patients on long-term warfarin therapy who did not receive any antimicrobial during the same period. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, pharmacists, and a systems analyst was then formed to complete a step-by-step outline of the processes involved in warfarin management and concomitant HPA therapy, followed by an FMEA. RESULTS: Patients taking trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, metronidazole, or fluconazole demonstrated a significantly increased risk of having an INR of >4.5. The FMEA identified 134 failure modes. The most common failure modes were as follows: (1) electronic medical records did not identify all patients receiving warfarin, (2) HPA prescribers were unaware of recommended warfarin therapy when HPAs were prescribed, (3) HPA prescribers were unaware that a patient was taking warfarin and that the drug interaction is significant, and (4) warfarin managers were unaware that an HPA had been prescribed for a patient. CONCLUSION: An FMEA determined that the risk of adverse events caused by concomitantly administering warfarin and HPAs can be decreased by preemptively identifying patients receiving warfarin, having a care process in place, alerting providers about the patient's risk status, and notifying providers at the anticoagulation clinic.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Análisis de Modo y Efecto de Fallas en la Atención de la Salud/métodos , Relación Normalizada Internacional/métodos , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Coagulación Sanguínea/fisiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Interacciones Farmacológicas/fisiología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Warfarina/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...