Quantifying disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using peripheral nerve sonography.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we investigated whether peripheral nerve sonography could be used as a biomarker to monitor disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: In 37 patients, ulnar and median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) was determined in at least 2 ultrasound sessions; mean follow-up was 14.5 months. Linear mixed-effects models were conducted to analyze time effects on CSA. RESULTS: Ulnar nerve CSA declined significantly at a monthly rate of -0.04 mm(2) (forearm) and -0.05 mm(2) (wrist); the decrease was more pronounced when baseline CSA was greater. To detect a 50% treatment effect on ulnar nerve CSA, 332 patients would need to be entered in a hypothetical randomized, controlled clinical trial. Time had no significant impact on median nerve CSA. CONCLUSIONS: Distal ulnar nerve ultrasound may be a useful biomarker to monitor disease progression in ALS, especially as hypothetical treatment effects on CSA seem to be detectable in manageable cohort sizes. Muscle Nerve 54: 391-397, 2016.

Peripheral nerve ultrasound in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis phenotypes.

INTRODUCTION: In this study we sought to determine the cross-sectional area (CSA) of peripheral nerves in patients with distinct subtypes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: Ulnar and median nerve ultrasound was performed in 78 ALS patients [classic, n = 21; upper motor neuron dominant (UMND), n = 14; lower motor neuron dominant (LMND), n = 20; bulbar, n = 15; primary lateral sclerosis (PLS), n = 8] and 18 matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Compared with controls, ALS patients had significant, distally pronounced reductions of ulnar CSA (forearm/wrist level) across all disease groups, except for PLS. Median nerve CSA (forearm/wrist level) did not differ between controls and ALS. CONCLUSION: Ulnar nerve ultrasound in ALS subgroups revealed significant differences in distal CSA values, which suggests it has value as a marker of LMN involvement. Its potential was particularly evident in the UMND and PLS groups, which can be hard to separate clinically, yet their accurate separation has major prognostic implications.