Frequency and Nature of Genomic Alterations in ERBB2-Altered Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) overexpression is an oncogenic driver in many solid tumors, including urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In addition, activating mutations in the ERBB2 gene have been shown to play an oncogenic role similar to ERBB2 amplification. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the frequency and nature of genomic alterations (GA) of ERBB2-altered (mutations, amplification) and ERBB2 wild-type UBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive profiling assay, 9518 UBC cases were grouped by ERBB2 alteration and evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations (GA), tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), and genomic mutational signature. PD-L1 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3). Categorical statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 602 (6.3%) UBC cases featured ERBB2 extracellular domain short variant (SV) GA (ECDmut+), 253 (2.7%) cases featured ERBB2 kinase domain SV GA (KDmut+), 866 (9.1%) cases had ERBB2 amplification (amp+), and 7797 (81.9%) cases were ERBB2 wild-type (wt). European genetic ancestry of ECDmut+ was higher than ERBB2wt. Numerous significant associations were observed when comparing GA by group. Notably among these, CDKN2A/MTAP loss were more frequent in ERBB2wt versus ECDmut+ and amp+. ERBB3 GA were more frequent in ECDmut+ and KDmut+ than ERBB2wt. TERT GA were more frequent in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ versus ERBB2wt. TOP2A amplification was significantly more common in ECDmut+ and amp+ versus ERBB2wt, and TP53 SV GA were significantly higher in ERBB2 amp+ versus ERBB2wt. Mean TMB levels were significantly higher in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ than in ERBB2wt. Apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptides (APOBEC) signature was more frequent in ECDmut+, KDmut+, and amp+ versus ERBB2wt. No significant differences were observed in PD-L1 status between groups, while gLOH-high status was more common in amp+ versus ERBB2wt. MSI-high status was more frequent in KDmut+ versus ERBB2wt, and in ERBB2wt than in amp+. CONCLUSIONS: We noted important differences in co-occurring GA in ERBB2-altered (ECDmut+, KDmut+, amp+) versus ERBB2wt UBC, as well as higher mean TMB and higher APOBEC mutational signature in the ERBB2-altered groups. Our results can help refine future clinical trial designs and elucidate possible response and resistance mechanisms for ERBB2-altered UBC.

Comprehensive Immunogenomic Profiling of IDH1-/2-Altered Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 genomic alterations (GA) occur in 20% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA); however, the immunogenomic landscape of IDH1-/2-mutated iCCA is largely unknown. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) was performed on 3,067 cases of advanced iCCA. Tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression (Dako 22C3), microsatellite instability (MSI), and genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) as a surrogate marker for homologous recombination deficiency were examined. RNA sequencing of 73 patient samples was analyzed for differences in stromal/immune cell infiltration, immune marker expression, and T-cell inflammation. Tissue microarray arrays were subjected to multiplex immunohistochemistry and colocalization analysis in 100 surgical samples. Retrospective clinical data were collected for 501 patients with cholangiocarcinoma to examine median overall survival (mOS) in IDH1/2+ versus IDHwt. RESULTS: Of 3,067 iCCA cases subjected to CGP, 426 (14%) were IDH1+ and 125 (4%) were IDH2+. IDH1 GA included R132C (69%) and R132L/G/S/H/F (16%/7%/4%/3%/<1%). IDH2 GA occurred at R172 (94.4%) and R140 (6.6%). No significant difference was seen in median gLOH between IDH1+ versus IDHwt iCCA (P = .37), although patterns of comutations differed. MSI-High (P = .009), TMB ≥10 mut/Mb (P < .0001), and PD-L1 positivity were lower in IDH1/2+ versus IDHwt iCCA. Resting natural killer cell population, CD70, and programmed cell death 1 expression were significantly higher in non-IDH1-mutated cases, whereas V-set domain containing T-cell activation inhibitor 1 (B7-H4) expression was significantly higher in IDH1+. No significant difference in mOS was observed between IDH1/2+ versus IDHwt patients. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in GA and immune biomarkers are noted between IDH1/2+ and IDHwt iCCA. IDH1-/2-mutated tumors appear immunologically cold without gLOH. These immunogenomic data provide insight for precision targeting of iCCA with IDH alterations.

Methylthioadenosine Phosphorylase Genomic Loss in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common sporadic homozygous deletions in cancers is 9p21 loss, which includes the genes methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), CDKN2A, and CDKN2B, and has been correlated with worsened outcomes and immunotherapy resistance. MTAP-loss is a developing drug target through synthetic lethality with MAT2A and PMRT5 inhibitors. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence and genomic landscape of MTAP-loss in advanced gastrointestinal (GI) tumors and investigate its role as a prognostic biomarker. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic and clinical analysis on an extensive cohort of 64 860 tumors comprising 5 GI cancers. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with GI cancer harboring MTAP-loss and MTAP-intact tumors in a retrospective study. RESULTS: The prevalence of MTAP-loss in GI cancers is 8.30%. MTAP-loss was most prevalent in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at 21.7% and least in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) at 1.1%. MTAP-loss tumors were more prevalent in East Asian patients with PDAC (4.4% vs 3.2%, P = .005) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC; 6.4% vs 4.3%, P = .036). Significant differences in the prevalence of potentially targetable genomic alterations (ATM, BRAF, BRCA2, ERBB2, IDH1, PIK3CA, and PTEN) were observed in MTAP-loss tumors and varied according to tumor type. MTAP-loss PDAC, IHCC, and CRC had a lower prevalence of microsatellite instability or elevated tumor mutational burden. Positive PD-L1 tumor cell expression was less frequent among MTAP-loss versus MTAP-intact IHCC tumors (23.2% vs 31.2%, P = .017). CONCLUSION: In GI cancers, MTAP-loss occurs as part of 9p21 loss and has an overall prevalence of 8%. MTAP-loss occurs in 22% of PDAC, 15% of IHCC, 8.7% of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, 2.4% of hepatocellular carcinoma, and 1.1% of CRC and is not mutually exclusive with other targetable mutations.

Characterizing the Genomic Landscape of the Micropapillary Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Harboring Activating Extracellular Mutations of ERBB2.

The micropapillary subtype of urothelial carcinoma (MPUC) of the bladder is a very aggressive histological variant of urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). A high frequency of MPUC contains activating mutations in the extracellular domain (ECD) of ERBB2. We sought to further characterize ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC to identify additional genomic alterations that have been associated with tumor progression and therapeutic response. In total, 5,485 cases of archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded UBC underwent comprehensive genomic profiling to identify ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC and evaluate the frequencies of genomic co-alterations. We identified 219 cases of UBC with ERBB2 ECD mutations (74% S310F and 26% S310Y), of which 63 (28.8%) were MPUC. Genomic analysis revealed that TERT, TP53, and ARID1A were the most common co-altered genes in ERBB2-mutant MPUC (82.5%, 58.7%, and 39.7%, respectively) and did not differ from ERBB2-mutant non-MPUC (86.5%, 51.9%, and 35.3%). The main differences between ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC compared with non-MPUC were KMT2D, RB1, and MTAP alterations. KMT2D and RB1 are tumor-suppressor genes. KMT2D frequency was significantly decreased in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (6.3%) in contrast to non-MPUC (27.6%; P < .001). RB1 mutations were more frequent in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (33.3%) than in non-MPUC (17.3%; P = .012). Finally, MTAP loss, an emerging biomarker for new synthetic lethality-based anticancer drugs, was less frequent in ERBB2 ECD-mutated MPUC (11.1%) than in non-MPUC (26.9%; P = .018). Characterizing the genomic landscape of MPUC may not only improve our fundamental knowledge about this aggressive morphological variant of UBC but also has the potential to identify possible prognostic and predictive biomarkers that may drive tumor progression and dictate treatment response to therapeutic approaches.

Prevalence of targetable genomic alterations in young women with advanced breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Approximately 5% of breast cancers each year are diagnosed in young women < 40 years who tend to have worse clinical outcomes. We compared genomic alterations using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumor tissue among very young women (< 30 years) and young women (30-39 years) compared to women ≥ 40 years at diagnosis. METHODS: 2049 advanced breast cancer cases were submitted to Foundation Medicine within a 22-month window for CGP. Hybrid-capture based CGP was performed to evaluate all classes of genomic alterations. Tumor mutational burden was determined on at least 0.8 Mbp of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability was determined on at least 95 loci. Immunocyte PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Of the total cases, 28 (1.37%) were < 30 years, 159 (7.76%) were 30-39 years, and 1862 (90.87%) were ≥ 40 at time of diagnosis. Breast tumors were less likely to be estrogen receptor positive in younger women (54% of < 30 years, p > 0.05; 60% of 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 69.4% of ≥ 40 years) and more likely to be triple negative (43%, p = 0.05; 33%, p = 0.05; 26.1% respectively). Young women had higher rates of BRCA1 mutations (17.9% <30 years, p < 0.001; 10.1% 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 2.6% ≥40 years), but lower rates of CDH1 (7.1% <30 years, p > 0.05; 5.0% 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 15.4% ≥40 years) and PIK3CA mutations (17.9% <30 years, p = 0.02; 17.6% 30-39 years, p < 0.001; 40.0% ≥40 years). CONCLUSION: Our findings contribute to the growing literature demonstrating unique genetic profiles among young women diagnosed with breast cancer, compared to older women.

Genomic Profiles and Clinical Outcomes of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden.

Importance: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a putative biomarker of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies of solid tumors, but not specifically for penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). Objective: To characterize biomarker features and ICI therapy outcomes associated with high TMB in PSCC in the routine clinical practice setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, 397 PSCC cases were analyzed to identify genomic alterations in more than 300 cancer-associated genes and genomic signatures, including TMB, using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay. Tumor mutational burden was categorized as low (<10 mutations per megabase [mut/Mb]), high (10-19 mut/Mb), or very high (≥20 mut/Mb). Germline status of genetic alterations was predicted using a validated somatic-germline computational method. Clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic PSCC receiving first-line ICI were abstracted using the deidentified nationwide Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2022. Exposure: Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using FoundationOne and FoundationOne CDx assays from Foundation Medicine Inc. Main outcomes and measures: The spectrum of genetic alterations by TMB level in PSCC, the percentage of germline genetic alterations, and the outcome (overall survival with routine clinical treatment) by TMB of chemotherapy-naive patients with PSCC who received ICI treatment up front were assessed in this descriptive study. Results: Among 397 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [54-73] years; 266 [67.0%] of European, 83 [20.9%] of admixed American, and 34 [8.5%] of African or other genomic ancestry), the median (IQR) age (eg, 65 [53-73] years for low TMB vs 68 [61-78] years for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) and genomic ancestry distribution (eg, European 228 of 339 [67.3%] for low TMB vs 38 of 58 [65.5%] for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) were similar between TMB subgroups. There were 339 PSCC cases (85.4%) with low TMB, 40 cases (10.1%) with high TMB, and 18 cases (4.5%) with very high TMB. Comparisons of TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher vs low TMB showed an enrichment of genetic alterations in PIK3CA (48.3% vs 18.3%; P < .001) and KMT2D (29.3% vs 7.7%; P < .001) and less frequent genetic alterations in CDKN2A (25.9% vs 45.7%; P = .05). Most genetic alterations did not co-occur. Human papillomavirus identification was more frequent as TMB increased: 28.3% for low TMB, 50.0% for high, and 72.2% for very high. In total, 95 of 1377 genetic alterations (6.9%) were germline. Of 10 patients identified from the CGDB receiving frontline ICIs, median (IQR) follow-up was 9.9 months. Four patients had overall survival with clinical treatment of more than 12 months, including 2 of 3 patients with TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of advanced metastatic PSCC based on TMB levels, significant differences were observed for biomarkers in nearly 15% of patients with a TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Germline testing and ICI-based therapy should be integrated into the management of selected PSCC cases.

Genomic landscape of clinically advanced KRAS wild-type pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Introduction: KRAS mutation is a common occurrence in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDA) and is a driver mutation for disease development and progression. KRAS wild-type PDA may constitute a distinct molecular and clinical subtype. We used the Foundation one data to analyze the difference in Genomic Alterations (GAs) that occur in KRAS mutated and wild-type PDA. Methods: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) data, tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) and PD-L1 by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) were analyzed. Results and discussion: Our cohort had 9444 cases of advanced PDA. 8723 (92.37%) patients had KRAS mutation. 721 (7.63%) patients were KRAS wild-type. Among potentially targetable mutations, GAs more common in KRAS wild-type included ERBB2 (mutated vs wild-type: 1.7% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001), BRAF (mutated vs wild-type: 0.5% vs 17.9%, p <0.0001), PIK3CA (mutated vs wild-type: 2.3% vs 6.5%, p <0.001), FGFR2 (mutated vs wild-type: 0.1% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001), ATM (mutated vs wild-type: 3.6% vs 6.8%, p <0.0001). On analyzing untargetable GAs, the KRAS mutated group had a significantly higher percentage of TP53 (mutated vs wild-type: 80.2% vs 47.6%, p <0.0001), CDKN2A (mutated vs wild-type: 56.2% vs 34.4%, p <0.0001), CDKN2B (mutated vs wild-type: 28.9% vs 23%, p =0.007), SMAD4 (mutated vs wild-type: 26.8% vs 15.7%, p <0.0001) and MTAP (mutated vs wild-type: 21.7% vs 18%, p =0.02). ARID1A (mutated vs wild-type: 7.7% vs 13.6%, p <0.0001 and RB1(mutated vs wild-type: 2% vs 4%, p =0.01) were more prevalent in the wild-type subgroup. Mean TMB was higher in the KRAS wild-type subgroup (mutated vs wild-type: 2.3 vs 3.6, p <0.0001). High TMB, defined as TMB > 10 mut/mB (mutated vs wild-type: 1% vs 6.3%, p <0.0001) and very-high TMB, defined as TMB >20 mut/mB (mutated vs wild-type: 0.5% vs 2.4%, p <0.0001) favored the wild-type. PD-L1 high expression was similar between the 2 groups (mutated vs wild-type: 5.7% vs 6%,). GA associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) response including PBRM1 (mutated vs wild-type: 0.7% vs 3.2%, p <0.0001) and MDM2 (mutated vs wild-type: 1.3% vs 4.4%, p <0.0001) were more likely to be seen in KRAS wild-type PDA.

Comparative Genomic Landscape of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Among Patients of East and South Asian Genomic Ancestry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the low rate of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) in patients of South Asian (SAS) and East Asian (EAS) descent, they make up a significant portion of the cases worldwide. Nevertheless, these patients are largely under-represented in clinical trials. We queried whether UCB arising in patients with SAS and EAS ancestry would have unique genomic features compared to the global cohort. METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was obtained for 8728 patients with advanced UCB. DNA was extracted and comprehensive genomic profiling was performed. Ancestry was classified using a proprietary calculation algorithm. Genomic alterations (GAs) were determined using a 324-gene hybrid-capture-based method which also calculates tumor mutational burden (TMB) and determines microsatellite status (MSI). RESULTS: Of the cohort, 7447 (85.3%) were EUR, 541 (6.2%) were AFR, 461 (5.3%) were of AMR, 74 (0.85%) were SAS, and 205 (2.3%) were EAS. When compared with EUR, TERT GAs were less frequent in SAS (58.1% vs. 73.6%; P = .06). When compared with non-SAS, SAS had less frequent GAs in FGFR3 (9.5% vs. 18.5%, P = .25). TERT promoter mutations were significantly less frequent in EAS compared to non-EAS (54.1% vs. 72.9%; P < .001). When compared with the non-EAS, PIK3CA alterations were significantly less common in EAS (12.7% vs. 22.1%, P = .005). The mean TMB was significantly lower in EAS vs. non-EAS (8.53 vs. 10.02; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this comprehensive genomic analysis of UCB provide important insight into the possible differences in the genomic landscape in a population level. These hypothesis-generating findings require external validation and should support the inclusion of more diverse patient populations in clinical trials.

Variable Landscape of PD-L1 Expression in Breast Carcinoma as Detected by the DAKO 22C3 Immunohistochemistry Assay.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, pembrolizumab was approved as a therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the companion diagnostic DAKO 22C3 programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry assay. The study aimed to determine the landscape of PD-L1 expression as detected by the DAKO 22C3 PD-L1 assay in breast cancer subtypes and compare the clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics of PD-L1 positive and negative TNBC. METHODS: PD-L1 expression using the DAKO 22C3 antibody was scored using a combined positive score (CPS) and positive status was defined as CPS ≥10. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using the FoundationOne CDx assay. RESULTS: Of the 396 BC patients stained with DAKO 22C3, the majority were HR+/HER2- and TNBC (42% and 36%, respectively). Median PD-L1 expression and frequency of CPS ≥10 was highest in TNBC cases (median: 7.5, 50% CPS ≥10) and lowest in the HR+/HER2- group (median: 1.0, 15.5% CPS ≥10) (P < .0001). A comparison of PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative TNBC demonstrated no significant differences in clinicopathologic or genomic characteristics. TNBC tissue samples from the breast did have an observed enrichment for PD-L1 positivity compared to TNBC tissue samples from a metastatic site (57% vs. 44%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .1766). In the HR+/HER2- group, genomic alterations in TP53, CREBBP, and CCNE1 were more prevalent and genomic loss of heterozygosity was higher in the PD-L1(+) group compared to the PD-L1(-) group. CONCLUSIONS: The subtypes of breast cancer have distinct patterns of PD-L1 expression, supporting that further research of immunotherapies may include specific evaluation of optimum cutoffs for non-TNBC patients. In TNBC, PD-L1 positivity is not associated with other clinicopathologic or genomic features and should be integrated into future studies of immunotherapy efficacy.

Mismatch repair deficiency, next-generation sequencing-based microsatellite instability, and tumor mutational burden as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor effectiveness in frontline treatment of advanced stage endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Molecular profiling is developing to inform treatment in endometrial cancer. Using real world evidence, we sought to evaluate frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor vs chemotherapy effectiveness in advanced endometrial cancer, stratified by Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) ≥10 mut/MB and microsatellite instability (MSI). METHODS: Patients with advanced endometrial cancer in the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Clinico-Genomic Database were included. Data originated from patients treated between January 2011- March 2022 at 280 US clinics. Next-generation sequencing assays were performed via FoundationOne or FoundationOneCDx. Longitudinal clinical data were derived from electronic health records. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment included pembrolizumab, dostarlimab, and nivolumab monotherapies. Time to next treatment, time to treatment discontinuation, and overall survival were assessed with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard models with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for known prognostic factors. We used the Likelihood ratio test to compare biomarker performance. RESULTS: A total of 343 patients received chemotherapy and 28 received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as frontline treatment. Patients who received monotherapy were more likely to be stage III at diagnosis (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 54.6% vs chemotherapy: 15.0%; p<0.001) and more likely to test MSI-high via next-generation sequencing (immune checkpoint inhibitor: 53.6% vs chemotherapy: 19.2%; p<0.001). In MSI-high cancers, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor had a more favorable time to next treatment (aHR: 0.18, p=0.001) and overall survival (aHR 0.29, p=0.045). Additional analyses on 70 unique tumor specimens revealed mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) via immunohistochemistry and MSI-high via next-generation sequencing concordance (91%), with nominal improvement of MSI over dMMR to predict time to treatment discontinuation (p=0.030), time to next treatment (p=0.032), and overall survival (p=0.22). MSI status was concordant with tumor mutational burden ≥10 in 94.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors may have improved efficacy over chemotherapy in frontline treatment for advanced endometrial cancer defined by MSI-high using next-generation sequencing as a nominally better predictor of outcomes than dMMR with immunohistochemistry. This provides the biologic rationale of active phase III trials.

Genomic landscape of 891 RET fusions detected across diverse solid tumor types.

In this study, we report the clinicopathologic and genomic profiles of 891 patients with RET fusion driven advanced solid tumors. All patient samples were tested using a tissue-based DNA hybrid capture next generation sequencing (NGS) assay and a subset of the samples were liquid biopsies tested using a liquid-based hybrid capture NGS assay. RET fusions were found in 523 patients with NSCLC and in 368 patients with other solid tumors. The two tumor types with the highest number of RET fusion were lung adenocarcinoma and thyroid papillary carcinoma, and they had a prevalence rate 1.14% (455/39,922) and 9.09% (109/1199), respectively. A total of 61 novel fusions were discovered in this pan-tumor cohort. The concordance of RET fusion detection across tumor types among tissue and liquid-based NGS was 100% (8/8) in patients with greater than 1% composite tumor fraction (cTF). Herein, we present the clinicopathologic and genomic landscape of a large cohort of RET fusion positive tumors and we observed that liquid biopsy-based NGS is highly sensitive for RET fusions at cTF ≥1%.

Genomic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer with methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: New treatment strategies for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) include synthetic lethality targets focused on protein arginine methyl transferases such as PRMT5 that exploit the impact of genomic loss of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP). METHODS: Twenty nine thousand three hundred seventy nine advanced NSCLC cases underwent hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling between June 1, 2018 and May 31, 2020. PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (Dako 22C3 PharmDx assay). RESULTS: 13.4% (3928/29,379) NSCLC cases exhibited MTAP loss distributed in adenocarcinoma (59%), squamous cell carcinoma (22%), NSCLC not otherwise specified (16%), and 1% each for large-cell neuroendocrine, sarcomatoid, and adenosquamous carcinoma. Statistically significant differences in mitogenic driver alterations included more KRAS G12C mutations in MTAP-intact versus MTAP-lost (12% vs. 10%, p = 0.0003) and fewer EGFR short variant mutations in MTAP-intact versus MTAP-lost NSCLC (10% vs. 13%, p < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences in currently untargetable genomic alterations included higher frequencies of TP53 (70% vs. 63%, p < 0.0001) and RB1 inactivation (10% vs. 2%, p < 0.0001) in MTAP-intact compared to MTAP-lost NSCLC. SMARCA4 inactivation (7% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001) was less frequent in MTAP-intact versus MTAP-lost NSCLC. Alterations in ERBB2, MET, ALK, ROS1, and NTRK1 did not significantly differ between the two groups. Predictors of immunotherapy efficacy were higher in MTAP-intact versus MTAP-lost NSCLC including tumor mutational burden (9.4 vs. 8.6 mut/Mb, p = 0.001) and low (30% vs. 28%, p = 0.01) and high PD-L1 (32% vs. 30%, p = 0.01) expression. Alterations in biomarkers potentially predictive of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance (STK11, KEAP1, and MDM2) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MTAP loss occurs in 13% of NSCLC, supporting the development of targeted therapies to exploit PRMT5 hyper-dependence. MTAP loss is accompanied by small differences in targeted and immunotherapy options which may impact future combination strategies.

Tissue and liquid biopsy profiling reveal convergent tumor evolution and therapy evasion in breast cancer.

Pathological and genomic profiling have transformed breast cancer care by matching patients to targeted treatments. However, tumors evolve and evade therapeutic interventions often through the acquisition of genomic mutations. Here we examine patients profiled with tissue (TBx) and liquid biopsy (LBx) as part of routine clinical care, to characterize the tumor evolutionary landscape and identify potential vulnerabilities in the relapsed setting. Real-world evidence demonstrates that LBx is utilized later in care and identifies associations with intervening therapy. While driver events are frequently shared, acquired LBx alterations are detected in a majority of patients, with the highest frequency in ER+ disease and in patients with longer biopsy intervals. Acquired mutations are often polyclonal and present at lower allelic fractions, suggesting multi-clonal convergent evolution. In addition to well-characterized resistance mutations (e.g., ESR1, NF1, RB1, ERBB2), we observe a diversity of rarer but potentially targetable mutations (e.g., PIK3CA, HRAS/NRAS/KRAS, FGFR1/2/3, BRAF) and fusions (e.g., FGFR1/2, ERBB2, RET), as well as BRCA1/2 reversions through a variety of mechanisms, including splice alterations and structural deletions. This study provides insights on treatment and selection-driven tumor evolution and identifies potential combinatorial treatment options in advanced breast cancer.

APOBEC Mutational Signatures in Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancers Are Associated With Poor Outcomes on CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Endocrine Therapy.

PURPOSE: APOBEC mutagenesis underlies somatic evolution and accounts for tumor heterogeneity in several cancers, including breast cancer (BC). In this study, we evaluated the characteristics of a real-world cohort for time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling results from 29,833 BC samples were analyzed for tumor mutational burden and APOBEC signatures. For clinical outcomes, a deidentified nationwide (United States-based) BC Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) was evaluated with log-rank and Cox models. Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC who received first-line ET and CDK4/6i were included. Eligible patients from Mayo Clinic and Duke University were HR+ HER2- BC with sequencing data between September 2013 and July 2020. RESULTS: Of 29,833 samples sequenced, 7.9% were APOBEC+ with a high rate in invasive lobular carcinoma (16.7%) and in metastatic tumors (9.7%) relative to locally biopsied BC (4.3%; P < .001). In CGDB, 857 patients with HR+ HER2- BC received ET plus CDK4/6i in the first line. APOBEC+ patients had significantly shorter TTD on ET plus CDK4/6i than APOBEC- patients, 7.8 (95% CI, 4.3 to 14.6) versus 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 14.1; hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.39; P = .0036). Clinical benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed in HR+ HER2-, APOBEC+, tumor mutational burden-high patients, with four of nine CGDB patients (TTD 0.3-11.3 months) and four of six patients in Duke/Mayo cohorts (TTD 0.9-40.5 months) with a TTD of ≥ 3 months. CONCLUSION: APOBEC+ HR+ HER2- patients had shorter TTD on first-line ET plus CDK4/6i relative to APOBEC- patients. Further research is needed to optimize the treatment of APOBEC+ HR+ HER2- BC and to investigate the efficacy of immunotherapeutic strategies in this population.

Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Pelvic and Perineal Region: A Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced pelvic squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a broad category of cancers affecting different pelvic organs and usually featuring unfavorable clinical outcomes. Thus, we aimed to assess genomic differences among pSCC cases and learn whether pSCC could potentially benefit from targeted therapies and/or immunotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1917 advanced pSCCs, including penile (penSCC), male urethral (murthSCC), male anal (manSCC), female urethral (furthSCC), vulvar (vulSCC), cervical (crvSCC), female anal (fanSCC), and vaginal (vagSCC), underwent comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). We used hybrid capture-based CGP to evaluate recurrent genomic alterations (GAs). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined on up to 1.1 Mb of sequenced DNA and microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined on up to 95 loci. Programmed cell-death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC; Dako 22C3). RESULTS: PIK3CA was the most frequently identified potentially "actionable" GA (22%-43%), followed by mTOR pathway [PTEN (0%-18%), FBXW7 (7%-29%)], and cell-cycle GAs. DNA-damage response (DDR) GAs and receptor-tyrosine kinase (RTK) targeted options were uncommon. NOTCH1 GAs were present in >15% of penSCC and vulvSCC. TMB ≥10 mut/Mb was >15% in manSCC, fanSCC, crvSCC, and vagSCC. PD-L1 high expression was >18% in all pSCC except urthSCC, manSCC, and vagSCC. HPV-16/18 detection was highest in manSCC, fanSCC, and crvSCC. CONCLUSION: Despite similar histology, pSCCs can differ in GAs and HPV status. Overall, PIK3CA is the most frequent potentially "targetable" GA followed by mTOR and cell cycle pathway. RTK and DDR GAs are rare in pSCC. Immunotherapy could be considered for pSCC management based on TMB and PD-L1 expression.

Molecular Characterization of Mesothelioma: Impact of Histologic Type and Site of Origin on Molecular Landscape.

PURPOSE: Mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy with heterogeneous outcomes that are partly driven by the differential efficacy of existing therapies across histologic types and sites of origin. Large-scale molecular analysis of mesothelioma and its subtypes has the potential to inform future therapeutic strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1,294 mesotheliomas {980 pleural (malignant pleural mesothelioma [MPM]) and 314 peritoneal (malignant peritoneal mesothelioma [MPeM])} using next-generation sequencing, determined programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and histology in a subset of cases, and assessed MTAP/CDKN2A copy-number status by fluorescence in situ hybridization and T-cell infiltration in an independent cohort. RESULTS: The molecular landscape of MPM was characterized by inactivating alterations in CDKN2A (49%), BAP1 (44%), CDKN2B (42%), MTAP (34%), and NF2 (33%). Compared with epithelioid MPM, nonepithelioid (ie, biphasic and sarcomatoid) MPM had identical tumor mutational burden (median 1.25 mut/Mb, P = .63), more commonly expressed PD-L1 (74% v 51%, P = .02), and was more likely to harbor MTAP, CDKN2A, and CDKN2B copy loss (P < .05). Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed that homozygous MTAP loss was enriched in nonepithelioid MPM. Relative to MPM, MPeM had comparable tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression. The molecular profile of MPeM was similar to MPM, with the distinction that PBRM1 alterations occurred at higher frequency (16% v 7%, P < .01). ALK rearrangements were only observed in MPeM. CONCLUSION: Regardless of histology and location, the molecular landscape of mesothelioma primarily consists of inactivating alterations in tumor suppressor genes, with enrichment of certain alterations in distinct subsets (eg, MTAP loss in nonepithelioid tumors). Given the limited efficacy of current therapies for this disease, novel approaches targeting recurring alterations should be explored.

Molecular analysis of endometrial serous carcinoma reveals distinct clinicopathologic and genomic subgroups.

OBJECTIVES: Endometrial serous carcinoma (EMSC) is an aggressive variant of uterine cancer with limited therapeutic options. We sought to define distinct clinicopathologic and genomic EMSC subgroups. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 2159 EMSC and 2346 endometrioid-type endometrial carcinomas (EEC) tissue specimens that had undergone comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) via the FoundationOne CDx assay during routine clinical care. High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was defined as ≥10mut/Mb using the FDA-approved CDx cutoff for pembrolizumab. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was determined on 95 loci. Evidence of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was determined via genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), a validated HRD detection method for predicting PARP inhibitor effectiveness in ovarian carcinoma. High gLOH was defined as ≥16%. RESULTS: A genomic analysis of 2159 EMSCs revealed a predominance of TP53 mutations, microsatellite stability, low tumor mutational burden (TMB), and recurrent alterations of PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, ERBB2, CCNE1, FBXW7 and MYC. Evidence of HRD via high gLOH was identified in 22% of EMSCs. BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations, as well as unique SET (solid, pseudo-endometrioid, and transitional cell-like) variant morphology, were enriched in HRD-EMSC. There was an increased frequency of CCNE1 amplification, a lower prevalence of PIK3CA and PPP2R1A alterations, and no differences in HRD, MSI or TMB biomarker frequencies in patients of predicted African ancestry. EMSC exhibited distinct gene mutation frequencies and MSI, TMB and gLOH biomarker signatures compared to a cohort 2346 EEC. CONCLUSIONS: Molecularly defined subgroups provide a framework to test the susceptibility of EMSC to targeted therapies in specific genetic settings (e.g. HRD, PIK3CA, PPP2R1A, ERBB2, MYC, CCNE1).

Correlating ROS1 Protein Expression With ROS1 Fusions, Amplifications, and Mutations.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we sought to further characterize ROS1 protein expression in solid tumors with the complete spectrum of ROS1 genomic alterations. METHODS: ROS1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using the ROS1 (SP384) class I assay per manufacturer's instructions on a variety of solid tumors (n = 32) with known ROS1 genomic alterations. Genomic alterations included fusions (n = 17), gene amplifications (n = 10), and short-variant mutations (n = 11). RESULTS: Of the 32 cases with ROS1 IHC results, 100% (11 of 11) with canonical ROS1 fusions were positive for ROS1 IHC. Among noncanonical ROS1 fusions, only two (of five) cases with SQSTM1-ROS1 and RDX-ROS1 fusions were positive for ROS1 IHC whereas PTPRK-ROS1 (two) and TTC28-ROS1 fusions were negative for ROS1 IHC. One sample with a canonical ROS1 fusion and co-occurring ROS1 resistance mutation (6094G>A, p.G2032R) was positive for ROS1 IHC. A total of 10% (one of 10) of ROS1 amplified tumors were positive for ROS1 IHC. None of the cases (zero of five) with ROS1 short-variant mutations were positive for ROS1 protein expression. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that if ROS1 IHC was used as a screening tool for ROS1 fusion, a subset of fusion-negative tumors will reveal positive IHC staining highlighting the value of reflexing to genomic profiling to confirm the presence of a targetable fusion-driver before the initiation of therapy. In addition, the ability of comprehensive genomic profiling to detect ROS1 resistance mutations will be important for clinical decision making.

Clinical Implications of Genomic Loss of Heterozygosity in Endometrial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Homologous recombination deficiency, identified by homologous recombination deficiency gene alterations or high percentage of genome-wide loss of heterozygosity (gLOH), is associated with improved prognosis, platinum sensitivity (PS), and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor response in high-grade ovarian cancer. Since the copy number-high (CN-H) endometrial cancer molecular subtype (EC-MS) shares molecular features with high-grade ovarian cancer, our aim was to assign EC-MS on the basis of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) results and evaluate the gLOH status with clinical behavior of EC. METHODS: Eighty-two epithelial EC tumor tissues were sequenced by hybrid capture-based CGP, and results were used to assign EC-MS (ultramutated, microsatellite instability-high, CN-low; CN-high). Retrospective chart review established clinical characteristics, including PS. Relationships of PS, EC-MS, gene alterations, and gLOH were assessed statistically. RESULTS: PS and EC-MS of CN-H showed statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS). Most notably, when the CN-H EC-MS was subcategorized by gLOH status, there was a significant difference in OS with gLOH-H being associated with longer survival. Cox semi-proportional hazard modeling showed that gLOH, stage, and race were significant in modeling OS. CONCLUSION: The method of assigning EC-MS by CGP demonstrates similar clinical features to previous reports of EC-MS assigned by other methods. CGP can also assess gLOH status with gLOH-H most commonly seen in CN-H tumors. CN-H, gLOH-H patients showed significantly improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.100 [0.02-0.51 95% CI]). Thus, gLOH status may be a meaningful prognostic biomarker within the CN-H tumors and possibly across EC-MS.

Contrasting genomic profiles from metastatic sites, primary tumors, and liquid biopsies of advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the contrasting genomic profiles from the primary tumors (PTs), metastatic (MET) sites, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) of patients with prostate cancer (PC). METHODS: A total of 1294 PC tissue specimens and 2462 ctDNA specimens underwent hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Specimens included tissue from PTs; MET biopsies from bone, liver (LIV), lung (LU), brain (BN), lymph node, and soft tissue sites; and ctDNA. RESULTS: Differences in alteration frequencies between PT, MET, and ctDNA specimens for selected genes were observed. TMPRSS2:ERG fusion frequencies were similar between PTs and MET sites (35% vs 33%) but varied among MET sites. Genomic alterations (GAs) in AR were lowest in PTs (2%) and highest in MET sites (from 24% in LU to 50% in LIV). BN had the highest genomic alterations/tumor (8) and enrichment for PTEN GAs. The BRCA2 GA frequency varied from 0% in BN to 15% in LIV. ERBB2 amplification was increased in MET sites in comparison with PTs. RB1 GAs were increased in LIV. Biomarkers potentially associated with an anti-PD(L)1 response included CDK12 GAs (16% in LU) and a microsatellite instability-high status (29% in BN). Analyses of ctDNA featured a broad spectrum of GAs similar to those detected across MET sites. CONCLUSIONS: CGP of PTs, MET sites, and ctDNA in PC exhibited differences most likely associated with tumor progression, clonal evolution, and exposure to systemic therapies; ctDNA can also capture a broad range of potential therapeutic opportunities for patients with PC.