Belgian patients of the European Registry for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ERHS-Be): data, scores and phenotypes since 2015.

Introduction Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease, characterized by painful and recurrent lesions in apocrine gland-bearing skin areas. It is a heterogeneous disease, which makes assessment and data collection difficult. Questionnaires with detailed items, such as the Belgian European Registry for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ERHS-Be), are useful to study HS and its associated comorbidities. The aim of this registry is to uncover new factors associated with HS, understand HS patients' clinical profiles and efficacy of treatments. Material and methods The ERHS-Be registry is based on questionnaires, with sections for socio-demographic data, medical and HS history, clinical examination and treatment plan. It allows identification of different clinical phenotypes and automatic calculation of severity scores. Results At present, 606 patients are included in the ERHS-Be (67% women, 33% men). Mean age at first visit is 38.5 years. Tobacco use is present in 72.6% of patients. A family history of HS is noted in 42% of patients. Comorbidities are documented in this cohort: depression is present in 43.8% of patients, arthritis in 27.8%, obesity in 31.5%, hypertension in 10.6%, diabetes mellitus in 6.4% and dyslipidemia in 12.4%. Moreover, 7.7% of patients suffer from IBD and 27.4% have a pilonidal sinus. History of severe acne is found in 32.1% of patients and psoriasis in 9.3%. Thirteen percent of women in our cohort suffer from polycystic ovarian syndrome. Severity of disease is quantified in 533 patients: for instance, Hurley I, II and III scores proportions are respectively 32.3%, 52.7% and 15%, while the mean IHS4 score is 5.2. This registry also enables determination of relative phenotype proportions in our cohort, according to different classifications. Conclusion The ERHS-Be questionnaires allow systematic and larger data collection, including detailed comorbidities, phenotypes and severity of disease. Analysis of this large database will contribute to a better understanding and management of HS, at a time where new therapeutic options are becoming available.

Treatment of Acne with Isotretinoin Should Be Avoided in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa "Conglobata Phenotype".

BACKGROUND: Acne conglobata (AC) and nodulocystic acne have long been confused clinically, despite the presentation and the response to treatment being different. AC and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) resemble each other; a subtype of HS called "conglobata phenotype" has recently been reported in a large Dutch cohort. Acne vulgaris and HS are often associated. Isotretinoin is typically ineffective in treating HS and may even aggravate it, but it is often indispensable in treating acne vulgaris. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess whether isotretinoin may be used safely in adults with both HS and acne vulgaris and when it might be contraindicated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Belgian HS patients from the European Registry for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Registry (ERHS) reporting a history of severe acne of the face and/or the back, and who have ever used isotretinoin for their acne, were all selected. Patients whose acne worsened on isotretinoin were compared to patients whose acne did not worsen (improvement or no change). RESULTS: Among the 82 selected patients, 10 (12.2%) report that their acne was aggravated while taking isotretinoin, while 72 (87.8%) report that their acne was not aggravated on isotretinoin. Of the 10 HS patients whose acne worsened with isotretinoin, 9 (90%) were men (p = 0.04) and 8 (80%) were HS "conglobata phenotype" (p < 0.001). In contrast, 47 (65.3%) of the 72 patients whose acne did not worsen on isotretinoin belonged to the HS "regular phenotype" (p = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, the item most strongly associated with poor response to isotretinoin was the HS "conglobata phenotype," followed by body mass index (BMI) (worse response to isotretinoin if BMI >25 kg/m2). Additionally, of 26 patients who received isotretinoin while their HS had already started, only 6 (23.1%) reported isotretinoin effectiveness on their HS. CONCLUSION: Subject to confirmation by larger studies, our study suggests that isotretinoin should be avoided in the treatment of acne in HS patients with the HS "conglobata phenotype," as it may worsen the acne, likewise being male or having a BMI above 25 seems to increase this risk of a bad therapeutic outcome. Patients with an HS "regular phenotype" appear to be at a reduced risk of isotretinoin treatment worsening their acne.

Overview and comparison of the clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-life clinical data.

Introduction: Partly due to its clinical heterogeneity, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is difficult to score accurately; illustrated by the large number of disease scores. In 2016, a systematic review by Ingram et al. reported the use of about thirty scores, and since then, this number has increased further. Our aim is twofold: to provide a succinct but detailed narrative review of the scores used to date, and to compare these scores with each other for individual patients. Materials and methods: The review of the literature was done among articles in English and French, on Google, Google scholar, Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane. To illustrate the differences between scores, data from some Belgian patients included in the European Registry for HS were selected. A first series of patients compares the severity of the following scores: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, three versions of Sartorius score (2003, 2007, 2009), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4), Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SAHS), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), Acne Inversa Severity Index (AISI), the Static Metascore, and one score that is not specific to HS: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A second set of patients illustrates how some scores change over time and with treatment: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, Sartorius 2003, Sartorius 2007, HS-PGA, IHS4, SAHS, AISI, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), the very new iHS4-55, the Dynamic Metascore, and DLQI. Results: Nineteen scores are detailed in this overview. We illustrate that for some patients, the scores do not predictably and consistently correlate with each other, either in an evaluation of the severity at a time-point t, or in the evaluation of the response to a treatment. Some patients in this cohort may be considered responders according to some scores, but non-responders according to others. The clinical heterogeneity of the disease, represented by its many phenotypes, seems partly to explain this difference. Conclusion: These examples illustrate how the choice of a score can lead to different interpretations of the response to a treatment, or even potentially change the results of a randomized clinical trial.

External Validation of the IHS4-55 in a European Antibiotic-Treated Hidradenitis Suppurativa Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Previously, a new dichotomous outcome was developed, calculated as 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 (IHS4-55) score. It was validated in datasets of adalimumab and placebo-treated HS patients. External validation is an important aspect of clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to externally validate the novel dichotomous IHS4-55 in a non-biologic treated dataset of HS patients. METHODS: Data from a previously published European-wide prospective clinical study of antibiotic treatment of HS patients were used to assess the association of IHS4-55 achievement with individual reduction in inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels. Moreover, the associations between IHS4-55 positivity and achievement of the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain, and NRS Pruritus were analyzed. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 283 individual patients, of which 36.4% (103/283) were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin and 63.6% (180/283) with tetracyclines for 12 weeks. Achievers of the IHS4-55 demonstrated a significant reduction the counts of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels (all p < 0.001). Additionally, IHS4-55 achievers had an odds ratio for achieving the MCID of DLQI, NRS Pain, and NRS Pruritus of 2.16 (95% CI 1.28-3.65, p < 0.01), 1.79 (95% CI 1.10-2.91, p < 0.05), and 1.95 (95% CI 1.18-3.22, p < 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the external validity of the novel IHS4-55 by demonstrating a significant association between IHS4-55 achievement and a reduction in inflammatory lesion counts as well as achievement of MCIDs for DLQI, NRS Pain, and NRS Pruritus in an antibiotic-treated cohort. These findings support the use of the IHS4-55 as a novel primary outcome measure in clinical trials.

Status epilepticus after gastric bypass surgery

Bariatric procedures are increasingly performed world-wide. They potentially have severe consequences for the nervous system. We report the case of a 39-year-old female who presented with status epilepticus after gastric bypass surgery. A diagnosis of multiple nutrient and vitamin deficiencies was made and she received vitamin supplementation with a good clinical response.

The efficacy and tolerability of tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: Results of a prospective European cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination therapy are both considered first-line therapy in current hidradenitis suppurativa guidelines. However, evidence for their efficacy is drawn from small studies, often without validated outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the 12-week efficacy of oral tetracyclines and a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin. METHODS: A prospective, international cohort study performed between October 2018 and August 2019. RESULTS: In total, 63.6% of the included 283 patients received oral tetracyclines, and 36.4% were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System from baseline (both P < .001). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in 40.1% and 48.2% of patients, respectively (P = .26). Patient characteristics or disease severity were not associated with the attainment of HiSCR or the minimal clinically important differences for the Dermatology Life Quality Index and pain. LIMITATIONS: Cohort study. Respectively, 23.9% and 19.4% of patients had to be excluded from the HiSCR analysis for the tetracycline and combination therapy group because of a low abscess and nodule count at baseline. CONCLUSION: This study shows significant efficacy of both tetracycline treatment and clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy after 12 weeks in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the 2 treatments, regardless of disease severity.