Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Quintessence Int ; 49(2): 113-122, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164181

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 6-month clinical efficacy of Er:YAG laser and standard scalpel technique in treating gingival hyperpigmentation. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Patients requesting treatment for moderate to severe gingival hyperpigmentation in the maxilla were enrolled in this split-mouth study. The contralateral maxillary sides were randomly assigned to receive either Er:YAG laser (continuous wavelength of 2,940 nm) with a noncontact tip or the standard scalpel technique. Dummett oral pigmentation index (DOPI) and Hedin melanin index (HMI) were compared at the baseline and at 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months following the treatment. Bleeding Index, total treatment time, patient preference, pain perception at the first 3 days, wound healing, and level of satisfaction were also compared. Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and chi-square test were used to test the significance between variables. A P value of less than or equal to .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 22 patients enrolled, 20 completed this study. After assessing DOPI and HMI at 1 and 2 weeks, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up appointments, both Er:YAG laser and scalpel were significantly effective in treating gingival hyperpigmentation when compared to baseline (P < .001) but with no statistically significant difference between the two treatment methods (P > .05). More patients preferred the scalpel technique as it was associated with slightly shorter treatment time and less postoperative pain when compared to Er:YAG laser, but with no statistical significance (P > .05). Er:YAG laser sites showed minimal bleeding and more rapid wound healing (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Both Er:YAG laser and scalpel technique achieved similar outcomes regarding the efficacy of gingival depigmentation, postoperative pain perception, and the time required for the treatment. Laser therapy requires more advanced technology and is associated with higher financial costs. Therefore, the scalpel technique is still considered the gold standard treatment for gingival depigmentation.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Encías/radioterapia , Enfermedades de las Encías/cirugía , Terapia por Láser/métodos , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/radioterapia , Trastornos de la Pigmentación/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Encía/efectos de la radiación , Encía/cirugía , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido , Masculino , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de Heridas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...