Urine kidney safety biomarkers improve understanding of indirect intra-renal injury potential in dogs with a drug-induced prerenal azotemia.

Drug-induced kidney injury (DIKI) is a frequent occurrence in nonclinical drug development. It is well established that novel urine kidney safety biomarkers will outperform urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine (sCr) for monitoring direct drug injury to the kidney across numerous compounds spanning diverse mechanisms and efforts are underway for a formal regulatory clinical qualification. However, it remains unclear how these novel biomarkers will perform under prerenal azotemia when BUN and sCr are elevated but no intra-renal injury is suspected. This lack of knowledge is largely due to the dearth of such nonclinical animal models. We report here that treatment of dogs with a potent antihypertensive compound MK-5478 at a suprapharmacologic dose for up to 9 days results in the development of prerenal azotemia and, in some dogs, kidney toxicity through the dual sustained effects of MK-5478 as a nitric oxide donor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). While conventional serum biomarkers BUN, and often sCr as well, were highly elevated in these dogs with or without kidney damage, urine kidney biomarkers clusterin (CLU) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) showed increases only in dogs with kidney histopathologic changes following the sustained period of prerenal azotemia. Urine albumin (ALB) and total protein also tracked with kidney lesions but with less sensitivity. Thus, we present evidence for the first time that urine kidney safety biomarkers used together with BUN and sCr can distinguish intra-renal injury among dogs with prerenal azotemia while the conventional serum biomarkers alone are ambiguous, either being interpreted as false positives of kidney injury, or dismissed under circumstances as benign without appreciation for a threshold of impending injury.

Regulatory Forum Commentary* Counterpoint: Dose Selection for Tg.rasH2 Mouse Carcinogenicity Studies.

High-dose selection for 6-month carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceutical candidates in Tg.rasH2-transgenic mice currently primarily relies on (1) estimation of a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) from the results of a 1-month range-finding study, (2) determination of the maximum dose administrable to the animals (maximum feasible dose [MFD]), (3) demonstration of a plateau in systemic exposure, and (4) use of a limit dose of 1,500 mg/kg/day for products with human daily doses not exceeding 500 mg. Eleven 6-month Tg.rasH2 carcinogenicity studies and their corresponding 1-month range-finding studies conducted at Merck were reviewed. High doses were set by estimation of the MTD in 6, by plateau of exposure in 3, and by MFD in 2 cases. For 4 of 6 studies where MTD was used for high-dose selection, the 1-month study accurately predicted the 6-month study tolerability whereas in the remaining 2 studies the high doses showed poorer tolerability than expected. The use of 3 or more drug-treated dose levels proved useful to ensure that a study would successfully and unambiguously demonstrate that a drug candidate was adequately evaluated for carcinogenicity at a minimally toxic high dose level, especially when the high dose may be found to exceed the MTD.