Can NIRS be a surrogate indicator of elective shunt in carotid endarterectomy? A single-center observational retrospective study says no.

BACKGROUND: Neuromonitoring during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia is desirable and may be useful for preventing brain ischemia, but the selection of the most appropriate method remains controversial. PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) compared to multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) in indicating elective shunts and predicting postoperative neurological status. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study including 86 consecutive patients with CEA under general anesthesia. NIRS and multimodality IONM were performed during the procedure. IONM included electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were calculated for each neuromonitoring modality. RESULTS: NIRS presented a sensitivity and a specificity for detecting brain ischemia of 77.7% and 89.6%, respectively (PPV = 46.6% and NPV = 97.2%). In contrast, a 100% sensitivity and specificity for multimodality IONM was determined (PPV and NPV = 100%). No significant difference (in demographical or clinical data) between "true positive" and "false-positive" patients was identified. Among the methods included in multimodality IONM, EEG showed the best results for predicting postoperative outcome after CEA (PPV and NPV=100%). CONCLUSION: NIRS is inferior to multimodality IONM in detecting brain ischemia and predicting postoperative neurological status during CEA under general anesthesia.

Anaesthesia and multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Chronological evolution and effects on intraoperative neurophysiology.

Contingency data was retrospectively collected to evaluate the historical and current ability to provide multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy under two conditions: total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) and low dose halogenated anaesthesia (SEVO). 229 patients were monitored during carotid endarterectomy procedures under general anaesthesia between 2012 and 2020. 121 Patients were monitored with SEVO at a minimum alveolar concentration less than 0.7 and 108 were monitored using TIVA, according to common anaesthetic practice standards in our hospital across the years. Multimodality IONM was established with electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials. As compared to TIVA, patients monitored with SEVO showed significantly higher motor evoked potential thresholds (313.52 ± 77.74 SEVO and 218.93 V ± 103.2 V TIVA p < 0.05) and lower reproducibility. Electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials showed no significant differences among the groups. When using SEVO, multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy could mask or miss a motor isolated change in patients in spite of low dose minimum alveolar concentration and of apparently adequate electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials for monitoring. Given these difficulties, we believe the chronological transfer to TIVA could have improved our ability to establish multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during carotid endarterectomy in recent times.

Daily Changes in the Expression of Clock Genes in Sepsis and Their Relation with Sepsis Outcome and Urinary Excretion of 6-Sulfatoximelatonin.

BACKGROUND: Whereas the circadian system controls the daily production of melatonin and the daily activity of the immune system, increasing evidences support the association between circadian misalignment with the alterations in the immune response and melatonin rhythm during sepsis. The aim of this study was to analyze the daily changes in clock genes expression and the urinary excretion of 6-SM (6-sulfatoxymelatonin, the major melatonin metabolite), and their connection with the innate immune activity, oxidative status in blood, and clinical outcome during sepsis. METHODS: Healthy volunteers, non-septic intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and septic ICU patients, were evaluated. The expression of bmal1, per2, clock, and cry1 genes was determined by polymerase chain reaction in blood; 6-SM was assessed in urine by ELISA; plasma cytokines IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, TNFα, and IL-10 were determined by a multiplex array method, and lipid peroxidation (LPO) and protein oxidation (AOPP) by spectrophotometry. Hematological and biochemical data, and clinical scores of the patients, were also recorded. RESULTS: Clock gene rhythm was maintained in non-septic patients but blunted in septic ones, whereas the innate immune and the oxidative stress responses were significantly higher in the latter. 6-SM excretion was also more elevated in septic than in non-septic patients, and it correlated with the degree of the immune response and oxidative status. 6-SM also correlated with SOFA and procalcitonin in the patients. Proinflammatory cytokines, LPO, and AOPP were normalized in the patients once recovered from sepsis. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a relationship between clock genes rhythm disruption, the immune response, and the oxidative status, with 6-SM acting as a compensatory response. ICU conditions are not a main clock disrupter because of the significant differences found in the responses of septic versus non-septic patients under the same ICU environment.