CRP Predicts the Need to Escalate Care After Initial Debridement for Musculoskeletal Infection.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal infections (MSKIs) are a major cause of morbidity in the pediatric population and account for nearly 1 in every 10 consultations with a pediatric orthopaedic provider at a tertiary care center. To prevent or deescalate the risk of adverse medical and musculoskeletal outcomes, timely medical intervention in the form of antibiotics and potential surgical debridement is required. While there have been numerous studies indicating the value of laboratory testing during the initial workup of a child with MSKI, few studies to date have examined the utility of longitudinal assessment of laboratory measures in the acute setting to monitor the efficacy of antibiotic therapy and/or surgical intervention. The purpose of this investigation was to retrospectively determine whether measuring changes in the inflammatory response could indicate the need for escalated care. Specifically, this study examined the hypothesis that serial measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP), immediately preoperatively and 2 days after surgical debridement, could predict the need for medical (change in antibiotics) or surgical (additional debridement) escalation. METHODS: Retrospective review of pediatric patients undergoing operative debridement for the treatment of MSKI between September 2009 and December 2015 from whom laboratory data (CRP) was obtained preoperatively and at postoperative day (POD) 2. Patient demographics, the need for escalated care, and patient outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Across 135 pediatric patients, preoperative CRP values >90 mg/L and a positive change in CRP at POD2 effectively predicted the need for escalation of care after initial surgical debridement (Area under the Receiver Operator Curve: 0.883). For each 10-unit increase in preoperative CRP or postoperative change in CRP, there was a 21% or 22% increased risk of needing escalated care, respectively. Stratification by preoperative CRP >90 mg/L and change in CRP postoperatively likewise correlated with increased rates of disseminated disease, percent tissue culture positivity, length of stay, and rate of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of serial CRP to assess the need for escalated care in patients being treated for MSKI. As serial CRP measurements become standard of practice in the acute setting, future prospective studies are needed to optimize the timing of CRP reassessment during inpatient hospitalization to prognosticate patient outcomes, weighing both improvements of patient care and clinical burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Tibial Plateau Fractures Complicated by Compartment Syndrome Are Associated With a 3 Times Higher Cost of Care.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) and identify cost drivers of 1-year total treatment costs for operative tibial plateau fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: 337 patients with tibial plateau fractures, 24 of which were complicated by ACS. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was total treatment cost over the first year for operatively treated tibial plateau fractures. The secondary objective was to use regression analysis to identify significant cost drivers. RESULTS: The diagnosis of ACS was associated with 2.85 times higher total treatment cost ( P < 0.001). ACS demonstrated increased total treatment cost when controlling for polytrauma ( P < 0.001) and postoperative infection ( P < 0.001). Regression analysis identified 5 variables significantly associated with total cost of care: body mass index, injury severity score, ACS, staged external fixation, and locking fixation ( P < 0.001; R 2 = 0.57). The diagnosis of ACS had the largest impact on total cost with a 3.5× greater impact on cost compared with the next highest variable, staged external fixation. CONCLUSIONS: Tibial plateau fractures complicated by ACS are associated with 2.85 times higher treatment costs over a 1-year period. There were 5 significant variables identified by regression analysis with ACS having the highest impact on total treatment. Together, these 5 factors account for 57% of treatment cost variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reformatting of Computed Tomography Scans Parallel to the S1 End Plate Increases Visualization of Trans Sacral Pathway in the First Sacral Segment, Especially With Dysmorphism.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether reformatted computed tomography (CT) scans would increase surgeons' confidence in placing a trans sacral (TS) screw in the first sacral segment. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: There were 50 patients with uninjured pelvises who were reviewed by 9 orthopaedic trauma fellowship-trained surgeons and 5 orthopaedic residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The overall percentage of surgeons who believe it was safe to place a TS screw in the first sacral segment with standard (axial cuts perpendicular to the scanner gantry) versus reformatted (parallel to the S1 end plate) CT scans. RESULTS: Overall, 58% of patients were believed to have a safe corridor in traditional cut axial CT scans, whereas 68% were believed to have a safe corridor on reformatted CT scans ( P < 0.001). When grouped by dysplasia, those without sacral dysplasia (n = 28) had a safe corridor 93% of the time on traditional scans and 93% of the time with reformatted CT scans ( P = 0.87). However, of those who had dysplasia (n = 22), only 12% were believed to have a safe corridor on original scans compared with 35% on reformatted scans ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT scan reformatting parallel to the S1 superior end plate increases the likelihood of identifying a safe corridor for a TS screw, especially in patients with evidence of sacral dysplasia. The authors would recommend the routine use of reformatting CT scans in this manner to provide a better understanding of the upper sacral segment osseous fixation pathways.

Occupational Hazards to the Joint Replacement Surgeon: Radiation Exposure.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative fluoroscopy is an essential tool to assist orthopedic surgeons in accurately and safely implanting hardware. In arthroplasty cases, its use is on the rise with the increasing popularity of the direct anterior (DA) approach for THA. However, exposure of ionizing radiation poses a potential health risk to surgeons. While the benefits of intraoperative fluoroscopy in DA THA is becoming clearer, and are well-described in the literature, the potential health dangers associated with career-long cumulative radiation exposure are rarely discussed. METHODS: In this article, we review the available literature to discuss radiation safety in orthopedics with a focus on total joint arthroplasty. We present the basic science of radiation, discuss the amount of radiation exposure in orthopedic surgery, and review the potential health risks associated with long-term exposure. CONCLUSION: Overall, the radiation dose exposure to arthroplasty surgeons is low and within recommendations for occupation exposure limits. However, due to the stochastic health impacts of ionizing radiation, there is no threshold dose below which radiation exposure is truly safe. Therefore, it is imperative that surgeons practice proper fluoroscopy safety habits, such as wearing proper protective equipment, minimizing fluoroscopy time and magnification, and maximizing distance from the radiation source to minimize the life-long cumulative radiation exposure and associated health risks.

Duration and Dosage of Opioids After Spine Surgery: Implications on Outcomes at 1 Year.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal Cohort Study OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine whether duration of postoperative opioids is associated with long-term outcomes, and if initial postoperative opioid dosage is associated with opioid cessation after spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative opioid use is associated with poor outcomes, but little evidence exists regarding the implications of opioid dosage and duration after spine surgery. METHODS: Data from our state's prescription drug database was linked to our prospective clinical spine registry to analyze opioid dispensing and outcomes in elective surgical spine patients between 2010 and 2017. Patients were stratified based on preoperative chronic opioid use and multivariable regression was used to assess associations between duration of postoperative opioids and outcomes at one year, including satisfaction, chronic opioid use, and meaningful improvements in pain, disability, and quality of life. In a secondary aim, a Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine whether initial postoperative opioid dosage was associated with time to opioid cessation. RESULTS: Of 2172 patients included, 35% had preoperative chronic opioid use. In patients without preoperative chronic opioid use, a postoperative opioid duration of 31 to 60 days was associated with chronic opioid use at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.1 [1.7-9.8]) and no meaningful improvement in extremity pain (aOR: 1.8 [1.3-2.6]) or axial pain (aOR: 1.6 [1.1-2.2]); cessation between 61 and 90 days was associated with no meaningful improvement in disability (aOR: 2 [1.3-3]) and dissatisfaction (aOR:1.8 [1-3.1]). In patients with preoperative chronic opioid use, postoperative opioids for ≥90 days was associated with dissatisfaction. Cox regression analyses showed lower initial postoperative opioid dosages were associated with faster opioid cessation in both groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a shorter duration of postoperative opioids may result in improved 1-year patient-reported outcomes, and that lower postoperative opioid dosages may lead to faster opioid cessation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Orthopaedic Conditions Among the Uninsured: Data from an American Student-Run Free Clinic.

Little is known about the epidemiology of orthopaedic conditions among the uninsured. This is a descriptive study of 107 patients presenting with 140 orthopaedic conditions for care at the student-run free clinic, the Shade Tree Clinic. Patients were 50.0 (± 13.0) years old with a BMI of 32.9 (± 8.60). About half were female (58.9%), of Spanish origin/Hispanic or Latino descent (50.9%), immigrants (48.3%), and non-English speaking (44.9%). Most presented with chronic (75.5%) conditions of the knee (24.3%), hand (16.4%) and spine (13.6%). While knee osteoarthritis was the most common diagnosis made (18.7%), there were 38 (35.5%) unique diagnoses with only a single occurrence. Most conditions were initially treated nonoperatively (82.9%). There was an average of 1.92 (± 1.44) visits per condition, and 74.0% of conditions had reported improvement or resolution. Though further study is needed, providing free comprehensive patient-centered orthopaedic care to uninsured individuals in a low-cost setting may prove cost-effective. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(2):112-116, 2020).

The Heterogeneity of Pediatric Knee Infections: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal infection is a major cause of morbidity in the pediatric population. Despite the canonical teaching that an irritable joint and signs of infection likely represent an infected joint space, recent evidence in the pediatric hip has demonstrated that alternative diagnoses are equally or more likely and that combinations of pathologies are common. The knee is the second most commonly infected joint in children, yet there remains a paucity of available data regarding the epidemiology and workup of the infected pediatric knee. The authors hypothesize that there is heterogeneity of pathologies, including combinations of pathologies, that presents as a potentially infected knee in a child. The authors aim to show the utility of magnetic resonance imaging and epidemiologic and laboratory markers in the workup of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of all consults made to the pediatric orthopaedic surgery team at a single tertiary care center from September 2009 through December 2015 regarding a concern for potential knee infection was performed. Excluded from the study were patients with penetrating trauma, postoperative infection, open fracture, no C-reactive protein (CRP) within 24 hours of admission, sickle cell disease, an immunocompromised state, or chronic osteomyelitis. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were analyzed in this study. There was marked variability in pathologies. Patients with isolated osteomyelitis or osteomyelitis+septic arthritis were older, had an increased admission CRP, were more likely to be infected with Staphylococcus aureus, required an increased duration of antibiotics, and had an increased incidence of musculoskeletal complications than patients with isolated septic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: When considering a child with an irritable knee, a heterogeneity of potential underlying pathologies and combinations of pathologies are possible. Importantly, the age of the patient and CRP can guide a clinician when considering further workup. Older patients with a higher admission CRP value warrant an immediate magnetic resonance imaging, as they are likely to have osteomyelitis, which was associated with worse outcomes when compared with patients with isolated septic arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective research study.

Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders in Pseudarthrosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE: Establish 1-year patient-reported outcomes after spine surgery for symptomatic pseudarthrosis compared with other indications. In the subgroup of pseudarthrosis patients, describe preexisting metabolic and endocrine-related disorders, and identify any new diagnoses or treatments initiated by an endocrine specialist. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Despite surgical advances in recent decades, pseudarthrosis remains among the most common complications and indications for revision after fusion spine surgery. A better understanding of the outcomes after revision surgery for pseudarthrosis and risk factors for pseudarthrosis are needed. METHODS: Using data from our institutional spine registry, we retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing elective spine surgery between October 2010 and November 2016. Patients were stratified by surgical indication (pseudarthrosis vs. not pseudarthrosis), and 1-year outcomes for satisfaction, disability, quality of life, and pain were compared. In a descriptive subgroup analysis of pseudarthrosis patients, we identified preexisting endocrine-related disorders, frequency of endocrinology referral, and any new diagnoses and treatments initiated through the referral. RESULTS: Of 2721 patients included, 169 patients underwent surgery for pseudarthrosis. No significant difference was found in 1-year satisfaction between pseudarthrosis and nonpseudarthrosis groups (77.5% vs. 83.6%, respectively). A preexisting endocrine-related disorder was identified in 82% of pseudarthrosis patients. Endocrinology referral resulted in a new diagnosis or treatment modification in 58 of 59 patients referred. The most common diagnoses identified included osteoporosis, vitamin D deficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, sex-hormone deficiency, and hypothyroidism. The most common treatments initiated through endocrinology were anabolic agents (teriparatide and abaloparatide), calcium, and vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing revision spine surgery for pseudarthrosis had similar 1-year satisfaction rates to other surgical indications. In conjunction with a bone metabolic specialist, our descriptive analysis of endocrine-related disorders among patients with a pseudarthrosis can guide protocols for workup, indications for endocrine referral, and guide prospective studies in this field.

Preoperative Opioids and 1-year Patient-reported Outcomes After Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: Determine 1-year patient-reported outcomes associated with preoperative chronic opioid therapy and high-preoperative opioid dosages in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain is the most disabling condition worldwide and over half of patients presenting for spine surgery report using opioids. Preoperative dosage has been correlated with poor outcomes, but published studies have not assessed the relationship of both preoperative chronic opioids and opioid dosage with patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: For patients undergoing elective spine surgery between 2010 and 2017, our prospective institutional spine registry data was linked to opioid prescription data collected from our state's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program to analyze outcomes associated with preoperative chronic opioid therapy and high-preoperative opioid dosage, while adjusting for confounders through multivariable regression analyses. Outcomes included 1-year meaningful improvements in pain, function, and quality of life. Additional outcomes included 1-year satisfaction, return to work, 90-day complications, and postoperative chronic opioid use. RESULTS: Of 2128 patients included, preoperative chronic opioid therapy was identified in 21% and was associated with significantly higher odds (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]) of not achieving meaningful improvements at 1-year in extremity pain (aOR:1.5 [1.2-2]), axial pain (aOR:1.7 [1.4-2.2]), function (aOR:1.7 [1.4-2.2]), and quality of life (aOR:1.4 [1.2-1.9]); dissatisfaction (aOR:1.7 [1.3-2.2]); 90-day complications (aOR:2.9 [1.7-4.9]); and postoperative chronic opioid use (aOR:15 [11.4-19.7]). High-preoperative opioid dosage was only associated with postoperative chronic opioid use (aOR:4.9 [3-7.9]). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with chronic opioids prior to spine surgery are significantly less likely to achieve meaningful improvements at 1-year in pain, function, and quality of life; and less likely to be satisfied at 1-year with higher odds of 90-day complications, regardless of dosage. Both preoperative chronic opioid therapy and high-preoperative dosage are independently associated with postoperative chronic opioid use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Emergency Department Visits After Elective Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) overuse is a costly and often neglected source of postdischarge resource utilization after spine surgery. Failing to investigate drivers of ED visits represents a missed opportunity to improve the value of care in spine patients. OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence, drivers, and timing of ED visits following elective spine surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spine surgery for degenerative disease at a major medical center were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient and surgery characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and 3 mo after surgery, along with self-reported 90-d ED visits. A multivariable regression model was used to identify independent factors associated with 90-d ED visits. For a sample of patients presenting to our institution's ED, charts were reviewed to identify the reason and time to ED postdischarge. RESULTS: Of 2762 patients, we found a 90-d ED visit rate of 9.4%. One-third of patients presented to our institution's ED and of these, 70% presented due to pain or medical concerns at 9 and 7 d postdischarge, respectively, with 60% presenting outside normal clinic hours. Independent risk factors for 90-d ED visits included younger age, preoperative opioid use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and more vertebral levels involved. CONCLUSION: Nearly 10% of elective spine patients had 90-d ED visits not requiring readmission. Pain and medical concerns accounted for 70% of visits at our center, occurring within 10 d of discharge. This study provides the clinical details and a timeline necessary to guide individualized interventions to prevent unnecessary, costly ED visits after spine surgery.

Causes and Timing of Unplanned 90-day Readmissions Following Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the causes, timing, and factors associated with unplanned 90-day readmissions following elective spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Unplanned readmissions after spine surgery are costly and an important determinant of the value of care. Several studies using database information have reported on rates and causes of readmission. However, these often lack the clinical detail and actionable data necessary to guide early postdischarge interventions. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective spine surgery for degenerative disease at a major medical center were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient and surgery-specific characteristics, baseline, and 3-month patient-reported outcomes were prospectively recorded. Readmissions were reviewed retrospectively to establish the reason and time to readmission. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was created to analyze the independent effects of several factors on readmission. RESULTS: Of 2761 patients with complete 3-month follow-up, 156 had unplanned 90-day readmissions (5.6%). The most common reason was surgery-related (52%), followed by medical complications (38%) and pain (10%). Pain readmissions presented with a median time of 6 days. Medical readmissions presented at 12 days. Surgical complications presented at various times with wound complications at 6 days, cerebrospinal fluid leaks at 12 days, surgical site infections at 23 days, and surgical failure at 38 days. A history of myocardial infarction, osteoporosis, higher baseline leg and arm pain scores, longer operative duration, and lumbar surgery were associated with readmission. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of all unplanned 90-day readmissions were because of pain and medical complications and occurred with a median time of 6 and 12 days, respectively. The remaining 52% of readmissions were directly related to surgery and occurred at various times depending on the specific reason. This timeline for pain and medical readmissions represents an opportunity for targeted postdischarge interventions to prevent unplanned readmissions following spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.