Modified FOLFIRINOX compared to Gemcitabine & nab-Paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - results of a match-pair analysis.

Background & objectives: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GN) are the most commonly used regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). As there is limited data on comparison of these two regimens, the present study was aimed to compare survivals and tolerance for both regimens through a match-pair analysis. Methods: The data of 350 patients with metastatic and locally advanced PDAC, treated between January 2013 and December 2019, were retrieved. A 1:1 matching, using age and performance status, without replacement was performed by using nearest neighbour matching method. Results: A total of 260 patients (130 modified FOLFIRINOX and 130 GN) were matched. The median overall survival (OS) was 12.98 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.257-8.776 months] in modifications of FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) cohort and 12.06 months (95% CI 6.690-8.88 months) in GN group (P=0.080). The incidence of grade 3 and 4 infections, diarrhoea, oral mucositis, and fatigue was higher with mFOLFIRINOX. Patients who received second line therapy had improved OS as compared to those who did not (14.06 vs. 9.07 months, P<0.001). Interpretation & conclusions: GN and mFOLFIRINOX appear to have similar survival outcomes in an unselected match paired patient population with advanced PDAC. A markedly increased incidence of non-myelosuppressive grade 3 and grade 4 side-effects and lack of survival improvements suggest a need for nuanced use of the mFOLFIRINOX regimen. Administration of second-line chemotherapy improves OS in patients with advanced PDAC.

Demographics, Pattern of Care & Outcomes of Primary CNS Lymphoma- Experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Center in India.

Primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma with the worst outcomes amongst all extranodal lymphomas. There is a scarcity of data on real-world outcomes of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) owing to the rarity of the disease. This study analyzed the demographic patterns, risk stratification, treatment regimens used, & outcomes of patients treated at Tata Memorial Center Mumbai, India. This is a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma patients treated at our centre over seven years from January 2013 to December 2019. A total of 142 patients with PCNSL were diagnosed during this period. Thirty (21.1%) patients were deemed ineligible for any systemic or local therapies,ten patients were referred to other hospitals, two patients had relapsed disease, and one was excluded because age less than 18 years. Finally 99 patients were included in the final analysis. Among these 99 patients,72 patients (72.7%) were < 60 years,70 (70.7%) patients had Eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status (PS) less than equal to 2. DLBCL was the most common histology (86.4%) while rests were high grade B cell NHL NOS (11.4%),Burkitt's Lymphoma(1%),Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma NOS (1.2%). Only one of 99 patients was positive for HIV serology. Multiple intracranial lesions were found in 59.5%. Surgical resection was performed in 28.4% of patients. Out of 63 patients in whom the International extranodal lymphoma study group (IELSG) score is available, 34(54%) were IELSG high-risk groups. As per Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) risk grouping, patients were almost equally distributed in all the risk groups, with 32(32.3%) patients in risk group 1 (age < 50 years), 36(36.4%) patients in risk group 2 (age > 50 years, KPS > = 70), and 31(31.3%) patients in risk group 3 age > 50 years, KPS < 70). First-line treatment with high dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based regimens was administered to 92 (92.9%) patients, and 72.8% of these patients received rituximab. Of these 92 patients, 59 (64.1%) patients could complete induction, and 52 patients received consolidation. Thirty-one patients received high dose cytarabine based chemo consolidation, one patient underwent high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ACST), and 19 patients received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 1 patient received temozolomide as consolidation regimen. Thus only 52 patients completed the entire course of induction with consolidation therapy. The response to treatment was assessed using International PCNSL Collaborative Group Criteria. Post completion of consolidation, 49(94.2%) patients had a complete response. With a median follow-up duration of 39.2 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and the median overall survival (OS) of the patients taken into the analysis (N = 99) were 21 and 37 months respectively. On multivariate analysis, age < 60 yrs, > = 5 HD-MTX cycles received & the use of rituximab predicted better OS.Outcomes of patients with PCNSL treated with HD-MTX based therapy are comparable to reported literature however a large proportion of patients do not undergo required treatment despite the curable nature of disease. Supplementary Information: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-022-01557-7.

Cancer care continuum at a tertiary care centre in India during the Covid-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdown: Healthcare delivery through telemedicine.

Background The Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown in India caused disruptions in cancer treatment due to the restriction on movement of patients. We aimed to maintain continuity in cancer treatment during the lockdown through teleconsultations. We tried to reach out to our patients using telephonic consultations by establishing a Teleconsult Centre facility run by a team of doctors and patient navigators. Methods We telephonically contacted all patients who had outpatient appointments from 23 March to 30 April 2020 at our centre through the Teleconsult Centre to understand their current circumstances, feasibility of follow-up, local resources and offered best possible alternatives to continue cancer treatment, if required. Results Of the 2686 patients scheduled for follow-up during this period, we could contact 1783 patients in 9 working days. Through teleconsultations, we could defer follow-ups of 1034 patients (57.99%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 55.6%-60.3%), thus reducing the need for patients to travel to the hospital. Change in systemic therapy was made in 75 patients (4.2%, 95% CI 3.3%-5.2%) as per the requirements and available resources. Symptoms suggestive of disease progression were picked up in 12 patients (0.67%, 95% CI 0.35%-1.17%), who were advised to meet local physicians. Conclusion Our study suggests that the majority of patients on follow-up can be managed with teleconsultation in times of crisis. Teleconsultation has the potential of being one of the standard methods of patient follow-up even during periods of normalcy.

Outcomes of Ewing sarcoma in adults over 40 years of age from a low-middle income country.

Introduction: The data on outcomes and toxicity in adult Ewing sarcoma (ES) patients, particularly those aged ≥40 years, is exceedingly scarce around the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and mandates research. Methods: The study involved histologically ascertained ES patients aged ≥40 years who registered at our institute from 2013 to 2018. Prospectively collected data were analysed for overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and chemotherapy-related toxicities. Results: There were 66 patients, of which 34 were non-metastatic, and 32 were denovo metastatic, recurrent or had doubtful metastasis. At presentation, median age was 46 years, and 42 (63.6%) had extra-skeletal primary and 24 (36.3%) had extremity tumours. Curative treatment was offered to 40 (60.6%) patients. Significant grade 3/4 toxicities in non-metastatic and metastatic cohort, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (61.3%, 37.5%), anaemia (58.1%, 37.5%), thrombocytopenia (45.2%, 25.0%), peripheral neuropathy (25.8%, 12.5%) and dyselectrolytemia (25.8%, 6.25%). Chemotherapy-related toxicity led to death in three patients in the metastatic cohort, versus none in the non-metastatic patients. The 5 year EFS and OS for non-metastatic cohort were 53.8% and 67.8%, while the same for metastatic cohort were 20.7% and 27.5%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-performance status >2 and metastasis at presentation predicted poorer EFS and OS. Additionally, raised lactate dehydrogenase, larger tumours (>8 cm) and palliative intent treatment predicted worse EFS, while extra-skeletal primary and female gender were indicators of worse OS. Conclusions: Older adult ES patients benefit from aggressive multimodality treatment even in LMIC infrastructure. However, careful patient selection, close monitoring and pertinent dose modifications is imperative due to higher propensity for potential toxicities.

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in Resource-Constrained Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICS) Scenario-Outcomes, Practice Patterns, and Commentary on Treatment Costs.

Anant RamaswamyIntroduction The overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) in clinical practice and resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries (LMICS) like India is not known. Materials and Methods Data of patients with mCRC treated between January 2013 and August 2017 were accessed from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, disease characteristics, chemotherapeutic regimens, use of monoclonal antibodies, and survival outcomes in treated patients were collected and analyzed. Costs of treatment options as off 2017 were also interpreted. Results The data of 403 patients satisfied prespecified inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The median age of the cohort was 48 years (range: 17-86) with a predominance of rectal cancers (63.3%), liver alone metastases (47.1%), and resected primary (69.7%). Signet ring histology was present in 82 patients (20.3%). The most commonly used first-line regimen (CT1) was modified capecitabine-oxaliplatin (53.3%). Two hundred and nineteen patients (54.3%) received second-line systemic therapy (CT2). Patients received a median of two lines of therapy (range: 1-6). MoAbs were used by 48 patients (13.4%) with CT1 and 34 patients (15.5%) with CT2. Median OS of the entire cohort was 17.61 months (95% confidence interval: 15.48-19.74), which was within the predicted range, as per investigator hypothesis. The presence of signet ring histology ( p <0.001), raised carcinoembryonic antigen at baseline ( p =0.017), and the absence of a resected primary ( p <0.001) predicted inferior median OS. Conclusions Survival of patients with mCRC in a resource-constrained LMIC scenario like India is approximately 12 to 15 months lower than published trial data. Limited access to targeted therapy and newer expensive treatment options due to financial constraints may contribute to this disparity.