Treatment-Free Interval: A Novel Approach to Assessing Real-World Treatment Effectiveness and Economic Impact Among Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea.

INTRODUCTION: Objective assessment of treatment effectiveness using real-world claims data is challenging. This study assessed treatment-free intervals (TFI) as a proxy for treatment effectiveness, and all-cause healthcare costs among adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) treated with rifaximin or eluxadoline in the USA. METHODS: Adult patients (18-64 years) with IBS-D and ≥ 1 rifaximin or eluxadoline prescription were identified in the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus database (10/01/2015-12/31/2021) and classified into two mutually exclusive cohorts (i.e., rifaximin and eluxadoline). Index date was the date of rifaximin or eluxadoline initiation. Entropy-balanced baseline characteristics, TFI (periods of ≥ 30 consecutive days without IBS-D treatment), and healthcare costs were reported. Healthcare costs were compared between cohorts using mean cost differences. RESULTS: There were 7094 and 2161 patients in the rifaximin and eluxadoline cohorts, respectively. After balancing, baseline characteristics (mean age 44.1 years; female 72.4%) were similar between cohorts. A higher proportion of patients treated with rifaximin achieved a TFI of ≥ 30 days (76.2% vs. 66.7%), ≥ 60 days (67.0% vs. 47.0%), ≥ 90 days (61.0% vs. 38.7%), ≥ 180 days (51.7% vs. 31.0%), and ≥ 240 days (47.7% vs. 27.9%) compared to eluxadoline. Among patients with a TFI ≥ 30 days, mean TFI durations were 8.3 and 6.0 months for the rifaximin and eluxadoline cohorts. Mean all-cause healthcare costs were lower for rifaximin vs. eluxadoline ($18,316 vs. $23,437; p = 0.008), primarily driven by pharmacy costs ($7348 vs. $10,250; p < 0.001). In a simulated health plan of one million commercially insured lives, initiating 50% of patients on rifaximin instead of eluxadoline resulted in total cost savings of $2.1 million per year or $0.18 per-member-per-month. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study suggests that TFI is a meaningful surrogate measure of treatment effectiveness in IBS-D. Patients treated with rifaximin had longer treatment-free periods and lower healthcare costs than patients treated with eluxadoline.

Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple treatment options exist for the management of moderate-to-severe acne. However, the comparative effectiveness (efficacy/safety) of moderate-to-severe acne treatments has not been systematically examined. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of ≥4 weeks of treatment (topical, oral, physical, or combinations) for moderate-to-severe facial acne in patients aged ≥9 years. Efficacy outcomes included: percentage of patients achieving ≥2-grade reduction from baseline and “clear” or “almost clear” for global severity score (treatment success); absolute change in inflammatory (ILs reduction); and noninflammatory lesion counts (NILs reduction). A random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for the efficacy outcomes. Treatments were ranked with posterior rank plots and surface under cumulative ranking values.  Results: Eighty-five studies were included in the SLR/NMA. Topical triple-agent fixed-dose combination (FDC) gel (clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1%) and combinations of double-agent fixed-dose topical treatments with oral antibiotics (TOA3) consistently ranked in the top 3 treatments. Topical triple-agent FDC gel was numerically superior to TOA3 for treatment success (log-odds ratios: 1.84 [95% credible interval (CrI) 1.36 to 2.29]) and 1.69 (95% CrI: 1.01 to 2.32) vs placebo/vehicle). TOA3 was numerically superior to topical triple-agent FDC gel for reduction of ILs (mean difference: -8.21 [-10.33 to -6.13]) and -10.40 [-13.44 to -7.14] vs placebo/vehicle) and NILs (mean difference: -13.41 [-16.69 to -10.32] and -17.74 [-22.56 to -12.85] vs placebo/vehicle). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this SLR/NMA, topical triple-agent FDC gel was the most efficacious and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):     doi:10.36849/JDD.8148.

Long-term Patiromer Use and Outcomes Among US Veterans With Hyperkalemia and CKD: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

Rationale & Objective: Patiromer is a potassium binder approved for the long-term management of hyperkalemia. Although patiromer use among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been shown to reduce the discontinuation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition therapy, it remains unclear whether patiromer can improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the association of long-term patiromer use with clinical outcomes among hyperkalemic patients with CKD. Study Design: This was a longitudinal observational study. Setting & Participants: We evaluated a national cohort of 854,217 US Veterans who had at least 1 serum potassium measurement of ≥5.1 mEq/L and were treated at US Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities between January 2016 and September 2019. Exposure: The exposure was long-term patiromer use. Outcomes: The outcomes were as follows: (1) composite endpoint of kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) or all-cause death and (2) all-cause death including the post-KFRT period. Analytical Approach: Cox proportional Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models were used in a propensity-matched cohort. Results: Among 2,004 patients who ever used patiromer during the study period (0.2% of the cohort), 666 met the criteria for long-term patiromer use. We matched 308 long-term patiromer users to 308 nonusers based on propensity scores. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 23.5 mL/min/1.73m2, and the median potassium level was 5.2 mEq/L. Approximately 45% were on renin-angiotensin system inhibitor(s) at baseline. During follow-up, 93 patients developed KFRT, and 134 patients died. Long-term patiromer users, when compared to nonusers, experienced a 26% lower risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.01; P = 0.06) and a 41% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84; P = 0.003). Limitations: The study cohort included mostly male veterans with relatively short follow-up periods. Conclusions: Long-term patiromer use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality among patients with CKD and hyperkalemia. Long-term potassium binder use for hyperkalemia may improve clinical outcomes in CKD. Plain-Language Summary: Hyperkalemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and can result in the discontinuation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition therapy, a cornerstone of CKD management. Patiromer is a new potassium binder approved for the long-term management of hyperkalemia, but it remains unclear whether patiromer can improve clinical outcomes. We examined a cohort of US Veterans with hyperkalemia between January 2016 and September 2019 and found that patiromer use was uncommon for treating hyperkalemia during this study period. We then matched 308 long-term patiromer users and 308 nonusers based on propensity scores. Long-term patiromer users, when compared to nonusers, experienced a 26% lower risk of the composite outcome and a 41% lower risk of all-cause mortality. These findings indicate that long-term potassium binder use for hyperkalemia may improve clinical outcomes in CKD.

Post-Hoc Exploratory Pooled Analysis of the Impact of IDP-126 Gel on QoL in Moderate-to-Severe Acne.

BACKGROUND: Acne has psychosocial effects on patient's quality of life (QoL). This post hoc exploratory analysis of pooled phase 3 data assessed the impact of investigational IDP-126 gel (for moderate to severe acne) on the Acne-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (Acne-QoL; exploratory endpoint in the trials).  Methods: A post hoc exploratory analysis using pooled data (N=309; age ≥13 years) was conducted to assess if 1) changes from baseline to week 12 in Acne-QoL domain scores significantly differ by treatment; 2) differences were clinically meaningful, and 3) relative importance of acne severity as measured by the Evaluator's Global Severity Score (EGSS) or lesion counts explains the changes in QoL (Acne-QoL).  Results: Acne-QoL domain scores significantly (P<0.001, each) improved for patients treated with IDP-126 Gel vs vehicle in all four domains (role-emotional [least squares mean difference {LSMean} 4.1], self-perception [LSMean 3.8], acne symptoms [LSMean 2.6], and role-social [LSMean 2.0]). The proportion of responders was significantly higher (P<0.05, each) in the IDP-126 Gel group vs vehicle across Acne-QoL domains, self-perception (odds ratio [OR]: 4.32), acne symptoms (OR: 3.90), role-social (OR: 3.59), and role-emotional (OR: 2.50). Across all Acne QoL domains, the improvement on the EGSS endpoint (53.8-63.3%) was more likely to influence QoL improvements than the inflammatory (20.1-33.4%) and non-inflammatory lesion (9.5-18.7%) counts.  Conclusions: This post hoc exploratory analysis of pooled phase 3 data (moderate to severe acne) suggests that treatment with IDP 126 Gel led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in QoL and improvement in QoL was primarily influenced by EGSS.J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10):1033-1039      doi:10.36849/JDD.7812.

Impact of rifaximin use following an initial overt hepatic encephalopathy hospitalization on rehospitalization and costs.

AIM: To assess the impact of rifaximin (± lactulose) use following discharge of an initial overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) hospitalization on OHE rehospitalizations and healthcare costs in a real-world setting. METHODS: Adults (18-64 years) with an OHE hospitalization were identified from MarketScan® Commercial claims (Q4'15-Q2'20), classified into two mutually exclusive treatment cohorts (i.e. rifaximin and no rifaximin treatment), and further stratified into four subgroups based on decreasing quality of care (QoC; i.e. Type 1 - rifaximin without delay post-discharge; Type 2 - rifaximin with delay post-discharge; Type 3 - lactulose only post-discharge; Type 4 - no rifaximin/lactulose treatment post-discharge). The impact of rifaximin use on 30-day and annualized OHE hospitalizations and healthcare costs were assessed between cohorts and by the QoC subgroup. RESULTS: Characteristics were similar between the rifaximin (N = 1,452; Type 1: 1,138, Type 2: 314) and no rifaximin (N = 560; Type 3:337, Type 4: 223) treatment cohorts. The 30-day risk of OHE rehospitalization was lower for the rifaximin vs. no rifaximin treatment cohort (odds ratio 0.56, p < .01) and increased with decreasing QoC. The annual rate of OHE hospitalizations was 59% lower for the rifaximin treatment cohort (incidence rate ratio 0.41, p < .01) and increased with decreasing QoC. Compared to the no rifaximin treatment cohort, the rifaximin treatment cohort had higher pharmacy costs, lower medical costs, and no difference in total healthcare costs. LIMITATIONS: This was a claims-based study subject to common data limitations such as billing inaccuracies or omissions in coded claims. Total healthcare costs were reported from a payer's perspective, which do not capture indirect costs associated with patient burden. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of rifaximin after an OHE hospitalization was associated with reduced OHE hospitalizations both in the 30-days following and annually. Further, reduced medical costs offset increased pharmacy costs, and no annual cost differences were observed between cohorts.

Content validation of a daily patient-reported outcome measure for assessing symptoms in patients with Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to generate evidence supporting the development and content validity of a new PRO instrument, the Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO) Symptom Measure (SSM) daily diary. The SSM assesses symptom severity in SIBO patients, with the ultimate goal of providing a fit for purpose PRO for endpoint measurement. METHODS: Qualitative research included 35 SIBO patients in three study stages, using a hybrid concept elicitation (CE)/cognitive interview (CI) method with US patients, ≥ 18 years. Stage 1 included a literature review, clinician interviews, and initial CE interviews with SIBO patients to identify symptoms important to patients for inclusion in the SSM. Stage 2 included hybrid CE/CI to learn more about patients' SIBO experience and test the draft SSM. Finally, stage 3 used CIs to refine the instrument and test its content validity. RESULTS: In stage 1 (n = 8), 15 relevant concepts were identified, with items drafted based on the literature review/clinician interviews and elicitation work. Within stage 2 (n = 15), the SSM was refined to include 11 items; with wording revised for three items. Stage 3 (n = 12) confirmed the comprehensiveness of the SSM, as well as appropriateness of the item wording, recall period, and response scale. The resulting 11-item SSM assesses the severity of bloating, abdominal distention, abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, flatulence, physical tiredness, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, appetite loss, and belching. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence supporting the content validity of the new PRO. Comprehensive patient input ensures that the SSM is a well-defined measure of SIBO, ready for psychometric validation studies.

Cannabis Use and Risk of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Transitioning to Dialysis.

Background: The current social and legal landscape is likely to foster the medicinal and recreational use of cannabis. Synthetic cannabinoid use is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in case reports; however, the association between natural cannabis use and AKI risk in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. Materials and Methods: From a nationally representative cohort of 102,477 U.S. veterans transitioning to dialysis between 2007 and 2015, we identified 2215 patients with advanced CKD who had undergone urine toxicology (UTOX) tests within a year before dialysis initiation and had inpatient serial serum creatinine levels measured within 7 days after their UTOX test. The exposure of interest was cannabis use compared with no use as ascertained by the UTOX test. We examined the association of this exposure with AKI using logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting with extensive adjustment for potential confounders. Results: The mean age of the overall cohort was 61 years; 97% were males, 51% were African Americans, 97% had hypertension, 76% had hyperlipidemia, and 75% were diabetic. AKI occurred in 56% of the cohort, and in multivariable-adjusted analysis, cannabis use (when compared with no substance use) was not associated with significantly higher odds of AKI (odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.87; p=0.7). These results were robust to various sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: In this observational study examining patients with advanced CKD, cannabis use was not associated with AKI risk. Additional studies are needed to characterize the impact of cannabis use on risk of kidney disease and injury.

Association of dyskalemias with short-term health care utilization in patients with advanced CKD.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for dyskalemias, which may induce arrhythmias that require immediate emergent or hospital care. The association of dyskalemias with short-term hospital/emergency room (ER) visits in advanced CKD is understudied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of dyskalemias with short-term hospital/ER visits in an advanced CKD population. METHODS: From among 102,477 US veterans transitioning to dialysis from 2007 to 2015, we identified 21,366 patients with 2 predialysis outpatient eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 90-365 days apart (with the second eGFR serving as the index date) and at least 1 potassium (K) in the baseline period (1 year before index) and 1 outpatient K (oK) in the follow-up (1 year after the index but before dialysis initiation). We examined the association of time-varying hypokalemia (K < 3.5 mEq/L) and hyperkalemia (K > 5.5 mEq/L) vs referent (3.5-5.5 mEq/L) with separate hospital and ER visits within 2 calendar days following each oK value over the 1-year follow-up period from the index. We used generalized estimating equations with binary distribution and logit link to model the exposure-outcome relationship adjusted for various confounders. We conducted various subgroup and sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our results. RESULTS: Over the 1-year follow-up, 125,266 oK measurements were observed, of which 6.8% and 3.7% were classified as hyper- and hypokalemia, respectively. In the multivariable-adjusted model, hyperkalemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.88-2.21) and hypokalemia (aOR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.48-1.86) were associated with significantly higher odds of hospital visits. Similarly, hyperkalemia (aOR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.65-2.03) and hypokalemia (aOR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.07-1.44) were associated with significantly higher odds of ER visits. Results were robust to subgroups and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced CKD, dyskalemias are associated with higher risk of hospital/ER visits. Interventions targeted at lowering the risk of dyskalemias might help in reducing the health care utilization and associated economic burden among patients with advanced CKD experiencing dyskalemias. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by grant 5U01DK102163 from the National Institute of Health (NIH) to Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh and Csaba P. Kovesdy and by resources from the US Department of Veterans Affairs. The data reported here have been supplied in part by the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). Support for VA/CMS data were provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development, VA Information Resource Center (project numbers SDR 02-237 and 98-004). Opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the funding institution. Kovesdy has received honoraria from Akebia, Ardelyx, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cara Therapeutics, Reata, and Tricida unrelated to this study. Kalantar-Zadeh has received honoraria and/or support from Abbott, Abbvie, ACI Clinical (Cara Therapeutics), Akebia, Alexion, Amgen, American Society of Nephrology, Astra-Zeneca, Aveo, BBraun, Chugai, Cytokinetics, Daiichi, DaVita, Fresenius, Genentech, Haymarket Media, Hofstra Medical School, International Federation of Kidney Foundations, International Society of Hemodialysis, International Society of Renal Nutrition & Metabolism, Japanese Society of Dialysis Therapy, Hospira, Kabi, Keryx, Kissei, Novartis, OPKO, National Institutes of Health, National Kidney Foundations, Pfizer, Regulus, Relypsa, Resverlogix, Dr Schaer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Shire, Veterans Affairs, Vifor, UpToDate, and ZS-Pharma, unrelated to this study. Gatwood has received research support from AstraZeneca, Merck & Co., and GlaxoSmithKline unrelated to this study. Obi has received research support from Relypsa/Vifor Pharma Inc. The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.

Refining a traditional urban-rural classification approach to better assess heterogeneity of treatment effects in patient-centered outcomes research.

This article describes a rationale and approach for modifying the traditional rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) coding scheme used to classify U.S. ZIP codes to enable suburban/rural vs. urban core comparisons in health outcomes research that better reflect current geographic differences in access to care in U.S. populations at risk for health disparities. The proposed method customization is being employed in the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute-funded Management Of Diabetes in Everyday Life (MODEL) study to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect for patient-centered diabetes self-care interventions across the rural-urban spectrum. The proposed suburban/rural vs. urban core classification scheme modification is based on research showing that increasing suburban poverty and rapid conversion of many rural areas into suburban areas in the U.S. has resulted in similar health care access problems in areas designated as rural or suburban.•The RUCA coding scheme was developed when a much higher percentage of U.S. individuals resided in areas with very low population density.•Using the MODEL study example, this study demonstrates that the RUCA classification scheme using ZIP codes does not reflect real differences in health care access experienced by medically underserved study participants.•Both internal and external validation data suggest that the proposed suburban/rural vs. urban core customization of the RUCA geographic coding scheme better reflects real differences in healthcare access and is better able to assess the differential impact of clinical interventions designed to address geographic differences in access among vulnerable populations.

Association of Dyskalemias with Ischemic Stroke in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Transitioning to Dialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hypo- and hyperkalemia are associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke. However, this association has not been examined in an advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. METHODS: From among 102,477 US veterans transitioning to dialysis between 2007 and 2015, 21,357 patients with 2 pre-dialysis outpatient estimated glomerular filtration rates <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 90-365 days apart and at least 1 potassium (K) each in the baseline and follow-up period were identified. We separately examined the association of both baseline time-averaged K (chronic exposure) and time-updated K (acute exposure) treated as categorized (hypokalemia [K <3.5 mEq/L] and hyperkalemia [K >5.5 mEq/L] vs. referent [3.5-5.5 mEq/L]) and continuous exposure with time to the first ischemic stroke event prior to dialysis initiation using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2,638 (12.4%) ischemic stroke events (crude event rate 41.9 per 1,000 patient years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 40.4-43.6) over a median (Q1-Q3) follow-up time of 2.56 (1.59-3.89) years were observed. The baseline time-averaged K category of hypokalemia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 95% CI: 1.35, 1.01-1.81) was marginally associated with a significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke. However, time-updated hyperkalemia was associated with a significantly lower risk of ischemic stroke (aHR, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.68-0.98). The exposure-outcome relationship remained consistent when using continuous K levels for both the exposures. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced CKD, hypokalemia (chronic exposure) was associated with a higher risk of ischemic stroke, whereas hyperkalemia (acute exposure) was associated with a lower risk of ischemic stroke. Further studies in this population are needed to explore the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Potassium Trajectories prior to Dialysis and Mortality following Dialysis Initiation in Patients with Advanced CKD.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced non-dialysis-dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) have a reduced ability for maintaining plasma potassium (K) in normal range. Deviation from normal plasma K ranges is associated with increased mortality; however, the average trajectory of plasma K over time in patients with advanced NDD-CKD and the outcomes associated with plasma K trajectory are unknown. METHODS: We identified 34,167 US veterans with advanced NDD-CKD transitioning to dialysis between October 2007 and March 2015 with at least 1 K measurement each year over a 3-year period prior to dialysis transition (3-year prelude). The K trajectory defined as the change in K (slope) per year over the entire 3-year prelude was estimated using linear mixed-effects models. The association between unadjusted (crude) K slope (categorized as stable [-0.09 to 0.09 mEq/L/year], decreasing [≤-0.10 mEq/L/year], and increasing [≥0.10 mEq/L/year]) and time to all-cause and cardiovascular mortality during the 6 months following dialysis initiation was assessed using multivariable-adjusted survival models. RESULTS: The crude and multivariable-adjusted K slopes (mean, 95% CI) over the 3-year prelude were 0.008 (0.0059, 0.0110) and -0.15 mEq/L/year (-0.19, -0.11), respectively. Decreasing K slope was associated with higher multivariable-adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI] vs. stable K slope: 1.08 [1.00-1.17]). No association was observed between K slope and cardiovascular mortality. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The average intraindividual plasma K trajectory is remarkably stable in patients with advanced NDD-CKD. A decreasing K slope is associated with higher all-cause mortality risk.

Predialysis Potassium Variability and Postdialysis Mortality in Patients With Advanced CKD.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with advanced non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) are prone to potassium (K) imbalances due to reduced kidney function. Both hypo- and hyperkalemia are associated with increased mortality; however, it is unclear if K variability before dialysis initiation is associated with outcomes after dialysis initiation. METHODS: We identified 34,167 US veterans with advanced NDD-CKD transitioning to dialysis between October 1, 2007, through March 31, 2015, who had at least 1 K measurement each year over a 3-year period before transition (3-year prelude). For each patient, a linear mixed-effects model was used to regress K over time (in years) over the 3-year prelude to derive K variability (square root of the average squared distance between the observed and estimated K). The main outcomes of interest were 6-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality after dialysis initiation. Multivariable Cox and Fine-Gray competing risk regression adjusted for 3-year prelude K intercept, K slope (per year), demographics, smoking status, comorbidities, length of hospitalizations, body mass index, vascular access type, medications, average estimated glomerular filtration rate, and number of K measurements over the 3-year prelude were used to assess the association of K variability (expressed as quartiles) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Higher prelude K variability was associated with higher multivariable-adjusted risk of all-cause mortality but not cardiovascular mortality (adjusted hazard/subhazard ratios [95% confidence interval] for highest quartile [vs. lowest] of K variability, 1.14 [1.03-1.25] and 0.99 [0.85-1.16] for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively). CONCLUSION: Higher K variability is associated with higher all-cause mortality after dialysis initiation.

Laxative Use and Risk of Dyskalemia in Patients with Advanced CKD Transitioning to Dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced CKD experience increased intestinal potassium excretion. This compensatory mechanism may be enhanced by laxative use; however, little is known about the association of laxative use with risk of dyskalemia in advanced CKD. METHODS: Our study population encompassed 36,116 United States veterans transitioning to ESKD from 2007 to 2015 with greater than or equal to one plasma potassium measurement during the last 1-year period before ESKD transition. Using generalized estimating equations with adjustment for potential confounders, we examined the association of time-varying laxative use with risk of dyskalemia (i.e., hypokalemia [potassium <3.5 mEq/L] or hyperkalemia [>5.5 mEq/L]) versus normokalemia (3.5-5.5 mEq/L) over the 1-year pre-ESKD period. To avoid potential overestimation of dyskalemia risk, potassium measurements within 7 days following a dyskalemia event were disregarded in the analyses. RESULTS: Over the last 1-year pre-ESKD period, there were 319,219 repeated potassium measurements in the cohort. Of these, 12,787 (4.0%) represented hypokalemia, and 15,842 (5.0%) represented hyperkalemia; the time-averaged potassium measurement was 4.5 mEq/L. After multivariable adjustment, time-varying laxative use (compared with nonuse) was significantly associated with lower risk of hyperkalemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.76 to 0.84) but was not associated with risk of hypokalemia (aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.07). The results were robust to several sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Laxative use was independently associated with lower risk of hyperkalemia during the last 1-year pre-ESKD period. Our findings support a putative role of constipation in potassium disarrays and also support (with a careful consideration for the risk-benefit profiles) the therapeutic potential of laxatives in hyperkalemia management in advanced CKD.

Laxative use in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease transitioning to dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Constipation is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly among those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), partly due to their dietary restrictions, comorbidities and medications. Laxatives are typically used for constipation management; however, little is known about laxative use and its associated factors in patients with advanced CKD transitioning to ESRD. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 102 477 US veterans transitioning to dialysis between October 2007 and March 2015, we examined the proportion of patients who filled a prescription for any type of laxative within each 6-month period over 36 months pre- and post-transition to ESRD. Factors associated with laxative use during the last 1-year pre-ESRD period were identified by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The proportion of patients prescribed laxatives increased as patients progressed to ESRD, peaking at 37.1% in the 6 months immediately following ESRD transition, then remaining fairly stable throughout the post-ESRD transition period. Among laxative users, stool softeners were the most commonly prescribed (∼30%), followed by hyperosmotics (∼20%), stimulants (∼10%), bulk formers (∼3%), chloride channel activator (<1%) and several combinations of these. The use of anticoagulants, oral iron supplements, non-opioid analgesics, antihistamines and opioid analgesics were among the factors independently associated with pre-ESRD laxative use. CONCLUSION: The use of laxatives increased considerably as patients neared transition to ESRD, likely mirroring the increasing burden of drug-induced constipation during the ESRD transition period. Findings may provide novel insight into better management strategies to alleviate constipation symptoms and reduce medication requirements in patients with advanced CKD.

Laxative Use and Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Constipation is highly prevalent in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), due in part to dietary (e.g., fiber) restrictions, and is often managed by laxatives; however, the effect of laxative use on kidney function in advanced CKD remains unclear. We aimed to examine the association of laxative use with longitudinal change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with advanced CKD. DESIGN AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of 43,622 US veterans transitioning to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from 2007 to 2015, we estimated changes in eGFR (slope) by linear mixed-effects models using ≥2 available outpatient eGFR measurements during the 2-year period before transition to ESRD. The association of laxative use with change in eGFR was examined by testing the interaction of time-varying laxative use with time for eGFR slope in the mixed-effects models with adjustment for fixed and time-varying confounders. RESULTS: Laxatives were prescribed in 49.8% of patients during the last 2-year pre-ESRD period. In the crude model, time-varying laxative use was modestly associated with more progressive eGFR decline compared with non-use of laxatives (median [interquartile interval] -7.1 [-11.9, -4.3] vs. -6.8 [-11.6, -4.0] mL/min/1.73 m2/year, P < .001). After multivariable adjustment, a faster eGFR decline associated with laxative use (vs. non-use of laxatives) remained statistically significant, although the between-group difference in eGFR slope was minimal (median [interquartile interval] -8.8 [-12.9, -5.9] vs. -8.6 [-12.6, -5.6] mL/min/1.73 m2/year, P < .001). The significant association was no longer evident across different types of laxatives (i.e., stool softeners, stimulants, or hyperosmotics). CONCLUSIONS: There was a clinically negligible association of laxative use with change in eGFR during the last 2-year pre-ESRD period, suggesting the renal safety profile of laxatives in advanced CKD patients.

Association between Nrf2 and CDKN2A expression in patients with end-stage renal disease: a pilot study.

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) display phenotypic features of premature biological aging, characterized by disproportionately high morbidity and mortality at a younger age. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) activity, a master regulator of antioxidative responses, declines with age and is implicated in the pathogenesis of age-related disorders; however, little is known about the association between Nrf2 and premature biological aging in ESRD patients. In a cross-sectional pilot cohort of 34 ESRD patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, we measured the expression of Nrf2 and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A, or p16INK4a, a biomarker of biological aging) genes in whole blood and examined the association of Nrf2 with CDKN2A expression, using Spearman's rank correlation and multivariable linear regression models with adjustment for potential confounders. There was a significant negative correlation between Nrf2 and CDKN2A expression (rho=-0.51, P=0.002); while no significant correlation was found between Nrf2 expression and chronological age (rho=-0.02, P=0.91). After multivariable adjustment, Nrf2 expression remained significantly and negatively associated with CDKN2A expression (ß coefficient=-1.51, P=0.01), independent of chronological age, gender, race, and diabetes status. These findings suggest a potential contribution of Nrf2 dysfunction to the development of premature biological aging and its related morbidities in ESRD patients.

The management of diabetes in everyday life study: Design and methods for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of text messaging versus health coaching.

Background African American patients with uncontrolled diabetes living in medically underserved areas need effective clinic-based interventions to improve self-care behaviors. Text messaging (TM) and health coaching (HC) are among the most promising low-cost population-based approaches, but little is known about their comparative effectiveness in real-world clinical settings. Objective Use a pragmatic randomized controlled trial design to determine the comparative effectiveness of TM and HC with enhanced usual care (EC) in African American adults with uncontrolled diabetes and multiple chronic health conditions. Methods/design The Management of Diabetes in Everyday Life (MODEL) study is randomizing 646 patients (n = 581with anticipated 90% retention) to 3 intervention arms: TM, HC, and EC. Participants are African American adults living in medically underserved areas of the Mid-South, age ≥ 18, with uncontrolled diabetes (A1c ≥ 8), one or more additional chronic conditions, and who have a phone with texting and voicemail capability. Primary outcome measures: the general diet, exercise, and medication adherence subscales of the revised Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities questionnaire assessed at one year. Secondary outcomes: diabetes-specific quality of life, primary care engagement, and average blood sugar (A1c). The study will also assess heterogeneity of treatment effects by six key baseline participant characteristics. Conclusions We describe the design and methods of the MODEL study along with design revisions required during implementation in a pragmatic setting. This trial, upon its conclusion, will allow us to compare the effectiveness of two promising low-cost primary care-based strategies for supporting self-care behaviors among African Americans individuals with uncontrolled diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02957513.

Can primary care access reduce health care utilization for patients with obesity-associated chronic conditions in medically underserved areas?

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and burdens of obesity-associated chronic conditions (OCC) are rising nationwide, particularly in health professional shortage areas (HPSA). This study examined the impact of access to primary care on health care utilization for vulnerable populations with OCC in the South. METHODS: Adult patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ), greater than or equal to one additional OCC, and self-reported primary care access data were retrospectively identified from hospital and emergency department (ED) electronic medical records of a major health care system in the South. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with self-reported access to primary care. Multivariable zero-inflated negative binomial models assessed effect of HPSA residence on relationships between self-reported access to primary care and health care utilization. RESULTS: A total of 29 674 patients were identified. Hypertension (76.1%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (34.1%), and hyperlipidemia (32.9%) were the most prevalent OCC. Males (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.47), unmarried (OR: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.76), and uninsured (OR: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.27-0.32) had lower odds of access to primary care. For patients living in HPSA (vs non-HPSA), access to primary care was associated with higher incidence of overall ED use (relative risk [RR]: 1.38; 95% CI, 1.19-1.61) and lower incidence of potentially preventable hospital use (RR: 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92). CONCLUSION: Paradoxically, access to primary care may increase ED use while reducing potentially preventable hospital utilization for patients with OCC in HPSA. Increasing access to primary care alone, without strengthening its capacity to serve the needs of vulnerable patients, may be insufficient to reduce hospital utilization.

Medication Adherence, Health Care Utilization, and Costs Among Patients Initiating Oral Oncolytics for Multiple Myeloma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Oral oncolytic therapies have improved survival in hematologic cancers, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and multiple myeloma (MM), which are now being managed like chronic conditions. However, compared with other cancers, there is a lack of studies assessing adherence, health care resource utilization, and costs in patients with these cancers. OBJECTIVE: To assess factors associated with adherence to oral oncolytic therapies, health care utilization, and costs in patients with CLL/SLL or MM. METHODS: A retrospective database study was conducted using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplement databases. Adults (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with and prescribed an oral oncolytic for CLL/SLL (ibrutinib or idelalisib) or MM (thalidomide, lenalidomide, or pomalidomide) between 2013 and 2016 and with continuous eligibility 6 months before and 12 months after oral oncolytic initiation were identified. Adherence to oral oncolytics was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) metric. Multiple linear regression and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify adherence predictors. Count models assessed the relationship between adherence and resource utilization, and generalized linear models assessed the relationship between adherence and health care costs. RESULTS: A total of 701 and 2,385 patients were identified with CLL/SLL or MM, respectively. Mean PDC (SD) for CLL/SLL and MM patients was 75.3 (22.5) and 57.6 (26.5), respectively. For CLL/SLL patients, those aged ≥ 65 years (beta [B] = -4.00) had lower medication use. Among MM patients, multiple predictors of higher medication use emerged: aged ≥ 65 years (B = 3.44), higher than average outpatient resource utilization (B = 3.53), insurance plan other than preferred provider organization (PPO; B = -2.58), previous cancer therapy (B = -2.81), higher number of concurrent unique therapeutic classes (B = -0.35), and higher comorbidity burden (B = -2.55). Patients with CLL/SLL and enrolled in plans other than a PPO were more likely to be adherent (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.01-1.98), whereas patients who were aged ≥ 65 years, were residents of the southern United States, and had visited the emergency department in the baseline period were less likely to be adherent. For MM patients, those aged ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.38-2.04) and with higher than average outpatient services utilization (OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.01-1.52) were more likely to be adherent, whereas those enrolled in plans other than a PPO, previously treated with cancer therapy, and with higher comorbidity burden were less likely to be adherent. In both cohorts, adherent patients had significantly lower odds of health care utilization and incurred lower medical costs, but higher prescription costs, following oncolytic initiation; however, total costs were not significantly lower in those adherent. CONCLUSIONS: Factors were identified that influenced adherence at the patient, treatment, and health system levels. These factors can be used to identify patients requiring interventions for improving medication-taking behavior and associated health care burden. DISCLOSURES: This study received no outside funding. Dashputre was recently employed by Novartis; K. Gatwood has received speaker fees from Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and J. Gatwood has received research funding from Merck & Co. and GlaxoSmithKline, unrelated to this study..

Impact of oral oncolytic initiation on medication adherence for pre-existing comorbid chronic conditions.

PURPOSE: Oral oncolytics have improved survival in hematological cancers like chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and multiple myeloma; however, it is unclear of the extent to which initiating these treatments might impact adherence to oral therapies for pre-existing comorbid chronic conditions. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with and prescribed oral oncolytics for chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, or multiple myeloma between 2013 and 2016 and with continuous eligibility six months before and after oral oncolytic initiation were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan databases. Among those identified, patients with pre-existing diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia with ≥1 fill for oral comorbid therapies were selected. Adherence to oral oncolytics and comorbid therapies was measured using the proportion of days covered metric. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests assessed changes in adherence for comorbid therapies after initiation of an oral oncolytic. Unadjusted difference-in-difference models assessed the impact of adherence to oral oncolytics on changes in adherence to comorbid therapies. RESULTS: Significant reductions in adherence after oncolytic initiation were observed across the comorbid therapies and were highest for patients taking lipid-lower agents (10.7-15.6%). Unadjusted difference-in-difference models revealed consistent and significantly lower reductions in adherence for those taking antihypertensives (chronic myeloid leukemia: p = 0.03; chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: p = 0.007; multiple myeloma: p = 0.09) and adherent to oral oncolytics. CONCLUSION: Initiation of oral oncolytics may negatively impact adherence to oral therapies for chronic comorbid conditions, necessitating the need for medication management strategies to help patients adhere to their entire medication regimen.