Tramadol/Diclofenac Fixed-Dose Combination for Acute Pain Management: Bioavailability Assessment of a Generic Product.

The multimodal analgesia strategy for acute pain involves using 2 or more analgesic medications with distinct mechanisms of action. This study assessed the bioavailability and tolerability of 2 tramadol hydrochloride (50 mg)/diclofenac sodium (50 mg) fixed-dose combination formulations under fed conditions to attend the Brazilian regulatory requirements for generic product registration. An open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, 2-way crossover trial was conducted, including healthy subjects of both sexes. Subjects received a single dose of either the test or reference formulation of tramadol/diclofenac fixed-dose combination tablets with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected up to 36 hours after dosing for tramadol and 12 hours for diclofenac and quantified using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Of 56 subjects enrolled, 53 completed the study. The 90% confidence intervals for maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration were within acceptable bioequivalence limits of 80%-125%. Considering the results presented in this study, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation and could be interchangeable in medical practice.

Etoricoxib Coated Tablets: Bioequivalence Assessment between Two Formulations Administered under Fasting Conditions.

Etoricoxib is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug with high selectivity for cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), exerting a pronounced anti-inflammatory effect with fewer adverse events when compared to COX-1 inhibitors. The present study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two etoricoxib-coated tablet formulations to meet regulatory requirements for a branded generic product registration in Brazil. A crossover study with an open-label, randomized design and a single-dose regimen with two treatments and two periods was conducted on healthy Brazilians of both genders. Subjects randomly received a single dose of a 90 mg etoricoxib coated tablet of test product Xumer® 90 mg (Adium S.A.) and the reference product Arcoxia® 90 mg (Merck Sharp & Dohme Farmacêutica Ltda.) under fasting conditions separated by a 14-day period. Blood samples were collected sequentially for up to 96 h following drug administration, and the concentrations of etoricoxib in plasma were determined using a validated UPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed utilizing non-compartmental analysis methods. A total of 32 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 25 subjects completed the study. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-inf were 103.98% (95.63-113.06), 96.82% (91.82-102.09), and 95.79% (90.70-101.16), respectively. In accordance with regulatory standards, the test formulation (Xumer® 90 mg) has been deemed bioequivalent to the reference product (Arcoxia® 90 mg). As a result, these formulations can be considered interchangeable in clinical practice, with both proving to be safe and well-tolerated. The need for in vivo testing for the Xumer® 60 mg strength was waived due to the proportional similarity of the formulations and the similar in vitro dissolution profiles observed across the various strengths.

Methylphenidate Multiphasic Release Tablet: Bioequivalence Assessment between Two Formulations Administered under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

Methylphenidate hydrochloride is used to treat children, adolescents, and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Multiphasic release formulation has been used to control drug levels, mainly during children's school period. This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release tablets to meet regulatory requirements for registration in Brazil. Two independent studies (under fasting and fed conditions) designed as open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-way crossover trials were conducted in healthy subjects of both genders. Subjects were enrolled and randomly received a single dose of the test formulation methylphenidate hydrochloride 54 mg extended-release tablet (Consiv®, Adium S.A., São Paulo, Brazil) or the reference formulation (Concerta®, Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltd., São Paulo, Brazil), in each period, with a 7-day washout interval. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 h post dose and methylphenidate plasma concentrations were obtained using a validated LC-MS/MS method. A total of 96 healthy subjects were enrolled in the fasting study, of which 80 completed the study. For the fed study, 52 healthy subjects were enrolled, and 46 subjects completed it. In both studies, 90% confidence intervals for Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-inf, and partial AUCs were within the acceptable limits of 80.00 to 125.00%. Thus, according to regulatory requirements, the test formulation (Consiv®) was considered to be bioequivalent to the reference formulation (Concerta®) in both conditions (fasting and fed) and, therefore, it can be considered interchangeable in clinical practice. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated in single-dose administration.

Sensitive LC-MS/MS method for quantification of rivaroxaban in plasma: Application to pharmacokinetic studies.

Rivaroxaban is an anticoagulant (orally active direct Xa inhibitor) considered to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism and treat deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other cardiovascular complications. Bioanalytical methods for rivaroxaban quantification in plasma are necessary for application in pharmacokinetic studies, as well as in drug therapeutic monitoring. In this work, we developed and validated a sensitive bioanalytical method using LC-MS/MS for rivaroxaban quantification in human plasma using an one-step liquid-liquid extraction. The linear concentration range was 1-600 ng/mL. The bioanalytical method was also applied to pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. The results demonstrated that the method is rapid, sensitive, and adequate for application in pharmacokinetic studies.

In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation for Desvenlafaxine Succinate Monohydrate Extended Release Tablets.

The objective of this study was to develop a dissolution test in order to establish an in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) model for desvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate (DVSM) extended release (ER) tablets. The in vitro release characteristics of the drug were determined using USP apparatus 1 at 75 rpm, with volume of HCl pH 1.2, acetate buffer solution (ABS) pH 4.5, or phosphate buffer solution (PBS) pH 6.8. In vivo plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters in healthy volunteers were obtained from a bioequivalence study. The similarity factors f1 and f2 were used to compare the dissolution data. The IVIVC model was developed using fraction dissolved and fraction absorbed of the reference product. For predictability, the results showed that the percentage prediction error (%PE) value of Cmax was 7.63%. The observed low prediction error for Cmax demonstrated that the IVIVC model was valid for this parameter.

In Vivo Predictive Dissolution (IPD) for Carbamazepine Formulations: Additional Evidence Regarding a Biopredictive Dissolution Medium.

The aim of the present study was to bring additional evidence regarding a biopredictive dissolution medium containing 1% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) to predict the in vivo behavior of carbamazepine (CBZ) products. Twelve healthy volunteers took one immediate release (IR) dose of either test and reference formulations in a bioequivalence study (BE). Dissolution profiles were carried-out using the medium. Level A in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVC) were established using both one-step and two-step approaches as well as exploring the time-scaling approach to account for the differences in dissolution rate in vitro versus in vivo. A detailed step by step calculation was provided to clearly illustrate all the procedures. The results show additional evidence that the medium containing 1% SLS can be classified as a universal biopredictive dissolution tool, and that both of the approaches used to develop the IVIVC (one and two-steps) provide good in vivo predictability. Therefore, this biopredictive medium could be a highly relevant tool in Latin-American countries to ensure and check the quality of their CBZ marketed products for which BE studies were not requested by their regulatory health authorities.

In vitro - In vivo correlation in the development of oral drug formulation: A screenshot of the last two decades.

In vitro - in vivo correlation (IVIVC) allows prediction of the in vivo performance of a pharmaceutical product based on its in vitro drug release profiles and can be used to optimize formulations, set dissolution limits, reduce the number of bioequivalence studies during product development, and facilitate certain regulatory decisions. This review article aimed to assess papers published in the last two decades regarding the use of the IVIVC in the development of oral formulations, to demonstrate the scenario in this area, as well as to describe the main characteristics of the assessed studies. A systematic search of PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted to retrieve articles reporting the use of the IVIVC in the oral formulation development in the period from 1998 to 2018. The qualified studies were abstracted regarding drug name, dosage form, BCS class, in vitro and in vivo data, level of IVIVC, number of formulations, presence of the validation and predictability. The discussion was supported by these data, which allowed to address broadly strengths and weaknesses in this area. Moreover, a large database has been described in this article containing different IVIVC models, with different substances, providing support to scientists interested in this area.

A randomized, single-dose, two-sequence, two-period, crossover study to assess the bioequivalence between two formulations of clonazepam tablet in healthy subjects.

Clonazepam is a benzodiazepine commonly prescribed to treat panic disorder, epilepsy, anxiety, depression and certain types of seizures. This study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence between two formulations of clonazepam tablets in order to meet regulatory requirements for marketing in Colombia and other countries in Latin America. An open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence, two-treatment crossover study was conducted in 36 healthy subjects of both genders. Subjects received a single dose of clonazepam 2 mg test tablet (Sanofi-Aventis de Colombia S.A.) and reference product (Rivotril®, Produtos Roche Químicos e Farmacêuticos S.A.) under fasting conditions according to a randomly assigned order with a 21-day washout period. Serial blood samples were collected up to 96 h post-dose. Plasma concentrations of clonazepam were obtained by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. A total of 36 healthy subjects were enrolled and 31 of them completed the study. Twenty-nine adverse events were reported (11 events with test product versus 18 events with reference product). There were no serious adverse events during the study. Geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for Cmax and AUC0-96h were 103.28% (98.10-108.64) and 102.50% (99.87-105.19), respectively. The test formulation of clonazepam 2 mg tablet manufactured by Sanofi-Aventis de Colombia S.A. was considered bioequivalent to reference product Rivotril® (Produtos Roche Químicos e Farmacêuticos S.A.) according to regulatory requirements. Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated during the study.

Avaliação da bioequivalência entre duas formulações de succinato de desvenlafaxina monoidratado ­ 50 mg comprimido revestido de liberação prolongada ­ administradas em jejum e pós-prandial em voluntários sadios de ambos os sexos / Bioequivalence evaluation of two desvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate formulations 50-mg extendedrelease coated tablet administered in fasted and fed conditions in healthy male and female volunteers

Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a bioequivalência entre duas formulações de succinato de desvenlafaxina monoidratado 50 mg comprimido revestido de liberação prolongada, sendo a formulação teste produzida por Medley Farmacêutica Ltda. e a formulação referência (Pristiq™) comercializada por Wyeth Indústria Farmacêutica Ltda. Métodos: Os estudos foram conduzidos em voluntários sadios e as formulações administradas em dose única, sob o estado jejum e pós-prandial. Cada estudo foi conduzido de maneira independente, sendo ambos do tipo aberto, dois períodos, utilizando um delineamento do tipo crossover 2x2, envolvendo 48 voluntários, com intervalo de sete dias entre os períodos (washout). Resultados: Na administração em jejum, a razão entre a média geométrica da formulação teste e referência (T/R) de Cmáx foi 107,49%, com intervalo de confiança (IC) 90% de 100,81 a 114,60%. Para ASC0-t, a razão T/R foi de 104,90%, com IC 90% de 97,53 a 112,82%. Na administração pós-prandial, a razão T/R de Cmáx foi 103,17%, com IC 90% de 95,08 a 111,94%. Para ASC0-t, a razão T/R foi 103,40%, com IC 90% de 94,97 a 112,58%. Conclusões: As formulações teste e referência foram consideradas estatisticamente bioequivalentes em ambas as condições de administração, jejum e pós-prandial, de acordo com os critérios exigidos pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa). A formulação teste foi o primeiro medicamento similar (Zodel®, 50 e 100 mg) registrado pela Anvisa nessa categoria e disponibilizado para comercialização, contribuindo assim com a ampliação da disponibilidade do tratamento para o transtorno depressivo maior e a redução de custos ao paciente.

Objective: The objective of this work was to evaluate the bioequivalence between two desvenlafaxine succinate monohydrate formulations 50-mg extended-release tablet, the test product manufactured by Medley Farmacêutica Ltd. and reference product (Pristiq™) commercialized by Wyeth Indústria Farmacêutica Ltda. Methods: The studies were performed in healthy volunteers and the formulations were administered in single-dose under fasted and fed conditions. Each study was conducted independently and performed of type open, two periods, using a 2x2 crossover design, involving 48 volunteers, with seven days of minimum interval between periods (washout). Results: In the fasted administration, the ratio between the geometrical mean of test formulation and reference (T/R) of Cmax was 107.49%, with confidence interval 90% (CI 90%) of 100.81 to 114.60%. For AUC0-t, the ratio T/R was of 104.90%, with CI 90% from 97.53% to 112.82%. In the fed administration, the ratio T/R of Cmax was 103.17% with CI 90% of 95.08 to 111.94%. For AUC0-t, the ratio T/R was 103.40%, with CI 90% of 94.97 to 112.58%. Conclusions: The test and reference formulations were considered statistically bioequivalent in the two administration conditions, fasted and fed, according to the requirements of Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa). The test formulation was the first similar medicine (Zodel®, 50 e 100 mg) to be registered by Anvisa in this category and available to commercialization, thus contributing to increase the availability of treatment for major depressive disorder and the reduction of costs to the patient.

Benznidazole Extended-Release Tablets for Improved Treatment of Chagas Disease: Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Study.

Benznidazole (BNZ) is the first-line drug for the treatment of Chagas disease. The drug is available in the form of immediate-release tablets for 100-mg (adult) and 12.5-mg (pediatric) doses. The drug is administered two or three times daily for 60 days. The high frequency of daily administrations and the long period of treatment are factors that significantly contribute to the abandonment of therapy, affecting therapeutic success. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the preclinical pharmacokinetics of BNZ administered as extended-release tablets (200-mg dose) formulated with different types of polymers (hydroxypropyl methylcellulose K4M and K100M), compared to the tablets currently available. The studies were conducted with rabbits, and BNZ quantification was performed in plasma and urine by ultraperformance liquid chromatography methods previously validated. The bioavailability of BNZ was adequate in the administration of extended-release tablets; however, with the administration of the pediatric tablet, the bioavailability was lower than with other tablets, which showed that the clinical use of this formulation should be monitored. The pharmacokinetic parameters demonstrated that the extended-release tablets prolonged drug release from the pharmaceutical matrix and provided an increase in the maintenance of the drug concentrationin vivo, which would allow the frequency of administration to be reduced. Thus, a relative bioavailability study in humans will be planned for implementation of a new product for the treatment of Chagas disease.

Rapid and sensitive ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography method for quantification of antichagasic benznidazole in plasma: application in a preclinical pharmacokinetic study.

Benznidazole (BNZ) and nifurtimox are the only drugs available for treating Chagas disease. In this work, we validated a bioanalytical method for the quantification of BNZ in plasma aimed at improving sensitivity and time of analysis compared with the assays already published. Furthermore, we demonstrated the application of the method in a preclinical pharmacokinetic study after administration of a single oral dose of BNZ in Wistar rats. A Waters® Acquity UHPLC system equipped with a UV-vis detector was employed. The method was established using an Acquity® UHPLC HSS SB C18 protected by an Acquity® UHPLC HSS SB C18 VanGuard guard column and detection at 324 nm. The mobile phase consisted of ultrapure water-acetonitrile (65:35), and elution was isocratic. The mobile phase flow rate was 0.55 mL/min, the volume of injection was 1 µL, and the run time was just 2 min. The samples were kept at 25°C until injection and the column at 45°C for the chromatographic separation. The sample preparation was performed by a rapid protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The linear concentration range was 0.15-20 µg/mL. The pharmacokinetic parameters of BNZ in rats were determined and the method was considered sensitive, fast and suitable for application in pharmacokinetic studies.

Evaluation of antimalarial activity and toxicity of a new primaquine prodrug.

Plasmodium vivax is the most prevalent of the five species causing malaria in humans. The current available treatment for P. vivax malaria is limited and unsatisfactory due to at least two drawbacks: the undesirable side effects of primaquine (PQ) and drug resistance to chloroquine. Phenylalanine-alanine-PQ (Phe-Ala-PQ) is a PQ prodrug with a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile compared to PQ. The toxicity of this prodrug was evaluated in in vitro assays using a human hepatoma cell line (HepG2), a monkey kidney cell line (BGM), and human red blood cells deficient in the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD). In addition, in vivo toxicity assays were performed with rats that received multiple doses of Phe-Ala-PQ to evaluate biochemical, hematological, and histopathological parameters. The activity was assessed by the inhibition of the sporogonic cycle using a chicken malaria parasite. Phe-Ala-PQ blocked malaria transmission in Aedes mosquitoes. When compared with PQ, it was less cytotoxic to BGM and HepG2 cells and caused less hemolysis of G6PD-deficient red blood cells at similar concentrations. The prodrug caused less alteration in the biochemical parameters than did PQ. Histopathological analysis of the liver and kidney did show differences between the control and Phe-Ala-PQ-treated groups, but they were not statistically significant. Taken together, the results highlight the prodrug as a novel lead compound candidate for the treatment of P. vivax malaria and as a blocker of malaria transmission.

Pharmacokinetics of hydroxymethylnitrofurazone and its parent drug nitrofurazone in rabbits.

The prodrug hydroximethylnitrofurazone (NFOH) presents antichagasic activity with greatly reduced toxicity compared to its drug matrix nitrofurazone (NF). Besides these new characteristics, the prodrug was more active against the parasite T. cruzi amastigotes. These advantages make the prodrug a possible therapeutic alternative for the treatment of both acute and the chronic phase of Chagas disease. However, the knowledge of pharmacokinetic profile is crucial to evaluate the feasibility of a new drug. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the in vivo formation of NF from the NFOH single administration and to evaluate its pharmacokinetic profile and compared it to NF administration. A bioanalytical method to determine the NF and NFOH by LCMS/MS was developed and validated to perform these investigations. Male albino rabbits (n=15) received NF intravenously and orally in doses of 6.35 and 63.5 mg / kg respectively, and NFOH, 80.5 mg / kg orally. The serial blood samples were processed and analyzed by mass spectrometry. The system operated in positive and negative modes for the analites determination, under elution of the mobile phase 50:50 water: methanol. The administration of NFOH allowed the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters for the prodrug, and the NF obtained from NFOH administration. Using the pharmacokinetic profile obtained from the NF i.v. administration, the oral bioavailability of NF from the administered prodrug was obtained (60.1%) and, as a key parameter in a prodrug administration, should be considered in future studies. The i.v. and oral administrations of NF differ in the constant of elimination (0.04 vs 0.002) and elimination half-life (17.32 min vs 276.09 min) due to the low solubility of the drug that hinders the formation of molecular dispersions in the digestory tract. Still, there was observed no statistical differences were observed between the pharmacokinetic parameters of orally administered NF and NF obtained from NFOH. The calculated area under the curve (AUC 0-∞) showed that the exposure to the parental drug was fairly the same (844.79 vs 566.44) for NF and NF obtained from the prodrug administration. The tendency to higher NF's mean residence time (MRT) as observed in the prodrug administration (956.1 min vs 496.3 min) guarantees longer time for the action of the drug and it allows the expansion of the administration intervals. These findings, added with the beneficial characteristics of the prodrug encourage new efficacy tests towards the clinical use of NFOH.

Pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation of the use of ciprofloxacin on an isoniazid-rifampicin regimen in rabbits.

The combination of isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP) and pyrazinamide (PYR) is used in the treatment of tuberculosis. Although this treatment is effective in most clinical cases, the side-effects and the development of mycobacterium resistance have hindered its success. There is evidence that the combination of INH, RMP and ciprofloxacin (CIPRO) is useful in the treatment of tuberculosis. However, the influence of this drug combination on the hepatotoxicity of INH is unknown. In this study, the safety of combined INH, RMP and CIPRO was evaluated. Male albino rabbits (n = 20) were divided into four groups and subjected to multiple oral doses for 7 days according to the following treatments: water (group 1); 50 mg/kg INH (group 2); 50 mg/kg INH + 100 mg/kg RMP (group 3) and 50 mg/kg INH + 100 mg/kg RMP + 50 mg/kg CIPRO (group 4). Blood samples were taken before and after treatments for the determination of ALT, AST, ALP and bilirubin to assess hepatotoxicity. For pharmacokinetic analysis, serial blood samples were collected over 24 h on day 7 of treatment. Plasma concentrations of INH and acetylisoniazid (AcINH) were determined by HPLC. Biochemical parameters did not show any statistically significant differences between the groups that received the drug combinations. The pharmacokinetic profile of INH was also similar for both groups of combinations. These findings allow us to infer that the inclusion of CIPRO did not increase the risk of hepatotoxicity when compared with the classic combination of INH and RMP.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a primaquine prodrug without red blood cell membrane destabilization property.

Primaquine is an important therapeutic resource for malaria treatment and it has wide activity against several pathogens. The haematotoxicity of primaquine is the major problem for its therapeutic application. This effect is aggravated by repeated use at high doses and by the wide fluctuation of plasma levels after administration. The primaquine prodrug (Phe-Ala-PQ) was planned in order to modify the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of primaquine. The in vitro conversion of Phe-Ala-PQ to primaquine, and the primaquine pharmacokinetics were evaluated in four groups of rats: two groups that received a single dose of Phe-Ala-PQ, one by intravenous and the other by gavage route, and two other groups that received primaquine diphosphate, by intravenous and gavage routes. In addition, the erythrocyte osmotic fragility was compared in two groups of rats that received multiple doses of primaquine diphosphate or Phe-Ala-PQ, as a parameter of haematotoxicity. The in vitro conversion of Phe-Ala-PQ to primaquine by plasma enzyme action was observed. The pharmacokinetic profile of primaquine from Phe-Ala-PQ was more favourable due to the lower fluctuation of plasma concentrations. Haematotoxicity was not evidenced in the prodrug administration. The results reinforce the need for further studies with this prodrug, promising an alternative in the therapeutic use of primaquine.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a new diclofenac prodrug without gastroulcerogenic effect.

Gastrotoxicity is a major problem for long-term therapy with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). DICCIC (1-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)indolin-2-one) is a new diclofenac prodrug, which has proven anti-inflammatory activity without gastroulcerogenic effect. The aim of this work was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of diclofenac from DICCIC (7.6 mg/kg equivalent to 8.1 mg/kg diclofenac) and diclofenac (8.1 mg/kg) administration in Wistar rats weighing 250-300 g (n=20). The doses were calculated by interspecific allometric scaling based on the 2 mg/kg from diary human dose of diclofenac. Blood samples were collected in heparinized tubes via the femoral artery through the implanted catheter. The plasma was separated and quantitation was made in a HPLC system with a UV-Vis detector. The confidence limits of the bioanalytical method were appropriate for its application in a preclinical pharmacokinetic study. The AUC of diclofenac from DICCIC (53.7± 5.8 ug/mL.min) was significantly less (Mann Whitney test, p<0.05) than that of diclofenac from diclofenac administration (885.9 ± 124,8 ug/mL.min). Terminal half-life of diclofenac from DICCIC (50.1 ± 17.2 min) was significantly less (Mann Whitney test, p<0.05) than that of diclofenac from diclofenac administration (247.4 ± 100.9 min). Still the parameters clearance and distribution volume were calculated for diclofenac from diclofenac, whose results were 9.2 ±1.2 mL/min.kg and 3.3 ±1.2 L/kg, respectively. The results of DICCIC from DICCIC administration were 108.9 ± 19.6 mL/min.kg and 7.8 ± 2.4 L/kg for clearance and distribution volume, respectively. The pharmacokinetic profile demonstrated that there was an increase in diclofenac elimination and a lower exposure to diclofenac with administration of DICCIC compared to diclofenac.