Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Psychol ; 12: 781220, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35095664

RESUMEN

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the public has often expressed great appreciation toward medical personnel who were often shown in the media expressing strong emotions about the situation. To examine whether the perception of people on a physician is in fact influenced by whether the physician treats patients with COVID-19 and the emotions they expressed in response to the situation, 454 participants were recruited in May 2020. Participants saw facial expressions of anger, sadness, happiness, and neutrality which supposedly were shown by physicians who were presented as working either in COVID-19 wards or in an internal medicine ward. Participants rated how competent, empathetic, caring, and likable each physician was, to what degree they would wish to be treated by each physician, and what salary each physician deserved. Physicians treating patients with COVID-19 were seen more positively and as deserving higher pay; they appeared more competent, caring, likable, and were more likely to be chosen as a caregiver compared to physicians not treating patients with COVID-19. The expressed emotions of physicians had a strong impact on how they were perceived, yet this effect was largely unrelated to whether they treated patients with COVID-19 or not such that happy physicians seemed more empathetic, caring, and likable than the physicians who showed negative emotions. Positive regard toward physicians treating patients with COVID-19 was associated with the fact that they were seen as saving lives and not due to the risk imposed by their work.

2.
Front Psychol ; 11: 585242, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33281681

RESUMEN

To avoid contagion, we need information about the health status of those whom we engage with. This is especially important when we have cause for concern that the other is indeed sick, such as is the case during the world-wide outbreak of the coronavirus in 2020. In three studies, one conducted several years before the pandemic, and two during the pandemic, we showed that facial expressions of emotions are used as signals of health status. Specifically, happy expressers are perceived as healthier than expressers showing negative emotions or neutrality (Studies 1-3), whereas anger was interpreted as a signal of ill health (Study 3). Importantly, however, facial expressions affected health perception only when there was a prior reason to suspect ill health. This was the case for older expressers before and after the pandemic for whom age-related stereotypes set expectations of ill health and for all ages during a wide-spread pandemic, which extends this suspicion to everyone. In Study 3, we showed that the effect of emotion expressions was also generalized to the physical distance that the observer wishes to keep from the expresser. Overall, this research is the first to show a role of emotion expressions in informing health perception.

3.
Arch Suicide Res ; 24(3): 355-366, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31213144

RESUMEN

Therapists' intense negative emotional responses regarding suicidal patients raise questions about therapists' willingness to treat them; however, this issue has yet to be investigated. The aim of the current study is to examine to what extent the severity of suicidality of a hypothetical patient will influence therapists' willingness to treat and the likelihood of their referring out. Mental health professionals (N = 249) completed a questionnaire that presented a vignette of a hypothetical patient referred for psychological treatment. The vignette contained a manipulation of the severity of suicidality levels of the referred patient, with two randomly assigned conditions: suicidal or depressive symptoms. Participants were then asked about their willingness to treat the hypothetical patient. Our results showed that willingness to treat was significantly lower and the likelihood of referring out was significantly higher among therapists in the suicidal patient condition, relative to the depressive patient condition. Longer professional seniority and previous training in suicide prevention moderated these effects. Our findings highlighted therapists' reluctance, especially among young practitioners, to treat suicidal patients, an inclination that may have a critical impact on patient suicidal outcomes. Findings reinforced the need for specific training on suicide prevention in the mental health curriculum.


Asunto(s)
Control de la Conducta , Depresión , Prevención del Suicidio , Suicidio , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Control de la Conducta/métodos , Control de la Conducta/psicología , Contratransferencia , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Psiquiatría Preventiva/educación , Psiquiatría Preventiva/métodos , Competencia Profesional , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psiquiatría/métodos , Intervención Psicosocial/métodos , Procesos Psicoterapéuticos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Ideación Suicida , Suicidio/psicología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...