Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 148
Filtrar
1.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 70(6): 523-541, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37337320

RESUMEN

Campylobacter is a major cause of food poisoning and is typically the most common cause of gastroenteritis in the UK. Data collected at broiler farm and abattoir level, for slaughter batches that were sampled for UK-wide monitoring, were used to generate two epidemiological risk factor models. A total of 483 batches slaughtered between January 2016 and March 2017 were used in the analysis, coming from 19 abattoirs representing more than 85% of UK broiler production. For each selected slaughter batch, one carcase was sampled after primary chilling and 10 randomly sampled birds had caecal samples collected at the evisceration point. Samples were used for Campylobacter identification and quantification. Two multivariable mixed-effects models were designed, one with the binary outcome for the detection of a highly contaminated (>1000 colony forming units (CFU)/g) Campylobacter-positive carcase, whereas the other used the Campylobacter colony count (CFU/g) carcase outcome. The results suggest that caecal colonization within the batch was a key factor for the occurrence of Campylobacter on carcases, and many factors that were identified in the model were also likely to be related to colonization or related to the risk of introduction of Campylobacter from partial depopulation (referred to as thinning) of ~30% of the flock approximately 1 week before full flock depopulation events. The amount of neck skin in the sample was another key factor identified and was included in both models as a risk factor. The models have also identified other factors which may be related to the general health and husbandry on-farm (use of prebiotics or vaccines, and identification of the product used for drinking line cleaning), whereas the other factors may identify control points related to transmission within a farm. The identification of these variables could help focus control efforts on-farm, especially for relatively easy improvements, such as improving the provision of house-specific bird-weighing buckets/cages in houses.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Campylobacter , Campylobacter , Animales , Microbiología de Alimentos , Pollos , Infecciones por Campylobacter/epidemiología , Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Factores de Riesgo , Mataderos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
3.
J Small Anim Pract ; 60(6): 329-339, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31025713

RESUMEN

There is a recent trend to feed pet dogs and cats in Britain and other developed countries on raw meat and animal by-products using either commercial preparations or home recipes. This shift from heat-treated processed food has been driven by perceived health benefits to pets and a suspicion of industrially produced pet food. The diets of wild-living related species have been used as a rationale for raw feeding, but differences in biology and lifestyle impose limitations on such comparisons. Formal evidence does exist for claims by raw-feeding proponents of an altered intestinal microbiome and (subjectively) improved stool quality. However, there is currently neither robust evidence nor identified plausible mechanisms for many of the wide range of other claimed benefits. There are documented risks associated with raw feeding, principally malnutrition (inexpert formulation and testing of diets) and infection affecting pets and/or household members. Surveys in Europe and North America have consistently found Salmonella species in a proportion of samples, typically of fresh-frozen commercial diets. Another emerging issue concerns the risk of introducing antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Raw pet food commonly exceeds hygiene thresholds for counts of Enterobacteriaceae. These bacteria often encode resistance to critically important antibiotics such as extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and raw-fed pets create an elevated risk of shedding such resistant bacteria. Other infectious organisms that may be of concern include Listeria, shiga toxigenic E scherichia coli , parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii and exotic agents such as the zoonotic livestock pathogen Brucella suis, recently identified in European Union and UK raw pet meat imported from Argentina.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos , Enfermedades de los Perros , Animales , Gatos , Dieta , Perros , Europa (Continente) , Zoonosis
4.
Epidemiol Infect ; 146(15): 1909-1915, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099969

RESUMEN

Salmonella prevalence in UK pigs is amongst the highest in Europe, highlighting the need to investigate pig farms which have managed to maintain a low Salmonella seroprevalence. A total of 19 pig farms that had a consistently low (<10%) seroprevalence over 4 years (named Platinum farms) were compared against 38 randomly selected Control farms, chosen to match the same distribution of production types and geographical distribution of the Platinum farms. Each farm was visited and floor faeces and environmental samples were collected. It was shown that Control farms had a significantly higher median percentage of pooled faecal samples positive for Salmonella compared with the Platinum farms (12.1% and 0.4% for pooled faecal samples, respectively) and were more likely to have serovars of public health importance detected (S. Typhimurium/ monophasic variants or S. Enteritidis). Considering the comprehensive on-farm sampling, the identification of farms negative for Salmonella, along with the identification of those that had maintained low prevalence over a long period is important. The risk factor analyses identified pelleted feed, feed deliveries crossing farm perimeter and regular antibiotic use as associated with being a Control farm. Performance data indicated that Platinum farms were performing better for slaughter live weight than Controls. Limited assessments of available pig movement records suggested that the source of pigs was not key to Platinum status, but further study would be needed to confirm this finding. These results emphasise that maintaining very low prevalence on UK farms is achievable.


Asunto(s)
Granjas , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Heces/microbiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Salmonella/clasificación , Serogrupo , Porcinos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
5.
Epidemiol Infect ; 146(4): 409-422, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29415790

RESUMEN

In this retrospective study, we describe and analyse Salmonella data from four livestock species in Great Britain between 1983 and 2014, focusing on Salmonella Typhimurium. A total of 96 044 Salmonella isolates were obtained during the study period. S. Typhimurium was the predominant serovar isolated from cattle and pigs and represented 40.7% (18 455/45 336) and 58.3% (4495/7709) of isolates from these species respectively, while it only accounted for 6.7% (2114/31 492) of chicken isolates and 8.1% (926/11 507) of turkey isolates. Over the study period, DT104 was the most common phage type in all four species; however, DT104 peaked in occurrence between 1995 and 1999, but is currently rare. Monophasic strains of S. Typhimurium represented less than 3% of all Salmonella isolates in cattle and chickens in 2014, but accounted for 10.4% of all turkey isolates and 39.0% of all pig isolates in the same year. Salmonella isolates were tested for their in vitro susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials. Antimicrobial resistance of S. Typhimurium isolates is largely influenced by the dominance of specific phage types at a certain time, which are commonly associated with particular resistance patterns. Changes in resistance patterns over time were analysed and compared between species.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Ganado/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella typhimurium/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Tipificación de Bacteriófagos , Bovinos/microbiología , Pollos/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Retrospectivos , Serotipificación , Porcinos/microbiología , Pavos/microbiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(10): 1983-1992, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28502264

RESUMEN

Anecdotal evidence has suggested that outdoor-kept pigs show an improvement to health and productivity after being moved to a new site. This study explores whether Salmonella occurrence reduced and was sustained after moving to a new site. Nine farms were followed for a year in which four sampling visits were completed. The highest detection of Salmonella was from pooled faecal dropping from pigs, run-off/ pooled water, rodents and wild birds. Descriptive summaries showed that the prevalence of both all Salmonella and serovars of public health importance were lower at all visits after the move. Some variability was shown in results from individual farms, but a year after the move, six farms still maintained a lower prevalence. A risk factor model showed that the prevalence at visits 2 and 3 after the move was significantly lower than baseline, after accounting for a number of significant factors that were included in the model. These were sample type and seasonality (included as a priori), presence of coughing in the sampled group and Glasser's disease on the farm, and the use of tent or kennel accommodation. This finding provides important evidence that more frequent site moves may help reduce Salmonella prevalence in outdoor herds.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella/fisiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Estudios Longitudinales , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Estaciones del Año , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Transportes , Reino Unido/epidemiología
7.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 64(1): 1-13, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26853216

RESUMEN

The control of Salmonella enterica in pig production is necessary for both public and animal health. The persistent and frequently asymptomatic nature of porcine Salmonella infection and the organism's abilities to colonize other animal species and to survive in the environment mean that effective control generally requires multiple measures. Vaccination is one such measure, and the present review considers its role and its future, drawing on studies in pigs from the 1950s to the present day. Once established in the body as an intracellular infectious agent, Salmonella can evade humoral immunity, which goes some way to explaining the often disappointing performance of inactivated Salmonella vaccines. More recent approaches, using mucosal presentation of antigens, live vaccines and adjuvants to enhance cell-mediated immunity, have met with more success. Vaccination strategies that involve stimulating both passive immunity from the dam plus active immunity in offspring appear to be most efficacious, although either approach alone can yield significant control of Salmonella. Problems that remain include relatively poor control of Salmonella serovars that are dissimilar to the vaccine antigen mix, and difficulties in measuring and predicting the performance of candidate vaccines in ways that are highly relevant to their likely use in commercial production.


Asunto(s)
Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Salmonella/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control , Animales , Porcinos , Zoonosis
8.
Avian Pathol ; 45(5): 559-68, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27171857

RESUMEN

Data on husbandry practices, performance, disease and drug use were collected during a cross-sectional survey of 89 poultry meat farms in England and Wales to provide information on possible risk factors for the occurrence of fluoroquinolone (FQ)-resistant bacteria. Faeces samples were used to classify farms as "affected" or "not affected" by FQ-resistant (FQr) Escherichia coli or Campylobacter spp. Risk factor analysis identified the use of FQ on the farms as having by far the strongest association, among the factors considered, with the occurrence of FQr bacteria. Resistant E. coli and/or Campylobacter spp. were found on 86% of the farms with a history of FQ use. However, a substantial proportion of farms with no history of FQ use also yielded FQr organisms, suggesting that resistant bacteria may transfer between farms. Further analysis suggested that for Campylobacter spp., on-farm hygiene, cleaning and disinfection between batches of birds and wildlife control were of most significance. By contrast, for E. coli biosecurity from external contamination was of particular importance, although the modelling indicated that other factors were likely to be involved. Detailed studies on a small number of sites showed that FQr E. coli can survive routine cleaning and disinfection. It appears difficult to avoid the occurrence of resistant bacteria when FQ are used on a farm, but the present findings provide evidence to support recommendations to reduce the substantial risk of the incidental acquisition of such resistance by farms where FQ are not used.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Campylobacter/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Aves de Corral/microbiología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Estudios Transversales , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Granjas , Heces/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Gales/epidemiología
9.
Avian Pathol ; 45(5): 576-81, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27207299

RESUMEN

In 2010, 81 confirmed cases of Salmonella Typhimurium DT8 were reported across England and Northern Ireland - an increase of 26% from 2009 and 41% since 2008. Five cases were hospitalized and one death reported, with a strong association found between cases and the consumption of duck eggs. Once present on farms, Salmonella may become persistent and can survive for long periods of time in residual organic matter, increasing risk of infection for follow-on flocks if cleaning and disinfection is not carried out effectively. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a range of disinfectants used by the duck industry against Salmonella using laboratory models. Sixteen products were selected from seven chemical groups and the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations determined. Each product was also tested at the recommended general orders (GO) concentration using a faecal suspension model to mimic boot dips and a surface contamination model to simulate contaminated building fabric and equipment. In the faecal suspension model, all products were effective at 2 × GO concentration, and activity was more inconsistent at GO concentration. At 0.5 × GO concentration, iodine-based and quaternary-ammonium-compound-based products were significantly less effective than products within other chemical groups (P < 0.001). Glutaraldehyde-based products were significantly more effective than the other products in the surface contamination tests (P < 0.001). Chlorocresol-based products were found to be most effective for use in boot dips and aldehyde-based products for surface disinfection, although there was variability between products within a chemical group.


Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes/farmacología , Patos/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella typhimurium/efectos de los fármacos , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Desinfección , Inglaterra , Heces/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/veterinaria , Modelos Teóricos , Óvulo/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología
10.
Avian Pathol ; 45(2): 261-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27100154

RESUMEN

Salmonella infection causes a significant number of cases of gastroenteritis and more serious illnesses in people in the UK and EU. The serovars Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium are most frequently associated with foodborne illness in Europe. Whilst control programmes exist to monitor these serovars in the chicken and turkey sectors, no regulatory programme is currently in place for the duck sector. A voluntary industry scheme (Duck Assurance Scheme) was launched in the UK in 2010. Hatcheries act as focal points of Salmonella contamination, in particular if Salmonella-contaminated eggs from positive breeding farms enter the hatchery. Five duck hatcheries were visited in this study and four were positive for Salmonella. S. Typhimurium DT8 and S. Indiana were isolated from hatchery 1 and S. Typhimurium DT41 and S. Senftenberg were isolated from hatchery 3. S. Kottbus, S. Bovismorbificans and S. Senftenberg were isolated from hatchery 2 and S. Kedougou was isolated from hatchery 4. Advice on the control/elimination of Salmonella was provided at each visit and a longitudinal study was undertaken to monitor its effectiveness. Extensive sampling was carried out in the hatcheries visited and the tray wash area and waste/external areas had the highest probability of being contaminated. The hatcher area was also found to be a primary focus of contamination. Improvements of farm and hatchery biosecurity standards have resulted in a reduction of hatchery contamination in this study and in previous investigations. Hatcheries 1 and 5 were cleared of Salmonella, demonstrating that elimination of Salmonella contamination from duck hatcheries is achievable.


Asunto(s)
Patos/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella enteritidis/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Femenino , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Óvulo/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Reino Unido/epidemiología
11.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 82(8): 2347-2355, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26873321

RESUMEN

The genetic diversity of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coliisolates from commercial broiler farms was examined by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), with an assessment of the impact of the sample type and laboratory method on the genotypes of Campylobacter isolated. A total of 645C. jejuniand 106C. coli isolates were obtained from 32 flocks and 17 farms, with 47 sequence types (STs) identified. The Campylobacter jejuniisolates obtained by different sampling approaches and laboratory methods were very similar, with the same STs identified at similar frequencies, and had no major effect on the genetic profile of Campylobacter population in broiler flocks at the farm level. ForC. coli, the results were more equivocal. While some STs were widely distributed within and among farms and flocks, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed a high degree of genetic diversity among farms forC. jejuni, where farm effects accounted for 70.5% of variance, and among flocks from the same farm (9.9% of variance for C. jejuni and 64.1% forC. coli). These results show the complexity of the population structure of Campylobacterin broiler production and that commercial broiler farms provide an ecological niche for a wide diversity of genotypes. The genetic diversity of C. jejuni isolates among broiler farms should be taken into account when designing studies to understand Campylobacter populations in broiler production and the impact of interventions. We provide evidence that supports synthesis of studies on C. jejuni populations even when laboratory and sampling methods are not identical.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Campylobacter coli/clasificación , Campylobacter jejuni/clasificación , Pollos/microbiología , Variación Genética , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Animales , Infecciones por Campylobacter/microbiología , Campylobacter coli/genética , Campylobacter coli/aislamiento & purificación , Campylobacter jejuni/genética , Campylobacter jejuni/aislamiento & purificación , Genotipo , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus
12.
Epidemiol Infect ; 144(7): 1538-49, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26586451

RESUMEN

An abattoir-based study was undertaken between January and May 2013 to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella spp. and Yersinia spp. carriage and seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv) in UK pigs at slaughter. In total, 626 pigs were sampled at 14 abattoirs that together process 80% of the annual UK pig slaughter throughput. Sampling was weighted by abattoir throughput and sampling dates and pig carcasses were randomly selected. Rectal swabs, blood samples, carcass swabs and the whole caecum, tonsils, heart and tongue were collected. Salmonella spp. was isolated from 30·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 26·5-34·6] of caecal content samples but only 9·6% (95% CI 7·3-11·9) of carcass swabs, which was significantly lower than in a UK survey in 2006-2007. S. Typhimurium and S. 4,[5],12:i:- were the most commonly isolated serovars, followed by S. Derby and S. Bovismorbificans. The prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica carriage in tonsils was 28·7% (95% CI 24·8-32·7) whereas carcass contamination was much lower at 1·8% (95% CI 0·7-2·8). The seroprevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii and PRRSv was 7·4% (95% CI 5·3-9·5) and 58·3% (95% CI 53·1-63·4), respectively. This study provides a comparison to previous abattoir-based prevalence surveys for Salmonella and Yersinia, and the first UK-wide seroprevalence estimates for antibodies to Toxoplasma and PRRSv in pigs at slaughter.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Respiratorio y de la Reproducción Porcina/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Toxoplasmosis Animal/epidemiología , Yersiniosis/veterinaria , Mataderos , Animales , Anticuerpos Antiprotozoarios/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Síndrome Respiratorio y de la Reproducción Porcina/virología , Virus del Síndrome Respiratorio y Reproductivo Porcino/aislamiento & purificación , Prevalencia , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología , Toxoplasma/aislamiento & purificación , Toxoplasmosis Animal/parasitología , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Yersinia/aislamiento & purificación , Yersiniosis/epidemiología , Yersiniosis/microbiología
13.
Br Poult Sci ; 56(3): 315-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26035643

RESUMEN

1. The objective of this study was to identify any issues arising during the laboratory testing of samples collected under the National Control Programme for Salmonella. 2. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Defra (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)-approved testing laboratories in order to identify any complicating factors that the laboratories may encounter during the processing of samples. 3. Samples were reported to arrive in good condition and within the specified time frame after collection. The only concern was that new clients may be unaware of the procedure or correct sampling consumables to use. 4. There was evidence of variability between laboratories regarding the sample testing procedure used, with deviation from the guidelines in some cases. 5. This finding suggests that further guidance for laboratories on methodology is likely to be beneficial as this could help improve the detection of low levels of Salmonella.


Asunto(s)
Pollos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/diagnóstico , Salmonelosis Animal/diagnóstico , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Pavos , Animales , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
14.
Br Poult Sci ; 56(1): 48-57, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654335

RESUMEN

1. The onset and progression of Salmonella infections was investigated in commercial turkey flocks from placement at 1 d old until slaughter in "brood and move" systems using a longitudinal observational approach based on faeces and environmental sampling with subsequent culture of Salmonella. 2. Persistent Salmonella Newport contamination was found within rearing houses and on their external concrete aprons after cleaning and disinfection between crops of heavily shedding young birds. 3. Salmonella shedding was often detected by 5 d of age and the frequency of positive samples peaked at 14-35 d. Thereafter Salmonella isolations declined, especially in the later (fattening) stages. Samples were still Salmonella-positive at low prevalence in half of the intensively sampled houses at slaughter age. 4. A number of management interventions to combat Salmonella infection of flocks, including sourcing policy, competitive exclusion cultures and cleaning and disinfection, were inadequate to prevent flock infection, although improved disinfection on one unit was associated with a delay in the onset of flock infection.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología Ambiental , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Pavos , Animales , Desinfección , Heces/microbiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Prevalencia , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
15.
Epidemiol Infect ; 143(8): 1681-91, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25266772

RESUMEN

There has been a rapid rise in the prevalence of cases of monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium (mST) in both humans and farm animals, and it has been found in pigs, cattle and poultry. It is therefore vital to have a good understanding of how to efficiently detect infected farms. The objective of this project was to determine sample type sensitivity in the detection of Salmonella to detect infected groups of animals on both pig (breeder, grower and finisher sites) and cattle (beef and dairy) farms, using data collected from a study investigating farms that were positive for mST, and to explore any variation between different age groups and management practices. A Bayesian approach in the absence of a gold standard was adopted to analyse the individual and pooled faecal sample data collected from each epidemiological group on each of the farms. The sensitivity of pooled sampling depended on the prevalence of infection in the group being sampled, with a higher prevalence leading to higher sensitivity. Pooled sampling was found to be more efficient at detecting positive groups of animals than individual sampling, with the probability of a random sample from a group of animals with 5% prevalence testing positive being equal to 15·5% for immature pigs (3·6% for an individual faecal sample, taking into account the sensitivity and infection prevalence), 7·1% for adult pigs (1·2% for individual sampling), 30% for outdoor cattle (2% for individual sampling) and 34% for indoor cattle (1% for individual sampling). The mean prevalence of each epidemiological group was higher in outdoor farms than indoor for both pigs and cattle (mean within-farm prevalence of 29·4% and 38·7% for outdoor pigs and cattle, respectively, compared to 19·8% and 22·1% for indoor pigs and cattle).


Asunto(s)
Heces/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/diagnóstico , Salmonella typhimurium/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Teorema de Bayes , Bovinos , Prevalencia , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Porcinos
16.
Prev Vet Med ; 117(3-4): 542-53, 2014 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25443396

RESUMEN

All European Union (EU) Member States (MSs) were required to conduct a baseline survey from October 2006 to September 2007 to estimate the prevalence of Salmonella infection in finisher pigs at slaughter. In the United Kingdom (UK), samples for microbiological culture were collected from the ileo-caecal lymph nodes, from carcass swabs and from caecal contents. Meat juice samples were also collected for testing in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (MJE) to detect a serological response. Salmonella was isolated from 22% (CI95% 19-25%) of ileo-caecal lymph nodes, 15% (CI95% 12-18%) of carcass swabs and 22% (CI95% 19-26%) of caecal contents. A quarter (25%, CI95% 22-29%) of MJE samples were positive for Salmonella antibodies (cut-off, S/P≥0.25). The most frequently identified serovars were Salmonella typhimurium (57%) and Salmonella derby (26%). The results were used to investigate some factors associated with Salmonella infection in slaughter pigs. The weight of the carcass was significant, with a lower probability of obtaining a positive meat juice result from pigs with a weight greater than 75 kg (p=0.03). The weight of the lymph node sample was significantly associated with Salmonella status, with a heavier sample of lymph nodes being more likely to be positive (OR=2.16 CI95% 1.07-4.39). 'Carcass weight' in two of the classes - 75-79 kg and 80-84 kg - (OR=0.44 CI95% 0.28-0.70; OR=0.64 CI95% 0.49-0.85) and 'fewer-than-1500-pigs' scheduled for slaughter on the day of sampling' (OR=0.41 CI95% 0.24-0.71) were also associated with a reduced risk of isolating Salmonella from lymph node. The model for carcass swabs showed a positive association with 'time-elapsed-since-the-start-of-the-line' indicating a higher risk of contamination as the day progressed (p<0.01). This model also showed positive association between isolation of Salmonella from a carcass swab and the occurrence of Salmonella in caecal contents from the same pig (OR=2.22 CI95% 1.38-3.59) and a negative association with time in singeing units (OR=0.88 CI95% 0.79-0.98).


Asunto(s)
Mataderos , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/análisis , Ciego/microbiología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Carne/microbiología , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Reino Unido/epidemiología
17.
Br Poult Sci ; 55(5): 559-68, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25350726

RESUMEN

High standards of biosecurity are known to reduce the risk of disease outbreaks; however, uptake of advice and implementation of biosecurity measures are dependent on many factors. This study assessed the uptake of targeted biosecurity advice by 60 laying hen farms provided during biosecurity audit visits. Advice was provided as bullet point cards focusing on specific areas identified as benefitting from improvement. These covered site entrance, site tidiness, vaccination, boot hygiene, hand hygiene, house tidiness, rodent control, fly control, red mite control and cleaning and disinfection between flocks. Background knowledge of Salmonella and biosecurity and farmers' willingness and intent to implement additional measures were assessed. About 50% of the principal decision-makers had basic background knowledge of Salmonella, with 22% considered well informed; almost all agreed that biosecurity could impact on Salmonella control and many appeared willing to implement additional biosecurity measures. Sixty-three per cent of study farms were categorised using the Defra Farmer Segmentation Model as Modern Family Businesses (MFBs), with 7-11% of farms being categorised as Custodian, Lifestyle Choice, Pragmatist or Challenged Enterprise; however, categorisation, did not determine uptake of advice. The most frequently used advice cards were boot hygiene, red mite control, hand hygiene, site entrance and cleaning and disinfection; uptake of advice ranged from 54 to 80% depending on the advice card. Uptake of advice by the farmers was encouraging, especially considering it was being provided by people other than their usual source of biosecurity information. Those who did not implement the recommended measures cited cost, difficulty of enforcement and practicality as the main reasons. However, the positive uptake of advice and implementation of recommended measures by many farmers demonstrates that targeted advice, discussed face to face with farmers, on a small number of key areas, is a potentially effective method of providing biosecurity information to complement more lengthy formal advisory reports.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Pollos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella/fisiología , Medidas de Seguridad , Animales , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Gales
18.
Br Poult Sci ; 55(5): 569-75, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25350727

RESUMEN

In line with European legislation and the UK National Control Programme for Salmonella, poultry farms are sampled to establish their Salmonella status. Regular samples are collected by the farmer (operator), with annual routine (official) samples being collected by the competent authority to verify achievement of the Salmonella programme reduction target. To confirm sampling was being carried out effectively, a questionnaire-based survey was conducted. The aim was to identify any complicating factors the samplers encountered and the decisions made in these circumstances. There was good compliance with the official sampling visits, with few delays reported. However, farm-specific clothing/separate boots for non-caged houses were rarely provided by the operator, whereas boot dips and hand washing facilities were usually available. The collection of dust was often a problem for official samplers, operator boot swabs were not always moistened before sampling and both sampler groups did not always follow the recommended method for the collection of faeces from belts and scrapers. Overall, there was a good application of the sampling protocol, although a few areas for improvement were identified.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Pollos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/prevención & control , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Salmonella/fisiología , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Animales , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
19.
Zoonoses Public Health ; 61(1): 18-27, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23398774

RESUMEN

Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is one of the most prevalent causes for human gastroenteritis and is by far the predominant Salmonella serovar among human cases, followed by Salmonella Typhimurium. Contaminated eggs produced by infected laying hens are thought to be the main source of human infection with S. Enteritidis throughout the world. Although previous studies have looked at the proportion of infected eggs from infected flocks, there is still uncertainty over the rate at which infected birds produce contaminated eggs. The aim of this study was to estimate the rate at which infected birds produce contaminated egg shells and egg contents. Data were collected from two studies, consisting of 15 and 20 flocks, respectively. Faecal and environmental sampling and testing of ovaries/caeca from laying hens were carried out in parallel with (i) for the first study, testing 300 individual eggs, contents and shells together and (ii) for the second study, testing 4000 eggs in pools of six, with shells and contents tested separately. Bayesian methods were used to estimate the within-flock prevalence of infection from the faecal and hen post-mortem data, and this was related to the proportion of positive eggs. Results indicated a linear relationship between the rate of contamination of egg contents and the prevalence of infected chickens, but a nonlinear (quadratic) relationship between infection prevalence and the rate of egg shell contamination, with egg shell contamination occurring at a much higher rate than that of egg contents. There was also a significant difference in the rate of egg contamination between serovars, with S. Enteritidis causing a higher rate of contamination of egg contents and a lower rate of contamination of egg shells compared to non-S. Enteritidis serovars. These results will be useful for risk assessments of human exposure to Salmonella-contaminated eggs.


Asunto(s)
Pollos/microbiología , Huevos/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Ciego/microbiología , Cáscara de Huevo/microbiología , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Microbiología de Alimentos , Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/microbiología , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Ovario/microbiología , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología
20.
Epidemiol Infect ; 142(5): 1061-9, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24020913

RESUMEN

A key element of national control programmes (NCPs) for Salmonella in commercial laying flocks, introduced across the European Union, is the identification of infected flocks and holdings through statutory sampling. It is therefore important to know the sensitivity of the sampling methods, in order to design effective and efficient surveillance for Salmonella. However, improved Salmonella control in response to the NCP may have influenced key factors that determine the sensitivity of the sampling methods used to detect Salmonella in NCPs. Therefore the aim of this study was to compare estimates of the sensitivity of the sampling methods using data collected before and after the introduction of the NCP, using Bayesian methods. There was a large reduction in the sensitivity of dust in non-cage flocks between the pre-NCP studies (81% of samples positive in positive flocks) and post-NCP studies (10% of samples positive in positive flocks), leading to the conclusion that sampling dust is not recommended for detection of Salmonella in non-cage flocks. However, cage dust (43% of samples positive in positive flocks) was found to be more sensitive than cage faeces (29% of samples positive in positive flocks). To have a high probability of detection, several NCP-style samples need to be used. For confirmation of Salmonella, five NCP faecal samples for cage flocks, and three NCP faecal boot swab samples for non-cage flocks would be required to have the equivalent sensitivity of the EU baseline survey method, which was estimated to have an 87% and 75% sensitivity to detect Salmonella at a 5% within-flock prevalence in cage and non-cage flocks, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Microbiología Ambiental , Modelos Biológicos , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Aves de Corral/microbiología , Salmonelosis Animal/diagnóstico , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Animales , Teorema de Bayes , Huevos/microbiología , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Heces/microbiología , Aves de Corral/microbiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...