Socioeconomic status as an independent risk factor for severe late bowel toxicity after primary radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of and risk factors for severe late bowel toxicity after curative radiotherapy in women treated for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Included were 515 women treated for locally advanced cervical cancer with primary radiotherapy with curative intent from 1992 to 2013. Bowel toxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Associations between risk factors and severe late bowel toxicity were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 78months. Fifty-nine patients developed severe late bowel toxicity. The actuarial 3-year and 5-year severe late bowel toxicity rates were both 13%. In the multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with severe late bowel toxicity were: smoking (HR 2.59 [1.48-4.55]), severe acute bowel toxicity (HR 2.46 [1.24-4.49]), previous major abdominal surgery (HR 2.35 [1.20-4.60]), hypertension (HR 2.33 [1.23-4.40]), parametrial boost (HR 2.18 [1.10-4.33]), low socioeconomic status (HR 2.05 [1.17-3.59]) and low BMI (HR 0.93 [0.88-0.99]). First symptoms of severe late bowel toxicity were reported after a median follow-up of 9months, but occurred up to 10years after end of treatment. Only one third of the patients with severe late bowel toxicity were referred to a gastroenterologist. CONCLUSIONS: Severe late bowel toxicity is a frequent complication of definitive radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Several independent risk factors were found which warrant further research. A standardized and structured approach in the early diagnostics and management of bowel toxicity is needed.

Postoperative single-dose interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy in therapy-resistant keloids.

PURPOSE: Patients with keloids complain of the cosmetic aspect, pain, and pruritus. Many different therapies are being used for keloids. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence rate and outcome after resection followed by a single-dose brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients treated by resection of the keloid plus a single dose of 13 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy were evaluated at least 1 year after treatment. Clinical response and cosmesis were assessed by a plastic surgeon and by the patients using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. RESULTS: Only 24 of the 61 invited patients responded to participate with the study; 29 keloids were evaluated. The recurrence rate was 24.1% after a median followup of 53 months (19-95 months). Patients scored on average 24.3 for their total Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score (range 6-52), whereas the observer scored on average 14.6 (range 6-42). CONCLUSIONS: This treatment has a higher recurrence rate than that reported in most other studies. This may be explained by differences in recurrence definition, differences in followup time among studies, and selection bias because of not contributing to the study. The cosmetic outcome for evaluated patients is relatively good. This treatment policy has the advantage that patients are treated in a single day.

Hearing loss in survivors of childhood head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma: a long-term follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the hearing status of survivors treated for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) at long-term follow-up. DESIGN: Cross-sectional long-term follow-up study. SETTING: Tertiary comprehensive cancer centre. PARTICIPANTS: Survivors treated for HNRMS during childhood in two concurrent cohorts; survivors in London had been treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT-based local therapy); survivors in Amsterdam were treated with AMORE (Ablative surgery, MOuld technique afterloading brachytherapy and surgical REconstruction) if feasible, otherwise EBRT (AMORE-based local therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed hearing status of HNRMS survivors at long-term follow-up. Hearing thresholds were obtained by pure-tone audiometry. METHODS: We assessed the hearing thresholds, the number of patients with clinically relevant hearing loss and hearing impairment graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAEv4) and Boston criteria. Furthermore, we compared hearing loss between survivors treated with EBRT-based local therapy (London) and AMORE-based local therapy (Amsterdam). RESULTS: Seventy-three survivors were included (median follow-up 11 years). We found clinically relevant hearing loss at speech frequencies in 19% of survivors. Multivariable analysis showed that survivors treated with EBRT-based treatment and those with parameningeal tumours had significantly more hearing impairment, compared to survivors treated with AMORE-based treatment and non-parameningeal tumours. CONCLUSIONS: One in five survivors of HNRMS developed clinically relevant hearing loss. AMORE-based treatment resulted in less hearing loss compared to EBRT-based treatment. As hearing loss was highly prevalent and also occurred in survivors with orbital primaries, we recommend systematic audiological follow-up in all HNRMS survivors.

Endocrine disorders among long-term survivors of childhood head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) survivors are at increased risk of developing pituitary dysfunction as an adverse event of radiotherapy. Our aim was to investigate the frequency and risk factors for pituitary dysfunction in these survivors. Secondly, we aimed to compare the prevalence of pituitary dysfunction between survivors treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and survivors treated with the ablative surgery, moulage technique after loading brachytherapy, and surgical reconstruction (AMORE) procedure. METHODS: Eighty HNRMS survivors treated in London (EBRT based) and Amsterdam (AMORE based: AMORE if feasible, otherwise EBRT) in the period 1990-2010 and alive ≥ 2 years post-treatment were evaluated. Survivors were evaluated in multidisciplinary late-effects clinics, with measurement of linear growth, determination of thyroid function, and growth hormone parameters. Additional data, such as baseline characteristics, anthropometrics, pubertal stage, and the results of additional laboratory investigations, were retrieved from patient charts. RESULTS: Pituitary dysfunction was diagnosed in 24 in 80 (30%) survivors, after a median follow-up time of 11 years. Median time to develop pituitary dysfunction after HNRMS diagnosis was 3.0 years. Risk factors were EBRT-based therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79-2.46), parameningeal tumour site (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.60-2.17) and embryonal RMS histology (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.19-1.90). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy used for the treatment of HNRMS confers a significant risk of the development of pituitary dysfunction. AMORE-based treatment in children with HNRMS resulted in less pituitary dysfunction than treatment with conventional EBRT. Our findings underscore the importance of routine early endocrine follow-up in this specific population.