Molecular Changes in Immunological Characteristics of Bone Marrow Multipotent Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Lymphoid Neoplasia.

Immune system and bone marrow stromal cells play an important role in maintaining normal hematopoiesis. Lymphoid neoplasia disturbs not only development of immune cells, but other immune response mechanisms as well. Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) of the bone marrow are involved in immune response regulation through both intercellular interactions and secretion of various cytokines. In hematological malignancies, the bone marrow stromal microenvironment, including MSCs, is altered. Aim of this study was to describe the differences of MSCs' immunological function in the patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In ALL, malignant cells arise from the early precursor cells localized in bone marrow, while in DLBCL they arise from more differentiated B-cells. In this study, only the DLBCL patients without bone marrow involvement were included. Growth parameters, surface marker expression, genes of interest expression, and secretion pattern of bone marrow MSCs from the patients with ALL and DLBCL at the onset of the disease and in remission were studied. MSCs from the healthy donors of corresponding ages were used as controls. It has been shown that concentration of MSCs in the bone marrow of the patients with ALL is reduced at the onset of the disease and is restored upon reaching remission; in the patients with DLBCL this parameter does not change. Proliferative capacity of MSCs did not change in the patients with ALL; however, the cells of the DLBCL patients both at the onset and in remission proliferated significantly faster than those from the donors. Expression of the membrane surface markers and expression of the genes important for differentiation, immunological status maintenance, and cytokine secretion differed significantly in the MSCs of the patients from those of the healthy donors and depended on nosology of the disease. Secretomes of the MSCs varied greatly; a number of proteins associated with immune response regulation, differentiation, and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells were depleted in the secretomes of the cells from the patients. Lymphoid neoplasia leads to dramatic changes in the functional immunological status of MSCs.

Kinetics of Recovery of Naïve and Memory T Cells in Acute Leukemia Patients after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Depending on Different GVHD Prophylaxis Regimens.

Background: Memory T cells are a heterogeneous population of immune cells that provide adaptive immunity. Its full recovery seems essential for graft-versus-tumor reactions that provide an opportunity for biological cure in patients with acute leukemia. The use of mismatched or haploidentical donors has increased, which has become possible because of modifications in graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Materials and Methods: Sixty-five leukemia patients (acute myeloid leukemia - 40, acute lymphoblastic leukemia - 25), median age 33 (17-61) years, underwent allo-HSCT from 2016 to 2019 in the National Research Centre for Hematology. Patients were divided into three groups based on the impact of GVHD prophylaxis on T cell recovery: horse antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-based regimen (n=32), horse ATG combined with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) (n=18), and ex vivo T cell depletion (n=15). Results: The early period after transplantation (before day +100) was characterized by significantly lower absolute numbers of T naïve, memory stem and T central memory cells in peripheral blood in patients after ATG+PT-Cy-regimen or ex vivo T cell depletion than after ATG-based prophylaxis (p<0.05). Moreover, strong depletion of naïve T and memory stem cells prevents the development of GVHD, and determining the absolute number of CD8+ naïve T and memory stem cells with a cutoff of 1.31 cells per microliter seems to be a perspective in assessing the risks of developing acute GVHD (p=0.008). The dynamics of T cell recovery showed the involvement of either circulating or bone marrow resident T effector cells shortly after allogeneic transplantation in all patients, but the use of manipulated grafts with ex vivo T cell depletion requires the involvement of naïve and memory stem cells. There was no significant effect of T cell recovery on leukemia relapse after allogeneic transplantation. Conclusion: These experimental outcomes contribute to providing the best understanding of immunological events that occur early after transplantation and help in the rational choice of GVHD prophylaxis in patients who will undergo allogeneic transplantation. Our study demonstrated the comparable immunological effects of posttransplant cyclophosphamide and ex vivo T cell depletion and immunological inefficiency of horse ATG for GVHD prevention.