Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Single-Institution Experience With a Collaborative Team.

BACKGROUND: Secondary to the complex care, involved specialty providers, and various etiologies, chronic pelvic pain patients do not receive holistic care. OBJECTIVE: To compare our general and neuromodulation cohorts based on referrals, diagnosis, and therapy and describe our neuromodulation patients. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team was established at our center. The intake coordinator assessed demographics and facilitated care of enrolled patients. Outcomes were compared using minimal clinical important difference of current Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) between patients with neuropathic pain who received neuromodulation and those who did not. The neuromodulation cohort completed outcome metrics at baseline and recent follow-up, including NRS score (best, worst, and current), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale. RESULTS: Over 7 yr, 233 patients were referred to our consortium and 153 were enrolled. A total of 55 patients had neuropathic pain and 44 of those were managed medically. Eleven underwent neuromodulation. A total of 45.5% patients of the neuromodulation cohort were classified as responders by minimal clinically important difference compared to 26.6% responders in the control cohort at most recent follow-up (median 25 and 33 mo, respectively). Outcome measures revealed improvement in NRS at worst (P = .007) and best (P = .025), ODI (P = .014), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale Rumination (P = .043). CONCLUSION: Eleven percent of patients were offered neuromodulation. There were more responders in the neuromodulation cohort than the conservatively managed neuropathic pain cohort. Neuromodulation patients showed significant improvement at 29 mo in NRS best and worst pain, disability, and rumination. We share our algorithm for patient management.

Physico-chemical stability of Plasma-Lyte 148® and Plasma-Lyte 148® + 5% Glucose with eight common intravenous medications.

BACKGROUND: Plasma-Lyte 148® is a balanced, crystalloid intravenous (IV) fluid which is both calcium-free and isotonic. It prevents the hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and iatrogenic hyponatremia seen with use of 0.9% sodium chloride and hypotonic solutions, respectively. However, data on compatibility with commonly used drugs are lacking. AIMS: To investigate the stability of Plasma-Lyte 148® and Plasma-Lyte 148® + 5% Glucose with eight commonly used therapeutic agents when compared with 5% glucose and 0.9% sodium chloride as diluents. We aimed to provide vital data which may facilitate the introduction of what appears to be a safer and more economic fluid. METHODS: Plasma-Lyte 148® and Plasma-Lyte 148® + 5% Glucose were mixed with morphine, midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, clonidine, aminophylline, salbutamol, and furosemide at set concentrations. Comparisons were made to 0.9% sodium chloride and 5% glucose fluid controls. Six repeats of each IV fluid and drug admixture were analyzed through high-performance liquid chromatography at three time points: 0, 2, and 24 hours. A concentration change of <5% was defined as chemically stable. Physical stability was assessed by observation of precipitate formation or color change. pH changes were measured using a Fisherbrand Hydrus 300 pH meter. RESULTS: Relative to starting concentration, all drugs except midazolam were stable to ±3%. All examined therapeutic agents were chemically stable at 2 and 24 hours relative to control solutions. No precipitate formed in any of the samples. All Plasma-Lyte 148® and Plasma-Lyte 148® + 5% Glucose drug admixtures remained in a safe, peripheral administration pH range of 5-9 and were closer to the pH of blood than standard fluid-drug admixtures. CONCLUSION: Morphine, fentanyl, ketamine, salbutamol, aminophylline, and clonidine are stable for 24 hours when mixed with Plasma-Lyte 148® and Plasma-Lyte 148®+5% Glucose for administration at concentrations equivalent to those found at a typical Y-site with maintenance fluid. Furosemide is stable at lower concentrations than those seen at a Y-site, but midazolam displayed instability.

Interictal Epileptiform Discharge Detection in EEG in Different Practice Settings.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to measure the performance of academic and private practice (PP) neurologists in detecting interictal epileptiform discharges in routine scalp EEG recordings. METHODS: Thirty-five EEG scorers (EEGers) participated (19 academic and 16 PP) and marked the location of ETs in 200 30-second EEG segments using a web-based EEG annotation system. All participants provided board certification status, years of Epilepsy Fellowship Training (EFT), and years in practice. The Persyst P13 automated IED detection algorithm was also run on the EEG segments for comparison. RESULTS: Academic EEGers had an average of 1.66 years of EFT versus 0.50 years of EFT for PP EEGers (P < 0.0001) and had higher rates of board certification. Inter-rater agreement for the 35 EEGers was fair. There was higher performance for EEGers in academics, with at least 1.5 years of EFT, and with American Board of Clinical Neurophysiology and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology-E specialty board certification. The Persyst P13 algorithm at its default setting (perception value = 0.4) did not perform as well at the EEGers, but at substantially higher perception value settings, the algorithm performed almost as well human experts. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-rater agreement among EEGers in both academic and PP settings varies considerably. Practice location, years of EFT, and board certification are associated with significantly higher performance for IED detection in routine scalp EEG. Continued medical education of PP neurologists and neurologists without EFT is needed to improve routine scalp EEG interpretation skills. The performance of automated detection algorithms is approaching that of human experts.

Correlation of seizure frequency and medication down-titration rate during video-EEG monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: The three important questions in video-EEG monitoring are (1) whether it is productive to monitor patients with low outpatient seizure frequency, (2) whether rapid down-titration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during EMU admission helps generate more recorded seizures, and (3) how long a patient who has not yet had a seizure should be monitored in the EMU. This study aimed to answer these three questions. METHODS: Preadmission seizure frequency, times of AED administration, and times of seizure occurrence were collected on all adult patients admitted to the EMU at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) between 2012 and 2014 - a total of 439 patients. The correlations between EMU seizure frequency and both (1) preadmission seizure frequency and (2) rate of antiepileptic drug (AED) down-titration were evaluated. The time of occurrence of seizures was evaluated. RESULTS: There was no correlation between patient-reported outpatient seizure frequency and EMU seizure frequency. In patients who were tapered off AEDs during monitoring, the rate of AED taper correlated with the EMU seizure frequency. Patients whose AEDs were more quickly tapered had higher EMU seizure frequencies. In order to record a first event in patients of unknown seizure type, approximately 3.5days of EMU monitoring was required. SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should not hesitate to admit patients with low preadmission seizure frequency to the EMU since many of these patients will have a seizure during monitoring. Faster AED down-titration in the EMU increases EMU seizure frequency. In patients who have not yet had a seizure in the EMU, monitoring should continue for at least four days.