RESUMEN
Background: To determine the superiority of the combination of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) in the same sitting over the individual modality alone in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures. Materials and Methods: A randomized study enrolled 60 adult patients with biliary strictures who were randomized into two groups: ERCP + DSOC and ERCP/DSOC. Histopathologic or cytologic assessment was performed in terms of benign, indeterminate, or malignant nature of the strictures. Procedural adverse events were documented. Accuracy in terms of sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), and predictive value [positive (PPV) and negative (NPV)] were noted. Results: As per final diagnosis, in ERCP/DSOC group, there were 12 (40%) benign cases and 18 (60%) malignant cases, and in group ERCP + DSOC, there were 8 (26.67%) benign cases and 22 (73.33%) malignant cases. ERCP/DSOC labeled 16 (53.33%) patients as benign, 8 (26.67%) as malignant, and 6 (20%) as indeterminate, while ERCP + DSOC labeled 8 (26.67%) as benign, 17 (56.67%) as malignant, and 5 (16.67%) as indeterminate. The Sn, Sp, PPV, and NPV of ERCP/DSOC were 44.4%, 75%, 100%, and 56.25%, and for ERCP + DSOC was 77.27%, 62.50%, 100%, and 62.5%, respectively (P = 0.033). Side effects were statistically similar in both the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: To conclude, the combination of ERCP with DSOC is safe and effective with higher diagnostic sensitivity (77.27%) in comparison to standard ERCP or DSOC alone (44.4%) for the diagnosis of biliary strictures.
RESUMEN
Background To contain the spread of infection and reduce the burden on healthcare infrastructure, many countries globally adopted a lockdown strategy during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Hospitals were converted to dedicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) centers, and non-COVID-19 patients were intervened on a triage basis. During this time, only emergency procedures were performed. The impact of this lockdown strategy during the first wave of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on various gastrointestinal endoscopy interventions remains unknown. Methodology In this retrospective, observational study conducted in the Department of Gastroenterology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar from March 25 to September 30, 2020, data related to clinical profile, indication, and endoscopic interventions performed in reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-negative patients with the use of personal protective kits were analyzed and compared with the historical controls. Results A total of 2,282 patients were admitted and 422 endoscopic procedures were performed during the six-month study period with an intervention rate of 18.49%. The most common procedure was upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (228, 58.13%), followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (88, 22.50%). Chronic liver disease (CLD) (144 patients) followed by malignancy (111 patients) were the most common diagnosis. During the first phase of the lockdown (March to May), only 52 procedures were performed (52 vs. 506). None of the patients underwent endoscopic ultrasound. In 2019, 4,501 patients were admitted and 1,224 procedures were performed with an intervention rate of 27.19 (p < 0.0001). None of the staff of the Department of Gastroenterology developed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection during this period. Conclusions There was a significant drop in endoscopic procedures during the lockdown and most of the esophagoduodenoscopy procedures were done for CLD and ERCP for biliary tract malignancy. Endoscopic procedures done on RT-PCR for COVID-19-negative patients were safe using personal protective kits.
