Implementation of a digital exercise programme in health services to prevent falls in older people.

BACKGROUND: StandingTall uses eHealth to deliver evidence-based balance and functional strength exercises. Clinical trials have demonstrated improved balance, reduced falls and fall-related injuries and high adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of StandingTall into health services in Australia and the UK. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six participants (Australia, n = 184; UK, n = 62) were recruited and encouraged to use StandingTall for 2 h/week for 6-months. A mixed-methods process evaluation assessed uptake and acceptability of StandingTall. Adherence, measured as % of prescribed dose completed, was the primary outcome. RESULTS: The study, conducted October 2019 to September 2021 in Australia and November 2020 to April 2022 in the UK, was affected by COVID-19. Participants' mean age was 73 ± 7 years, and 196 (81%) were female. Of 129 implementation partners (e.g. private practice clinicians, community exercise providers, community service agencies) approached, 34% (n = 44) agreed to be implementation partners. Of 41 implementation partners who referred participants, 15 (37%) referred ≥5. Participant uptake was 42% (198/469) with mean adherence over 6 months being 41 ± 39% of the prescribed dose (i.e. 39 ± 41 min/week) of exercise. At 6 months, 120 (76%) participants indicated they liked using StandingTall, 89 (56%) reported their balance improved (moderately to a great deal better) and 125 (80%) rated StandingTall as good to excellent. For ongoing sustainability, health service managers highlighted the need for additional resources. CONCLUSIONS: StandingTall faced challenges in uptake, adoption and sustainability due to COVID-19 and a lack of ongoing funding. Adherence levels were lower than the effectiveness trial, but were higher than other exercise studies. Acceptance was high, indicating promise for future implementation, provided sufficient resources and support are made available. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001329156.

Implementation of the StandingTall programme to prevent falls in older people: a process evaluation protocol.

INTRODUCTION: One in three people aged 65 years and over fall each year. The health, economic and personal impact of falls will grow substantially in the coming years due to population ageing. Developing and implementing cost-effective strategies to prevent falls and mobility problems among older people is therefore an urgent public health challenge. StandingTall is a low-cost, unsupervised, home-based balance exercise programme delivered through a computer or tablet. StandingTall has a simple user-interface that incorporates physical and behavioural elements designed to promote compliance. A large randomised controlled trial in 503 community-dwelling older people has shown that StandingTall is safe, has high adherence rates and is effective in improving balance and reducing falls. The current project targets a major need for older people and will address the final steps needed to scale this innovative technology for widespread use by older people across Australia and internationally. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project will endeavour to recruit 300 participants across three sites in Australia and 100 participants in the UK. The aim of the study is to evaluate the implementation of StandingTall into the community and health service settings in Australia and the UK. The nested process evaluation will use both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore uptake and acceptability of the StandingTall programme and associated resources. The primary outcome is participant adherence to the StandingTall programme over 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the South East Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC reference 18/288) in Australia and the North West- Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (IRAS ID: 268954) in the UK. Dissemination will be via publications, conferences, newsletter articles, social media, talks to clinicians and consumers and meetings with health departments/managers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619001329156.

The effect of group exercise on physical functioning and falls in frail older people living in retirement villages: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a 12-month program of group exercise can improve physical functioning and reduce the rate of falling in frail older people. DESIGN: Cluster randomized, controlled trial of 12 months duration. SETTING: Retirement villages in Sydney and Wollongong, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred fifty-one people aged 62 to 95 (mean+/-standard deviation=79.5+/-6.4) who were living in self- and intermediate-care retirement villages. MEASUREMENTS: Accidental falls, choice stepping reaction time, 6-minute walk distance postural sway, leaning balance, simple reaction time, and lower-limb muscle strength. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty subjects were randomized to the weight-bearing group exercise (GE) intervention that was designed to improve the ability of subjects to undertake activities for daily living. Subjects randomized to the control arm (n=271) attended flexibility and relaxation (FR) classes (n=90) or did not participate in a group activity (n=181). In spite of the reduced precision of cluster randomization, there were few differences in the baseline characteristics of the GE and combined control (CC) subjects, although the mean age of the GE group was higher than that of the CC group, and there were fewer men in the GE group. The mean number of classes attended was 39.4+/-28.7 for the GE subjects and 31.5+/-25.2 for the FR subjects. After adjusting for age and sex, there were 22% fewer falls during the trial in the GE group than in the CC group (incident rate ratio=0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.62-0.99), and 31% fewer falls in the 173 subjects who had fallen in the past year (incident rate ratio=0.69, 95% CI=0.48-0.99). At 6-month retest, the GE group performed significantly better than the CC group in tests of choice stepping reaction time, 6-minute walking distance, and simple reaction time requiring a hand press. The groups did not differ at retest in tests of strength, sway, or leaning balance. CONCLUSION: These findings show that group exercise can prevent falls and maintain physical functioning in frail older people.

Multifocal glasses impair edge-contrast sensitivity and depth perception and increase the risk of falls in older people.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which multifocal glasses impair contrast sensitivity and depth perception at critical distances required for detecting hazards in the environment and whether multifocal glasses use increases the risk of falls in older people. DESIGN: One-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Falls Laboratory, Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-six community-dwelling people aged 63-90. MEASUREMENTS: Contrast sensitivity, depth perception, accidental falls. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects (55.8%) were regular wearers of multifocal (bifocal, trifocal, or progressive lens) glasses. These subjects performed significantly worse in the distant depth perception and distant edge-contrast sensitivity tests in conditions that forced them to view test stimuli through the lower segments of their glasses. Multifocal glasses wearers were more than twice as likely to fall in the follow-up period than nonmultifocal glasses wearers (odds ratio (OR) = 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-4.92), when adjusting for age, poor vision, reduced lower limb sensation and strength, slow reaction time, and increased postural sway. Multifocal glasses wearers were also more likely to fall because of a trip (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.08-7.22), when outside their homes (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.14-5.70), and when walking up or down stairs (P <.01). The population attributable risks of regular multifocal glasses use were 35.2% for any falls, 40.9% for falls due to a trip, and 40.9% for falls outside the home. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicate that multifocal glasses impair depth perception and edge-contrast sensitivity at critical distances for detecting obstacles in the environment. Older people may benefit from wearing nonmultifocal glasses when negotiating stairs and in unfamiliar settings outside the home.