Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
2.
G Ital Nefrol ; 30(2)2013.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23832457

RESUMEN

Contrast-induced nephropathy has become a significant source of hospital morbidity and mortality particularly in patients with multi-organs defects. No current treatment can reverse or ameliorate contrast induced nephropathy once it occurs, but prophylaxis is possible. We present the case of a 61-year-old male patient with concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD stage III K/DOQI) and diabetes complicated by severe multi-vascular disease, who developed acute kidney damage probably due to the simultaneously exposure to intravascular contrast media and cholesterol crystal embolism. In addition, owing to rapid deterioration of renal function, this patient started renal replacement therapy. No renal biopsy was performed due to the poor clinical condition of the patient. After a month of hemodialysis, he switched to a peritoneal dialysis procedure to which specific treatment for vascular lesions, including antibiotics, prostanoids, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, antiaggregants/anticoagulants and physiotherapy, was associated. After 7 months, the dialysis treatment was stopped and he began intensive clinical follow-up. At present, the patient is in conservative medical treatment (the Tenckhoff catheter has been removed), he is in good condition and severe vascular lesions are absent. Our conclusion is that contrast-induced nephropathy in vasculopathic diabetic patients requires a multidisciplinary approach. In particular, good cooperation between nephrologists and angiologists is useful to avoid rapid and chronic deterioration of renal failure and to prevent the onset and development of severe vascular damage.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Riñón/fisiopatología , Diálisis Peritoneal , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Angiopatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Angiopatías Diabéticas/terapia , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Embolia por Colesterol/complicaciones , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Prostaglandinas/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo
3.
Nat Rev Nephrol ; 5(6): 349-54, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19399018

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A 29-year-old white woman with a family history of Fabry disease was referred to a nephrology clinic with hypertension and nephropathy. Her renal function was below normal (serum creatinine level 141 micromol/l; estimated glomerular filtration rate 41 ml/min/1.73 m2) with no proteinuria or albuminuria. INVESTIGATIONS: Medical history, physical examination, leukocyte alpha-galactosidase A assay, laboratory tests (for antinuclear antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies, complement and cryoglobulin), ophthalmological examination, echocardiography, brain magnetic resonance angiography, renal ultrasonography, renal color echo-Doppler scan, renal magnetic resonance angiography, renal angiography and renal biopsy. DIAGNOSIS: Diffuse sclero-atrophic renal tissue changes and widespread renal arterio-arteriolosclerotic changes secondary to Fabry disease. TREATMENT: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and maintenance treatment with agalsidase-beta, 1 mg/kg body weight, every 2 weeks.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Fabry/patología , Riñón/patología , Adulto , Biopsia , Educación Médica Continua , Enfermedad de Fabry/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Fabry/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Angiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 3(4): 1185-94, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18417749

RESUMEN

Dedicated European and US clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes in the elderly have been released, but they do not specifically address the issue of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) in older patients with diabetes. General clinical guidelines have been published on the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), but these address the issue of how to prevent progression and treat advanced DN without distinguishing between different age groups. Elderly patients with diabetes and stages 3 to 4 CKD have particular needs that differ from those of younger patients with the same conditions. This is mainly due to their frailty and shorter life expectancy. Differently tailored therapeutic strategies are needed, which may have less stringent targets; and the use of common drugs should be critically evaluated. The management agenda (metabolic control, low-protein diet, controlling BP, preventing progression of advanced DN, preventing cardiovascular outcomes) for these patients is discussed in light of the limits and perspectives of current guidelines. Intensive, simultaneous management of all items on the agenda may not be feasible for a proportion of older patients, and clinicians may have to give priority to reducing some risk factors rather than others, choosing between different therapies.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Nefropatías Diabéticas/terapia , Selección de Paciente , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapia Combinada , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Nefropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 23(4): 1313-7, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18029376

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In frail elderly patients, the chronic use of renal replacement therapy sometimes affords no tangible benefits and may even negatively affect their quality of life (Qol), making prolonged conservative management a reasonable option. METHODS: This observational, uncontrolled study was conducted on 11 end-stage renal disease patients over 75 years of age, on prolonged conservative treatment with a follow-up of at least 6 months, to assess compliance with the Italian clinical guidelines concerning the treatment of renal failure, comorbidities, hospital stays, and several psychometric and Qol indicators in the patients and their caregivers. RESULTS: We found a substantial compliance with the targets recommended in the guidelines, a moderate tendency for disease progression and satisfactory psychometric and Qol parameters, which proved much the same as those observed in a parallel (uncontrolled) group of patients on haemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that a conservative strategy is feasible for frail uraemic patients, achieving acceptable clinical results and a Qol comparable with patients on haemodialysis. The study also provides indications on how to plan trials on this topic, to obtain the evidence needed to guide the difficult choice of whether to recommend dialysis or conservative treatment for such frail patients.


Asunto(s)
Diuréticos/uso terapéutico , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Anciano Frágil , Furosemida/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Morbilidad/tendencias , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 49(5): 569-80, 2007 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17472838

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A supplemented very-low-protein diet (sVLPD) seems to be safe when postponing dialysis therapy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter randomized controlled study designed to assess the noninferiority of diet versus dialysis in 1-year mortality assessed by using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Italian uremic patients without diabetes older than 70 years with glomerular filtration rate of 5 to 7 mL/min (0.08 to 0.12 mL/s). INTERVENTION: Randomization to an sVLPD (diet group) or dialysis. The sVLPD is a vegan diet (35 kcal; proteins, 0.3 g/kg body weight daily) supplemented with keto-analogues, amino acids, and vitamins. Patients following an sVLPD started dialysis therapy in the case of malnutrition, intractable fluid overload, hyperkalemia, or appearance of uremic symptoms. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Mortality, hospitalization, and metabolic markers. RESULTS: 56 patients were randomly assigned to each group, median follow-up was 26.5 months (interquartile range, 40), and patients in the diet group spent a median of 10.7 months (interquartile range, 11) following an sVLPD. Forty patients in the diet group started dialysis treatment because of either fluid overload or hyperkalemia. There were 31 deaths (55%) in the dialysis group and 28 deaths (50%) in the diet group. One-year observed survival rates at intention to treat were 83.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74.5 to 94.0) in the dialysis group versus 87.3% (95% CI, 78.9 to 96.5) in the diet group (log-rank test for noninferiority, P < 0.001; for superiority, P = 0.6): the difference in survival was -3.6% (95% CI, -17 to +10; P = 0.002). The hazard ratio for hospitalization was 1.50 for the dialysis group (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.01; P < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: The unblinded nature of the study, exclusion of patients with diabetes, and incomplete enrollment. CONCLUSION: An sVLPD was effective and safe when postponing dialysis treatment in elderly patients without diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Dieta con Restricción de Proteínas/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/dietoterapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
7.
J Nephrol ; 18(2): 123-35, 2005.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15931640

RESUMEN

Given the alarming predictions of the potentially devastating future epidemic of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), further knowledge is still urgently needed on this topic. The real dimensions of the problem are still unclear. It is difficult to compare Europe and the USA because different criteria are used in data collection and not much information is available, but the epidemic of silent chronic kidney disease seems to be more widespread in the States than in Europe, and more severe in terms of cardiovascular mortality. Defining early chronic renal insufficiency carrying a definite risk of ESRD is not easy, particularly for chronic renal conditions in which the clinical picture is still faint and the renal dysfunction minimal. It is also hard to say which tools are most suitable for diagnosing such renal disorders (renal filtration indexes vs. composite indexes of renal damage, e.g. the NKF's CKD stages). Furthermore, it is still not clear which strategies best identify subjects with these conditions (screening vs. early interception; general population vs. high-risk groups), how effective therapeutic approaches are, which subject categories benefit from early diagnosis and intervention, and how clinical measures should be structured (multidisciplinary case management-based approaches vs. general practitioner-oriented approaches). These issues are discussed in this paper.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/prevención & control , Enfermedad Crónica , Diagnóstico Precoz , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 36(3): 409-16, 2004.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15783117

RESUMEN

Increased interest in aneurysms involving the renal artery and its branches has occurred during the past 3 decades. The prevalence of renal artery aneurysms is approximately 0.01%-1% in the general population as well as 2.5% in hypertensive patients undergoing angiography. Intraparenchymal renal artery aneurysms (IPRAAs) are rare since being detected in less than 10% of patients with renal artery aneurysms. The Authors report an unusual case of multiple small intrarenal artery aneurysms associated with a large IPRAA located in the mid portion of the right kidney. Usually, IPRAAs are secondary to diseases or injuries of the kidney vascular network. They are classified as true, false, saccular, fusiform, dissecting, and microaneurysms. Potential complications of IPRAAs include peripheral dissection, thrombosis, hypertension, renal infarction and rupture. IRAAs may be detected incidentally as well as present with urologic symptoms and signs related to complications. Actually, IRAAs are investigated by non invasive modalities including duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography, spiral three-dimensional computed tomography angiography, and three-dimensional reconstructed rotational digital substraction angiography of the segmental and distant branches of the renal artery. Angiography with intrarterial injection of contrast material is the gold standard in diagnosing IPRAAs. Treatment options for IPRAAs include observation, aneurysmectomy with surgical repair, endovascular procedures, nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy. Observation is indicated for asymptomatic intraparenchymal renal artery aneurysms measuring less than 2 cm in diameter. Surgical repair of IPRAAs includes aneurysmectomy and reconstruction of the renal artery by in vivo or ex vivo technique. The procedure is indicated for IPRAAs causing renovascular hypertension, dissection, urologic symptoms, embolization, local expansion and women of childbearing age with a potential for pregnancy. In recent years, transcatheter arterial embolization has emerged as a simple, useful and effective technique in managing IRAAs. The procedure is performed by transfemoral catheterization as well as by superselective catheterization and embolization of interlobar arteries with 3F microcatheters. Endovascular occlusion is obtained by using gelatin sponge, steel coils, detachable baloons, and conventional non-detachable microcoils delivered through a microcatheter. Nephrectomy or partial nephrectomy are reserved for conditions precluding renal revascularization which include overt RAA rupture, covert RAA rupture, artery-to-vein fistula, renal cell carcinoma, end stage nephropaty, renal infarction, severe ischemic renal atrophy or complex intrarenal aneurysms. Recently, partial nephrectomy by the laparoscopic approach has been proposed for managing IPRAAs and the procedure is considered feasible and safe.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/diagnóstico , Arteria Renal , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Riñón
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...