Diagnostic Yield of Small Bowel Videocapsule Endoscopy in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia. A Systematic Review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or malabsorption represents the most frequent aetiologies of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). The cause of IDA remains undetermined in ~10% to 20% of patients undergoing upper and lower GI endoscopies. In this scenario, a small bowel examination with videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) is recommended. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic yield of VCE in patients with IDA without overt bleeding, assessing the prevalence of either any lesion or lesions at high potential of bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published until March 2023. RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 1703 IDA patients (Males: 47%; age range: 19-92 y) were included in this systematic review. The diagnostic yield of VCE for overall lesions in the small bowel was 61% (95% CI=44-77; 95 CI=97.2-98.1; I2=97.7%). When analyzing only small bowel lesions likely responsible of IDA, the diagnostic yield was 40% (95% CI=27-53; 95% CI=95.3-97; I2=96.3%). CONCLUSION: VCE plays a relevant role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with IDA without overt bleeding with a satisfactory diagnostic yield.

Small bowel lesions in patients with iron deficiency anaemia without overt bleeding: a multicentre study.

The diagnostic work-up in iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) patients can be challenging when bleedings or malabsorption are not clinically manifest. Lesions on the small bowel mucosa may cause IDA. We evaluated the prevalence of lesions on the small bowel mucosa detected at Videocapsule Endoscopy (VCE) in IDA patients following negative upper and lower endoscopies. Clinical and endoscopic data collected in 5 centres were retrieved. Lesions with a high bleeding potential (P2) were computed, and predictive factors investigated at multivariate analysis. By considering data of 230 patients, the endoscopic examination detected a total of 96 (41.7%; 95% CI: 35.4-48.1) P2 lesions on the small bowel mucosa, including 4 (1.7%) cancers. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was found to be the only associated factor at both univariate (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 2.4-13.4; P <0.001) and multivariate (OR: 2.8; 95% CI: 1.7-3.9, P <0.01) analyses. Present study showed that evaluation of small bowel mucosa with VCE allows to disclose a potential cause of IDA in near half patients. The cooperation between haematologists and gastroenterologists in the diagnostic work-up may be useful.

Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality in Italy: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: International guidelines advise improving esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) quality in Western countries, where gastric cancer is still diagnosed in advanced stages. This nationwide study investigated some indicators for the quality of EGD performed in endoscopic centers in Italy. METHODS: Clinical, endoscopic, and procedural data of consecutive EGDs performed in one month in the participating centers were reviewed and collected in a specific database. Some quality indicators before and during endoscopic procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 3,219 EGDs performed by 172 endoscopists in 28 centers were reviewed. Data found that some relevant information (family history for GI cancer, smoking habit, use of proton pump inhibitors) were not collected before endoscopy in 58.5-80.7% of patients. Pre-endoscopic preparation for gastric cleaning was routinely performed in only 2 (7.1%) centers. Regarding the procedure, sedation was not performed in 17.6% of patients, and virtual chromoendoscopy was frequently (>75%) used in only one (3.6%) center. An adequate sampling of the gastric mucosa (i.e., antral and gastric body specimens) was heterogeneously performed, and it was routinely performed only by 23% of endoscopists, and in 14.3% centers. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that the quality of EGD performed in clinical practice in Italy deserves to be urgently improved in different aspects.

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country. Patients and Methods: Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retrospectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The en bloc resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported. Results: Data of 84 patients with esophageal (N = 13), gastric (N = 61), and duodenal (N = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. En bloc and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (N = 7) and perforation (N = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation. Conclusions: Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.

Introdução/objetivos: A dissecção endoscópica da submucosa (ESD) tem sido proposta para a exérese de tumores subepiteliais gastrointestinais (GI-SETs), embora a literatura seja escassa. Este estudo teve como objetivo reportar uma série de casos de um país ocidental. Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva incluindo doentes com SETs do tubo digestivo superior submetidos a ESD em 4 centros (1 ano de follow-up). Antes do procedimento, a lesão foi caracterizada por ecoendoscopia, histologia e tomografia computadorizada. Foram avaliadas as taxas de ressecção em bloco e R0, bem como a incidência de complicações. Resultados: Incluídos 84 doentes com GI-SETs esofágicos (N = 13), gástricos (N = 61) e duodenais (N = 10). O diâmetro médio das lesões foi de 26 mm (intervalo 12­110 mm) ­ 17 tumores do estroma gastrointestinal, 12 tumores neuroendócrinos, 35 leiomiomas, 18 lipomas e 2 hamartomas. A resseção foi em bloco e R0 em 83 (98.8%) e em 80 (95.2%) doentes, respectivamente. Globalmente, ocorreram complicações em 11 (13.1%) doentes, incluindo hemorragia (N = 7) e perfuração (N = 4). A terapêutica endoscópica foi eficaz em todas as hemorragias exceto em 1 doente que necessitou de embolização radiológica e em 2 perfurações (submetidas a cirurgia). No geral, a abordagem cirúrgica foi necessária em 5 (5.9%) ­ 3 doentes com resseção R1 e 2 com perfuração. Conclusões: A ESD pode ser uma alternativa eficaz e segura à intervenção cirúrgica para GI-SETs benignos e malignos localizados.

Efficacy of Helicobater pylori eradication in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the stomach: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The role of Helicobater pylori eradication in the treatment of high-grade diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the stomach is unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available data. DLBCL-remission rate after eradication therapy, post-remission maintenance, and response rate in the case of additional oncological therapy were extracted. RESULTS: By considering data of seven studies, the DLBCL remission was achieved in 81 (53.3%; 95% CI = 45.3-61.2) out of 152 H. pylori eradicated patients. The regression rate did not differ between pure DLCBL and DLCBL with MALT component, between stage I and stage II disease, and between Caucasians and Asians. Disease regression was maintained in all patients after at a median of 63 months (range: 46-29) follow-up. In those non-responders, DLBLC remission after additional chemo-immunotherapy was achieved in 63 (98.4%; 95% CI = 95.4-100) out of 64 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Data this systematic review suggest considering H. pylori eradication as first-line therapy to treat infected patients with early-stage, high-grade gastric lymphoma.

Quality performance measures in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for lesion detection: Italian AIGO-SIED-SIGE joint position statement.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) plays a crucial role in the management of gastroduodenal diseases by allowing a direct and accurate evaluation of the mucosa and the execution of several operative maneuvers. Despite a constant development of new imaging tools and operative devices, the widespread use of EGD has not resulted in a significant reduction of mortality for patients affected by esophageal/gastric cancer during the last three decades in Western countries. Evidence indicates that this disheartening scenario derives from a high variability of execution of EGD which determines its quality and diagnostic yield, delaying the diagnosis of neoplastic diseases. Based on this evidence, in recent years many scientific societies have produced different position papers aimed at defining quality performance measures in EGD. Thus, the Italian Association of Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists, the Italian Society of Digestive Endoscopy and the Italian Society of Gastroenterology have produced this joint document based on the review of ASGE, ACG, BSG, ESGE and Asian Consensus EGD position papers with the aim of indicating the quality standards of EGD (pre-, intra- and post-procedure) focused on lesion detection to be adopted in the Italian context.

Rescue Therapies for H. pylori Infection in Italy.

Background/Aims: Curing Helicobacter pylori infection remains challenging for clinicians, as no proposed first-line therapy achieves bacterial eradication in all treated patients so that several patients need two or more consecutive treatments. Bacterial culture with antibiotics susceptibility testing is largely unachievable in Italy, and empiric second-line and rescue therapies are generally used. This study aimed to identify what eradication regimens perform better in Italy, following first-line therapy failure. Methods: We performed a literature search on PubMed for studies on standard therapy regimens used as second-line or rescue treatments performed in adult patients. Studies including modified drug combinations were not considered. Both intention-to-treat and per- protocol analyses were computed for each therapy subgroup. Results: Data from 35 studies with a total of 4830 patients were eventually considered. As a second-line therapy, Pylera® (90.6%) and a sequential regimen (89.8%) achieved eradication rates significantly higher than other therapies. For third-line therapy, a levofloxacin-based regimen and Pylera® achieved comparable eradication rates (88.2% vs. 84.7%; p = 0.2). Among therapies used as fourth (or more) attempts, Pylera® and a rifabutin-based therapy achieved 77.4% and 66.4% cure rates, respectively (p = 0.013). A therapy sequence based on the type of first-line therapy used was proposed. Conclusions: Data obtained through our review indicate that standard therapies for H. pylori eradication can be used when following an appropriate sequence, allowing clinicians to improve the cure rate without resorting to bacterial culture.

Helicobacter pylori eradication following first-line treatment failure in Europe: What, how and when chose among different standard regimens? A systematic review.

Cure rate following standard first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication is decreasing so several patients require two or more treatments. Antibiotic susceptibility-based therapy, advised in current guidelines, is largely impracticable in clinical practice. Some 'standard' regimens (triple therapies based on either levofloxacin or rifabutin, bismuth-based quadruple therapies, sequential, concomitant and hybrid therapies) were empirically used as rescue therapies. We performed a systematic review on recent studies carried out in European countries dealing with these regimens. A total of 24 studies, with 3804 patients, were identified. As second-line therapy, Pylera (89.2%) and sequential therapy (92.5%) achieved significantly higher cure rates as compared to all the other regimens. As third-line therapy, levofloxacin-based therapy (84.1%) and Pylera (83.6%) achieved similarly high cure rates, whereas standard, bismuth-based quadruple therapy (64.1%) achieved the lowest. As a rescue therapy, the success rate was close to 75% following all therapies used, with data on rifabutin-based regimen consolidated in the larger sample size. Overall, levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy achieved higher eradication rates when the 14- rather than 10-day regimen was used (87.1 vs. 72.2%; P = 0.003). Among bismuth-based therapies, Pylera achieved a significantly higher eradication rate than standard quadruple therapy (88 vs. 67%; P < 0.0001). These data suggest that a wise 'therapeutic package' following first-line therapy could be Pylera, levofloxacin- and rifabutin-based therapy, as long as Pylera therapy was not used as a first-line regimen and levofloxacin-based regimen was administered for 14 days.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplastic lesions in Western countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplastic lesions removal is largely performed in Asian countries. Unfortunately, ESD diffusion, particularly for gastric lesion removal, is still limited in Western countries. We performed a systematic review of available data coming from Western centers. The en bloc and the R0 resection rates for all neoplastic lesions, including early gastric cancer (EGC) and dysplasia, were calculated, as well as the curative rate for EGC. Complications and the 1-month mortality rates were computed. A total of 22 studies from Europe (N = 15), Latina America (N = 6), and Canada (N = 1) were retrieved, with 1152 patients and 1210 lesions. The en bloc resection was successful in 96% [95% confidence interval (CI) 93-98] with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 63.5%; P < 0.0001). The R0 was achieved in 84% (95% CI 79-89; I2 = 79.9%; P < 0.001). The resection rate was curative in 72% out of 340 patients with EGC (95% CI 65-79, I2 = 8%; P = 0.36). Overall, complications occurred in 9.5% of patients, including bleeding (5.8%), perforation (3.4%), and stenosis (0.35%). A total of three (0.26%) patients deceased within 1 month, but none was directly related to the procedure. Lesion recurrence was observed in 38 (3.5%; 95% CI 2.3-4.4) cases, including 21 EGC and 17 dysplasia. In Western countries, the en bloc and the R0 resections were successful in the large majority of cases, whilst the resection was curative in 72% of patients with EGC. The complications rate was acceptably low.

Gastroprotection in patients on antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy: a position paper of National Association of Hospital Cardiologists (ANMCO) and the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO).

Aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed. However, potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested for PPIs, and, in recent years, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Indeed, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction through hepatic CYP2C19 between PPIs and clopidogrel, which could translate into clinical inefficacy, leading to higher rates of cardiovascular events. The FDA and the EMA sent a warning in 2010 discouraging the concomitant use of clopidogrel with omeprazole or esomeprazole. In addition, whether the use of PPIs may affect the clinical efficacy of the new P2Y12 receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, remains less known. According to current guidelines, PPIs in combination with antiplatelet treatment are recommended in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Like vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), DOACs can determine gastrointestinal bleeding. Results from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies suggest that high-dose dabigatran (150 mg bid), rivaroxaban and high-dose edoxaban (60 mg daily) are associated with a higher risk of GI bleeding as compared with apixaban and warfarin. In patients taking oral anticoagulant with GI risk factor, PPI could be recommended, even if usefulness of PPIs in these patients deserves further data. Helicobacter pylori should always be searched, and treated, in patients with history of peptic ulcer disease (with or without complication). Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition or anticoagulant effect potentially carries a considerable clinical impact. The present joint statement by ANMCO and AIGO summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses consequent clinical implications.

Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Extra-Oesophageal Reflux Symptoms: A Multicentre Study.

BACKGROUND: There are no evidence-based recommendations for performing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) in patients with extra-oesophageal symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). However, UGIEs are often performed in clinical practice in these patients. We aimed to assess the prevalence of gastro-oesophageal lesions in patients with atypical GORD symptoms. METHODS: Patients complaining of at least one extra-oesophageal GORD symptom and undergoing UGIE in seven centres were prospectively enrolled. Clinically relevant lesions (Barrett's oesophagus, erosive oesophagitis, gastric precancerous conditions, peptic ulcer, cancer, and H. pylori infection) were statistically compared between groups regarding GORD symptoms (atypical vs. both typical and atypical), type of atypical symptoms, age, and presence of hiatal hernia. RESULTS: Two hundred eleven patients were enrolled (male/female: 74/137; mean age: 55.5 ± 14.7 years). Barrett's oesophagus was detected in 4 (1.9%), erosive oesophagitis in 12 (5.7%), gastric precancerous conditions in 22 (10.4%), and H. pylori infection in 38 (18%) patients. Prevalence of clinically relevant lesions was lower in patients with only atypical GORD symptoms (28.6 vs. 42.5%; p = 0.046; χ2 test), in patients ≤50 years (20 vs. 44.8%; p = 0.004; χ2 test), and in those in ongoing proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy (21.1 vs. 40.2%; p = 0.01; χ2 test). No clinically relevant lesions were detected in patients ≤50 years, without alarm symptoms, and receiving PPI therapy. Hiatal hernia was diagnosed in only 6 patients with cardiologic and in 41 patients with ear-nose-throat symptoms (11.3 vs. 35.1%; p = 0.03; χ2 test). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant lesions are uncommon among young (≤50 years) patients with extra-oesophageal GORD symptoms. Hiatal hernia is not more prevalent in patients with cardiologic symptoms and suspicion of GORD. The usefulness of UGIE in these patients is questionable.

INTRODUÇÃO: Não existem recomendações baseadas na evidencia para realização de endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) em doentes com sintomas extra-esofágicos da doença de refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE). No entanto, EDAs são frequentemente realizadas na orientação clínica destes doentes. O nosso objectivo foi a valiar a prevalência de lesões gastro-esofágicas em doentes com sintomas atípicos de DRGE. MÉTODOS: Doentes com pelo menos um sintoma extra-esofágico de DRGE e que realizaram EDA em 7 centros foram prospectivamente recrutados. Lesões clinicamente relevantes (esófago de Barrett, esofagite erosiva, condições pré-malignas gástricas, úlcera péptica, cancro e infecção H. pylori) foram estatisticamente comparadas entre os grupos tendo em conta sintomas de DRGE (atípicos vs. quer típicos e atípicos), tipo de sintomas atípicos, idade e presenta de hérnia do hiato. RESULTADOS: Duzentos e onze doentes foram recrutados (H/M: 74/137; Idade média: 55.5 ± 14.7 anos). Esófago de Barrett foi detetado em 4 (1.9%), esofagite erosiva em 12 (5.7%), condições pré-malignas gástricas em 22 (10.4%) e infeção H. pylori em 38 (18%) doentes. A prevalência de lesões clinicamente relevantes foi inferior em doentes com apenas sintomas atípicos (28.6 vs. 42,5%; p = 0.046; teste de qui-quadrado), doentes com <50 anos (20 vs. 44.8%; p = 0.004; teste de qui-quadrado), e nos doentes medicados com iniciadores da bomba de protões (IBP) (21.1 vs.40.2%; p = 0.01; teste de qui-quadrado). Nenhuma lesáo clinicamente relevante foi detectada nos doentes com <50 anos, sem sintomas de alarme e medicados com IBP. Hérnia do hiato foi diagnosticada apenas em 6 doentes com sintomas do tipo cardíaco e em 41 com sintomas ORLs (11.3 vs. 35.1%; p = 0.03; teste de qui-quadrado). CONCLUSÕES: Lesões clinicamente relevantes são incomuns em doentes jovens com sintomas extra-esofágicos de DRGE. Hérnia do hiato não é mais prevalente em doentes com sintomas do tipo cardíaco e suspeita de DRGE. A utilidade da EDA nestes doentes é discutível.

[ANMCO/AIGO Intersocietary consensus document: Gastroprotection in patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant drugs]. / Documento di consenso intersocietario ANMCO/AIGO: Gastroprotezione nei pazienti in terapia antiaggregante e/o anticoagulante.

Aspirin and P2Y12 receptor antagonists are widely used across the spectrum of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Gastrointestinal complications, including ulcer and bleeding, are relatively common during antiplatelet treatment and, therefore, concomitant proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is often prescribed. However, potential increased risk of cardiovascular events has been suggested for PPIs, and, in recent years, it has been discussed whether these drugs may reduce the cardiovascular protection by aspirin and, even more so, clopidogrel. Indeed, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies suggested an interaction through CYP2C19 between PPIs and clopidogrel, which could translate into clinical inefficacy, leading to higher rates of cardiovascular events. The Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency sent a warning in 2010 discouraging the concomitant use of clopidogrel with omeprazole or esomeprazole. In addition, whether the use of PPIs may affect the clinical efficacy of the new P2Y12 receptor antagonists, ticagrelor and prasugrel, remains less known. According to current guidelines, PPIs in combination with antiplatelet treatment are recommended in patients with risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding, including advanced age, concurrent use of anticoagulants, steroids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori infection. Like traditional anticoagulants, novel oral anticoagulants may cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Results from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies suggest that high-dose dabigatran (150 mg bid), rivaroxaban and high-dose edoxaban (60 mg daily) are associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding as compared with warfarin. However, the usefulness of PPIs in patients receiving these anticoagulants deserves to be further demonstrated. Given the large number of patients treated with antithrombotic drugs and PPIs, even a minor reduction of platelet inhibition or anticoagulant effect potentially carries a considerable clinical impact. The present joint statement by ANMCO and AIGO summarizes the current knowledge regarding the widespread use of platelet inhibitors, anticoagulants, and PPIs in combination. Moreover, it outlines evidence supporting or opposing drug interactions between these drugs and discusses consequent clinical implications.

[Antithrombotic therapy and digestive endoscopy: a difficult management.] / Terapia antitrombotica ed endoscopia digestiva: una gestione difficile.

Antithrombotic therapy (antiplatelet and anticoagulant) is frequently used in clinical practice for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients at risk, such as those with atrial fibrillation or pro-thrombotic conditions. On the other hand, endoscopic investigations on the upper digestive tract (gastroscopy, endoscopic retrograde colangiopancreatography) and lower (colonoscopy) are increasingly performed to prevent, diagnose and treat different diseases of digestive tract. Therefore, it is not uncommon for a patient to undergo endoscopic examination while taking antithrombotic therapy. The pharmacological management of these patients requires a careful balance between the haemorrhagic risk linked to the continuation of therapy and the hemorrhagic risk inherent to the endoscopic procedure, particularly when an operative procedure (polypectomy, sphincterotomy, etc.) is required. Beyond classical anticoagulants (vitamin K antagonists, dicumarolici), the so-called "direct-acting anticoagulants" have been recently introduced, and management of these drugs in before an endoscopic examination is different. Since endoscopic procedures are largely scheduled as "open access" directly by general practitioner, she/he is clearly involved in the management of these patients. This review aims to report the recommendations of international guidelines on this field, and to provide some schematic tools for performing a correct management of patients on antithrombotic therapy before gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Diagnosis of chronic anaemia in gastrointestinal disorders: A guideline by the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) and the Italian Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP).

Anaemia is a common pathologic condition, present in almost 5% of the adult population. Iron deficiency is the most common cause; other mechanisms can be involved, making anaemia a multi-factorial disorder in most cases. Anaemia being a frequent manifestation in the diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, patients are often referred to gastroenterologists. Furthermore, upper and lower endoscopy and enteroscopy are pivotal to the diagnostic roadmap of anaemia. In spite of its relevance in the daily clinical practice, there is a limited number of gastroenterological guidelines dedicated to the diagnosis of anaemia. For this reason, the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists and the Italian Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition commissioned a panel of experts to prepare a specific guideline on anaemia and its diagnostic roadmap in the gastroenterological scenario. The panel also discussed about the potential involvement of gastroenterologists and endoscopists in the management of patients with anaemia, with particular attention to the correct use of investigations. The panel paid particular attention to practical issues with the aim to support gastroenterologists in their clinical practice when dealing with patients with anaemia.

Sequential therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: 10- or 14-day regimen?

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Standard 10-day sequential therapy is advised as first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication by current Italian guidelines. Some data suggested that a 14-day regimen may achieve higher eradication rates. This study compared the efficacy of sequential therapy administered for either 10- or 14-days. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, open-label study enrolled patients with H. pylori infection without previous treatment. Patients were receiving a sequential therapy for either 10 or 14 days with esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g (5 or 7 days) followed by esomeprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (5 or 7 days), all given twice daily. Bacterial eradication was checked using 13C-urea breath test. Eradication cure rates were calculated at both Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were enrolled, including 146 patients in 10-day and 145 in the 14-day regimen. The eradication rates were 87% (95% CI = 81.5-92.4) and 90.3% (95% CI = 85.5-95.1) at ITT analysis with the 10- and 14-day regimen, respectively, and 92.7% (95% CI = 88.3-97) and 97% (95% CI = 94.2-99.9) at PP analysis (p =0.37). Among patients, who earlier had interrupted therapy, bacterial eradication was achieved in 8 out of 9 who completed the first therapy phase and performed at least >/=3 days of triple therapy in the second phase. CONCLUSION: This study found that both 10- and 14-day sequential therapies achieved a high eradication rate for first-line H. pylori therapy in clinical practice.

Role of MIC levels of resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole significantly affects the cure rate of standard therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection. We tested whether different MIC levels of resistance to these antibiotics play a role in therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of data from a therapeutic trial in which patients with antibiotic susceptibility testing (Etest) received first-line sequential therapy. The level of antibiotic resistance was classified according to MIC values into low (MIC from >0.5 to ≤8 for clarithromycin, and from >8 to ≤32 for metronidazole) and high (MIC from >8 to 256 mg/L for clarithromycin, and from >32 to 256 mg/L for metronidazole). RESULTS: Data from 1006 patients were included. There were 520 (51.7%) patients with susceptible strains, 136 (13.5%) with clarithromycin-resistant strains, 144 (14.3%) with metronidazole-resistant strains and 206 (20.5%) with clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains. In the presence of double resistance, the cure rate was still high (38/41, 92.7%) when MIC levels were low and it was reduced (94/112, 83.9%) only when MIC levels of both antibiotics were high. The cure rates did not significantly differ between patients with single antibiotic-resistant strains, irrespective of MIC values, and those with susceptible strains. CONCLUSIONS: We found that MIC levels of resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole play a role in H. pylori therapy outcome and that bacterial resistance becomes relevant in vivo when clarithromycin-resistant and metronidazole-resistant strains have high MIC values for at least one of these antibiotics.

Diagnostic yield of upper endoscopy according to appropriateness: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite some official guidelines are available, a substantial rate of inappropriateness for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopies has been reported. This study aimed to estimate the inappropriate rate of UGI in different countries, also including the diagnostic yield. METHODS: A systematic review of studies on UGI endoscopy appropriateness was performed by adopting official guidelines as reference standard. Diagnostic yield of relevant endoscopic findings and cancers was compared between appropriate and inappropriate procedures. The Odd Ratio (OR) values and the Number-Needed-to-Scope (NNS) were calculated. RESULTS: Data of 23 studies with a total of 53,392 patients were included. UGI indications were overall inappropriate in 21.7% (95% CI = 21.4-22.1) of the patients. The inappropriateness rate significantly (P < 0.0001) decreased from 35.1% in the earlier studies to 22.1%-23% in the more recent ones. A relevant finding was found in 43.3% of appropriate and in 35.1% of inappropriate endoscopies (P < 0.0001; OR: 1.42, 95% CI = 1.36-1.49; NNS = 12). Prevalence of cancers was also higher in appropriate than in inappropriate UGIs (2.98% vs. 0.09%, P < 0.0001; OR = 3.33; NNS = 48). The prevalence of detected cancers significantly (P < 0.004) increased from 1.38% in the earlier studies to 2.11% in the more recent ones, whilst prevalence of other relevant findings remained similar. CONCLUSIONS: Rate of inappropriate UGI endoscopies is still high. Diagnostic yield of appropriate endoscopies is higher than that of inappropriate procedures, including upper GI cancers. Therefore, implementation of guidelines in clinical practice is urged.