Colon capsule versus computed tomography colonography for colorectal cancer screening in patients with positive fecal occult blood test who refuse colonoscopy: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: Some patients (10 % - 32 %) with a positive guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) do not undergo the recommended colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and computed tomography colonography (CTC) in terms of participation rate and detection outcomes when offered to patients with a positive gFOBT who did not undergo the recommended colonoscopy. METHODS: An invitation letter offering CTC or VCE was sent to selected patients after randomization. Acceptance of the proposed (or alternative) procedure and procedure results were recorded. Sample size was evaluated according to the hypothesis of a 13 % increase of participation with VCE. RESULTS: A total of 756 patients were targeted. Following the invitation letter, 5.0 % (19/378) of patients underwent the proposed VCE and 7.4 % (28/378) underwent CTC, (P = 0.18). Following the letter, 9.8 % (37/378) of patients in the VCE group underwent a diagnostic procedure (19 VCE, 1 CTC, 17 colonoscopy) vs. 10.8 % in the CTC group (41/378: 28 CTC, 13 colonoscopy; P = 0.55). There were more potentially neoplastic lesions diagnosed in the VCE group than in the CTC group (12/20 [60.0 %] vs. 8/28 [28.6 %]; P = 0.04). Thus, 15/20 noninvasive procedures in the VCE group (19 VCE, 1 CTC; 75.0 %) vs. 10/28 in the CTC group (35.7 %; P = 0.01) resulted in a recommendation of further colonoscopy, but only 10/25 patients actually underwent this proposed colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Patients with a positive gFOBT result who do not undergo the recommended colonoscopy are difficult to recruit to the screening program and simply proposing an additional, less-invasive procedure, such as VCE or CTC, is not an effective strategy.ClinicalTrials.govNCT02558881TRIAL REGISTRATION: Randomized, controlled trial NCT02558881 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Oesophageal capsule endoscopy versus oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy for the diagnosis of recurrent varices: a prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy is the standard method for the diagnosis of recurrent oesophago-gastric varices after endoscopic treatment and eradication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the PillCam Eso capsule endoscopy in this setting. METHODS: Prospective, multicentre study in which patients with history of oesophageal varices treated by band ligation underwent PillCam Eso capsule and oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy. Capsule recordings were blindly read by two endoscopists. Indication for a new prophylactic treatment and patient satisfaction were determined for both procedures. RESULTS: 80 patients (80% males, mean age: 57±12 years) were included, after a median delay of 16 months from last endoscopic treatment. Recurrent oesophageal varices requiring a new prophylactic treatment were detected in 26 patients (32.5%). The mean oesophageal transit time of the capsule was 153 s (range 2-930 s). Capsule sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values for indication of new prophylactic treatments were 65%, 83%, 83%, and 65%, respectively. Capsule adequately classified 77.5% of the patients for prophylaxis indication. Inter-observer concordance for capsule readings was 88% for the prophylaxis indication. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that accuracy of PillCam Eso capsule for the diagnosis of recurrent oesophageal varices after endoscopic eradication is suboptimal. PillCam Eso capsule might therefore be proposed in patients unable or unwilling to undergo oesophago-gastroduodenoscopy.

Capsule endoscopy or push enteroscopy for first-line exploration of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The position of capsule endoscopy (CE) relative to push enteroscopy (PE) in the diagnostic algorithm of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is unclear, as previous studies involved the use of both techniques in all patients. We therefore conducted a trial in which patients were randomized to undergo one or other exploration. METHODS: All consecutive patients referred for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were randomized between CE and PE as the first-line exploration. The alternative method was only used if the first-line method revealed no definite bleeding source, or if required for clinical reasons during follow-up. RESULTS: CE and PE, used as the first-line exploration, identified a bleeding source in 20 of 40 patients and 9 of 38 patients, respectively (50% vs 24%; P = .02). CE missed lesions in 8% of patients, and all these lesions were located in sites accessible to standard endoscopy. PE missed lesions in 26% of patients. At the end of the 12-month follow-up period, the strategy based on CE as first-line exploration followed by PE if necessary only was similar to PE followed by CE in terms of diagnostic yield, clinical outcome, and therapeutic impact, but reduced the percentage of patients needing the alternative exploration (25% vs 79%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: CE has a higher diagnostic yield than PE in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, and a strategy based on CE as first-line exploration avoids unnecessary explorations.

Ileal Crohn's disease in a woman with Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome.

Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by oculocutaneous albinism and platelet dysfunction. A subset of patients also show ceroid deposition, which can result in pulmonary fibrosis or granulomatous colitis. Whether this colitis may be considered Crohn's disease is under debate. We report a case of a patient with HPS associated with inflammatory bowel disease which affected the distal small bowel but not the colon. Ileitis was severe, and recurred rapidly after surgery. Search for mutations in HPS1, ADTB3A, HPS3, HPS4 and for CARD15 were negative. Symptoms and ileal ulcerations which recurred after surgery were successfully treated with azathioprine and infliximab.

Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy and the risk of colorectal adenoma in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: an observational study.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). The long-term administration of UDCA might indirectly favor colon carcinogenesis by increasing the fecal excretion of secondary bile acids or, in contrast, it might inhibit colon carcinogenesis, as demonstrated in animal models. In patients with PBC, we examined the effect of prolonged UDCA administration on the prevalence and recurrence of colorectal adenoma and on the proliferation of colon epithelial cells. One hundred fourteen patients (103 women, 11 men; mean age, 55 years) with PBC, were enrolled in a colonoscopic surveillance program. The prevalence of colon adenoma was compared in patients already treated with UDCA (mean duration 46 months) at the time of colonoscopy (treated group, n = 52) and in patients undergoing colonoscopy just prior to treatment initiation (untreated group, n = 62). The recurrence of adenoma following removal (mean follow-up, 35 months) was compared between UDCA-treated patients and appropriate age- and gender-matched controls (2/1) selected from a cohort of 205 patients undergoing polypectomy. Epithelial cell proliferation was assessed using anti-Ki67 antibodies on colon biopsies from both treated and untreated patients. Treated and untreated patients displayed similar demographic characteristics. The prevalence of colorectal adenomas was 13% in the treated group versus 24% in the untreated group (P =.16). The colon epithelial cell proliferation index was significantly lower in treated patients than in untreated patients (P =.001). Following removal of the adenoma, the probability of recurrence was significantly lower in patients treated with UDCA than in controls (7% vs. 28% at 3 years, P =.04). In conclusion, this study suggests that, in patients with PBC, the prolonged administration of UDCA (1) is not associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal adenomas, and (2) significantly decreases the probability of colorectal adenoma recurrence following removal. These results are strengthened by the significant reduction in colon epithelial cell proliferation seen in patients treated with UDCA.