Antiretroviral treatment outcomes among late HIV presenters initiating treatment with integrase inhibitors or protease inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) with integrase inhibitor (INI) or protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens in patients with low CD4 cell counts and/or an AIDS-defining disease. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicentre analysis to investigate discontinuation proportions and virological response in patients with CD4 cell counts < 200 cells/µL and/or AIDS-defining disease when starting first-line ART. Proportions of those discontinuing ART were compared using univariate analysis. Virological response was analysed using the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot analysis (HIV-1 RNA < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 48). RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen late presenters were included in the study: 13.8% were women and 23.8% were of non-European ethnicity, and the mean baseline CD4 count was 91 cells/µL (standard deviation 112 cells/µL). A total of 131 late presenters started on INI- and 87 on PI-based treatment. It was found that 86.1% of patients treated with INIs and 81.1% of patients treated with PIs had a viral load < 50 copies/mL at week 48; proportions of discontinuation because of adverse events were 6.1% in the INI group and 11.5% in the PI group. No significant differences in discontinuation proportions were observed at week 12 or 48 between INI- and PI-based regimens (P = 0.76 and 0.52, respectively). Virological response was equally good in those receiving INIs and those receiving PIs (86.1% vs. 81.1%, respectively; P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: In a European cohort of late presenters starting first-line INI or PI-based ART regimens, there were no significant differences in discontinuation proportions or virological response at week 48.

Sex and Gender Differences in Rilpivirine based ART - Data from the HIVCENTER Frankfurt.

OBJECTIVE: While Rilpivirine has shown high overall response rates in treatment-naïve patients without sex and gender specific differences in clinical trials, Sex and gender specific data in treatment experienced patients receiving rilpivirine are still limited. We conducted a 48 week efficacy and safety analysis in naïve and treatment experienced men and women using retrospective data from the HIVCENTER Frankfurt. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective observational study data of all patients who received a rilpivirine based regimen at the HIVCENTER between March 2011 and December 2015 were analyzed. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with any discontinuation until week 48. Virologic response rates (FDA snapshot analysis; HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) were assessed at week 48. RESULTS: 194 patients (34% female) were included in the analysis. 74% were treatment-experienced and 26% naïve, respectively. Discontinuations were observed in 31 (15.9%) patients. Regarding sex differences, the proportion of discontinuations was significantly higher in women than in men (24.2% vs. 11.7%; p=0.024; ODDS-Ratio = 2.41; CI 1.12 - 5.18). Virologic failure occurred in 8 PLWHIV (4.1%). CONCLUSION: While virologic overall response rates to rilpivirine based ART were high for both treatment-experienced and -naïve patients the proportion of discontinuations was significantly higher in women (24.2% vs. 11.7%; p = 0.024; ODDS-Ratio = 2.41; CI 1.12 - 5.18). Although the total number of patients with virologic failure was low (4.1%), the higher rate of ART discontinuations in female patients receiving RPV require close monitoring in the first months of treatment addressing special needs of women living with HIV.

Similar long-term efficacy of dual therapy containing raltegravir and a boosted protease inhibitor versus standard triple therapies in pretreated HIV-1-infected patients in a retrospective, real-life cohort of 14 years.

OBJECTIVES: Raltegravir is used in many antiretroviral combinations, but its use in treatment-experienced patients without knowledge of baseline resistance is discussed controversially as a number of comparative studies have shown a higher rate of virological failure. However, it has been used frequently for the management of treatment failure, as it was the first integrase inhibitor to become available, and thus offered new options for patients with multiple resistance. The strategic use of raltegravir in this setting is examined in this study. METHODS: In order to examine the efficacy of raltegravir in second and later lines of antiretroviral combinations, data for 740 patients from three clinical cohorts were analysed with a focus on the combinations that were used. These were stratified into the combination of two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and raltegravir (2NRTIs + RAL), the combination of a boosted protease inhibitor and raltegravir (bPI + RAL), and other raltegravir-containing combinations. RESULTS: The overall rate of virological suppression to < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL was 69.5%. Although the baseline rate of virological suppression was higher for 2NRTIs + RAL than for the other strata, the outcomes were similar for all three groups at weeks 24, 48, 72 and 96. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that, in a real-life setting, raltegravir can be used with a high virological success rate in treatment-experienced patients, and that the different combinations analysed (2NRTIs + RAL, bPI + RAL and others) show comparable rates of virological suppression.

Protease inhibitor therapy for hepatitis C virus-infection.

INTRODUCTION: The hepatitis C virus (HCV) has affected an estimated of 80 million individuals worldwide and is a strain on public health. Around 25-30% of patients in Europe and the US who are infected with HIV are coinfected with HCV. Prior to 2013, treatment modalities containing an NS3/4A protease inhibitor in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates. However, rates of severe side effects were high. Nowadays, oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combination therapy offers excellent treatment efficacy, safety and tolerability. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the current literature and clinical evidence and their impact regarding NS3/4A protease inhibitors. The pitfalls encountered in treating HIV- and HBV-coinfected patients are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: In the era of DAA treatment, third-generation pan-genotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitors (mainly glecaprevir and voxilaprevir) show high antiviral activity and a genetic resistance barrier with cure rates of over 95% when combined with an NS5A inhibitor, irrespective of baseline resistance associated variants (RASs) being present. These new key components of DAA combination therapy are impressive options to eradicate HCV in the so-called difficult-to-treat population (e.g. compensated cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease and patients who failed previous DAA treatment).

Efficacy of raltegravir-containing regimens in antiretroviral-naïve and -experienced individuals in routine clinical practice.

Raltegravir is one of the standard antiretroviral therapy (ART) options in treatment-experienced and -naïve patients. However, efficacy data from clinical practice are scarce. Therefore, the efficacy of raltegravir-containing ART in clinical practice was investigated retrospectively. In all, 295 treatment-naïve and -experienced patients were analysed using two different cut-offs for virological failure (200 or 50 copies/ml). The response at week 24 and onwards was evaluated as a 'time to loss of virological response' analysis and estimated as a survival function. Additionally, dual therapy regimens (raltegravir plus boosted protease inhibitor) were compared to standard combinations in experienced patients performing a snapshot analysis at weeks 24 and 48, as well as a time to loss of virological response analysis. A total of 86.2% of the 64 treatment-naïve patients maintained virological suppression using a cut-off of 200 copies/ml (c/ml), while 67.7% maintained virological suppression with a 50 copies/ml cut-off from week 24 until the end of observation. Among the 231 treatment-experienced patients, 84.8% maintained virological suppression from week 24 onwards using a cut-off of 200 copies/ml; and 71.0% using 50 copies/ml, respectively. In the subgroup snapshot analysis at week 24, 98.3% (86.7% using a cut-off of 50 copies/ml) and at week 48, 93.3% (80.0%) of patients responded to dual therapy. Patients who were receiving a standard background therapy responded in 88.3% (81.3%) at week 24 and in 86.0% (80.7%) at week 48. Differences were not significant. This study shows again the overall long-term efficacy of raltegravir-based ART and furthermore gives reference for a comparable efficacy of dual and standard nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor-backbone regimens in experienced patients on raltegravir over a period of 48 weeks in a real-life cohort where patients with severe comorbidities were included.

Induction and characterization of multianalyte antibodies against penicillins in egg yolk.

Antibodies against penicillins were induced in eggs of laying hens after immunization with 6-aminopenicillanic acid (6-APA) coupled to key-hole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Development of the antibody titer was monitored by an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), with 6-APA coupled to ovalbumin as antigen for coating microtiter plates. Different characteristics (time course, affinity) of the immune reaction were observed by testing eggs of individual hens. Titer values varied between 150 and 2000. Antibodies were isolated by polyethylene glycol precipitation and affinity chromatography, using a hapten sorbent with 6-APA as ligand. Glycine buffer, pH 3.0, was used to elute the immunoglobulins. Antibody specificity was determined in a competitive ELISA with 7 penicillins and the cephalosporin cephalexin as competitors. Cross reactivities for the penicillins were between 100 and 290% (6-APA = 100%). Cephalexin cross reacted only marginally (3%).