A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To optimise treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines recommend using risk stratification, with the aim of patients achieving low-risk status. Previous analyses of registries made progress in using risk stratification approaches, however, the focus is often on patients with a low-risk prognosis, whereas most PAH patients are in intermediate-risk or high-risk categories. Using only six parameters with high prognostic relevance, we aimed to demonstrate a pragmatic approach to individual patient risk assessment to discriminate between patients at low risk, intermediate risk and high risk of death. METHODS: Risk assessment was performed combining six parameters in four criteria: (1) WHO functional class, (2) 6 min walk distance, (3) N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)/BNP plasma levels or right atrial pressure and (4) cardiac index or mixed venous oxygen saturation. Assessments were made at baseline and at first follow-up after 3-4 months. RESULTS: 725 PAH treatment-naive patients were analysed. Survival estimates between risk groups were statistically significant at baseline and first follow-up (p<0.001), even when the analysis was performed within PAH etiological subgroups. Similar results were observed in 208 previously treated PAH patients. Furthermore, patients who remained at or improved to low risk had a significantly better estimated survival compared with patients who remained at or worsened to intermediate risk or high risk (p≤0.005). CONCLUSION: The simplified risk-assessment method can discriminate idiopathic, connective-tissue-disease-associated and congenital-heart-disease-associated PAH patients into meaningful high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk groups at baseline and first follow-up. This pragmatic approach reinforces targeting a low-risk profile for PAH patients.

[Balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: 5 years of experience in Italy]. / L'angioplastica delle arterie polmonari nel cuore polmonare cronico tromboembolico: 5 anni di esperienza in Italia.

BACKGROUND: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) represents a therapeutic option for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in patients who are not eligible for surgical pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) or with persistent/recurrent symptomatic pulmonary arterial hypertension after PEA. This study evaluated the safety of BPA during 5 years of experience of the only Italian center systematically performing this procedure. METHODS: The BPA program was activated at the S. Orsola Polyclinic in Bologna in June 2015. Life-threatening periprocedural complications were defined as: death <30 days, need for cardiopulmonary support, hemoptysis with the need for endotracheal intubation. Serious complications were vascular complications requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention. Other endpoints of interest were: hemoptysis, pulmonary vascular damage with or without hemoptysis, and pulmonary reperfusion injury with high-resolution computed tomography lung scan at 24 h. RESULTS: From June 2015 to September 2020, 50 patients (45% male, median age 68 years), 42 inoperable and 8 with persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA, underwent 156 BPA procedures at our institution. There was one life-threatening complication (2% of patients, 0.06% of the procedures), i.e. severe hemoptysis requiring endotracheal intubation, and four serious complications (8% of the patients, 2.6% of the procedures), i.e. one pulmonary artery perforation requiring percutaneous treatment and three access-site vascular complications requiring surgery. There were no deaths <30 days. Pulmonary reperfusion injury occurred in 37 patients (74%) for a total of 96 sessions (62%). However, reperfusion injury was limited and with subclinical course in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the relative safety of BPA in patients with CTEPH who are not candidates for heart surgery or with persistent pulmonary hypertension after PEA in the first large Italian experience.