Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 3-year toxicity results of a multicentre randomized phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is a standard treatment for prostate cancer patients. We compared 2 moderate HFRT regimens, with a biologically equivalent dose of 80 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, with a modest simultaneous integrated boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized phase 3 trial with acute toxicity as the primary endpoint, comparing: 56 Gy in 4 weeks (16x3.5 Gy, 4 days/week, Arm A) with 67 Gy in 5 weeks (25x2.68 Gy, 5 days/week, Arm B). The H0 hypothesis is that both regimens are equivalent in terms of acute grade ≥ 2 gastro-intestinal toxicity, defined as a difference in acute grade ≥ 2 gastro-intestinal toxicity of ≤ 10 %. Here we report on acute and late toxicity. RESULTS: We included 170 patients in Arm A and 172 patients in Arm B. The median follow-up time for all patients was 42 months. Acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity was reported by 24 % of patients in both groups. Acute grade 2 and 3 urinary toxicity was observed in 52 % and 9 % of patients in Arm A and 53 % and 7 % in Arm B. Late grade 2 and grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 19 % and 4 % of patients in Arm A compared with 15 % and 4 % in Arm B. Late grade 2 and grade ≥ 3 urinary toxicity was observed in 37 % and 10 % of patients in Arm A and 36 % and 6 % in Arm B. CONCLUSION: This analysis confirms that both HFRT regimens are safe and equivalent in terms of acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Patients with High-risk Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicentric Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: High-risk muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has a poor prognosis. Old trials showed that external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after radical cystectomy (RC) decreases the incidence of local recurrences but induces severe toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the toxicity and local control rate after adjuvant EBRT after RC delivered with volumetric arc radiotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multicentric phase 2 trial. From August 2014 till October 2020, we treated 72 high-risk MIBC patients with adjuvant EBRT after RC. High-risk MIBC is defined as ≥pT3-MIBC ± lymphovascular invasion, fewer than ten lymph nodes removed, pathological positive lymph nodes, or positive surgical margins. INTERVENTION: Patients received 50 Gy in 25 fractions with intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the pelvic lymph nodes ± cystectomy bed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome is acute toxicity. We report on local relapse-free rate (LRFR), clinical relapse-free survival (CRFS), overall survival (OS), and bladder cancer-specific survival (BCSS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up is 18 mo. Forty-two patients (61%) developed acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Four patients (6%) had acute grade 3 GI toxicity. One patient had grade 5 diarrhea and vomiting due to obstruction at 1 mo. Two-year probabilities of developing grade ≥3 and ≥2 GI toxicity were 17% and 76%, respectively. Urinary toxicity, assessed in 17 patients with a neobladder, was acceptable with acute grade 2 and 3 urinary toxicity reported in 53% (N = 9) and 18% (N = 3) of the patients, respectively. The 2-yr LRFR is 83% ± 5% and the 2-yr CRFS rate is 43% with a median CRFS time of 12 mo (95% confidence interval: 3-21 mo). Two-year OS and BCSS are 52% ± 7% and 62% ± 7%, respectively. Shortcomings are the nonrandomized study design and limited follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant EBRT after RC can be administered without excessive severe toxicity. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we looked at the incidence of toxicity and local control after adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) following radical cystectomy (RC) in high-risk muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. We found that adjuvant EBRT was feasible and resulted in good local control. We conclude that these data support further enrollment of patients in ongoing trials to evaluate the place of adjuvant EBRT after RC.

Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

For patients experiencing biochemical recurrence in the absence of distant metastasis, salvage radiotherapy (SRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the only possible curative treatment option. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monitoring and the selected use of SRT has some advantages when compared with adjuvant radiotherapy. The most important one is avoidance of a potential overtreatment of patients who would never have disease progression, even in the presence of high-risk pathological features. The identification of a specific PSA cut-off seems to be incorrect. In patients with more adverse pathological features, early SRT administered at the very first sign of a PSA rise granted better disease control. Dose-intensified SRT is feasible and well tolerated with no significant difference in grade 2 or more acute and late toxicity. At least 66 Gy must be given in the salvage setting. ADT has a radio-sensitising effect on the radiotherapy by inhibiting the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. The use of ADT in the salvage setting results in a better oncological outcome. Hormonal therapy is associated with a decrease in quality of life and side-effects depending on the duration of hormone therapy. The oncological benefit of hormone therapy duration depends on their clinical and pathological characteristics. 68-Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography is the gold standard in staging prostate cancer patients with biochemical persistence or recurrence after radical prostatectomy. The implementation of 18F-labelled PSMA tracers can provide a further improvement.

The survival impact of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy for treatment of high-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Several randomized controlled trials assessed the outcomes of patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). The majority of them included mainly low and intermediate risk prostate cancer (PCa) without specifically assessing PCa-related death (PCRD). Thus, there is a lack of knowledge regarding a possible effect of NHT on PCRD in the high-risk PCa population. We aimed to analyze the effect of NHT on PCRD in a multicenter high-risk PCa population treated with RP, using a propensity-score adjustment. METHODS: This is a retrospective multi-institutional study including patients with high-risk PCa defined as: clinical stage T3-4, PSA >20 ng ml-1 or biopsy Gleason score 8-10. We compared PCRD between RP and NHT+RP using competing risks analysis. Correction for group differences was performed by propensity-score adjustment. RESULTS: After application of the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1573 patients remained for analysis; 1170 patients received RP and 403 NHT+RP. Median follow-up was 56 months (interquartile range 29-88). Eighty-six patients died of PCa and 106 of other causes. NHT decreased the risk of PCRD (hazard ratio (HR) 0.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.80; P=0.0014). An interaction effect between NHT and radiotherapy (RT) was observed (HR 0.3; 95% CI 0.21-0.43; P<0.0008). More specifically, of patients who received adjuvant RT, those who underwent NHT+RP had decreased PCRD rates (2.3% at 5 year) compared to RP (7.5% at 5 year). The retrospective design and lack of specific information about NHT are possible limitations. CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity-score adjusted analysis from a large high-risk PCa population, NHT before surgery significantly decreased PCRD. This effect appeared to be mainly driven by the early addition of RT post-surgery. The specific sequence of NHT+RP and adjuvant RT merits further study in the high-risk PCa population.

Pattern of Progression after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Nodal Recurrences.

AIMS: To report the relapse pattern of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligorecurrent nodal prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PCa patients with ≤3 lymph nodes (N1/M1a) at the time of recurrence were treated with SBRT. SBRT was defined as a radiotherapy dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction to a biological effective dose of at least 80 Gy to all metastatic sites. Distant progression-free survival was defined as the time interval between the first day of SBRT and appearance of new metastatic lesions, outside the high-dose region. Relapses after SBRT were recorded and compared with the initially treated site. Secondary end points were local control, time to palliative androgen deprivation therapy and toxicity scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. RESULTS: Overall, 89 metastases were treated in 72 patients. The median distant progression-free survival was 21 months (95% confidence interval 16-25 months) with 88% of patients having ≤3 metastases at the time of progression. The median time from first SBRT to the start of palliative androgen deprivation therapy was 44 months (95% confidence interval 17-70 months). Most relapses (68%) occurred in nodal regions. Relapses after pelvic nodal SBRT (n = 36) were located in the pelvis (n = 14), retroperitoneum (n = 1), pelvis and retroperitoneum (n = 8) or in non-nodal regions (n = 13). Relapses after SBRT for extrapelvic nodes (n = 5) were located in the pelvis (n = 1) or the pelvis and retroperitoneum (n = 4). Late grade 1 and 2 toxicity was observed in 17% (n = 12) and 4% of patients (n = 3). CONCLUSION: SBRT for oligometastatic PCa nodal recurrences is safe. Most subsequent relapses are again nodal and oligometastatic.

Cognitive factors influencing treatment decision-making in patients with localised prostate cancer: development of a standardised questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer have to make a well-informed treatment choice between (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and, in selected cases, brachytherapy and active surveillance. We developed and validated a questionnaire to determine the cognitive reasons motivating this choice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Prostate Cancer Decision-Making Questionnaire (PC-DMQ) was designed in-house and validated through the Delphi method. Finally, we tested the questionnaire in a cohort of 24 men, recently diagnosed with localised PC, before undergoing RARP (n = 16), EBRT (n = 6), brachytherapy (n = 1) or active surveillance (n = 1). RESULTS: The experts reached consensus after three rounds. In the patient cohort, 75% of men undergoing RARP chose this treatment because 'it provides the best chance of cure'. Reasons to choose EBRT were not as explicit: 33.3% chose this treatment because 'it provides the best chance of cure' and 33.3% because 'the maintenance of potency is important to them'. CONCLUSIONS: The PC-DMQ is a comprehensive and standardised tool that allows further research into cognitive factors that influence treatment decision-making in patients with localised PC.

Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy in the palliative treatment of pseudomyxoma peritonei.

BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare clinical syndrome characterized by mucinous peritoneal disease arising from disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis. Primary treatment involves a combination of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). There is no consensus on the proper treatment of recurrent PMP. In selected patients, repeated cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC might improve outcome. However, every repeated debulking procedure becomes less effective with increased morbidity. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a patient with intestinal obstruction caused by recurrent pseudomyxoma peritonei. We treated the patient with whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) to a total dose of 33 Gy, delivered in 22 daily fractions. The treatment was well tolerated and resulted in resolution of the obstruction for a period of 24 months. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case report showing the possibility of resolving intestinal obstruction with WAPRT in a patient with recurrent PMP. It is our opinion that WAPRT delivered by IMAT, in analogy with ovarian cancer, should be considered as a palliative treatment option in managing patients with recurrent PMP especially in case of obstruction.

Imaging treated prostate cancer.

In patients with a clinical suspicion of recurrence after treatment for prostate cancer, imaging can be used to distinguish between local recurrence and metastatic disease. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate may be a valuable imaging modality for the detection and localization of local recurrence in patients treated for prostate cancer. In mpMRI, morphological T2-weighted images are combined with functional MRI techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to improve accuracy. In this paper, the current status of imaging techniques used to detect and to localize tumor recurrence in patients treated for prostate cancer will be reviewed, with emphasis on mpMRI for local prostate cancer recurrence.

Screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer: an update.

Screening for prostate cancer has become a main controversial topic. First the currently used screening tools, PSA (Prostate Specific Antigen) and DRE (Digital Rectal Examination) have a low accuracy in the prediction of prostate cancer. Second, the benefit of screening in reducing the prostate cancer related mortality was not uniformly shown in older screening studies and there was concern about the risk of overdiagnosis and over-treatment of insignificant prostate cancers. Very recently, 3 major prospective, randomized screening studies have been published. This paper aims to provide an overview how the performance of the current screening tools can be ameliorated and evaluates the recently published screening studies with practical considerations for future screening protocols.

Intensity-modulated arc therapy with cisplatin as neo-adjuvant treatment for primary irresectable cervical cancer. Toxicity, tumour response and outcome.

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of intensity-modulated arc therapy ± cisplatin (IMAT ± C) followed by hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 30 patients were included in the study. The primary tumour and PET-positive lymph node(s) received a simultaneous integrated boost. Four weeks after IMAT ± C treatment, response was evaluated. Resection consisted of hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Tumour response, acute and late radiation toxicity, postoperative morbidity and outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: All hysterectomy specimens were macroscopically tumour-free with negative resection margins; pathological complete response was 40%. In 2 patients, one resected lymph node was positive. There was no excess in postoperative morbidity. Apart from two grade 3 hematologic toxicities, no grade 3 or 4 acute radiation toxicity was observed. No grade 3, 1 grade 4 (4%) intestinal, and 4 grade 3 (14%) urinary late toxicities were observed. The 2-year local and regional control rates were 96% and 100%, respectively. The 2-year distant control rate was 92%. Actuarial 2-year progression free survival rate was 89%. Actuarial 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 96% and 91%, while 3-year overall survival was 84%. CONCLUSION: Surgery after IMAT ± C is feasible with low postoperative morbidity and radiation toxicity. Local, regional, distant control and survival rates are promising.

The impact of clinical factors on the development of late radiation toxicity: results from the Medical Research Council RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397).

AIMS: A variety of dosimetric parameters have been shown to influence the incidence of late radiation toxicity. The effect of other treatment- and patient-related factors is less well established. The aim of this study was to elucidate the influence of such factors in the development of late symptoms after radical radiotherapy to the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient- and treatment-related factors that are thought to influence the development of late toxicity were analysed in 788 patients who had received radical radiotherapy to the prostate in the Medical Research Council RT01 trial. Late toxicity data were recorded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Late Effects of Normal Tissues/Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic, Royal Marsden Hospital and the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index. Acute toxicity was measured using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading system. RESULTS: On multivariate analysis, acute bowel toxicity was statistically significantly associated with increased proctitis (hazard ratio=1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.18, 2.24; P=0.003) and increased stool frequency (hazard ratio=1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.27, 2.46; P=0.001). Hypertension was strongly associated with a decreased risk of poor urinary stream (hazard ratio=0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.09, 0.71; P=0.009). There was an increased risk of rectal bleeding with increased age (hazard ratio=1.04 per year of age, 95% confidence interval 1.01, 1.08; P=0.009). As expected, a higher prescribed dose increased the risk of several late toxicity end points. Although acute bladder toxicity was associated with the presence of bladder symptoms at 5 years, the effect disappeared for all symptoms except increased urinary frequency and haematuria when a change in bladder function from baseline was calculated. Patients with any pretreatment bladder symptoms were more likely to report increased urinary frequency (hazard ratio=2.09, 95% confidence interval 1.48, 2.95; P<0.0005), increased urinary incontinence (hazard ratio=4.22, 95% confidence interval 2.13, 8.35; P<0.0005) and decreased stream (hazard ratio=2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.62, 4.31; P<0.0005), after treatment and before the most recent follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, increased acute gastrointestinal and bladder symptoms and prescribed dose were associated with increased late radiation toxicity. The presence of hypertension seemed to be protective for the development of late effects. Baseline symptoms should be taken into account when radiation toxicity is analysed.

A comparison of the acute toxicity profile between two-dimensional and three-dimensional image-guided radiotherapy for postoperative prostate cancer.

AIMS: To compare acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity for patients positioned with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and patients positioned with kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during postoperative prostate radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and April 2010, 196 prostate cancer patients were referred for postoperative salvage radiotherapy. Patient position was corrected using EPID (1999 to December 2006, n=116) or CBCT (January 2007 to present, n=80). The treatment technique, number of beams, dose prescription, dose computation algorithm and planning target volume margins were not altered over time. Grade 1-3 acute gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity were compared between the EPID group and the CBCT group. RESULTS: The incidence of grade 1 and 2 genitourinary toxicity was significantly reduced by 17 and 14%, respectively, in the CBCT group compared with the EPID group (P<0.05). This was mainly attributed to a decrease in the following grade 1 symptoms: frequency (P<0.05), nocturia (P=0.06) and urgency (P=0.07). Grade 2 incontinence (P=0.06) and frequency (P=0.06) were lower in the CBCT group. Grade 3 genitourinary toxicity was comparably low (EPID 3% versus CBCT 1%). There was no significant difference in gastrointestinal grade 1-2 toxicity between both groups. No grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patient positioning with CBCT significantly reduces acute genitourinary toxicity compared with positioning with EPID.

Clinical and imaging tools in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer, a review.

Measurement of serum Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level is useful to detect early prostate cancer. PSA-screening may reduce the mortality rate from prostate cancer, but this is associated with a high rate of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. To improve the detection of clinically significant cancers, several auxiliary clinical and imaging tools can be used. The absolute PSA value can be complemented with parameters such as PSA velocity, PSA density and free/total PSA. Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) has only moderate accuracy in the detection of prostate carcinoma, but is very useful in the estimation of prostate volume and thus calculation of PSA-density. The role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in diagnosis and staging of prostate carcinoma is rapidly increasing. Morphologic T2-weighted MR images (T2-WI), preferably with an endorectal coil, depict the prostatic anatomy with high resolution and can detect tumoral areas within the peripheral zone of the prostate. Addition of MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and/or diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) further increase the diagnostic performance of MRI. The gold standard for diagnosis of prostate carcinoma is histological assessment obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic core needle biopsy. In the future, imaging-based targeted biopsies may improve the biopsy yield and decrease the number of biopsy cores. Computed Tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have no value in early prostate cancer detection and the indications are limited to lymph node staging and detection of distant metastases.

Magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis, staging and radiotherapy planning for prostate cancer.

T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), preferably using an endorectal coil, is able to clearly depict the normal prostatic anatomy and to identify prostate cancer with fair diagnostic accuracy. The latter can be further increased by using functional techniques such as spectroscopy (assessment of prostatic metabolism), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (assessment of angiogenesis) and diffusion-weighted imaging (assessment of cellular density). T2-weighted MRI is an important tool for local staging of prostate cancer in patients clinically staged as cT1 or cT2, because of its high specificity for macroscopic capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion. Compared to CT-imaging, MRI depicts the internal prostatic anatomy, prostatic margins and the extent of prostatic tumours much more clearly. This benefit can be exploited to improve the accuracy of target delineations in radiotherapy planning.

Dose conformation in IMRT for head and neck tumors: which solution to apply?

At Ghent University Hospital, IMRT for head and neck cancer is routinely performed. The desired dose distribution is defined upfront as a range of acceptable doses assigned to each voxel of volumes of interest. It was found important to specify the range of acceptable doses separately to areas of the PTV either in or outside the buildup zone as well as to areas which do or do not intersect with PTV-dose limiting organs at risk (OAR). To avoid high doses at distance from the PTV, the creation of a "surrounding" OAR which is the whole scanned volume minus the PTV was found efficient, especially if inside this OAR, subvolumes were created at increasing distance from the PTV. By specifying inside these subvolumes maximum dose constraints which decreased with distance from the PTV, conformality is secured. The creation of these additional PTV and OAR subvolumes allows comprehensive and unambiguous definition of the range of acceptable doses and thereby avoids user-interactive assignment of weights to the terms of the objective function during optimization. The efficiency of inverse planning is highly improved. Its outcome is predictable, plan evaluation is objective as the plan either does or does not comply with the predefined range of acceptable doses. Accurate reporting of the planned dose distribution is facilitated by description of the dose range to all volumes. The expense of this procedure is modest and lays mostly 1) in the creation of the subvolumes, which can be done semi-automatically by modern image segmentation tools and 2) in the inclusion of constraints to all subvolumes into the objective function.

Influence of preoperative combined radiochemotherapy on surgical outcome and colonic anastomotic healing: experimental study in the rat.

PURPOSE: To study the influence of combined preoperative hyperfractionated irradiation with intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on surgical outcome and colonic anastomotic healing in a rat model. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were given 41.6 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) or sham irradiation, with intraperitoneal 5-FU at low dose (10 mg/kg) or high dose (20 mg/kg). Animals were arranged in 6 groups: RT + low-dose 5-FU (RCT-L), RT + high-dose 5-FU (RCT-H), sham RT + low-dose 5-FU (CT-L), sham RT + high-dose 5-FU (CT-H), RT alone (R), and a control group (sham RT + intraperitoneal saline). Side-to-side colonic anastomoses were constructed from one irradiated and one nonirradiated limb 4 days after radiochemotherapy. Animals were sacrificed 10 days after surgery. RESULTS: Compared to controls, more complications occurred in group RCT-H (50% versus 0%, p = 0.01). Adhesion formation was more intense in groups RCT-H and CT-H (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). After therapy, white blood cell counts dropped significantly in all irradiated animals (p < 0.01), and platelet counts decreased significantly in group RCT-H (p = 0.01). No significant differences were noticed in anastomotic bursting pressure when the treated groups were compared to each other or to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no adverse effect on the strength of colonic anastomosis in this rat model. However, the combined RT with high-dose 5-FU does increase operative morbidity and adhesion formation.