Mortality due to bleeding, myocardial infarction and stroke in dialysis patients.

Essentials Mortality due to bleeding vs. arterial thrombosis in dialysis patients is unknown. We compared death causes of 201 918 dialysis patients with the general population. Dialysis was associated with increased mortality risks of bleeding and arterial thrombosis. Clinicians should be aware of the increased bleeding and thrombosis risks. SUMMARY: Background Dialysis has been associated with both bleeding and thrombotic events. However, there is limited information on bleeding as a cause of death versus arterial thrombosis as a cause of death. Objectives To investigate the occurrence of bleeding, myocardial infarction and stroke as causes of death in the dialysis population as compared with the general population. Methods We included 201 918 patients from 11 countries providing data to the ERA-EDTA Registry who started dialysis treatment between 1994 and 2011, and followed them for 3 years. Age-standardized and sex-standardized mortality rate ratios for bleeding, myocardial infarction and stroke as causes of death were calculated in dialysis patients as compared with the European general population. Associations between potential risk factors and these causes of death in dialysis patients were investigated by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by the use of Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results As compared with the general population, the age-standardized and sex-standardized mortality rate ratios in dialysis patients were 12.8 (95% CI 11.9-13.7) for bleeding as a cause of death (6.2 per 1000 person-years among dialysis patients versus 0.3 per 1000 person-years in the general population), 13.4 (95% CI 13.0-13.9) for myocardial infarction (22.5 versus 0.9 per 1000 person-years), and 12.4 (95% CI 11.9-12.9) for stroke (14.3 versus 0.7 per 1000 person-years). Conclusion Dialysis patients have highly increased risks of death caused by bleeding and arterial thrombosis as compared with the general population. Clinicians should be aware of the increased mortality risks caused by these conditions.

Mortality due to pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke among incident dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: It is has been suggested that dialysis patients have lower mortality rates for pulmonary embolism than the general population, because of platelet dysfunction and bleeding tendency. However, there is limited information whether dialysis is indeed associated with a decreased mortality risk from pulmonary embolism. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate whether mortality rate ratios for pulmonary embolism were lower than for myocardial infarction and stroke in dialysis patients compared with the general population. METHODS: Cardiovascular causes of death for 130,439 incident dialysis patients registered in the ERA-EDTA Registry were compared with the cardiovascular causes of death for the European general population. RESULTS: The age- and sex-standardized mortality rate (SMR) from pulmonary embolism was 12.2 (95% CI 10.2-14.6) times higher in dialysis patients than in the general population. The SMRs in dialysis patients compared with the general population were 11.0 (95% CI 10.6-11.4) for myocardial infarction, 8.4 (95% CI 8.0-8.8) for stroke, and 8.3 (95% CI 8.0-8.5) for other cardiovascular diseases. In dialysis patients, primary kidney disease due to diabetes was associated with an increased mortality risk due to pulmonary embolism (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.8), myocardial infarction (HR 4.1; 95% CI 3.4-4.9), stroke (HR 3.5; 95% CI 2.8-4.4), and other cardiovascular causes of death (HR 3.4; 95% CI 2.9-3.9) compared with patients with polycystic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: Dialysis patients were found to have an unexpected highly increased mortality rate for pulmonary embolism and increased mortality rates for myocardial infarction and stroke.

Fluctuations of haemoglobinaemia in chronic haemodialysis patients.

In March 2008 and June 2009, an ad hoc working group of nephrologists discussed the status of anaemia therapy with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents [ESA] in patients on chronic haemodialysis, the phenomenon of fluctuations of haemoglobinaemia, and the need for individualisation of ESA treatment. The working group put together the following statements: (1) ESAs increase the haemoglobin concentration and adaptations of the ESA dose adjust the response according to a negative-feedback loop. The long lag time between an ESA dose change and its effect on erythropoiesis is cumbersome. The optimal haemoglobin target concentration is different for every haemodialysis patient; the lowest haemoglobin concentration upon which one could consistently demonstrate a positive subjective and objective clinical benefit in chronic dialysis is 11 g/dL, in contrast to the lowest haemoglobin concentration of 10 g/dL recommended in the current EMEA label for ESAs. (2) Intra-individual fluctuation of haemoglobinaemia over time is unavoidable, not only due to the ESA dose/haemoglobin response interaction, but also, and more importantly, due to the occurrence of acute illnesses and exacerbations of co-morbid conditions. Many different methodologies to characterise haemoglobin variability have been described but there is currently no universally applied definition of the phenomenon. (3) An impact of the haemoglobin level and the amplitude of the haemoglobin fluctuations on patient outcome has been observed. Without disclosing any causal relationship, worse outcomes were associated with haemoglobin fluctuations around the lower target level, but later on, more simply linked to the relative time spent below the haemoglobin concentration of 11 g/dL and to the administration of inappropriately high ESA doses in order to achieve the recommended haemoglobin target range. A plausible mechanism might be that acute illnesses blunt the patients' basal ESA sensitivity; this leads to subnormal and/or varying haemoglobin levels, currently initiating an ESA dose increase. The longer it takes the patient to recover from the acute illness, the more the prolongation of the clinically poor condition is to some extent maintained by the persistence of low haemoglobinaemia and/or by the administration of high ESA doses, and, as such, on their turn possibly contributing to an ultimate poor outcome. In the absence of clinical trials, recommendations should be offered how to proceed with the administration of ESAs as optimal as possible in periods of clinical instability.

An observational study of the effectiveness of darbepoetin alpha administered in dialysis patients once every 2 weeks for 12 months.

AIMS: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are recommended for managing renal anemia. ALTERNATE is an observational study in European and Australian dialysis patients evaluating darbepoetin a (DA) once every 2 weeks (Q2W) in clinical practice. METHODS: Adult dialysis patients initiating treatment with DA Q2W were eligible regardless of previous/current ESA use. Data were collected 6 months before and 12 months after Q2W initiation. The primary endpoint was hemoglobin (Hb) concentration 12 months after initiation. RESULTS: A total of 6,112 patients were enrolled; 6,104 were eligible (87% hemodialysis, 12% peritoneal dialysis). Before initiation, 77.3%, 8.8%, and 7.8% of patients were receiving DA, epoetin beta, and epoetin alpha, respectively; 6% were ESA naïve. Mean (95% CI) Hb (g/dl) was 11.68 (11.63-11.72) 6 months before initiation, 12.00 (11.97-12.04) at initiation, and 11.62 (11.58-11.66) 12 months after initiation. Geometric mean (95% CI) weekly ESA dose (µg/wk) was 27.27 (26.62-27.93) immediately before initiation, 23.69 (23.28 - 24.10) at initiation, and 26.80 (26.12-27.49) 12 months after initiation. At month 12, 77.3% of patients were receiving DA Q2W. CONCLUSIONS: This large observational study demonstrates that Hb concentrations can be effectively maintained over 12 months in a general dialysis population with DA Q2W without an increase in ESA dose.

Senescence rates in patients with end-stage renal disease: a critical appraisal of the Gompertz model.

The most frequently used model to describe the exponential increase in mortality rate over age is the Gompertz equation. Logarithmically transformed, the equation conforms to a straight line, of which the slope has been interpreted as the rate of senescence. Earlier, we proposed the derivative function of the Gompertz equation as a superior descriptor of senescence rate. Here, we tested both measures of the rate of senescence in a population of patients with end-stage renal disease. It is clinical dogma that patients on dialysis experience accelerated senescence, whereas those with a functional kidney transplant have mortality rates comparable to the general population. Therefore, we calculated the age-specific mortality rates for European patients on dialysis (n=274 221; follow-up=594 767 person-years), for European patients with a functioning kidney transplant (n=61 286; follow-up=345 024 person-years), and for the general European population. We found higher mortality rates, but a smaller slope of logarithmic mortality curve for patients on dialysis compared with both patients with a functioning kidney transplant and the general population (P<0.001). A classical interpretation of the Gompertz model would imply that the rate of senescence in patients on dialysis is lower than in patients with a functioning transplant and lower than in the general population. In contrast, the derivative function of the Gompertz equation yielded the highest senescence rates for patients on dialysis, whereas the rate was similar in patients with a functioning transplant and the general population. We conclude that the rate of senescence is better described by the derivative function of the Gompertz equation.

Severe diarrhea in renal transplant patients: results of the DIDACT study.

Diarrhea is common in transplant recipients. While the majority of cases are mild and transient, some are severe and prolonged, which can threaten graft survival through dehydration. While it is known that some immunosuppressive agents can elicit diarrhea, there does not appear to be any consensus on the role that other nonimmunosuppressive causes can play in transplant patients. The aim of the present open, nonrandomized, multicenter study was to identify nonimmunosuppressive factors involved in severe diarrhea in renal transplant patients. Patients (n = 108) with severe diarrhea (>/=3 stools/day for >/=7 days) were enrolled from 16 Belgian transplant centers. Patients were diagnosed according to an agreed flowchart that consisted of identification of possible infections, followed by changes in empirical and immunosuppressive treatment. Approximately 50% of patients experienced resolution of severe diarrhea following treatment for infections, dietary problems or diarrhea-causing concomitant medications. In conclusion, a large proportion of the severe diarrhea observed in renal transplant recipients is not associated with immunosuppressive therapy and can be treated through anti-infectives, changes to concomitant medication and other empirical treatments. Correct diagnosis of the cause of severe diarrhea in such patients should help to protect graft survival in transplant recipients.

Preservation of renal function after heart transplantation: initial single-center experience with sirolimus.

BACKGROUND: Long-term survivors of heart transplantation are often confronted with chronic kidney disease, by definition related to the intake of calcineurin-inhibitors. Sirolimus is increasingly proposed as an alternative immunosuppressive agent due to its absence of nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Between November 2002 and November 2003, 9 adult heart transplant candidates with moderate to severe chronic renal disease were switched from cyclosporine to sirolimus. The conversion scheme consisted of an immediate stop of cyclosporine and an 8-mg loading dose of sirolimus, followed by 3 mg/d; after 1 week, the sirolimus dose was adjusted to maintain trough levels between 5 and 15 microg/L. The majority of patients were on corticosteroids, and on either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. At conversion, the mean serum creatinine level was 2.11 (+/-0.4) mg/dL and the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 32 (+/-7) mL/min/1.73 m(2). Prior to conversion, the renal dysfunction was predominantly stable. RESULTS: After conversion, there were 7 dropouts (75%) due to several side effects related to sirolimus: edema (n = 2), general discomfort (n = 2), delayed wound healing (n = 1), cardiac thrombus (n = 1), and diarrhea (n = 1). The median treatment time with Sirolimus, therefore, was only 4.0 months. While on sirolimus, the renal function of all patients remained unchanged or showed even some improvement. Retrospective nephrological review revealed severe renal artery stenoses in 2 patients and serious generalized abdominal and renal atheromatosis in 7 patients. No cardiac dysfunction was seen. CONCLUSION: Conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus was problematic due to sirolimus side effects, occurring at any time after the switch. One should also question whether chronic kidney disease after heart transplantation is routinely caused by the administration of calcineurin-inhibitors, in view of the generalized renal and abdominal atheromatosis.

Mortality rates after heart transplantation: how to compare center-specific outcome data?

BACKGROUND: Studies of outcome in cardiac transplantation have focused primarily on identifying patient- and donor-related factors associated with patient mortality. Less consideration has been given to the impact of the transplant center. This study was undertaken to assess variability in heart transplantation outcome in Eurotransplant centers to provide a framework for auditing. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a 2-year period, 1,401 adult patients underwent heart transplantation in 45 centers. The 1-year patient survival rate was 76% (95% CI, 74%-78%) with a range of 0% to 100% at the center level. The risk-adjusted center effect on mortality was estimated by calculating a standardized difference between the observed number of deaths 1 year after transplantation and the expected number of deaths based on the case mix. By assessing within- and between-center variations with empirical Bayes (EB) methods, after adjustment for all registered prognostic factors, an improved estimate of the true center effect was obtained. Compared with the standard risk-adjusted center effect method, fewer outlying centers were identified with the EB method. CONCLUSION: EB methods, because they are known to incorporate more information from the data, enable a more precise and realistic portrayal of heart transplant centers' performances, compared with other risk-adjusted center effect methods. In the context of auditing procedures, EB methods should preferably be used for the identification of centers that deviate significantly from quality standards.

Cardioscopy and robotic assistance for the diagnosis of intraventricular endocarditis.

A 44-year-old male patient with an undefined mass in the left ventricular endocardium was scheduled for minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Ventricular investigation and tissue biopsies were completed with the help of a voice-controlled robotic arm. Pathologic examination revealed non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis. In addition to videoscopy, robotic assistance allows an easier diagnostic and therapeutic approach of intraventricular pathologies.

Iso-risk curves as a tool for clinical decision-making: donor factors and medical urgency in cardiac transplantation.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND; No significant improvement of overall graft survival in cardiac transplantation has occurred during the past decade, notwithstanding the identification of several prognostic donor and recipient risk factors. By translating multivariate results into iso-risk curves plots, stratified for medical urgency, we attempt to present results in a more practical manner, to be used as guidelines at the time of donor heart offer and of allocation. METHODS: We analyzed all first heart-only transplants performed in adults and carried out between January 1, 1997, and June 30, 1998 (N = 1120). Before transplant, 687 patients were at home, 233 on hospital wards, and 200 on the intensive care unit. The overall Cox model yielded 5 independent factors associated with 1-year graft outcome: donor age, donor:recipient weight ratio, medical urgency, end-stage heart disease, and transplant country. We used the significant donor variables of donor age and donor:recipient weight ratio for the iso-risk curves; we calculated relative risks for all combinations of donor age and donor:recipient weight ratio. We obtained iso-risk curves by linking equal relative risks. RESULTS: All iso-risk curves showed that with older donor age, the donor:recipient weight ratio must be higher to obtain the same relative risk for all 3 medical urgency groups. The more urgent the heart transplant candidate, the higher the course of the iso-risk curve for all donor ages. CONCLUSIONS: Iso-risk curve is an elegant tool for presenting multivariate analyses in a more practical and patient-oriented manner. The more understandable prognostic factors become the more likely we are to achieve better results in cardiac transplantation and to use more optimally donor hearts. As an example, we have demonstrated the interaction between donor age, donor:recipient size ratio, and medical urgency.

Renal retransplantation of children: is a policy 'first cadaver donor, then live donor' an acceptable option?

Retransplantation is often a necessity for children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), as kidney graft survival is still not infinite. If a suitable live donor is present, the current policy is to use the live donor first, in order to obtain excellent long-term outcome and to prevent human leucocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization. Data from the Eurotransplant International Foundation were analyzed to determine whether the sequence, first a cadaveric donor then a live donor, is acceptable. Between January 1 1983 and December 31 1995, 1305 children received a first renal transplant; 269 of them had a second transplant during the same period. Follow-up of at least 1 yr was available. Categories were made according to the sequence of renal donor source: 217 patients were classified as first cadaver and second cadaver (1cad-2cad) transplant, 26 as first cadaver and second live (1cad-2liv) donor transplant, 23 as first live donor and second cadaver (1liv-2cad) transplant and three patients had two subsequent live donor transplants (1liv-2liv). When a live donor transplant was carried out, either first or second, the donor age was always higher, and the chance of a pre-emptive transplantation or short stay on dialysis was higher, compared with a cadaver transplant. The re-graft survival rate of the '1cad-2liv' was better than the '1cad-2cad' and '1liv-2cad' transplants. At 5 yr, the survival was 76%, 49%, and 61%, respectively. These data suggest that, when a suitable live donor is not available for a first transplantation owing to medical and/or familial reservations, a policy of 'first a cadaver donor then a live donor' transplantation is a viable option and should even be promoted. The pre-emptive stage of the second transplant, probably with a live donor, is additionally advantageous.

Listing for lung transplantation: life expectancy and transplant effect, stratified by type of end-stage lung disease, the Eurotransplant experience.

BACKGROUND: Increased referral for lung transplantation, persistent shortage of donor lungs, and moderate transplant outcome call not only for adequate listing criteria, but also for an optimal allocation scheme. We used global cohort survival after listing and survival benefit from transplantation to study the effect of a lung allocation scheme, primarily driven by waiting time, on the different types of end-stage lung disease. METHODS: We followed all adult patients consecutively listed for first, lung-only transplantation between 1990 and 1996 (n = 1,208) for at least 2 years, with an additional 2-year follow-up after transplantation (n = 744). We used the competing risk method, the Kaplan-Meier method, and a time-dependent non-proportional hazards model to analyze waiting-list outcome and global mortality after listing, post-transplant survival, and transplant effect, respectively. Each analysis was stratified for type of end-stage lung disease. RESULTS: At 2 years, 57% of the total cohort had received lung transplants, whereas 25% had died on the waiting list. The 2-year survival post-transplant was 55%. The global mortality of the cohort, since listing, amounted to 46% at 2 years. Compared with continued waiting, patients experienced benefit from transplantation by Day 100, which lasted until the end of the 2-year analysis period. We noticed the highest global mortality rates for patients with pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension (54% and 52%); emphysema patients had the lowest (38%). Patients with pulmonary fibrosis and cystic fibrosis had much earlier benefit from transplantation, 55 and 90 days, respectively. Transplantation also benefited emphysema patients by Day 260. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation conferred transplant benefit in a Western European cohort of adults, in particular for patients with pulmonary fibrosis and cystic fibrosis, but also for patients with emphysema. The global survival rate, reflecting the real life expectancy for a newly listed transplant candidate, is poor for patients with pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. Allocation algorithms that lessen the impact of waiting time and take into account the type of end-stage lung disease should be developed.

Heart transplantation indicated only in the most severely ill patient: perspectives from the German heart transplant experience.

The COCPIT study, performed in a complete national cohort of adult patients consecutively listed for cardiac transplantation in Germany in 1997, found a beneficial effect only in the group that was at high risk of dying from heart failure without transplantation. If these results can be reproduced in other countries, the discussion on the respective roles of pharmacological and organ-saving surgical therapies for advanced heart failure, medical urgency and waiting time as heart transplantation allocation criteria, and the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial testing the survival benefit of transplantation must be reopened.

Effect of receiving a heart transplant: analysis of a national cohort entered on to a waiting list, stratified by heart failure severity. Comparative Outcome and Clinical Profiles in Transplantation (COCPIT) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a survival benefit associated with cardiac transplantation in Germany. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: All 889 adult patients listed for a first heart transplant in Germany in 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality, stratified by heart failure severity. RESULTS: Within 1 year after listing, patients with a predicted high risk had the highest global death rate (51% v 32% and 29% for medium and low risk patients respectively; P<0.0001), had the highest risk of dying on the waiting list (32% v 20% and 20%; P=0.0003), and were more likely to receive a transplant (48% v 45% and 41%; P=0.01). Differences between the risk groups in outcome after transplantation did not reach significance (P=0.2). Transplantation was not associated with a reduction in mortality risk for the total cohort, but it did provide a survival benefit for the high risk group. CONCLUSION: Cardiac transplantation in Germany is currently associated with a survival benefit only in patients with a predicted high risk of dying on the waiting list. Patients with a predicted low or medium risk have no reduction in mortality risk associated with transplantation; they should be managed with organ saving approaches rather than transplantation.

Permanent detrimental effect of nonimmunological factors on long-term renal graft survival: a parsimonious model of time-dependency.

PURPOSE: We attempted to model and test the pattern of effects of prognostic factors on renal graft survival during the posttransplantation time course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received a cadaveric kidney-only transplant between January 1990 and December 1995 in Eurotransplant, who received cyclosporine as induction therapy, and who had a complete follow-up at the time of analysis were included in the study (n= 10614). An index summarizing all covariate information was calculated and used for modeling the time-dependent effects with relation to graft failure. RESULTS: The immunological factors (HLA mismatch and % panel-reactive antibody) were seen to have a slowly decreasing negative effect on renal graft survival. The cold ischemic trauma (>24 hr) exerted a permanent detrimental effect on the grafts. The use of organs obtained from old donors was associated with a constant higher risk of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: An analysis of determinants of human allograft dysfunction should also study the interaction between the effects and time. Nonimmunological factors had a constant detrimental effect on graft failure, whereas the impact of the immunological factors--although remaining important for late graft loss--very slowly decreased. In the context of marginal transplants, clustering of unfavorable factors should be avoided to prevent late graft losses.

Cross-reactive group matching does not lead to a better allocation and survival of donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND: In cadaveric renal transplantation HLA-A, -B, -DR matching of donor and recipient is beneficial for graft survival. However, allocation based on HLA matching seems to favor recipients with more frequently occurring HLA antigens. In this study we investigated whether matching on the basis of cross-reactive groups (CREGs), defined according to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), would be a good alternative for the allocation of kidneys without negatively influencing graft survival. Theoretically, this approach would provide more recipients with an immunologically well-matched donor organ. METHODS: The influence of CREG matching on graft survival was studied in univariate analyses using the Eurotransplant database. RESULTS: No beneficial effect of CREG matching was observed, whereas a significant HLA matching effect was observed in the 0 CREG mismatched donor/ recipient combinations. Only in the small subgroup with 1 MM for HLA-A, -B and 0 MM for HLA-DR, a significantly better survival was observed, when this mismatch belonged to the 0 or 1 MM CREG group versus two or more MM CREG group. However, this subgroup concerns only 8% of the transplants performed. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to other reports, our study showed that HLA matching is by far more beneficial than CREG matching. In the homogenous Eurotransplant population, adjusting the matching criteria toward CREG matching would not lead to an improved graft survival.