TRAbectedin in adVanced rEtroperitoneal well differentiated/dedifferentiated Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma (TRAVELL): results of a phase II study from the Italian Sarcoma Group.

BACKGROUND: This is a multicentre, single-arm, phase II study aimed at further exploring the activity of trabectedin as second-/further-line treatment in retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (LPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary endpoint was the growth modulation index (GMI) defined as the ratio between PFS under trabectedin (PFS) and during previous chemotherapy treatment: time to progression (TTP-1). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and PFS. As per protocol, patients were considered responders if the GMI was >1.33, non-responders if <0.75 and neither if 0.76-1.32. RESULTS: Overall 91 patients were assessable for the primary endpoint (32 patients with LMS and 59 patients with LPS): the median number of cycles received was 6.0 (Q1-Q3 3.0-12.0), and the main reason for treatment discontinuation was disease progression in 72% of patients. The median PFS was 6.0 months, while the median TTP1 was 7.5 months (8.1 and 6.4 months for LMS and LPS, respectively). Thirty-three patients [52%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 36% to 58%, P = 0.674, odds of response 1.1] had a GMI >1.33 (LMS 46%, 95% CI 26% to 67%, odds of response 0.85; LPS 56%, 95% CI 40% to 72%, odds of response 1.3). Overall, in LPS we observed 15/47 patients with a GMI <0.5 and 15/47 patients with a GMI >2. Among LMS patients, 9/26 had a GMI <0.5 and 10/26 had a GMI >2. Overall, ORR (complete response + partial response) was 16% (24% for LMS and 12% for LPS). CONCLUSIONS: While the primary endpoint of the study was not met, we noticed a subgroup of patients with a markedly discrepant TTP with trabectedin in comparison to previous therapy (GMI <0.5 or >2, the latter including some patients with a long TTP with trabectedin). A mismatch between PFS and overall survival was observed, possibly due to the natural history of the two different histologies and the availability of further lines in LMS.

The sacral chordoma margin.

OBJECTIVE: Aim of the manuscript is to discuss how to improve margins in sacral chordoma. BACKGROUND: Chordoma is a rare neoplasm, arising in half cases from the sacrum, with reported local failure in >50% after surgery. METHODS: A multidisciplinary meeting of the "Chordoma Global Consensus Group" was held in Milan in 2017, focusing on challenges in defining and achieving optimal margins in chordoma with respect to surgery, definitive particle radiation therapy (RT) and medical therapies. This review aims to report on the outcome of the consensus meeting and to provide a summary of the most recent evidence in this field. Possible new ways forward, including on-going international clinical studies, are discussed. RESULTS: En-bloc tumor-sacrum resection is the cornerstone of treatment of primary sacral chordoma, aiming to achieve negative microscopic margins. Radical definitive particle therapy seems to offer a similar outcome compared to surgery, although confirmation in comparative trials is lacking; besides there is still a certain degree of technical variability across institutions, corresponding to different fields of treatment and different tumor coverage. To address some of these questions, a prospective, randomized international study comparing surgery versus definitive high-dose RT is ongoing. Available data do not support the routine use of any medical therapy as (neo)adjuvant/cytoreductive treatment. CONCLUSION: Given the significant influence of margins status on local control in patients with primary localized sacral chordoma, the clear definition of adequate margins and a standard local approach across institutions for both surgery and particle RT is vital for improving the management of these patients.

Grading the neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: an evidence-based proposal.

Lung neuroendocrine tumors are catalogued in four categories by the World Health Organization (WHO 2004) classification. Its reproducibility and prognostic efficacy was disputed. The WHO 2010 classification of digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms is based on Ki67 proliferation assessment and proved prognostically effective. This study aims at comparing these two classifications and at defining a prognostic grading system for lung neuroendocrine tumors. The study included 399 patients who underwent surgery and with at least 1 year follow-up between 1989 and 2011. Data on 21 variables were collected, and performance of grading systems and their components was compared by Cox regression and multivariable analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. At Cox analysis, WHO 2004 stratified patients into three major groups with statistically significant survival difference (typical carcinoid vs atypical carcinoid (AC), P=0.021; AC vs large-cell/small-cell lung neuroendocrine carcinomas, P<0.001). Optimal discrimination in three groups was observed by Ki67% (Ki67% cutoffs: G1 <4, G2 4-<25, G3 ≥25; G1 vs G2, P=0.021; and G2 vs G3, P≤0.001), mitotic count (G1 ≤2, G2 >2-47, G3 >47; G1 vs G2, P≤0.001; and G2 vs G3, P≤0.001), and presence of necrosis (G1 absent, G2 <10% of sample, G3 >10% of sample; G1 vs G2, P≤0.001; and G2 vs G3, P≤0.001) at uni and multivariable analyses. The combination of these three variables resulted in a simple and effective grading system. A three-tiers grading system based on Ki67 index, mitotic count, and necrosis with cutoffs specifically generated for lung neuroendocrine tumors is prognostically effective and accurate.

Phase I-II study of vinorelbine in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: a regimen with a low subjective toxic burden.

BACKGROUND: Vinorelbine, is an active drug in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and has a favorable toxicity profile. Its combination with other effective and well-tolerated cytotoxics may thus be beneficial. We investigated the therapeutic effect of a combination of vinorelbine plus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer were enrolled in this phase I-II study and treated with 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 to 3), folinic acid (100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 to 3) and vinorelbine given on days 1 and 3 at the dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1), or 30 mg/m2 (dose level 2). Therapy was given on an outpatient basis every three weeks. RESULTS: Phase I: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at the second dose level of vinorelbine (30 mg/m2), with two out of three patients developing severe constipation ('ileus-like syndrome' grade 4), and fever (grade 2). Consequently, the dose evaluated in the phase II study was 25 mg/m2. Phase II: Objective responses were observed in 24 of 39 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval (95% CI), 47% to 77%). There were seven complete responses (18%), 17 partial responses (44%), and for nine patients (23%) disease was stable. Only six patients (15%) experienced disease progression. The median response duration was 10 months (range 6 to 24+) and the median time to progression was eight months (range 2 to 24+). Granulocytopenia was the most frequently observed side effect, with a grade 4 nadir being observed in 30 patients (77%), with four hospital admissions due to febrile neutropenia. Nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were mild to moderate and reported by less than half of the patients. Alopecia was moderate and occurred in about one-third of the patients. The other side effects were mild and easily manageable. CONCLUSIONS: This effective combination chemotherapy of vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid is comparable to other first-line regimens in terms of efficacy, and is subjectively well tolerated, thus deserving a test in randomized trials in the advanced and adjuvant settings.