RESUMEN
Background: The prognostic impact of catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients has not yet been satisfactorily elucidated. Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of CA of AF on clinical outcomes in a large cohort of HCM patients. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 555 HCM patients with AF were enrolled, 140 undergoing CA and 415 receiving medical therapy. 1:1 propensity score matching led to the inclusion of 226 patients (113 medical group, 113 intervention group) in the final analysis. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplant and acute heart failure exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included AF recurrence and transition to permanent AF. Additionally, an inverse probability weighted (IPW) model was examined. Results: At propensity score matching analysis, after a median follow-up of 58.1 months, the primary endpoint occurred in 29 (25.7%) patients in intervention group vs 42 (37.2%) in medical group (P = 0.9). Thromboembolic strokes and major arrhythmic events in intervention vs medical group were 9.7% vs 7.1% (P = 0.144) and 4.4 vs 8.0% (P = 0.779), respectively. Fewer patients in intervention vs medical group experienced AF recurrences (63.7% vs 84.1%, P = 0.001) and transition to permanent AF pattern (20.4% vs 33.6%, P = 0.026). IPW analysis showed consistent results. Severe complications related to CA were uncommon (0.7%). Conclusions: After 5 years of follow-up, CA did not improve major adverse cardiac outcomes in a large cohort of patients with HCM and AF. Nevertheless, CA seems to facilitate the maintenance of sinus rhythm and slow the progression to permanent AF, without significant safety concerns.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of effective lipid-lowering drugs, only few high-risk patients attain their LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) guideline-recommended risk-based goal because of underprescription of combination therapy. We present an 18-month experience with variation of prescription protocols after publication of the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidemias. METHODS: Overall, 621 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin, Italy, between January 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled. Lipid-lowering therapy recommended at discharge was registered to evaluate how many patients received statin monotherapy, statin plus ezetimibe combination or triple therapy with high-intensity statin plus ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i). At 6-month follow-up, the reduction in LDL-C, adverse events, compliance and cardiovascular recurrences was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 621 patients enrolled, 7 died during hospitalization. During the entire study period, 33% of patients received statin monotherapy, 50% were discharged on statin-ezetimibe combination, and PCSK9i (evolocumab) was prescribed to 17% of patients. Between April 2020 and June 2021, when new recommendations were introduced into clinical practice, 20% of patients received evolocumab, 56% combination therapy and only 24% were discharged on statin monotherapy. At the beginning of observation, evolocumab was prescribed to 3% of patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome, while at the end of the study period 27% of patients were discharged on PCSK9i, with an increase of the prescription rate by 759%; in the same period, prescription of statin monotherapy decreased by 75%. At 6-month follow-up, LDL-C reduction was 77% in patients treated with PCSK9i vs 48% in patients taking statin-ezetimibe combination therapy (p<0.001). All patients on evolocumab reached the guideline-directed goals and a low rate of adverse events was reported, mainly represented by local injection site reactions. Six patients experienced acute coronary syndrome recurrence; only one of them was treated with evolocumab. CONCLUSION: Prescription of intensive lipid-lowering therapy after acute coronary syndrome, eventually with introduction of PCSK9i during hospitalization or at discharge, leads to attainment of guideline-recommended goals for all patients, with a low incidence of adverse events and optimal compliance.
