Radiographic angle width as predictor of clinical outcomes following regenerative periodontal therapy with enamel matrix derivative: a retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of at least 10 years.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between the baseline radiographic defect angle and the long-term clinical outcomes following periodontal regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative (EMD). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Baseline periapical radiographs obtained from a cohort of patients treated with periodontal regenerative therapy were digitized and the radiographic angle width between the root surface and the bony wall of the adjacent intraosseous defect was calculated and reported (in degrees). Changes in pocket probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed and reported (in mm). Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline (T0), 6 months following therapy (T1), and at the latest follow-up (T2). RESULTS: Thirty-eight defects in 26 patients enrolled in supportive periodontal care for a mean period of 10.4 years (range 8.0 to 15.5 years) were available for analysis. The mean PD change between T0 and T2 was 2.33 ± 1.66 mm at teeth with a defect angle width < 20 degrees and 0.86 ± 1.66 mm at teeth with a defect angle width > 30 degrees (P = .021). When the baseline radiographic angle width was < 20 degrees the probability of obtaining a CAL gain > 3 mm was 1.5-times higher (95% CI 0.19 to 13.8) at T1 and 2.5-times higher (95% CI 0.40 to 15.6) at T2 compared with defects with a radiographic angle width > 30 degrees. CONCLUSION: Within their limitations, these results indicate that pretherapeutic measurement of the radiographic defect angle width might provide relevant information on the short-/long-term clinical outcomes following regenerative periodontal therapy with EMD.

Five-year results following regenerative periodontal surgery with an enamel matrix derivative in patients with different smoking status.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the five-year results following regenerative periodontal surgery of intrabony defects using an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) in patients with different smoking status. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The dental records of patients treated with regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD between 2001 and 2011 were screened. The clinical parameters at baseline (T0) and 6 months (T1) and 5 years (T2) after surgery were collected and analyzed in relation to patient's smoking status (smokers, former smokers, and nonsmokers). RESULTS: A total of 71 sites were initially assessed in 38 patients. In total, 56 sites could be evaluated at T1, and 34 after 5 years (T2). At 6 months after surgery, a statistically significant mean probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction of 2.91 ± 1.60 mm and a mean clinical attachment level (CAL) gain of 1.89 ± 1.90 mm were measured. Nonsmokers revealed a greater, statistically not significant CAL gain compared to smokers (2.38 ± 2.12 mm vs 1.50 ± 1.71 mm). Although at 5 years the site-specific PPD values remained stable in nonsmokers, smokers showed an increase of 1.60 ± 2.41 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides evidence that regenerative periodontal surgery with EMD may lead to clinically relevant improvements even in smoking patients. However, the positive effect of EMD seems to be limited in time and can only partially compensate for the negative influence of smoking.