Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in the Treatment of Experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa Pneumonia in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits: Impact on Strains with Genetically Defined Mechanisms of Resistance.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel cephalosporin with in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa that is resistant to extended-spectrum penicillins and antipseudomonal cephalosporins. In order to assess the antimicrobial effect of C/T in treatment of Pseudomonas pneumonia, we investigated the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of C/T in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Pseudomonas pneumonia was established by direct endotracheal inoculation. Treatment groups consisted of C/T, ceftazidime (CAZ), piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP), and untreated controls (UC). Rabbits received a dosage of C/T of 80 mg/kg every 4 h (q4h) intravenously (i.v.) (53 mg/kg ceftolozane/26 mg/kg tazobactam) to match the free drug time above the MIC as well as a comparable plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) (humanized doses of ceftolozane-tazobactam of 3 g [2 g/1 g]) q8h, due to the more rapid elimination of ceftolozane in rabbits (0.75 h) than in humans (2.5 h). Four molecularly characterized clinical P. aeruginosa isolates from patients with pneumonia were studied, including one isolate from each classification group: pan-susceptible (PS), outer membrane porin D (OPRD) porin loss (OPRDPL), efflux pump expression (EPE), and AmpC hyperexpression (ACHE). Treatment was continued for 12 days. Treatment with ceftolozane-tazobactam resulted in a ≥105 reduction in residual pulmonary and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid bacterial burdens caused by all 4 strains (P ≤ 0.01). This antibacterial activity coincided with reduction of lung weight (an organism-mediated pulmonary injury marker) (P < 0.05). CAZ was less active in ACHE-infected rabbits, and TZP had less activity against EPE, ACHE, and OPRDPL strains. Survival was prolonged in the C/T and CAZ treatment groups in comparison to the TZP and UC groups (P < 0.001). Ceftolozane-tazobactam is highly active in treatment of experimental P. aeruginosa pneumonia in persistently neutropenic rabbits, including infections caused by strains with the most common resistance mechanisms.

Antibacterial effects of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin simulating epithelial lining fluid concentrations against community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Current North American guidelines advocate the use of respiratory fluoroquinolones for the empirical management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). While community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has emerged as a pathogen frequently encountered in skin and skin structure infections, it has also now been recognised as a causative pathogen in CAP. Since fluoroquinolones may be used empirically to treat unsuspected CA-MRSA pneumonia, the objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin using human simulated drug exposures in epithelial lining fluid (ELF). METHODS: An in vitro model was used to simulate the ELF concentrations, previously determined in older adults receiving multiple doses, of levofloxacin 500 mg once daily and moxifloxacin 400mg once daily. Four CA-MRSA isolates were studied at a starting inoculum of 10(6) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL; selected isolates were also studied at 10(8) CFU/mL. Bacterial density and resistance were quantitatively assessed over 48 hours. Drug exposure (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) was confirmed using validated drug assays. RESULTS: At a standard 10(6) starting inoculum, sustained bacterial kill (3.6-4.5 log) with both fluoroquinolones was noted for CA-MRSA isolates 27 and 44 (AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 383-3923). Despite an MIC of 8 microg/mL (AUC/MIC = 25) for isolate 3, levofloxacin displayed a 2.8 log kill, while moxifloxacin (MIC 1 microg/mL) sustained a 4.5 log kill (AUC/MIC = 207) over 48 hours. Against isolate 59, levofloxacin displayed no antibacterial effect (AUC/MIC = 3), while moxifloxacin with an MIC of 8 microg/mL (AUC/MIC = 31) killed 4.6 log. At a high inoculum (10(8)), both fluoroquinolones showed 5.2-5.6 log kill for the susceptible isolate (44), while moxifloxacin showed no antibacterial activity against isolate 59. Drug exposure (AUC/MIC) appeared to correlate well (r(2) = 0.99) with the change in log CFU/mL. Maximal activity was observed for both drugs at an AUC/MIC of approximately 30. CONCLUSION: When evaluated at human simulated ELF concentrations, both levofloxacin and moxifloxacin appeared to demonstrate sustained antibacterial activity for CA-MRSA isolates with MICs