Trends and Outcomes of Fresh and Frozen Donor Oocyte Cycles in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends, characteristics, and outcomes of donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles by original oocyte and resultant embryo state and determine whether oocyte state (fresh or frozen) is differentially associated with clinical pregnancy, live birth, and term, normal birthweight neonates among singleton live births. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: Patients undergoing donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles in the United States reporting to National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) from 2013-2020 EXPOSURE: Original donor oocyte and resultant embryo state (fresh or frozen) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual numbers and proportions of total donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles stratified by oocyte and embryo state and single embryo transfer cycles resulting in live birth of term (≥37 weeks gestation), normal birthweight (≥2500g) singletons during 2013-2020. Rates of live birth and term, normal birthweight neonates among singleton live births for 2018-2020 are also reported. Relative risks (RR) examine associations between donor oocyte state and live birth and term, normal birthweight neonates among singleton live births resulting from donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles. RESULTS: From 2013-2020, there were 135,085 donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles, of which the proportions increased for frozen embryos (42.3% to 76.6%), fresh embryos using frozen donor oocytes (19.9% to 68.3%) and single embryo transfer (SET) (36.4% to 85.5%). During 2018-2020, there were 48,679 donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles. Rates of live birth were lower with frozen compared to fresh donor oocytes for both fresh (46.2%, 55.9%; aRR 0.83 [95% CI 0.79-0.87]) and frozen (41.3%, 45.8%; aRR 0.94 [95% CI 0.91-0.98]) embryo transfer cycles. Among singleton live births, rates of delivering a term, normal birthweight neonate were similar for frozen compared to fresh donor oocyte transfer cycles among fresh (77.3, 77.2%; aRR 1.01 [95% CI 0.98-1.03]) and frozen (75.6, 75.1%; aRR 1.02 [95% CI 0.99-1.04]) embryos. CONCLUSION: In this national study of donor oocyte embryo transfer cycles, frozen embryo transfers, fresh embryo transfers using frozen oocytes, and SET increased. Although frozen compared to fresh oocytes were associated with a slightly reduced rate of live birth, rates of term, normal birthweight neonates among singleton live births were comparable between donor oocyte states.

Multiple Imputation of Missing Race/Ethnicity Information in the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System.

Background: Missing race/ethnicity data are common in many surveillance systems and registries, which may limit complete and accurate assessments of racial and ethnic disparities. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Surveillance System (NASS) has a congressional mandate to collect data on all ART cycles performed by fertility clinics in the United States and provides valuable information on ART utilization and treatment outcomes. However, race/ethnicity data are missing for many ART cycles in NASS. Materials and Methods: We multiply imputed missing race/ethnicity data using variables from NASS and additional zip code-level race/ethnicity information in U.S. Census data. To evaluate imputed data quality, we generated training data by imposing missing values on known race/ethnicity under missing at random assumption, imputed, and examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and the rate of stillbirth per pregnancy. Results: The distribution of imputed race/ethnicity was comparable to the reported one with the largest difference of 0.53% for non-Hispanic Asian. Our imputation procedure was well calibrated and correctly identified that 89.91% (standard error = 0.18) of known race/ethnicity values on average in training data. Compared to complete-case analysis, using multiply imputed data reduced bias of parameter estimates (the range of bias for stillbirth per pregnancy across race/ethnicity groups is 0.02%-0.18% for imputed data analysis, versus 0.04%-0.66% for complete-case analysis) and yielded narrower confidence intervals. Conclusions: Our results underscore the importance of collecting complete race/ethnicity information for ART surveillance. However, when the missingness exists, multiply imputed race/ethnicity can improve the accuracy and precision of health outcomes estimated across racial/ethnic groups.

Trends and Outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles Using a Gestational Carrier Between 2014 and 2020.

This study used national surveillance data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology to describe trends and outcomes in assisted reproductive technology cycles using a gestational carrier vs those not using a gestational carrier.

Association of state insurance coverage mandates with assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation.

BACKGROUND: Insurance coverage for fertility services may reduce the financial burden of high-cost fertility care such as assisted reproductive technology and improve its utilization. Patients who exit care after failing to reach their reproductive goals report higher rates of mental health problems and a lower sense of well-being. It is important to understand the relationship between state-mandated insurance coverage for fertility services and assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether state-mandated insurance coverage for fertility services is associated with lower rates of care discontinuation after an initial assisted reproductive technology cycle that did not result in a live birth. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study using data from United States fertility clinics reporting to the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System during 2016 and 2018. Patients who began their first autologous assisted reproductive technology cycle during 2016 and 2017 and did not have a live birth were included. We describe the rate of assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation (no additional cycle within 12 months of the previous cycle's date of failure). Multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate factors independently associated with care discontinuation, including the scope of fertility services included in state coverage mandate at assisted reproductive technology cycle initiation that were as follows: comprehensive (≥3 assisted reproductive technology cycles), limited (1, 2, or an unspecified number of assisted reproductive technology cycles), mandate not including assisted reproductive technology, and no mandate. RESULTS: Among 91,324 patients who underwent their first autologous assisted reproductive technology cycle that did not result in live birth, 24,072 (26.4%) discontinued care. Compared with patients who lived in states with mandates for comprehensive assisted reproductive technology coverage, those in states with mandates for fertility services coverage that did not include assisted reproductive technology or states with no mandate were 46% (adjusted relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.63) and 26% (adjusted relative risk, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.39) more likely to discontinue care, respectively, after controlling for patient and cycle characteristics. Increasing patient age, distance from clinic ≥50 miles, previous live birth, fewer oocytes retrieved, and not having embryos cryopreserved were also associated with higher rates of discontinuation. Non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic patients had higher rates of care discontinuation than non-Hispanic White patients regardless of the existence or scope of state-mandated assisted reproductive technology coverage. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive state-mandated insurance coverage for assisted reproductive technology is associated with lower rates of assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation.

Embryo donation: national trends and outcomes, 2004-2019.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration amended existing regulations to increase access to donated embryos for reproductive use. Current information regarding the characteristics and outcomes of embryo donation cycles could benefit patients and providers during counseling and decision making. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the trends in the utilization of embryo donation, pregnancy rates, and live birth rates per transfer between 2004 and 2019 and to describe the recipients of donated embryos and outcomes of frozen donated embryo transfer cycles during the most recent time period, that is, 2016 to 2019. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of frozen donated embryo transfer cycles in United States fertility clinics reporting to the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System during 2004 to 2019. The trends in the annual number and proportion of frozen donated embryo transfers, pregnancy rates, and live birth rates from 2004 to 2019 were described. During 2016 to 2019, the rates of cycle cancellation, pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, singleton birth, and good perinatal outcome (delivery ≥37 weeks, birthweight ≥2500 g) of frozen donated embryo transfers were also calculated. Transfer and pregnancy outcomes stratified by oocyte source age at the time of oocyte retrieval were also described. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2019, there were 21,060 frozen donated embryo transfers in the United States, resulting in 8457 live births. During this period, the annual number and proportion of frozen donated embryo transfers with respect to all transfers increased, as did the pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Among all initiated cycles during 2016 to 2019, the cancellation rate was 8.2%. Among 8773 transfers with known outcomes, 4685 (53.4%) resulted in pregnancy and 3820 (43.5%) in live birth. Among all pregnancies, 814 (17.4%) resulted in miscarriage. Among all live births, 3223 (84.4%) delivered a singleton, of which 2474 (76.8%) had a good perinatal outcome. The clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate per frozen donated embryo transfer decreased with increasing age of oocyte source. CONCLUSION: The outcomes of embryo donation cycles reported in this national cohort may aid patients and providers when considering the use of donated embryos.

Factors associated with large-for-gestational-age infants born after frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Objective: To examine trends of frozen embryo transfer (FET) proportions and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) incidence and determine risk factors for LGA infants after FET. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: Frozen embryo transfer cycles. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Singleton LGA infant. Results: The percentage of FETs increased from 20%-74% of transfers, whereas the rate of LGA among FET singleton births decreased from 18%-12% during 2004-2018. In a subanalysis of 127,525 FET-associated singleton live births during 2016-2018, patient factors associated with LGA were higher-than-normal maternal body mass index (body mass index [BMI], 25.0-29.9 kg/m2; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.36; BMI, 30.0-34.9 kg/m2; aRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.41-1.55; and BMI, >35 Kg/m2; aRR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.59-1.77) and ≥1 prior birth vs. none. Low maternal BMI (<18.5 vs. 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and cycles involving patients who were non-Hispanic (NH) Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, NH Black, or Hispanic (compared with NH White) were at lower risk of LGA infants. Cycle factors associated with LGA included gestational carrier use (aRR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16-1.34) and donor sperm (aRR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.25). Conclusions: Although the number and proportion of FET cycles increased from 2004-2018, the rate of LGA after FET decreased. Maternal BMI, parity, and race/ethnicity were the strongest risk factors for LGA infants after FET.

Risks of subsequent primary cancers among breast cancer survivors according to hormone receptor status.

BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at examining the risks of subsequent primary cancers (SPCs) among breast cancer survivors by hormone receptor (HR) status and age at diagnosis. METHODS: Data from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries were used to identify 431,222 breast cancer survivors (at least 1 year) diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 84 years from 1992 to 2015. Risks of SPCs were measured as the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the excess absolute risk (EAR) per 10,000 person-years. Poisson regression was used to test the difference in SIRs by HR status. RESULTS: In comparison with the general population, the risk of new cancer diagnoses among survivors was 20% higher for those with HR-positive cancers (SIR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.21; EAR, 23.3/10,000 person-years) and 44% higher for those with HR-negative cancers (SIR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.41-1.47; EAR, 45.2/10,000 person-years), with the risk difference between HR statuses statistically significant. The higher risk after HR-negative cancer was driven by acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and breast, ovarian, peritoneal, and lung cancers. By age at diagnosis, the total EAR per 10,000 person-years ranged from 15.8 (95% CI, 14.1-17.5; SIR, 1.11) among late-onset (age, 50-84 years) HR-positive survivors to 69.4 (95% CI, 65.1-73.7; SIR, 2.24) among early-onset (age, 20-49 years) HR-negative survivors, with subsequent breast cancer representing 73% to 80% of the total EAR. After breast cancer, the greatest EARs were for ovarian cancer among early-onset HR-negative survivors, lung cancer among early- and late-onset HR-negative survivors, and uterine corpus cancer among late-onset HR-positive survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Risks of SPCs after breast cancer differ substantially by subtype and age. This suggests that more targeted approaches for cancer prevention and early-detection strategies are needed in survivorship care planning.

Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.

The American Cancer Society (ACS) recommends that individuals with a cervix initiate cervical cancer screening at age 25 years and undergo primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years through age 65 years (preferred); if primary HPV testing is not available, then individuals aged 25 to 65 years should be screened with cotesting (HPV testing in combination with cytology) every 5 years or cytology alone every 3 years (acceptable) (strong recommendation). The ACS recommends that individuals aged >65 years who have no history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe disease within the past 25 years, and who have documented adequate negative prior screening in the prior 10 years, discontinue all cervical cancer screening (qualified recommendation). These new screening recommendations differ in 4 important respects compared with the 2012 recommendations: 1) The preferred screening strategy is primary HPV testing every 5 years, with cotesting and cytology alone acceptable where access to US Food and Drug Administration-approved primary HPV testing is not yet available; 2) the recommended age to start screening is 25 years rather than 21 years; 3) primary HPV testing, as well as cotesting or cytology alone when primary testing is not available, is recommended starting at age 25 years rather than age 30 years; and 4) the guideline is transitional, ie, options for screening with cotesting or cytology alone are provided but should be phased out once full access to primary HPV testing for cervical cancer screening is available without barriers. Evidence related to other relevant issues was reviewed, and no changes were made to recommendations for screening intervals, age or criteria for screening cessation, screening based on vaccination status, or screening after hysterectomy. Follow-up for individuals who screen positive for HPV and/or cytology should be in accordance with the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk-based management consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

Breast cancer statistics, 2019.

This article is the American Cancer Society's biennial update on female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening. Over the most recent 5-year period (2012-2016), the breast cancer incidence rate increased slightly by 0.3% per year, largely because of rising rates of local stage and hormone receptor-positive disease. In contrast, the breast cancer death rate continues to decline, dropping 40% from 1989 to 2017 and translating to 375,900 breast cancer deaths averted. Notably, the pace of the decline has slowed from an annual decrease of 1.9% during 1998 through 2011 to 1.3% during 2011 through 2017, largely driven by the trend in white women. Consequently, the black-white disparity in breast cancer mortality has remained stable since 2011 after widening over the past 3 decades. Nevertheless, the death rate remains 40% higher in blacks (28.4 vs 20.3 deaths per 100,000) despite a lower incidence rate (126.7 vs 130.8); this disparity is magnified among black women aged <50 years, who have a death rate double that of whites. In the most recent 5-year period (2013-2017), the death rate declined in Hispanics (2.1% per year), blacks (1.5%), whites (1.0%), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (0.8%) but was stable in American Indians/Alaska Natives. However, by state, breast cancer mortality rates are no longer declining in Nebraska overall; in Colorado and Wisconsin in black women; and in Nebraska, Texas, and Virginia in white women. Breast cancer was the leading cause of cancer death in women (surpassing lung cancer) in four Southern and two Midwestern states among blacks and in Utah among whites during 2016-2017. Declines in breast cancer mortality could be accelerated by expanding access to high-quality prevention, early detection, and treatment services to all women.

Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019.

Adults aged 85 years and older, the "oldest old," are the fastest-growing age group in the United States, yet relatively little is known about their cancer burden. Combining data from the National Cancer Institute, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Center for Health Statistics, the authors provide comprehensive information on cancer occurrence in adults aged 85 years and older. In 2019, there will be approximately 140,690 cancer cases diagnosed and 103,250 cancer deaths among the oldest old in the United States. The most common cancers in these individuals (lung, breast, prostate, and colorectum) are the same as those in the general population. Overall cancer incidence rates peaked in the oldest men and women around 1990 and have subsequently declined, with the pace accelerating during the past decade. These trends largely reflect declines in cancers of the prostate and colorectum and, more recently, cancers of the lung among men and the breast among women. We note differences in trends for some cancers in the oldest age group (eg, lung cancer and melanoma) compared with adults aged 65 to 84 years, which reflect elevated risks in the oldest generations. In addition, cancers in the oldest old are often more advanced at diagnosis. For example, breast and colorectal cancers diagnosed in patients aged 85 years and older are about 10% less likely to be diagnosed at a local stage compared with those diagnosed in patients aged 65 to 84 years. Patients with cancer who are aged 85 years and older have the lowest relative survival of any age group, with the largest disparities noted when cancer is diagnosed at advanced stages. They are also less likely to receive surgical treatment for their cancers; only 65% of breast cancer patients aged 85 years and older received surgery compared with 89% of those aged 65 to 84 years. This difference may reflect the complexities of treating older patients, including the presence of multiple comorbidities, functional declines, and cognitive impairment, as well as competing mortality risks and undertreatment. More research on cancer in the oldest Americans is needed to improve outcomes and anticipate the complex health care needs of this rapidly growing population.

Breast cancer subtypes among Eastern-African-born black women and other black women in the United States.

BACKGROUND: A previous study reported that Eastern-African-born black women in the United States had lower prevalence of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer than those in US-born and Western-African-born black women, among whom the prevalence was similar. It is unknown whether the prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer (negative for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor 2 receptor) among black women in the United States differs similarly by birthplace. METHODS: In the National Program of Cancer Registries and US Cancer Statistics, the authors identified 65,211 non-Hispanic black women who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010 through 2015 and were recorded as being born in the United States, East Africa, West Africa, or the Caribbean. The prevalence of triple-negative and hormone receptor-negative breast cancer (negative for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor) among each group of foreign-born black women was compared with that among US-born black women and was expressed as the adjusted prevalence rate ratio, accounting for sociodemographic and tumor characteristics. Analyses were stratified by Census region, and region-specific estimates were summarized using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: Compared with US-born black women, the prevalence rate ratio of triple-negative breast cancer was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.81-1.04) among Western-African-born, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) among Caribbean-born, and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.37-0.77) among Eastern-African-born black women. Patterns for hormone receptor-negative tumors were generally similar, although the differences between populations were attenuated. The test for heterogeneity by Census region was not significant in any of the comparisons (all P for heterogeneity >.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of triple-negative breast cancer among black women in the United States varied significantly by birthplace, particularly among Eastern-African-born black women. These findings underscore the importance of considering geographic origin in studies characterizing breast cancer among women of African descent in the United States and elsewhere.

Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019.

In the United States, African American/black individuals bear a disproportionate share of the cancer burden, having the highest death rate and the lowest survival rate of any racial or ethnic group for most cancers. To monitor progress in reducing these inequalities, every 3 years the American Cancer Society provides the estimated number of new cancer cases and deaths for blacks in the United States and the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, survival, screening, and risk factors using data from the National Cancer Institute, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, approximately 202,260 new cases of cancer and 73,030 cancer deaths are expected to occur among blacks in the United States. During 2006 through 2015, the overall cancer incidence rate decreased faster in black men than in white men (2.4% vs 1.7% per year), largely due to the more rapid decline in lung cancer. In contrast, the overall cancer incidence rate was stable in black women (compared with a slight increase in white women), reflecting increasing rates for cancers of the breast, uterine corpus, and pancreas juxtaposed with declining trends for cancers of the lung and colorectum. Overall cancer death rates declined faster in blacks than whites among both males (2.6% vs 1.6% per year) and females (1.5% vs 1.3% per year), largely driven by greater declines for cancers of the lung, colorectum, and prostate. Consequently, the excess risk of overall cancer death in blacks compared with whites dropped from 47% in 1990 to 19% in 2016 in men and from 19% in 1990 to 13% in 2016 in women. Moreover, the black-white cancer disparity has been nearly eliminated in men <50 years and women ≥70 years. Twenty-five years of continuous declines in the cancer death rate among black individuals translates to more than 462,000 fewer cancer deaths. Continued progress in reducing disparities will require expanding access to high-quality prevention, early detection, and treatment for all Americans.

Incidence Trends of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Subtypes by Race, Ethnicity, and Age in the United States, 1997-2014.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is limited information on contemporary incidence rates and trends, by race, ethnicity, and age, for major subtypes of esophageal and gastric cancer in the United States. We examined the most recent nationwide incidence data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA), and gastric non-cardia adenocarcinoma (GNCA) by race, ethnicity, and age in the United States. METHODS: Average contemporary incidence rates (2010-2014) and annual percent changes in rates (from 1997 through 2014) by race, ethnicity, and age were calculated for each cancer subtype using nationwide data compiled by the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. RESULTS: From 1997 through 2014, overall esophageal squamous cell carcinoma incidence rates continuously decreased in both sexes and all racial and ethnic groups, although rates remained stable among younger non-Hispanic white women. Overall, EAC incidence rates decreased or stabilized during the most recent time period (2006-2007 through 2014) in men and women, after increasing from 1997 through 2006 and 2007. However, EAC incidence rates continued to increase from 1997 through 2014 in several subpopulations, including non-Hispanic white men younger than 50 years, non-Hispanic white women younger than 70 years, and Asian/Pacific Islander men (all ages combined). Overall GCA incidence rates increased among non-Hispanic whites, but decreased among Hispanics (men only) and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Although overall GNCA rates decreased in both sexes and all racial and ethnic groups, rates increased in younger age groups among men (all races and ethnicities combined) and non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic women. CONCLUSIONS: Using high-quality nationwide population-based data, we found increasing incidence trends for EAC, GCA, and GNCA in several subpopulations in the United States.

Trends in stage at diagnosis for young breast cancer patients in the United States.

PURPOSE: Previous studies reported increasing rates of metastatic breast cancer among young US women. However, these studies were based on limited geographic areas and did not account for the sharp decline in unknown-stage disease. In this study, we examined trends in early-onset breast cancer incidence rates by stage at diagnosis in a national dataset, after correcting for temporal changes in unstaged disease. METHODS: Using data from 42 states, covering 82% of the US population, we examined trends in incidence rates by stage at diagnosis and race/ethnicity in women ages 20-39 years. Stage was imputed for non-Hispanic (NH) white and NH black cases with missing information by distributing cases proportionally according to survival statistics. RESULTS: During 2001-2015, incidence rates of early-onset metastatic breast cancer increased sharply among NH white, NH black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API) women. Increasing trends were also observed for local-stage disease (all racial/ethnic groups) and regional-stage disease (NH white and API). In contrast, rates decreased sharply for unstaged disease among all groups. After imputing stage for cases with missing information, the increasing trends for regional- and distant-stage disease in NH whites and local-stage disease in NH blacks were no longer statistically significant, but the increase in distant-stage disease in NH blacks was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: After accounting for the sharp decline in unstaged cases, the increase in incidence rates for distant-stage disease became non-significant in NH whites but not in NH blacks. Future studies should consider accounting for temporal changes in unstaged disease when examining stage-specific incidence trends.

Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018.

In 2018, there will be approximately 22,240 new cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed and 14,070 ovarian cancer deaths in the United States. Herein, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of ovarian cancer occurrence based on incidence data from nationwide population-based cancer registries and mortality data from the National Center for Health Statistics. The status of early detection strategies is also reviewed. In the United States, the overall ovarian cancer incidence rate declined from 1985 (16.6 per 100,000) to 2014 (11.8 per 100,000) by 29% and the mortality rate declined between 1976 (10.0 per 100,000) and 2015 (6.7 per 100,000) by 33%. Ovarian cancer encompasses a heterogenous group of malignancies that vary in etiology, molecular biology, and numerous other characteristics. Ninety percent of ovarian cancers are epithelial, the most common being serous carcinoma, for which incidence is highest in non-Hispanic whites (NHWs) (5.2 per 100,000) and lowest in non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (APIs) (3.4 per 100,000). Notably, however, APIs have the highest incidence of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas, which occur at younger ages and help explain comparable epithelial cancer incidence for APIs and NHWs younger than 55 years. Most serous carcinomas are diagnosed at stage III (51%) or IV (29%), for which the 5-year cause-specific survival for patients diagnosed during 2007 through 2013 was 42% and 26%, respectively. For all stages of epithelial cancer combined, 5-year survival is highest in APIs (57%) and lowest in NHBs (35%), who have the lowest survival for almost every stage of diagnosis across cancer subtypes. Moreover, survival has plateaued in NHBs for decades despite increasing in NHWs, from 40% for cases diagnosed during 1992 through 1994 to 47% during 2007 through 2013. Progress in reducing ovarian cancer incidence and mortality can be accelerated by reducing racial disparities and furthering knowledge of etiology and tumorigenesis to facilitate strategies for prevention and early detection. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:284-296. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Treatment Patterns Among Women Diagnosed With Stage I-III Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To examine contemporary treatment patterns for women diagnosed with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the United States. METHODS: We identified 48,961 patients diagnosed with stage I-III TNBC from 2010 to 2013 in the National Cancer Data Base and created 3 treatment subcohorts (definitive locoregional therapy [appropriate local therapy, including surgery/radiation], adjuvant chemotherapy [stage II-III disease or stage I tumors with tumor size ≥1 cm], and adjuvant chemotherapy for small tumors [stage I tumors with tumor size <1 cm and node negative]). We performed descriptive analyses, calculated percentages for treatment receipt, and used multivariable modified Poisson regression models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) predicting receipt of treatments. RESULTS: Older age, larger tumor size, positive nodal status, and Southern/Pacific US regions, but not race/ethnicity, were strongly associated with a lower probability of receiving definitive locoregional therapy. Older age was also strongly associated with lower likelihood of adjuvant chemotherapy receipt, as were grade, negative nodal status, and higher comorbidity. For example, compared with women aged 18 to 39 years, those aged 75 to 90 years were 17% less likely to receive definitive locoregional therapy (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.88), and 62% less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.35-0.41). Age, tumor grade, tumor size, and comorbidity score were also independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy for women with small TNBC. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age but not race/ethnicity was associated with lower likelihood of recommended treatment receipt among women with TNBC. Although omission of therapy among older patients with breast cancer may be appropriate in the case of smaller and lower risk TNBC, some were likely undertreated.

Factors That Contributed to Black-White Disparities in Survival Among Nonelderly Women With Breast Cancer Between 2004 and 2013.

Purpose To estimate the contribution of differences in demographics, comorbidity, insurance, tumor characteristics, and treatment to the overall mortality disparity between nonelderly black and white women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods Excess relative risk of all-cause death in black versus white women diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer, expressed as a percentage and stratified by hormone receptor status for each variable (demographics, comorbidity, insurance, tumor characteristics, and treatment) in sequentially, propensity-scored, optimally matched patients by using multivariable hazard ratios (HRs). Results We identified 563,497 white and black women 18 to 64 years of age diagnosed with stage I to III breast cancer from 2004 to 2013 in the National Cancer Data Base. Among women with hormone receptor-positive disease, who represented 78.5% of all patients, the HR for death in black versus white women in the demographics-matched model was 2.05 (95% CI, 1.94 to 2.17). The HR decreased to 1.93 (95% CI, 1.83 to 2.04), 1.54 (95% CI, 1.47 to 1.62), 1.30 (95% CI, 1.24 to 1.36), and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.31) when sequentially matched for comorbidity, insurance, tumor characteristics, and treatment, respectively. These factors combined accounted for 76.3% of the total excess risk of death in black patients; insurance accounted for 37.0% of the total excess, followed by tumor characteristics (23.2%), comorbidities (11.3%), and treatment (4.8%). Results generally were similar among women with hormone receptor-negative disease, although the HRs were substantially smaller. Conclusion Matching by insurance explained one third of the excess risk of death among nonelderly black versus white women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer; matching by tumor characteristics explained approximately one fifth of the excess risk. Efforts to focus on equalization of access to care could substantially reduce ethnic/racial disparities in overall survival among nonelderly women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state.

In this article, the American Cancer Society provides an overview of female breast cancer statistics in the United States, including data on incidence, mortality, survival, and screening. Approximately 252,710 new cases of invasive breast cancer and 40,610 breast cancer deaths are expected to occur among US women in 2017. From 2005 to 2014, overall breast cancer incidence rates increased among Asian/Pacific Islander (1.7% per year), non-Hispanic black (NHB) (0.4% per year), and Hispanic (0.3% per year) women but were stable in non-Hispanic white (NHW) and American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The increasing trends were driven by increases in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, which increased among all racial/ethnic groups, whereas rates of hormone receptor-negative breast cancers decreased. From 1989 to 2015, breast cancer death rates decreased by 39%, which translates to 322,600 averted breast cancer deaths in the United States. During 2006 to 2015, death rates decreased in all racial/ethnic groups, including AI/ANs. However, NHB women continued to have higher breast cancer death rates than NHW women, with rates 39% higher (mortality rate ratio [MRR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.43) in NHB women in 2015, although the disparity has ceased to widen since 2011. By state, excess death rates in black women ranged from 20% in Nevada (MRR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.42) to 66% in Louisiana (MRR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.54, 1.79). Notably, breast cancer death rates were not significantly different in NHB and NHW women in 7 states, perhaps reflecting an elimination of disparities and/or a lack of statistical power. Improving access to care for all populations could eliminate the racial disparity in breast cancer mortality and accelerate the reduction in deaths from this malignancy nationwide. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:439-448. © 2017 American Cancer Society.