Management of symptomatic cholelithiasis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic cholelithiasis is a common surgical disease and accounts for half of the over one million cholecystectomies performed in the USA annually. Despite its prevalence, only one prior systematic review has examined the evidence around treatment strategies and it contained a narrow scope. The goal of this systematic review was to analyze the clinical effectiveness of treatment options for symptomatic cholelithiasis, including surgery, non-surgical therapies, and ED pain management strategies. METHODS: Literature search was performed from January 2000 through June 2020, and a narrative analysis was performed as studies were heterogeneous. RESULTS: We identified 12 publications reporting on 10 trials (9 randomized controlled trials and 1 observational study) comparing treatment methods. The studies assessed surgery, observation, lithotripsy, ursodeoxycholic acid, electro-acupuncture, and pain-management strategies in the emergency department. Only one compared surgery to observation. CONCLUSION: This work presents the existing data and underscores the current gap in knowledge regarding treatment for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. We use these results to suggest how future trials may guide comparisons between the timing of surgery and watchful waiting to create a set of standardized guidelines. Providing appropriate and timely treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis is important to streamline care for a costly and prevalent disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Protocol Number: CRD42020153153.

Delay to Surgery for Patients with Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: Retrospective Analysis of an Administrative California Database after Discharge from the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Timely receipt of surgery should be available for all patients. Few studies have examined differences in the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis (SC), a common surgical problem, based on race/ethnicity or insurance status. This study aimed to identify differences in repeat emergency department (ED) use and wait time to cholecystectomy for SC. STUDY DESIGN: Patients discharged from the ED with SC between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were identified from California administrative databases and followed for 1 year. Repeat ED use and wait time to elective and nonelective cholecystectomy after ED discharge were examined using logistic and negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: The final cohort analyzed 13,596 patients who underwent cholecystectomy within 1 year from index ED visit for SC. In adjusted analysis, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher odds for repeat ED use for biliary-related conditions before elective surgery and experienced longer waits for cholecystectomy (across several measures of wait times) compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Similar findings were seen for Medicaid and self-pay compared with privately insured patients. For example, self-pay patients had more than double the odds of experiencing repeat ED use while waiting for elective cholecystectomy compared with privately insured patients (adjusted odds ratio 2.49, 95% CI 1.88-3.31). CONCLUSION: Patients with SC receiving cholecystectomy within 1 year from index ED visit were more likely to have repeat ED use and longer waits to surgery based on their race/ethnicity and insurance status, even after adjusting for other measures of access. We identify a vulnerable population at risk for differences in treatment for a common surgical pathology.

Identifying vulnerable populations with symptomatic cholelithiasis at risk for increased health care utilization.

BACKGROUND: Gallstones are a common problem in the United States with many patients suffering from symptomatic cholelithiasis (SC). Patients with SC may first present to the emergency department ED) and are often discharged for elective follow-up; however, it is unknown what system and patient factors are associated with increased risk for ED revisits. This study aimed to assess longitudinal ED utilization and cholecystectomy for patients with SC and identify patient, geographic, and hospital characteristics associated with ED revisits, specifically race/ethnicity and insurance status. METHODS: Patients discharged from the ED with SC between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were identified from California administrative databases and followed for 1 year. Emergency department revisits and cholecystectomy after discharge were examined using logistic regression, clustering standard errors by hospital. Models adjusted for patient, geographic, and hospital variables using census and hospital administrative data. RESULTS: Cohort included 34,427 patients who presented to the ED with SC and were discharged. There were 18.8% of the patients that had one or more biliary-related ED revisits within 1 year. In fully adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black patients had higher odds for any ED revisit (adjusted odds ratio 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.39) and for two more ED revisits (adjusted odds ratio 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.82). Insurance type was also associated with ED revisits. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced higher utilization of health care resources for SC after adjusting for other patient, geographic and hospital variables. Strategies to mitigate these disparities may include the development of standardized protocols regarding the follow-up and education for SC. Implementation of such strategies can ensure equitable treatment for all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level III.

Robot-Assisted General Surgery Procedures at the Veterans Health Administration: A Comparison of Surgical Techniques.

INTRODUCTION: The use of the robot in general surgery has exploded in the last decade. The Veterans Health Administration presents a unique opportunity to study differences between surgical approaches due to the ability to control for health system and insurance variability. This study compares clinical outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic or open techniques for three general surgery procedures. METHODS: A retrospective observational study using the Veterans Affair Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Operative time, length of stay, and complications were compared for cholecystectomy (robot-assisted versus laparoscopic), ventral, and inguinal hernia repair (robot-assisted versus laparoscopic or open) from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS: More than 80,000 cases were analyzed (21,652 cholecystectomy, 9214 ventral hernia repairs, and 51,324 inguinal hernia repairs). Median operative time was longer for all robot-assisted approaches as compared to laparoscopic or open techniques with the largest difference seen between open and robot-assisted primary ventral hernia repair (unadjusted difference of 93 min, P < 0.001). Median length of stay was between 1 and 4 d and significantly for robot-assisted ventral hernia repairs (versus open, P < 0.01; versus lap for recurrent hernia, P < 0.05). Specific postoperative outcomes of interest were overall low with few differences between techniques. CONCLUSIONS: While the robotic platform was associated with longer operative time, these findings must be interpreted in the context of a learning curve and indications for use (i.e., use of the robot for technically challenging cases). Our findings suggest that at the Veterans Health Administration, the robot is as safe a platform for common general surgery procedures as traditional approaches. Future studies should focus on patient-centered outcomes including pain and cosmesis.

Surgical Hand Tracking in Open Surgery Using a Versatile Motion Sensing System: Are We There Yet?

With changes in work hour limitations, there is an increasing need for objective determination of technical proficiency. Electromagnetic hand-motion analysis has previously shown only time to completion and number of movements to correlation with expertise. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of hand-motion-tracking analysis in determining surgical skill proficiency. A nine-degree-of-freedom sensor was used and mounted on the superior aspect of a needle driver. A one-way analysis of variance and Welch's t test were performed to evaluate significance between subjects. Four Novices, four Trainees, and three Experts performed a large vessel patch anastomosis on a phantom tissue. Path length, total number of movements, absolute velocity, and total time were analyzed between groups. Compared to the Novices, Expert subjects exhibited significantly decreased total number of movements, decreased instrument path length, and decreased total time to complete tasks. There were no significant differences found in absolute velocity between groups. In this pilot study, we have identified significant differences in patterns of motion between Novice and Expert subjects. These data warrant further analysis for its predictive value in larger cohorts at different levels of training and may be a useful tool in competence-based training paradigms in the future.