Physiological relationships between central vascular haemodynamics and left ventricular structure.

Left ventricular hypertrophy is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. In hypertensives, the pattern of hypertrophy is influenced by central haemodynamic characteristics. Central haemodynamics may also determine physiological differences in left ventricular structure and predispose to particular responses of the left ventricle to pathological increases in load. M-mode echocardiography was used to measure left ventricular diastolic dimension and to estimate left ventricular mass index, relative wall thickness and stroke volume in 159 healthy volunteers aged between 19 and 74 years. Tonometric sphygmography was used to estimate augmentation index, central end-systolic and mean arterial blood pressure. Effective arterial elastance was calculated as the ratio of end-systolic pressure to stroke volume. Left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness were adjusted for variation in age, sex and blood pressure before analyses. Left ventricular diastolic dimension exhibited significant inverse correlations with both effective arterial elastance (r=-0.72, P<0.0001) and augmentation index (r=-0.23, P=0.004). Adjusted left ventricular mass index was inversely correlated with effective arterial elastance (r=-0.35, P<0.0001), but no correlation was observed between left ventricular mass index and augmentation index (r=0.04). Adjusted relative wall thickness correlated with increasing effective arterial elastance (r=0.32, P<0.0001) and augmentation index (r=0.18, P=0.02). Relative wall thickness (r=0.34, P<0.0001), but not left ventricular mass index, correlated with age. Higher elastance and augmentation correlates with relatively smaller left ventricular cavity size but larger relative wall thickness. Age-related changes in left ventricular afterload may affect relative wall thickness more significantly than left ventricular mass index and may contribute to a particular change in left ventricular geometry with age.

Increased left ventricular mass is not associated with impaired left ventricular diastolic filling in normal individuals.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy has been associated with diastolic dysfunction. However, the underlying physiological relationship between LV size and diastolic function remains to be clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between several measures of diastolic filling and LV mass in a population sample. METHODS: We used M-mode and Doppler echocardiography to compare left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and wall thickness with five measures of ventricular diastolic filling (ratio of the peak early mitral inflow velocity to the peak atrial mitral inflow velocity, deceleration time of early mitral inflow, isovolumetric relaxation time, ratio of the peak pulmonary venous systolic to diastolic flow and difference between the durations of the pulmonary venous and mitral inflow atrial waves) in 159 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: LVMI was significantly (P< 0.0001) greater in men (81.3 g/m2, interquartile range: 67-94) than women (59.7 g/m2, interquartile range: 49-74), but no gender differences were observed in diastolic filling. Higher age, blood pressure and heart rate showed significant correlation with diminished diastolic filling. However, no measure of diastolic filling correlated with LVMI or wall thickness in either univariate or multiple regression analyses that adjusted for relevant covariates. CONCLUSIONS: LVMI does not explain physiological differences in diastolic filling. The significant decline in diastolic filling with age reflects changes in the quality rather than the quantity of myocardial tissue.

Discrepancies between echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular mass in a healthy adult population.

Increased left ventricular (LV) mass is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. LV mass is commonly estimated from echocardiography according to the Penn or ASE (American Society of Echocardiography) conventions. No formal statistical test of agreement between these methods has been published. Therefore we compared M-mode echocardiographic LV mass estimates by the Penn and ASE methods in a normal adult population. M-mode echocardiographic tracings were obtained in 169 healthy volunteers and used to calculate LV mass using the Penn and ASE methods. Median values of the estimates were similar [Penn, 126 g (interquartile range 96-170 g); ASE, 129 g (105-164 g); P=0.08] and were highly intercorrelated (r=0.98, P<0.0001). However, the Bland-Altman analysis of agreement revealed significant inconsistencies between Penn and ASE LV mass values. The difference between Penn and ASE values was correlated significantly with heart size (P<0.0001), such that, for small hearts, the Penn LV mass was lower than the ASE LV mass; in contrast, for large hearts, Penn estimates were greater than ASE values. In the upper 5% of the LV mass distribution, the median value for the Penn LV mass index was 132.4 g/m(2), compared with 116.5 g/m(2) for ASE values (2P=0.017). Thus the two most common methods of echocardiographic estimation of LV mass differ significantly at the upper and lower ends of the heart size distribution. These results have important implications for both cardiac research and clinical evaluation.