RESUMEN
P. falciparumerythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) is the major parasite protein responsible for rosetting by binding to host receptors such as heparan sulfate, CR1 on RBC surface. Usually monomeric protein-carbohydrate interactions are weak [1], therefore PfEMP1 binds to plasma proteins like IgM or α2-macroglobulin that facilitate its clustering on parasitized RBC surface and augment rosetting [2,3]. We show that 3D7A expresses PfEMP1, PF3D7_0412900, and employs its CIDRγ2 domain to interact with glycophorin B on uninfected RBC to form large rosettes but more importantly even in the absence of plasma proteins. Overall, we established the role of PF3D7_0412900 in rosetting as antibodies against CIDRγ2 domain reduced rosetting and also identified its receptor, glycophorin B which could provide clue why glycophorin B null phenotype, S-s-U- RBCs prevalent in malaria endemic areas is protective against severe malaria.
Asunto(s)
Malaria , Plasmodium falciparum , Humanos , Plasmodium falciparum/metabolismo , Glicoforinas/metabolismo , Proteínas Protozoarias/química , Eritrocitos/metabolismo , Proteínas Sanguíneas/metabolismoRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic that emerged around December 2019 claimed millions of lives. For vaccine development, S protein on viral envelope that binds to ACE2 receptor on cells for entry was identified as vaccine candidate. S protein consists of Receptor Binding Motif (RBM) in the S1 subunit followed by the S2 subunit with an intermediate furin cleavage site. A stabilized version of S protein with 2 proline residues was used as antigen. Overall, most vaccines exhibited efficacy between 80 and 95%. However, being a RNA virus that is prone to mutations along with selection pressure on S protein and frequent use of convalescent plasma led to evolution of variants. These variants are responsible for multiple waves of infection observed globally. In our review, we discuss current data on vaccines and its efficacy in neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 from Wuhan and its variants. Further, our docked mutations observed in variants on the ACE2-S complex cryo-EM structure show that mostly the S1 domain is under selection pressure where major mutations occur in the N terminal domain (NTD), RBM and junction near S1-S2 subunit. Therefore, this review would be a reference for development of new candidate antigen(s) with better efficacy against variants.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Secuencias de Aminoácidos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Antígenos/química , Sitios de Unión , Salud Global , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Mutación , Pandemias/prevención & control , Prolina , Unión Proteica , Dominios Proteicos , Desarrollo de VacunasRESUMEN
COVID-19 has become one of the biggest health concern, along with huge economic burden. With no clear remedies to treat the disease, doctors are repurposing drugs like chloroquine and remdesivir to treat COVID-19 patients. In parallel, research institutes in collaboration with biotech companies have identified strategies to use viral proteins as vaccine candidates for COVID-19. Although this looks promising, they still need to pass the test of challenge studies in animal models. As various models for SARS-CoV-2 are under testing phase, biotech companies have bypassed animal studies and moved to Phase I clinical trials. In view of the present outbreak, this looks a justified approach, but the problem is that in the absence of animal studies, we can never predict the outcomes in humans. Since animal models are critical for vaccine development and SARS-CoV-2 has different transmission dynamics, in this review we compare different animal models of SARS-CoV-2 with humans for their pathogenic, immune response and transmission dynamics that make them ideal models for vaccine testing for COVID-19. Another issue of using animal model is the ethics of using animals for research; thus, we also discuss the pros and cons of using animals for vaccine development studies.