Utility of Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for Culture-Positive Septic Arthritis in a Lyme Disease-Endemic Region.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of synovial fluid biomarkers to identify children with culture-positive septic arthritis. METHODS: We identified children 6 months to 18 years old presenting to a single emergency department between 2007 and 2022 undergoing evaluation for septic arthritis defined by having a synovial fluid culture obtained. Our primary outcome was septic arthritis defined by a positive synovial fluid culture. We evaluated the ability of synovial fluid biomarkers to identify children with septic arthritis using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses. We measured the sensitivity and specificity of commonly used synovial fluid biomarkers. RESULTS: We included 796 children, of whom 79 (10%) had septic arthritis. Compared with synovial white blood cell count (AUC, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.78), absolute neutrophil count (AUC, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.66-0.79; P = 0.09), percent neutrophils (AUC, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.60-0.71; P = 0.12), and glucose (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90; P = 0.33) performed similarly, whereas protein (AUC, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.40-0.63, P = 0.04) had lower diagnostic accuracy. Synovial fluid white blood cell count ≥50,000 cells/µL had a sensitivity of 62.0% (95% CI, 50.4%-72.7%) and a specificity of 67.0% (95% CI, 63.4%-70.4%), whereas a positive synovial fluid Gram stain had a sensitivity of 48.1% (95% CI, 36.5%-59.7%) and specificity of 99.1% (95% CI, 98.1%-99.7%) for septic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: None of the routinely available synovial fluid biomarkers had sufficient accuracy to be used in isolation in the identification of children with septic arthritis. New approaches including multivariate clinical prediction rules and novel biomarkers are needed.

Video-Assisted Laryngoscopy for Pediatric Tracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Study of Clinical Outcomes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between video-assisted laryngoscopy (use of a videolaryngoscope regardless of where laryngoscopists direct their gaze), first-attempt success, and adverse airway outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an observational study using data from 2 airway consortiums that perform prospective surveillance: the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) and a pediatric emergency medicine airway education collaborative. Data collected included patient and procedural characteristics and procedural outcomes. We performed multivariable analyses of the association of video-assisted laryngoscopy with individual patient outcomes and evaluated the association between site-level video-assisted laryngoscopy use and tracheal intubation outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort included 1,412 tracheal intubation encounters performed from January 2017 to March 2021 across 11 participating sites. Overall, the first-attempt success was 70.0%. Video-assisted laryngoscopy was associated with increased odds of first-attempt success (odds ratio [OR] 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48 to 2.73) and decreased odds of severe adverse airway outcomes (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.85) including decreased severe hypoxia (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.87). Sites varied substantially in the use of video-assisted laryngoscopy (range from 12.9% to 97.8%), and sites with high use of video-assisted laryngoscopy (> 80%) experienced increased first-attempt success even after adjusting for individual patient laryngoscope use (OR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.79 to 2.95). CONCLUSION: Video-assisted laryngoscopy is associated with increased first-attempt success and fewer adverse airway outcomes for patients intubated in the pediatric emergency department. There is wide variability in the use of video-assisted laryngoscopy, and the high use is associated with increased odds of first-attempt success.

See one, see one, teach one - Decisions on allocating intubation opportunities in pediatric emergency medicine.

Background: Decisions about who should perform tracheal intubation in academic settings must balance the needs of trainees to develop competency in pediatric intubation with patient safety. Airway protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced opportunities for trainees, representing an opportunity to examine the impact of shifting laryngoscopy responsibilities away from trainees. Methods: This observational study combined data from 11 pediatric emergency departments in North America participating in either the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children (NEAR4KIDS) or a national pediatric emergency medicine airway education collaborative. Sites provided information on airway protocols, patient and procedural characteristics, and clinical outcomes. For the pre-pandemic (January 2017 to March 2020) and pandemic (March 2020 to March 2021) periods, we compared tracheal intubation opportunities by laryngoscopist level of training and specialty. We also compared first-attempt success and adverse airway outcomes between the two periods. Results: There were 1129 intubations performed pre-pandemic and 283 during the pandemic. Ten of 11 sites reported a COVID-19 airway protocol-8 specified which clinician performs tracheal intubation and 10 advocated for videolaryngoscopy. Both pediatric residents and pediatric emergency medicine fellows performed proportionally fewer tracheal intubation attempts during the pandemic: 1.1% of all first attempts versus 6.4% pre-pandemic for residents (p < 0.01) and 38.4% versus 47.2% pre-pandemic for fellows (p = 0.01). Pediatric emergency medicine fellows had greater decrease in monthly intubation opportunities for patients <1 year (incidence rate ratio = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.2, 0.57) than for older patients (incidence rate ratio = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.99). Neither the rate of first-attempt success nor adverse airway outcomes differed between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic led to pediatric institutional changes in airway management protocols and resulted in decreased intubation opportunities for pediatric residents and pediatric emergency medicine fellows, without apparent change in clinical outcomes.

C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin Levels May Not Predict Delirium in Critically Ill Children.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between C-reactive protein and procalcitonin and the diagnosis of delirium in critically ill children. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care urban academic PICU. PATIENTS: All PICU patients (ages 0-21 yr) admitted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, who had a C-reactive protein and/or procalcitonin level drawn within the first 14 days of their PICU stay. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Each patient was screened for delirium and/or coma bid using the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium. Patient information including demographics, delirium status, and laboratory values were extracted from the electronic medical record. Seven-hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled, with C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels drawn in 664 and 587 patients, respectively. Thirty-seven percent of patients (n = 274) were delirious on at least one study day. In bivariate analysis, C-reactive protein was not related to either delirium or coma. Procalcitonin was highest on days with coma and lowest on days with delirium. There was no statistically significant relationship between inflammatory markers and any subtype of delirium. CONCLUSIONS: Despite evidence of inflammatory markers being predictive of delirium in adults, in this retrospective pediatric cohort, no association was found between C-reactive protein or procalcitonin levels and development of delirium.

Delirium in hospitalised children.

Delirium is a syndrome characterised by an acute and fluctuating alteration in cognition and awareness. It occurs frequently in children with serious medical illness, and is associated with adverse outcomes such as increased length of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital costs, and mortality. Delirium-especially the hypoactive subtype-is often overlooked by paediatric practitioners, but can be reduced by mitigating risks and effectively managed if detected early. Non-modifiable risk factors of delirium include young age (age <2 years), cognitive or neurological disabilities, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, severe underlying illness and pre-existing chronic conditions, and poor nutritional status. Routine bedside screening using validated tools can enable early detection of delirium. To reduce delirium in hospitalised children, health-care providers should optimise the hospital environment (eg, by reducing sleep disruption and keeping the child stimulated during the day), improve pain management, and decrease sedation (particularly use of benzodiazepines).