Human NLRC4 promotes cancer survival and is associated to type-I interferon signaling and immune infiltration.

The immune system can control cancer progression. However, even though some innate immune sensors of cellular stress are expressed intrinsically in epithelial cells, their potential role in cancer aggressiveness and subsequent overall survival in humans is mainly unknown. Here, we show that NLR family CARD Domain Containing 4 (NLRC4) is downregulated in epithelial tumor cells of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients by using spatial tissue imaging. Strikingly, only the loss of tumor NLRC4 but not stromal is associated with poor immune infiltration (mainly dendritic and CD4+/CD8+ T cells) and accurately predicts progression to metastatic Stage IV and decrease of overall survival. By combining multi-omics approaches, we show that restoring NLRC4 expression in human colorectal cancer cells triggers a broad inflammasome-independent immune reprogramming consisting of Type-I IFN signaling genes and the release of chemokines and myeloid growth factors involved in the tumor infiltration and activation of dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells. Consistently, such reprogramming in cancer cells is sufficient to directly mature human DCs towards a Th1 antitumor immune response through IL-12 production in vitro. In multiple human carcinomas (colorectal, lung, and skin), we confirmed that NLRC4 expression in patient tumors is strongly associated with Type-I IFN genes, immune infiltrates and high microsatellite instability. Thus, we shed light on the epithelial innate immune sensor NLRC4 as a novel therapeutic target to promote an efficient antitumor immune response against the aggressiveness of various carcinomas.

Long-term prognosis of patients with metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease by non-invasive methods.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive assessment of fibrosis is predictive of the prognosis of non-alcoholic and alcoholic fatty liver disease but this has not been demonstrated in metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). AIMS: We assessed the prognosis of non-invasive methods in patients with MAFLD. METHODS: All consecutive patients with MAFLD, with liver stiffness measurements, FIB-4 (Fibrosis-4), and LIVERFASt were included in this cohort study. The primary endpoint was analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method and secondary endpoints were estimated by Gray test or logistic regression. Factors independently associated with overall mortality and morbidity were identified by a multivariate Cox model. The prognostic performance of non-invasive methods for prediction of mortality was evaluated by Harrell's C-index and for morbidity by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1239 patients with MAFLD were analysed (median age 56 years, male 56.5%, median body mass index 31 kg/m2 and obesity 59%). The median follow-up was 62 months [42-91 months] and 73 (5.8%) subjects died. Baseline results of non-invasive methods were correlated with overall and liver-related mortalities (P < 0.001), and with all-cause and liver-related outcomes (P < 0.001). A predictive model (composed of clinical parameters and liver stiffness measurement, FIB-4 or LIVERFASt) was an excellent predictor of overall and liver-related mortalities (C-index 0.8-0.9), and a good predictor of overall and liver-related morbidities (AUC 0.72-0.74). CONCLUSION: Baseline liver stiffness measurement, FIB-4 and LIVERFASt can predict global and liver-related mortality and morbidity in patients with MAFLD and could be prognosis endpoints in clinical trials.

Long-term prognosis of patients with alcohol-related liver disease or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease according to metabolic syndrome or alcohol use.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The boundary between non-alcoholic (NAFLD) and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is based on alcohol consumption. However, metabolic syndrome and alcohol use frequently co-exist. The aim of this study was to determine prognostic factors of long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with NAFLD or ALD. METHODS: From 2003 to 2016, all consecutive NAFLD or ALD patients were prospectively included in this cohort study. We evaluated overall survival, specific cause of mortality and occurrence of any complication. The primary endpoint was analysed by the Kaplan Meier method, secondary endpoints were estimated by Gray test method or logistic regressions. Factors independently associated with overall mortality and morbidity were identified by a multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: A total of 3365 patients (1667 with ALD and 1698 with NAFLD) were included. Median follow-up was 54 months (range: 30-86) and 563 subjects died. In the overall population, overall mortality was higher in patients with ALD (HR: 10.1 [7.57-13.3]), and with weekly alcohol consumption >7 units (HR:1.66 [1.41-1.96]). Liver-related mortality was higher in patients with ALD (HR: 11 [7.27-16.5]). In the NAFLD group, weekly alcohol consumption >1 unit was associated with higher overall mortality (HR: 1.9 [1.1-3.4]), and weekly alcohol consumption >7 units was associated with higher overall morbidity (OR: 1.89 [1.61-2.21]). In the ALD group, the presence of metabolic syndrome was associated with higher overall (HR:1.27 [1.02-1.57]), and liver (HR: 1.47 [1.1-1.96]) mortalities, and overall (OR: 1.46 [1.14-1.88]), liver (OR: 1.46 [1.14-1.88]) morbidities. CONCLUSION: In fatty liver diseases, light alcohol consumption and metabolic syndrome are prognosis cofactors.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of vascular liver diseases.

Vascular disorders of the liver are rare diseases, some of which are diagnosed mainly with non-invasive tests and others by liver biopsy. Non-invasive methods can be used to diagnose and monitor these diseases. However, their evaluation needs to be performed by expert centers. Liver biopsy is needed each time there is an unexplained abnormality.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of hyperferritinaemia.

Increased serum ferritin is a very frequent cause of referral for which thorough evaluation is required to avoid unnecessary exploration and inaccurate diagnosis. Clinicians must thus know factors and tools that are relevant in this setting. Several biochemical and radiological tools drastically improved the diagnosis work-up of increased serum ferritin. Because serum ferritin value can be altered by many cofounding factors, scrutiny in the initial clinical evaluation is crucial. Alcohol consumption, and the metabolic syndrome are the most frequent causes of secondary increased ferritin. Serum transferrin saturation level is a pivotal test, and if increased prompt testing for HFE C282Y patients in Caucasian population. In most cases further tests are require to establish whether increased ferritin is associated or not to iron overload. Magnetic resonance imaging is the reference method allowing to accurately establish liver iron content which indirectly reflect body iron load. Second line genetic testing for rare forms of iron overload or increased serum ferritin are available in reference center and should be discussed if diagnosis is equivocal or remain uncertain after careful evaluation. Definite genetic diagnosis is worthwhile as it allows family screening and refining long term management of the patient. Liver biopsy remains seldom useful to assess liver fibrosis, mostly in patients with severe iron overload.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of chronic infection with hepatitis B virus.

Diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, initial staging of infection and monitoring of treated and untreated patients are mainly based on clinical, biological and imaging criteria allowing a complete non-invasive management for the majority of patients. Along to the conventional virological tools, rapid diagnostic tests and blotting paper tests for HBV DNA are validated alternatives. After diagnosis, the initial work-up should include HIV, HCV and HDV serologies, HBeAg status, and HBsAg and HBV DNA quantification. Assessment of severity (inflammation and fibrosis) is based on ALT serum levels and non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis by elastography or blood tests, which must be interpreted cautiously using specific cut-offs and taking into account ALT levels. Taken together, these parameters allow disease classification and treatment decision. Decision of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by ultra-sound every six months may be difficult in non-cirrhotic patients and the use of risk-scores such as PAGE-B is encouraged. Chronic HBV infection often has a dynamic and often unpredictable profile and regular monitoring is mandatory. In untreated patients, regular (3-12 months) follow-up should include ALT and HBV DNA serum levels. Periodical HBsAg quantification and non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis may refine disease outcome and prognosis. In treated patients, checking efficacy is mainly based on HBV DNA negativity. In patients with advanced fibrosis, evolution of liver stiffness can be useful for portal hypertension evaluation, but its improvement should not be considered to stop hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Finally, new parameters (HBV RNA, HBcrAg) are promising but their use is still restricted for research.

Non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of primary biliary cholangitis.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the intra-hepatic bile ducts [1]. It is characterised biologically by chronic cholestasis associated with the presence of specific autoantibodies, and histologically by lesions of nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis. If left untreated it can progress to cirrhosis, portal hypertension and liver failure. Diagnosis, staging and follow-up are largely based on non- or minimally-invasive assessment (blood tests, ultrasound, liver stiffness measurement). Histological examination of the liver and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are sometimes necessary, but their indications remain limited. The purpose of this chapter is to provide the clinicians with what should be known about the non-invasive assessment of PBC and to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice.

Quality criteria for the measurement of liver stiffness.

Liver elastography offers the possibility of a quick, non-invasive, and painless evaluation of the liver with immediate results at bedside. Transient elastography is the most validated technology, and many others such as point shear wave elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography, or magnetic resonance elastography have been developed. To ensure the best evaluation, several conditions of examination must be respected for liver stiffness measurement. Indeed, patient, operator and examination characteristics have all been shown to influence the result of liver stiffness measurement. Food intake increases liver stiffness, whereas withdrawal in alcoholics is associated with a decrease in elastography results. Inter-observer reproducibility of the measurement seems suboptimal, and the influence of the operator experience is still being debated. The measurement site and the FibroScan® probe must be correctly chosen. Finally, the intrinsic characteristics and quality criteria of the measurement, especially the interquartile range/median ratio, must be carefully checked to avoid overestimation of liver stiffness. Most of the results come from studies which have evaluated transient elastography, with less data available for the other technologies. Liver stiffness measurement could appear as a simple way to explore the liver, but several conditions must be met before deciding the patient management according to its result.

Is There Still a Place for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma at the Time of Immunotherapies? A Focus on Lenvatinib.

The systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma is changing rapidly. Three main classes of treatment are now available. Historically, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line; regorafenib and cabozantinib as second-line) were the first to show an improvement in overall survival (OS). Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibodies can be used in first-line (bevacizumab) or second-line (ramucirumab) combination therapy. More recently, immuno-oncology (IO) has profoundly changed therapeutic algorithms, and the combination of atezolizumab-bevacizumab is now the first-line standard of care. Therefore, the place of TKIs needs to be redefined. The objective of this review was to define the place of TKIs in the therapeutic algorithm at the time of IO treatment in first-line therapy, with a special focus on lenvatinib that exhibits one of the higher anti-tumoral activity among TKI in HCC. We will discuss the place of lenvatinib in first line (especially if there is a contra-indication to IO) but also after failure of atezolizumab and bevacizumab. New opportunities for lenvatinib will also be presented, including the use at an earlier stage of the disease and combination with IOs.

Profile of Cabozantinib for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.

Management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is challenging. With an increasing number of options for the first and second-line treatment, understanding and developing optimal systemic treatment strategies are crucial. In second line, two tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and one monoclonal antibody have been approved after sorafenib by both the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration based on the results of phase 3 trials: cabozantinib, regorafenib and ramucirumab. Cabozantinib has demonstrated an improved overall survival and progression-free survival in the phase 3 CELESTIAL study in second and third line, in patients in good general condition (performance status 0-1) and with a normal liver function Child-Pugh class A. Analysis of subgroups has shown that even elderly patients over 65 years, or patients with high baseline alpha-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL benefit from cabozantinib. The choice in second-line between the three drugs should be based on factors such as previous tolerance of sorafenib, safety profile of drugs and quality of life. In this review, we will analyze clinical data available on cabozantinib, clarifying the choice between the different possible treatments. However, the upcoming of a new standard in first line with the combination atezolizumab and bevacizumab will change the game and will warrant further investigations to define the accurate subsequent sequence of TKIs. Cabozantinib is also actually tested in first-line in combination with atezolizumab, results of the phase 3 COSMIC trial are eagerly awaited.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), previously known as veno-occlusive disease, is characterized by concentric and non-thrombotic obstruction of the sinusoid and central vein lumen with no identified primitive or thrombotic hepatic vein lesions. The initial lesion is a result of endothelial denudation, corresponding to the migration of damaged sinusoidal cells to the central veins of the hepatic lobules, leading to sinusoidal and veno-occlusive congestive obstruction. SOS may be associated with other lesions such as centrilobular perisinusoidal fibrosis, peliosis, or nodular regenerative hyperplasia. The first cases of SOS were documented in 1920 in South Africa, after ingestion of food sources contaminated by pyrrolizidine alkaloids. SOS is a well-known complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Numerous toxins and drugs have been associated with SOS, mainly chemotherapies and immunosuppressive therapies, as well as total body or liver irradiation and ABO mismatch platelet transfusion. The pathogenesis of this entity remains unknown.