Safety and efficacy of resmetirom in the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), spanning from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to liver fibrosis, poses a global health challenge amid rising obesity and metabolic syndrome rates. Effective pharmacological treatments for NASH and liver fibrosis are limited. Objective: This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the safety and efficacy of resmetirom, a selective thyroid hormone receptor-ß agonist, in NASH and liver fibrosis treatment. By analyzing data from clinical trials, we aim to offer evidence-based recommendations for resmetirom's use in managing these conditions and identify avenues for future research. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were systematically searched, supplemented by manual screening of relevant sources. Only English-language randomized controlled trials were included. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, pooled analyses, and meta-regression were performed. Results: Three randomized controlled trials involving 2231 participants were analyzed. Resmetirom demonstrated significant reductions in hepatic fat fraction [standardized mean difference (SMD) -4.61, 95% CI -6.77 to -2.44, P < 0.0001], NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis [risk ratio (RR) 2.51, 95% CI 1.74-3.64, P = 0.00001), and liver fibrosis improvement (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.20-4.44, P = 0.01). Secondary outcomes showed significant improvements in lipid profiles, liver enzymes, and NASH biomarkers with resmetirom treatment. Meta-regression revealed associations between covariates and primary outcomes. Conclusion: Resmetirom exhibits promising efficacy in reducing hepatic fat, improving NASH resolution, and ameliorating liver fibrosis with a favorable safety profile. Further research is warranted to validate findings and optimize therapeutic strategies for NASH and liver fibrosis management.

Unraveling disparities: Probing gender, race, and geographic inequities in pulmonary heart disease mortality in the United States: An extensive longitudinal examination (1999-2020) leveraging CDC WONDER data.

This comprehensive study delves into the epidemiological landscape of Pulmonary Heart Disease (PHD) mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2020, leveraging the extensive CDC WONDER database. PHD encompasses conditions affecting the right side of the heart due to lung disorders or elevated pressure in the pulmonary arteries, including pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary embolism, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Analyzing data from death certificates, demographic characteristics, and geographical segmentation, significant trends emerge. The age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) for PHD-related deaths show a fluctuating pattern, initially decreasing from 1999 to 2006, followed by a steady increase until 2020. Male patients consistently exhibit higher AAMRs than females, with notable disparities observed among racial/ethnic groups and geographic regions. Non-hispanic (NH) Black or African American individuals, residents of specific states like Colorado and the District of Columbia, and those in the Midwest region demonstrate elevated AAMRs. Furthermore, nonmetropolitan areas consistently manifest higher AAMRs than metropolitan areas. These findings underscore the urgent need for intensified prevention and treatment strategies to address the rising mortality associated with PHD, particularly among vulnerable populations. Insights from this study offer valuable guidance for public health initiatives aimed at reducing PHD-related mortality and improving outcomes nationwide.

Insights into Covid-19 mortality: A comprehensive study of cardiovascular sensitivity, gender, race, and geography trends in the United States (2020-2023).

This investigation meticulously explores the evolving landscape of Covid-19-related mortality in the United States from 2020 to 2023. Leveraging the comprehensive CDC WONDER database, the study conducts a detailed analysis of age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs), considering various demographic and regional parameters. The identified pattern illustrates an initial surge in AAMRs from 2020 to 2021, followed by a subsequent decline until 2023. Notably, there is a discernible reduction in AAMRs for both the elderly (85 years and older) and infants (below one year). Within specific demographic segments, heightened AAMRs are observed among NH American Indian or Alaska Native individuals, men, and residents in particular states and regions. Emphasizing the significant impact of Covid-19 on cardiovascular health, the study underscores increased mortality rates associated with the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. AAMR rates were standardized per 100,000 population, providing a comparative metric. Noteworthy states with elevated AAMRs include Mississippi, Oklahoma, Kentucky, New Mexico, and Alabama, with the Southern region exhibiting the highest AAMR. The research sheds light on demographic and regional disparities in Covid-19-related mortality, calling for intensified efforts in prevention and treatment strategies. These findings, offering nuanced insights, serve as a guide for strategic public health initiatives to mitigate the multifaceted repercussions of the pandemic, especially among vulnerable populations.

Comparative effectiveness of intra-articular therapies in knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis comparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with other treatment modalities.

Introduction: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a progressive joint disease commonly treated with intra-articular injections, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), hyaluronic acid (HA), or corticosteroids (CS). This updated meta-analysis aims to enhance the statistical power of the results and provide comprehensive clinical evidence that reflects the most current research. By doing so, the authors aim to suggest a reliable estimate for the development of guidelines, addressing the pressing need for effective and minimally invasive treatment options. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Central were searched until March 2023, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of intra-articular injectable therapies, including PRP, HA, CS, and placebo, in KOA. Data extraction involved baseline characteristics and outcome measures [Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, KOOS, and IKDC scores] at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analysis, including subgroup analysis, assessment of heterogeneity, and publication bias, was conducted using Review Manager. Results: Our meta-analysis of 42 studies involving 3696 patients demonstrated that PRP treatment resulted in significant pain relief compared to HA injections, as evidenced by improved WOMAC pain (MD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.46; P≤0.00001; I 2=94%) and VAS pain (MD: -0.65; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.06; P=0.03; I2=97%) outcomes. Similarly, PRP showed greater efficacy in reducing WOMAC pain (MD: -8.06; 95% CI: -13.62 to -2.51: P=0.004; I 2=96%) and VAS pain (MD: -1.11; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.59; P≤0.0001; I 2=68%) compared to CS injections, with the most significant improvement observed at 6 months. Conclusions: PRP is an effective treatment for KOA. It provides symptomatic relief, has the potential to reduce disease progression, and has sustained effects up to 12 months. PRP offers superior pain relief and functional enhancement compared to CS and HA injections.