National Provider Survey: Use of Naltrexone for Pregnant Individuals with Substance Use Disorders.

OBJECTIVES: A national survey evaluated the availability of naltrexone as a treatment for alcohol use disorder and/or opioid use disorder for pregnant individuals. Provider perceptions of barriers to treatment with naltrexone during pregnancy were also examined. METHODS: Sites were selected from a national registry of naltrexone prescribers (N = 5208). A 10% sampling of sites within 150 miles of each state's capital was selected (n = 2073). Survey of 11 questions included availability of naltrexone for pregnant individuals, standard practices for treating pregnant individuals already on naltrexone, and barriers to treatment. Survey responses were summarized to identify top barriers and national trends in service availability. RESULTS: Of the 236 sites contacted, 78 (33.1%) completed the survey. There was significant geographic variation in number of available sites, with Northeast United States having the most sites. Of the 78 responding sites, only 23 (35.9%) offered naltrexone for pregnant individuals. The most common barriers to prescribing naltrexone included the following: sites without pregnant patients (15.6%), lack of national guidelines in using naltrexone for pregnant patients (14.1%), providers' discomfort with prescribing naltrexone during pregnancy due to safety concerns (9.4%), and providers' discomfort due to inexperience (4.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Accessibility of naltrexone and related care for pregnant individuals with alcohol use disorder and opioid use disorder varies greatly across the United States with numerous barriers and educational gaps identified. Additional research and resources are needed to expand naltrexone treatment access for pregnant individuals.

Correction to: Prior bariatric surgery lowers complication rates following spine surgery in obese patients.

The AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) has requested the correction of the result Tables 1-3 of this study: All stated numbers below 10 shall be modified to read "<10" instead.

Diminishing Clinical Returns of Multilevel Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Single institution retrospective clinical review. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between levels fused and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing open and minimally invasive surgical (MIS) lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Minimally invasive spinal fusion aims to reduce the morbidity associated with conventional open surgery. As multilevel arthrodesis procedures are increasingly performed using MIS techniques, it is necessary to weigh the risks and benefits of multilevel MIS lumbar fusion as a function of fusion length. METHODS: Patients undergoing <4 level lumbar interbody fusion were stratified by surgical technique (MIS or open), and grouped by fusion length: 1-level, 2-levels, 3+ levels. Demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), surgical factors, and perioperative complication rates were compared between technique groups at different fusion lengths using means comparison tests. RESULTS: Included: 361 patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion (88% transforaminal, 14% lateral; 41% MIS). Breakdown by fusion length: 63% 1-level, 22% 2-level, 15% 3+ level. Op-time did not differ between groups at 1-level (MIS: 233 min vs. Open: 227, P = 0.554), though MIS at 2-levels (332 min vs. 281) and 3+ levels (373 min vs. 323) were longer (P = 0.033 and P = 0.231, respectively). While complication rates were lower for MIS at 1-level (15% vs. 30%, P = 0.006) and 2-levels (13% vs. 27%, P = 0.147), at 3+ levels, complication rates were comparable (38% vs. 35%, P = 0.870). 3+ level MIS fusions had higher rates of ileus (13% vs. 0%, P = 0.008) and a trend of increased adverse pulmonary events (25% vs. 7%, P = 0.110). MIS was associated with less EBL at all lengths (all P < 0.01) and lower rates of anemia at 1-level (5% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) and 2-levels (7% vs. 16%, P = 0.193). At 3+ levels, however, anemia rates were similar between groups (13% vs. 15%, P = 0.877). CONCLUSION: MIS lumbar interbody fusions provided diminishing clinical returns for multilevel procedures. While MIS patients had lower rates of perioperative complications for 1- and 2-level fusions, 3+ level MIS fusions had comparable complication rates to open cases, and higher rates of adverse pulmonary and ileus events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Alcoholism as a predictor for pseudarthrosis in primary spine fusion: An analysis of risk factors and 30-day outcomes for 52,402 patients from 2005 to 2013.

INTRODUCTION: This study assessed the incidence and risk factors for pseudarthrosis among primary spine fusion patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of ACS-NSQIP (2005-2013). Differences in comorbidities between spine fusion patients with and without pseudarthrosis (Pseud, N-Pseud) were assessed using chi-squared tests and Independent Samples t-tests. Binary logistic regression assessed patient-related and procedure-related predictors for pseudarthrosis. RESULTS: 52,402 patients (57yrs, 53%F, 0.4% w/pseudarthrosis). Alcohol consumption (OR:2.6[1.2-5.7]) and prior history of surgical revision (OR:1.6[1.4-1.8]) were risk factors for pseudarthrosis operation. Pseud patients at higher risk for deep incisional SSI (at 30-days:OR:6.6[2.0-21.8]). Pseud patients had more perioperative complications (avg:0.24 ±â€¯0.43v0.18 ±â€¯0.39,p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Alcoholism and surgical revision are major risk factors for pseudarthrosis in patients undergoing spine fusion.

Prior bariatric surgery lowers complication rates following spine surgery in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery (BS) is an increasingly common treatment for morbid obesity that has the potential to effect bone and mineral metabolism. The effect of prior BS on spine surgery outcomes has not been well established. The aim of this study was to assess differences in complication rates following spinal surgery for patients with and without a history of BS. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected New York State Inpatient Database (NYSID) years 2004-2013. BS patients and morbidly obese patients (non-BS) were divided into cervical and thoracolumbar surgical groups and propensity score matched for age, gender, and invasiveness and complications compared. RESULTS: One thousand nine hundred thirty-nine spine surgery patients with a history of BS were compared to 1625 non-BS spine surgery patients. The average time from bariatric surgery to spine surgery is 2.95 years. After propensity score matching, 740 BS patients were compared to 740 non-BS patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery, with similar comorbidity rates. The overall complication rate for BS thoracolumbar patients was lower than non-BS (45.8% vs 58.1%, P < 0.001), with lower rates of device-related (6.1% vs 23.2%, P < 0.001), DVT (1.2% vs 2.7%, P = 0.039), and hematomas (1.5% vs 4.5%, P < 0.001). Neurologic complications were similar between BS patients and non-BS patients (2.3% vs 2.7%, P = 0.62). For patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, BS patients experienced lower rates of bowel issues, device-related, and overall complication than non-BS patients (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery patients undergoing spine surgery experience lower overall complication rates than morbidly obese patients. This study warrants further investigation into these populations to mitigate risks associated with spine surgery for bariatric patients.

Clinical Impact and Economic Burden of Hospital-Acquired Conditions Following Common Surgical Procedures.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical impact and economic burden of the three most common hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) that occur within 30-day postoperatively for all spine surgeries and to compare these rates with other common surgical procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: HACs are part of a non-payment policy by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and thus prompt hospitals to improve patient outcomes and safety. METHODS: Patients more than 18 years who underwent elective spine surgery were identified in American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005 to 2013. Primary outcomes were cost associated with the occurrence of three most common HACs. Cost associated with HAC occurrence derived from the PearlDiver database. RESULTS: Ninety thousand five hundred fifty one elective spine surgery patients were identified, where 3021 (3.3%) developed at least one HAC. Surgical site infection (SSI) was the most common HAC (1.4%), then urinary tract infection (UTI) (1.3%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (0.8%). Length of stay (LOS) was longer for patients who experienced a HAC (5.1 vs. 3.2 d, P < 0.001). When adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, LOS was 1.48 ±â€Š0.04 days longer (P < 0.001) and payments were $8893 ±â€Š$148 greater (P < 0.001) for patients with at least one HAC. With the exception of craniotomy, patients undergoing common procedures with HAC had increased LOS and higher payments (P < 0.001). Adjusted additional LOS was 0.44 ±â€Š0.02 and 0.38 ±â€Š0.03 days for total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty, and payments were $1974 and $1882 greater. HACs following hip fracture repair were associated with 1.30 ±â€Š0.11 days LOS and $4842 in payments (P < 0.001). Compared with elective spine surgery, only bariatric and cardiothoracic surgery demonstrated greater adjusted additional payments for patients with at least one HAC ($9975 and $10,868, respectively). CONCLUSION: HACs in elective spine surgery are associated with a substantial cost burden to the health care system. When adjusted for demographic factors and comorbidities, average LOS is 1.48 days longer and episode payments are $8893 greater for patients who experience at least one HAC compared with those who do not. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.