Colorectal cancer treatment outcomes during the pandemic: Our experience of COVID-19 at a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUNDS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to major shifts in the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aims to identify the impact and early outcomes of COVID-19 following CRC management at a tertiary referral center in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, utilizing the Australian Comprehensive Cancer Outcomes and Research Database and inpatient records. Patients presenting for CRC management at our institution were identified coinciding with the first Victorian outbreak of COVID-19 (March 26 to September 26, 2020) (COVID). Management decisions including chemoradiotherapy utilization and surgical outcomes were analyzed within 6 months and compared with the corresponding period in 2019 (pre-COVID). RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were included in this study (147 pre-COVID period, 129 COVID period). During the COVID period, more patients (47.6% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.033) presented symptomatically and less for surveillance (10.9% vs. 2.3%; p < 0.01). Eighty-four pre-COVID and 69 COVID period patients proceeded to surgery. The average time from diagnosis date to surgery was 15.6 days less during the COVID period. There were no significant differences in postoperative utilization of higher care (p = 0.74), complications (p = 0.93), median hospital length of stay (p = 0.67), 30-day readmission (p = 0.50), or 30-day reoperation (p = 0.74). In 1.6% of cases, pandemic impacts resulted in a change in management. CONCLUSION: Presentation of patients with CRC varied, with a significant increase in symptomatic presentations and decreased numbers for surveillance. Through flexibility and change in practice, our institution helped improve access to surgical intervention and oncological therapies. Further prospective work is required to identify long-term outcomes and characterize the effects of ongoing disruptions.

Are health outcomes in the older colorectal cancer patients treated by curative intent surgery any different to the younger patients?

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer poses a major burden. Its incidence increases with age and older patients with comorbidities have a higher likelihood of major complications. This study investigated the impact of age on health outcomes in colorectal cancer patients treated by surgery. METHODS: A prospective database of all patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery with curative intent between 2012 and 2017 was used to identify patients. A retrospective review of existing medical records investigating health-related outcomes in colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery was performed. Primary outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Difference in restricted mean survival times (RMST) up to a pre-specified time point of 24 months was used to compare four age groups. RESULTS: Six-hundred and fifty-one patients were divided into four age group categories: ≤65-years (n = 244), 66 to 75-years (n = 213), 76 to 85-years (n = 162) and >85-years (n = 32). Older patients were found to have a higher rate of post-operative medical complications (including confusion) (P = 0.001) and a longer length of stay (LOS) (P = 0.01). There was no difference between the 76 to 85-year age group and >85-year age group in OS and DFS. However, there was a reduced OS in older patients (>65) compared to their younger cohorts (<65) (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Older patients who undergo curative surgery have reduced OS, increased LOS and higher complication rates. Complex older patients may benefit from geriatric assessment and management in the peri-operative period.

Associations between asthma status and radiologically confirmed fracture in children: A data-linkage study.

AIM: World-wide, approximately 14% of children have prevalent asthma. As most bone accrual occurs in childhood, and data suggest a detrimental role in bone from asthma and/or medications, we investigated whether asthma was associated with radiologically confirmed fractures in a large cohort of children. METHODS: Data from the Barwon Asthma Study (2005), a population-based, cross-sectional survey of all children attending 91 primary schools in the Barwon Statistical Division, were linked to the Geelong Osteoporosis Study Fracture Grid (2006-2007), a fracture register encompassing the Barwon Statistical Division (n = 16 438; 50.5% boys; aged 3.5-13.6 years). Asthma, ascertained from parent-reported symptoms using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire, was categorised as: (i) recent wheeze; and number of (ii) recent wheezy episodes; (iii) doctor visits for wheeze symptoms; and (iv) doctor visits for asthma check-ups. Using logistic regression analyses, stratified by sex and adjusted for age and medication use, we determined whether asthma was associated with radiologically confirmed fractures. RESULTS: In total, 961 fractures were observed among 823 Barwon Asthma Study participants (5.9% of total sample; 61.1% boys). Recent wheeze and 1-3 recent wheezy episodes were associated with increased odds of fracture in boys (odds ratio (OR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.55; OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12-1.77, respectively), but not girls (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78-1.37; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.19). Results were independent of age, and sustained after adjustment for medication. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of age, asthma was associated with fracture for boys, but not girls. There is an imperative for strategies to promote bone health among children with asthma.