Expression of ghrelin and biological activity of specific receptors for ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin in human prostate neoplasms and related cell lines.

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), has been identified in prostate carcinoma cell lines. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the presence of ghrelin and its receptors in human prostate tumours and in DU-145, PC-3 and LNCaP prostate carcinoma cell lines, and to assess the effects of ghrelin and its more abundant circulating form, des-octanoyl ghrelin, on cell proliferation. METHODS: Ghrelin and types 1a and 1b GHS receptor (GHS-R) were determined at the mRNA and protein levels by RT-PCR, in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry and enzyme immunoassay in tissues, cell lines and culture medium. Ghrelin binding was determined by radioreceptor assay. The effects on cell proliferation were evaluated by growth curves. RESULTS: Ghrelin mRNA was found in prostatic carcinomas and benign hyperplasias, but immunohistochemistry was negative. GHS-R1a and 1b mRNAs were absent from carcinomas, but GHS-R1b mRNA was present in 50% of hyperplasias. Ghrelin peptide and mRNA were present in PC-3 cells exclusively, whereas GHS-R1a and 1b mRNAs were expressed in DU-145 cells only. Specific [125I]Tyr4-ghrelin binding was detected in prostate tumour, DU-145 and PC-3 cell membranes and the binding was displaced by ghrelin, synthetic GHS and des-octanoyl ghrelin, which is devoid of GHS-R1a binding affinity and GH-releasing activity. Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin inhibited DU-145 cell proliferation, displayed a biphasic effect in PC-3 cells and were ineffective in LNCaP cells. CONCLUSIONS: Specific GHS binding sites, other than GHS-R1a and 1b, are present in human prostatic neoplasms. Ghrelin, in addition to des-acyl ghrelin, exerts different effects on cell proliferation in prostate carcinoma cell lines.

Activation of GABAA and opioid receptors reduce penile erection induced by hexarelin peptides.

The effect of muscimol, a GABA(A) receptor agonist, and of morphine, an opioid receptor agonist, on penile erection induced by the hexarelin analogue peptide EP 80661 (GAB-D-Trp(2-Me)-D-Trp(2-Me)-LysNH(2)) and on the increase in the concentration of NO(2)(-) and NO(3)(-) that occurs concomitantly in the dialysate obtained from the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus by intracerebral microdialysis, was studied in male rats. Muscimol (50, 100 and 200 ng) and morphine (0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 microg) given into the PVN dose-dependently reduced penile erection induced by EP 80661 (1 microg) injected into the PVN. The reduction of penile erection was parallel to a decrease of the concomitant NO(2)(-) and NO(3)(-) increase that occurs in the paraventricular dialysate in these experimental conditions. Muscimol and morphine effects on EP 80661-induced penile erection and NO(2)(-) increase were prevented by the prior administration into the PVN of bicuculline (250 ng) and naloxone (5 microg), respectively. The present results show that the activation of GABA(A) receptors and of opioid receptors in the PVN reduces penile erection induced by hexarelin analogue peptides by reducing the increase in NO activity that occurs in this hypothalamic nucleus in these experimental conditions.

Targeting the ghrelin receptor: orally active GHS and cortistatin analogs.

Ghrelin has been discovered as a natural ligand of the receptor specific for synthetic GH secretagogues (GHS). Ghrelin as well as synthetic GHS not only possess a remarkable GH-releasing activity but are also endowed with other endocrine and nonendocrine activities including orexigenic action, influence on gastro-enteropancreatic functions, and cardiovascular and anti-proliferative effects. Based on these data, particular effort has been focused on the isolation of new putative natural ligands of the GHS-receptors (GHS-R) and on the identification of synthetic compounds endowed with agonistic or antagonistic activity. For instance, ghrelin analogs acting as agonists or antagonists would be able to enhance or reduce appetite and food intake; these molecules would receive obvious interest for treatment of eating disorders and obesity, respectively. Ghrelin and its orally active, agonistic analogs could have prespectives for diagnosis and treatment of GH insufficiency. In this context, EP1572, a selective, orally active, peptidomimetic GHS as well as cortistatin, another putative, natural ligand of the GHS-R, and its analogs, are currently under investigation.

Cardiac effects of ghrelin and its endogenous derivatives des-octanoyl ghrelin and des-Gln14-ghrelin.

The mechanisms underlying the cardiac activities of synthetic growth hormone secretagogues (GHS) are still unclear. The natural ligand of the GHS receptors, i.e. ghrelin, classically binds the GHS receptor and exerts endocrine actions in acylated forms only; its cardiovascular actions still need to be investigated further. In order to clarify these aspects, we studied the effects of either the synthetic peptidyl GHS hexarelin (1 microM), or the natural ghrelin (50 nM) and the endogenous ghrelin derivatives des-Gln14-ghrelin (1-100 nM) and des-octanoyl ghrelin (50 nM), on the tension developed by guinea pig papillary muscle and on L-type Ca2+ current (ICa) of isolated ventricular cells. The binding of these molecules to ventricular cell membrane homogenates was also studied. We observed that all peptides reduced the tension developed at low frequencies (60-120 beats/min) in a dose-dependent manner. No alteration in cardiac contractility was induced by des-Gln14-ghrelin or des-octanoylated ghrelin when the endocardial endothelium had been removed or after cyclooxygenase blockade. Pretreatment with tyramine (2 microM) had no effect on the inotropic response induced by des-Gln(14)-ghrelin. No significant effect on I(Ca) of isolated ventricular cells was observed in the presence of des-Gln14-ghrelin (100 nM). The order of potency on the tension of papillary muscle was: des-octanoyl ghrelin > ghrelin = des-Gln14-ghrelin > hexarelin. This gradient of potency was consistent with the binding experiments performed on ventricular membranes where either acylated or unacylated ghrelin forms, and hexarelin, recognized a common high-affinity binding site. In conclusion, ghrelin, des-Gln14-ghrelin and des-octanoyl ghrelin, show similar negative inotropic effect on papillary muscle; as des-octanoyl ghrelin is peculiarly devoid of any GH-releasing activity, the cardiotropic action of these molecules is independent of GH release. The binding studies and the experiments performed both on the isolated cells and on papillary muscle after endothelium removal or cyclooxygenase blockade indicate that the cardiotropic action of natural and synthetic ghrelin analogues reflects the interaction with a novel GHS receptor (peculiarly common for ghrelin and des-octanoyl ghrelin), leading to release of cyclooxygenase metabolites from endothelial cells, as indicated by direct measurement of prostacyclin metabolite 6-keto-PGF(1alpha).

PLGA-PEG microspheres of teverelix: influence of polymer type on microsphere characteristics and on teverelix in vitro release.

Teverelix microspheres were produced by coacervation using a new type of poly(ester-carbonates) made of block copolymers of poly(lactic-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). Five different PLGA-PEG copolymers and one PLGA were used. The 'stability window' has been determined for all polymers. It varied depending on the molecular weight and the weight percentage of PEG. With increasing core loading (from 9.4 to 34.2%), the microparticle size increased from 10-50 to 5-1000 micrometer. The core loading did not have any influence on encapsulation yield, which remained above 80%. The influence of polymer type on microsphere characteristics was studied at two different core loadings: 9.4 and 28%. At a low core loading, the nature of the polymer had no influence on microsphere characteristics whereas at 28%, only PLGA-PEG copolymers gave acceptable microparticles in term of particle size. At 28%, the glass transition temperature (T(g)) of loaded particles was 1-8 degrees C higher than the T(g) of the corresponding polymer. Increasing the core loading increased teverelix release whereas polymer degradation was decreased. All microparticles made of PLGA-PEG copolymers showed a faster release of teverelix than PLGA-based microspheres, whatever the core loading. One PLGA-PEG was selected on the basis of in vitro release rate for further in vivo investigations.

Ghrelin plays a minor role in the physiological control of cardiac function in the rat.

We have previously reported that a 7-d pretreatment with hexarelin, a synthetic ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), largely prevented damages induced by ischemia and reperfusion in isolated rat hearts. Our aim was to ascertain whether ghrelin, an endogenous ligand of the GHS-R, is physiologically endowed with cardioprotective activity. Hypophysectomized rats were treated in vivo for 7 d with either ghrelin (320 microg/kg) or hexarelin (80 microg/kg), and their hearts were subjected in vitro to the ischemia and reperfusion procedure. Ghrelin was far less effective than hexarelin in preventing increases in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (15% and 60% protection for ghrelin and hexarelin, respectively), coronary perfusion pressure (10% and 45% reduction), and release of creatine kinase in the heart perfusate (15% and 55% reduction). In the second experiment, normal rats were passively immunized against ghrelin for 21 d before the ischemia and reperfusion procedure. In these isolated hearts, the ischemia-reperfusion damage was not significantly increased compared with control rats. After hypophysectomy, CD36 mRNA levels significantly increased, whereas those of atrial natriuretic factor significantly decreased. We conclude that: 1) ghrelin plays a minor role in the control of heart function; and 2) hexarelin effects are mediated in part by the GHS-R and largely by interactions with the CD36.

The endocrine response to ghrelin as a function of gender in humans in young and elderly subjects.

Ghrelin modulates somatotroph, lactotroph, corticotroph, and insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. To clarify the influence of gender and age on the endocrine actions of ghrelin in humans, we studied the effects of ghrelin (1.0 micro g/kg iv) or placebo on GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, insulin, glucagon, and glucose levels in 18 young subjects (YS) and 16 elderly subjects (ES) of both genders. The GH response to GHRH (1.0 micro g/kg iv) was also studied. The GH response to ghrelin in YS was higher (P < 0.01) than in ES and both higher (P < 0.01) than to GHRH, without gender-related differences. In YS ghrelin also induced: 1) gender-independent increase (P < 0.01) in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; 2) gender-independent increase in glucose levels (P < 0.01); 3) decrease (P < 0.01) in insulin levels in male YS; and 4) no change in glucagon. In ES, ghrelin induced gender-independent PRL, ACTH, and cortisol responses (P < 0.01). In ES ghrelin elicited gender-independent transient decrease in insulin (P < 0.01) coupled with increase in glucose levels (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the GH-releasing effect of ghrelin is independent of gender but undergoes age-related decrease. The effect of ghrelin on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion is age and gender independent. In both ES and YS, ghrelin influences insulin secretion and glucose metabolism.

New active series of growth hormone secretagogues.

New growth hormone secretagogue (GHS) analogues were synthesized and evaluated for growth hormone releasing activity. This series derived from EP-51389 is based on a gem-diamino structure. Compounds that exhibited higher in vivo GH-releasing potency than hexarelin in rat (subcutaneous administration) were then tested per os in beagle dogs and for their binding affinity to human pituitary GHS receptors and to hGHS-R 1a. Compound 7 (JMV 1843, H-Aib-(d)-Trp-(d)-gTrp-formyl) showed high potency in these tests and was selected for clinical studies.(1)

Acetylcholine does not play a major role in mediating the endocrine responses to ghrelin, a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor, in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin is a 28 amino residue peptide produced predominantly by the stomach with substantially lower amounts deriving from other central and peripheral tissues. Ghrelin is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and possesses a potent GH-releasing activity for which the acylation in serine 3 is essential. Ghrelin also possesses other endocrine and non-endocrine activities reflecting central and peripheral GHS-R distribution and stimulates PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion, has been reported able to induce hyperglycaemia and to decrease insulin levels and has orexigenic activity. Moreover, ghrelin stimulates gastric motility and acid secretion and its action is mediated by acetylcholine which, in turn, is known to play a stimulatory influence on GH, ACTH and insulin secretion. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In order to clarify the influence, if any, of acetylcholine on the endocrine activities of ghrelin, we studied the effects of cholinergic enhancement by pyridostigmine (PD, 120 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) and blockade by pirenzepine (PIR, 100 mg p.o. at -60 minutes) on GH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to human acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) in seven normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM): 28.3 +/- 3.1 years; BMI: 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effects of PD and PIR on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 minutes) have also been studied. RESULTS: The administration of ghrelin induced a prompt increase in circulating GH levels (hAUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/L) which was markedly higher (P < 0.01) than that elicited by GHRH (966.9 +/- 20.50 microg*min/L). Ghrelin also induced a significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/L) and cortisol levels (15505.1 +/- 796.3 microg*min/L) and a decrease in insulin levels (Delta hAUC: -198.1 +/- 39.2 mU*min/L) which was preceded by an increase in plasma glucose levels (8743.8 +/- 593.0 mg*min/dL). The GH response to GHRH was markedly potentiated by PD (4363.3 +/- 917.3 microg*min/L; P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone). In turn, PD did not modify either the GH response to ghrelin (6564.2 +/- 1753.5 microg*min/L) or its stimulatory effect on PRL and cortisol as well as its effects on insulin and glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by PIR (171.5 +/- 34.7 microg*min/L, P < 0.01 vs. GHRH alone) which, in turn, did not significantly modify the GH response to ghrelin (4044.0 +/- 948.8 microg*min/L). PIR also did not modify the effects of ghrelin on PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels. CONCLUSIONS: The endocrine activities of ghrelin are not affected significantly by cholinergic enhancement and muscarinic blockade. Thus, acetylcholine does not play a major role in the endocrine actions of ghrelin. Moreover, as the cholinergic system influences GH secretion via modulation of somatostatin release, the present data agree with the assumption that ghrelin is partially refractory to the influence of somatostatin.

Ghrelin and synthetic GH secretagogues.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino-acid acylated peptide, produced mainly by the stomach, displays strong growth hormone-(GH)-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamus-pituitary growth hormone potential secretagogue (GHS) receptor which had been shown to be specific for a family of synthetic, orally active GHS. GHS are reliable provocative tests for the diagnosis of GH deficiency but, as orally active growth-promoting agents, they are not comparable with human recombinant GH in terms of efficacy. The usefulness of GHS in anabolic, anti-ageing drug intervention in the somatopause is still unclear. GHS also act on central and peripheral receptors and show other actions, including an orexigenic effect, an influence on gastroentero-pancreatic functions, and cardiovascular and anti-proliferative effects. Ghrelin mediates the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation. Taking into account its orexigenic effect, GHS analogues acting as agonists or antagonists on appetite could represent a new drug intervention for eating disorders.

Ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin inhibit cell death in cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells through ERK1/2 and PI 3-kinase/AKT.

Ghrelin is an acyl-peptide gastric hormone acting on the pituitary and hypothalamus to stimulate growth hormone (GH) release, adiposity, and appetite. Ghrelin endocrine activities are entirely dependent on its acylation and are mediated by GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHSR)-1a, a G protein-coupled receptor mostly expressed in the pituitary and hypothalamus, previously identified as the receptor for a group of synthetic molecules featuring GH secretagogue (GHS) activity. Des-acyl ghrelin, which is far more abundant than ghrelin, does not bind GHSR-1a, is devoid of any endocrine activity, and its function is currently unknown. Ghrelin, which is expressed in heart, albeit at a much lower level than in the stomach, also exerts a cardio protective effect through an unknown mechanism, independent of GH release. Here we show that both ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin inhibit apoptosis of primary adult and H9c2 cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells in vitro through activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1/2 and Akt serine kinases. In addition, ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin recognize common high affinity binding sites on H9c2 cardiomyocytes, which do not express GHSR-1a. Finally, both MK-0677 and hexarelin, a nonpeptidyl and a peptidyl synthetic GHS, respectively, recognize the common ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin binding sites, inhibit cell death, and activate MAPK and Akt.These findings provide the first evidence that, independent of its acylation, ghrelin gene product may act as a survival factor directly on the cardiovascular system through binding to a novel, yet to be identified receptor, which is distinct from GHSR-1a.

Ghrelin-induced GH secretion in normal subjects is partially resistant to homologous desensitization by GH-releasing peptide-6.

OBJECTIVE: GH secretagogues and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) exert a complex cross-talk at the somatotrope cell, and undertake homologous and heterologous desensitization. On the other hand, the discovery of ghrelin as a new factor implicated in the regulation of GH secretion makes a thorough assessment of its properties and cell biology processes mandatory. In order to implement this, three different testing schedules were devised using the administration, on the same day, of two GH stimuli administered in sequential order 120 min apart. The two aims of the study were (a) to evaluate the relative potency of ghrelin in comparison with other GH stimulants and (b) to assess the presence of homologous or heterologous desensitization between these compounds. DESIGN: The different testing days performed in random order were (a) on one day, saline was administered at time 0 min and ghrelin at time 120 min, (b) on another testing day, GHRH was administered at 0 min followed by ghrelin at 120 min and (c) on the last testing day, GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) and ghrelin were injected at 0 and 120 min respectively. Ghrelin, GHRH and GHRP-6 were always administered at 1 microg/kg i.v., and plasma GH was measured. PATIENTS: Six normal subjects participated in the study after providing informed consent, and each was assessed on three different testing days, at least 1 week apart. RESULTS: Saline did not modify peak GH (means+/-s.e.) values (1.5+/-0.6 microg/l), and ghrelin administered 120 min later induced a significant GH rise (39.9+/-2.8 microg/l). On a different testing day, GHRH induced a GH peak (9.4+/-2.8 microg/l) lower than that of ghrelin injected 120 min later (26.8+/-4.7 microg/l). On the last testing day, GHRP-6 at time 0 induced a GH peak of 18.4+/-5.9 microg/l and ghrelin 120 min later a peak of 19.8+/-2.9 microg/l. The ghrelin-mediated GH secretion after GHRP-6 was significantly lower than the GH elicited by ghrelin when the preceding administration was saline. This demonstrated that ghrelin was partially affected by GHRP-6 and was not affected by GHRH. CONCLUSIONS: Calculated at equal mass doses or in molecular terms, ghrelin appears to be a more potent stimulus than GHRP-6 and GHRH. Ghrelin was completely insensitive to the previous administration of GHRH as well as relatively resistant to the homologous desensitization exerted by GHRP-6.

Ghrelin secretion is inhibited by either somatostatin or cortistatin in humans.

Ghrelin possesses endocrine and non-endocrine actions mediated by the GH Secretagogue (GHS)-Receptors (GHS-R). The regulation of ghrelin secretion is still largely unknown. Somatostatin (SRIF) modulates central and gastroenteropancreatic hormonal secretions and functions. SRIF actions are partially shared by cortistatin (CST), a natural SRIF analogue, that binds all SRIF receptors and also GHS-R. Herein, we studied the effects of SRIF-14 or CST-14 (2.0 micro g/kg/h i.v. over 120 min) and of placebo on ghrelin, GH, insulin, glucagon and glucose levels in 6 normal young men. Placebo unaffected GH, insulin, glucagon, glucose and ghrelin levels. SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p < 0.05) spontaneous GH secretion of about 90%. After SRIF or CST withdrawal, GH levels recovered to baseline levels. Both SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p<0.01) insulin secretion of about 45%. In both sessions, after SRIF or CST withdrawal, insulin overrode baseline levels. Both SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p < 0.01) glucagon levels of about 40%. After SRIF or CST withdrawal, glucagon persisted lower (p < 0.05) than at baseline. Neither SRIF nor CST modified glucose levels. Both SRIF and CST similarly inhibited (p < 0.01) circulating ghrelin levels of about 55%. Ghrelin levels progressively decreased from time +15 min, reaching the nadir at 120 and 105 min for SRIF and CST, respectively. Even 30 min after SRIF or CST withdrawal, ghrelin levels persisted lower (p < 0.05) than those at baseline. In conclusion, this study first shows that SRIF and CST strongly inhibits ghrelin secretion that, differently from GH and insulin secretion, persists inhibited even after stopping the infusion of SRIF or CST.

Effects of glucose, free fatty acids or arginine load on the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester in serine-3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion. In humans, ghrelin is more potent than growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and non-natural GHS such as hexarelin. Moreover, ghrelin shows a true synergism with GHRH, has no interaction with hexarelin and, similarly to non-natural GHS, is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of exogenous somatostatin (SS). Despite this evidence, the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect of ghrelin in humans have not been fully clarified. SUBJECTS: To this aim we enrolled six normal young volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.9 +/- 3.1 year; body mass index 22.3 +/- 1.0 kg/m2). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: In all subjects we studied the effects of glucose (OGTT, 100 g oral glucose at -45 min) or free fatty acids (FFA) load [lipid-heparin emulsion, Li-He, Intralipid 10% 250 ml + heparin 2500 U i.v. from -30 to +120 min] as well as of arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg infused from 0 to +30 min) on the GH response to human ghrelin (1.0 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 min) administration. These results were compared with those obtained by studying the effects of OGTT, Li-He and ARG on the GH response to GHRH-29 (1.0 micro g/kg i.v. at 0 min). RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (auc 5452.4 +/- 991.3 micro g/l/h) was higher (P < 0.05) than that after GHRH (1519.4 +/- 93.3 micro g/l/h). The GH response to GHRH was inhibited by OGTT (450.7 +/- 81.1 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) and almost abolished by Li-He (230.0 +/- 63.6 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) while was markedly potentiated by ARG (2520.4 +/- 425.8 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05). The GH response to GHRH + ARG, however, was lower (P < 0.05) than that to ghrelin alone. The GH response to ghrelin was blunted by OGTT (2153.1 +/- 781.9 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) as well as by Li-He (3158.8 +/- 426.7 micro g/l/h, P < 0.05) but these responses remained higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH alone. On the other hand, ARG did not modify the GH response to ghrelin (6324.3 +/- 1275.5 micro g/l/h). For GH 1 micro g/l = 2 mU/l. CONCLUSIONS: In humans, ghrelin exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion which is partially refractory to the inhibitory effect of both glucose and FFA load and is not enhanced by ARG. These factors almost abolish and potentiate, respectively, the GH response to GHRH, at least partially, via modulation of hypothalamic SS release. Thus, our findings agree with the hypothesis that ghrelin as well as non-natural GHS acts, at least partially, by antagonizing SS activity.

Endocrine activities of cortistatin-14 and its interaction with GHRH and ghrelin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST)-14, a neuropeptide with high homology with somatostatin (SS)-14, binds all sst subtypes but, unlike SS, also ghrelin's receptor. In six normal adults, we studied the effects of CST-14 or SS-14 administration (2.0 micro g/kg/h iv) on: 1) GH and insulin secretion; 2) the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg i.v.); and 3) the GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, insulin, and glucose responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v.). CST-14 inhibited GH and insulin secretion (P < 0.01) to the same extent of SS-14. The GH response to GHRH was similarly inhibited (P < 0.01) by either CST-14 or SS-14. Ghrelin released more GH than GHRH (P < 0.01); these responses were similarly inhibited (P < 0.05) by either CST-14 or SS-14, that made ghrelin-induced GH rise similar to that after GHRH alone. Neither CST-14 nor SS-14 modified PRL, ACTH, or cortisol responses to ghrelin. The inhibitory effect of CST-14 and SS-14 on insulin was unaffected by ghrelin that, in turn, reduced insulin secretion per se (P < 0.01). Ghrelin increased glucose levels (P < 0.05); CST-14 and SS-14 did not modify this effect. Thus, CST-14 inhibits both basal and stimulated GH secretion in humans to the same extent of SS-14. The GH-releasing activity of ghrelin seems partially resistant to CST-14 as well as SS-14. CST-14 and SS-14 do not affect PRL and ACTH secretion but, like ghrelin, inhibit insulin secretion; the ghrelin-induced inhibition is not additive with that of CST-14 or SS-14, suggesting a common mechanism of action on beta cell secretion.

Ghrelin injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male rats induces feeding but not penile erection.

The effect of ghrelin, a recently characterized endogenous receptor agonist for growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptors, on feeding and penile erection was compared with that of EP 80661, a peptide analogue of the GH secretagogue hexarelin, previously identified for its pro-erectile activity when injected into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male rats. Ghrelin (0.01-1 microg), but not EP 80661 (0.02-1 microg), was found to be particularly effective in enhancing feeding. The minimal effective dose of ghrelin was 0.1 microg, which increased food intake by 88%, while the maximal response (355% above control values) was found with 1 microg of the peptide. The enhancing effect of ghrelin on feeding was prevented by the prior administration of the neuropeptide Y Y5 receptor antagonist (DTyr(2), DThr(32)) neuropeptide Y (NPY, 10 microg), but not by the GH-RH receptor antagonist MZ-4-71 (10 microg), or by EP 91073, a hexarelin analogue that antagonizes the pro-erectile effect of EP 80661 (10 microg), given into the lateral ventricles. In contrast, ghrelin failed to induce penile erection at all doses tested, while EP 80661 induced penile erection in a dose-dependent manner. The pro-erectile effect of EP 80661 was prevented by EP 91073 (10 microg), but not by (DTyr(2), DThr(32)) NPY (10 microg) or by the GH-RH receptor antagonist MZ 4-71 (10 microg), given into the lateral ventricles. The present results provide further support to the hypothesis that the GH secretagogue receptors mediating feeding are different from those mediating penile erection and activated by pro-erectile EP peptides.

Ghrelin: much more than a natural growth hormone secretagogue.

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong growth hormone-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamus-pituitary GH secretagogue receptors that were found to be specific for a family of synthetic, orally active GH secretagogues. The discovery of ghrelin brings us to a new understanding of the regulation of GH secretion. However, ghrelin is much more than simply a natural GH secretagogue. It also acts on other central and peripheral receptors and exhibits other actions, including stimulation of lactotroph and corticotroph secretion, orexigenic, influences gastroenteropancreatic functions, and has metabolic, cardiovascular and antiproliferative effects. Knowledge of the whole spectrum of biologic activities of this new hormone will provide new understanding of some critical aspects of neuroscience, metabolism and internal medicine. In fact, GHS were born more than 20 years ago as synthetic molecules, eliciting the hope that orally active GHS could be used to treat GH deficiency as an alternative to recombinant human GH. However, the dream did not become reality and the usefulness of GHS as an anabolic anti-aging intervention restoring the GH/IGF-I axis in somatopause is still unclear. Instead, we now face the theoretic possibility that GHS analogues acting as agonists or antagonists could become candidate drugs for the treatment of pathophysiologic conditions in internal medicine totally unrelated to disorders of GH secretion.

Effects of acute hexarelin administration on cardiac performance in patients with coronary artery disease during by-pass surgery.

Growth hormone (GH) secretagogues are synthetic molecules with neuroendocrine but also cardiovascular activities mediated by specific GH secretagogue-receptors. The acute administration of hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, increases left ventricular ejection fraction in normal subjects and even in patients with severe GH deficiency. We evaluated cardiac performances in patients with coronary artery disease after acute administration of hexarelin (2.0 microg/kg, i.v.) compared to that in patients given with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 2.0 microg/kg, i.v.), recombinant human (rh)-GH (10.0 microg/kg, i.v.) or placebo. Cardiac performance was studied in 24 male patients (age [mean +/- S.E.M.]: 59.5 +/- 1.1 years; body mass index: 24.6 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2); left ventricular ejection fraction: 57.2 +/- 1.4%) with coronary artery disease undergoing by-pass surgery during general anesthesia. Left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end diastolic volume, cardiac index and cardiac output were evaluated by intraoperative omniplane transoesophageal echocardiography while wedge pressure, central venous pressure, mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance index were evaluated by systemic and pulmonary arterial catheterization. RhGH, GHRH and placebo did not exert any hemodynamic effect while hexarelin induced a prompt (after +10 min) increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (P < 0.001), cardiac index (P < 0.001) and cardiac output (P < 0.001) lasting up to +90 min without any variation in left ventricular end diastolic volume. Accordingly, hexarelin induced a reduction of wedge pressure (P < 0.01). These changes occurred in the presence of increased mean arterial pressure (P < 0.05) and transient decrease of central venous pressure (P < 0.05 at +30 min only) but no change in systemic vascular resistance index. Heart rate after hexarelin was similar to that after placebo. Hexarelin induced a slight increase in GH levels which was similar to that after GHRH but far lower (P < 0.01) than that after rhGH. Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing by-pass surgery, the acute administration of hexarelin clearly improves cardiac performance without any relevant variation in systemic vascular resistance. The cardiotropic effect of hexarelin is not shared by GHRH or by rhGH, indicating that it is not mediated by the increase in circulating GH levels but more likely reflects activation of specific cardiovascular GH secretagogue receptors.

Endocrine responses to ghrelin in adult patients with isolated childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid acylated peptide, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogues (GHS) receptor (GHS-R), which is specific for synthetic GHS. Similar to synthetic GHS, ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion but also displays significant stimulatory effects on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. It has been hypothesized that isolated GH deficiency (GHD) could reflect hypothalamic impairment that would theoretically involve defect in ghrelin activity. PATIENTS: In the present study, we verified the effects of ghrelin (1 microg/kg i.v.) on GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in adult patients with isolated severe GHD [five males and one female, age (mean +/- SEM) 24.7 +/- 2.6 years, BMI 25.7 +/- 2.7 kg/m2]. In all patients, the GH response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia (ITT, 0.1 IU regular insulin i.v.) and GH releasing hormone (GHRH) (1 microg/kg i.v.) + arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) was also studied. The hormonal responses in GHD were compared with those in age-matched normal subjects (NS, seven males, age 28.6 +/- 2.9 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2). RESULTS: IGF-I levels in GHD were markedly lower than in NS (69.8 +/- 11.3 vs. 167.9 +/- 19.2 microg/l, P < 0.003). Ghrelin administration induced significant increase in GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels in all GHD. In GHD, the GH response to ghrelin was higher (P < 0.05) than that to GHRH + ARG, which, in turn, was higher (P < 0.05) than that to ITT (9.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.4 microg/l). These GH (1 microg/l = 2 mU/l) responses in GHD were markedly lower (P < 0.0001) than those in NS (ghrelin vs. GHRH + ARG vs. ITT 92.1 +/- 16.7 vs. 65.3 +/- 8.9 vs. 17.7 +/- 3.5 microg/l). In GHD, the highest individual peak GH response to ghrelin was markedly lower than the lowest peak GH response in NS (28.5 vs. 42.9 microg/l). GHD and NS showed overlapping PRL (1 microg/l = 32 mU/l) (10.0 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.9 +/- 2.2 microg/l), ACTH (22.3 +/- 5.3 vs. 18.7 +/- 4.6 pmol/l) and cortisol responses (598.1 +/- 52.4 vs. 486.9 +/- 38.9 nmol/l). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that ghrelin is one of the most powerful provocative stimuli of GH secretion, even in those patients with isolated severe GHD. In this condition, however, the somatotroph response is markedly reduced while the lactotroph and corticotroph responsiveness to ghrelin is fully preserved, indicating that this endocrine activity is fully independent of mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing effect. These results do not support the hypothesis that ghrelin deficiency is a major cause of isolated GH deficiency but suggest that ghrelin might represent a reliable provocative test to evaluate the maximal GH secretory capacity provided that appropriate cut-off limits are assumed.

The GH-releasing effect of ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue, is only blunted by the infusion of exogenous somatostatin in humans.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a 28-amino-acid peptide purified from the stomach and showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at the serine 3 residue, is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R). Ghrelin strongly stimulates GH secretion in both animals and humans, showing a synergistic effect with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) but no interaction with synthetic GHS. However, the activity of ghrelin as well as that of non-natural GHS is not fully specific for GH; ghrelin also induces a stimulatory effect on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion, at least in humans. DESIGN: To further clarify the mechanisms underlying the GH-releasing activity of this natural GHS, we studied the effects of somatostatin (SS, 2.0 microg/kg/h from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) in seven normal young male volunteers [age (mean +/- SEM) 28.6 +/- 2.9 years; body mass index (BMI) 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2]. In the same subjects, the effect of SS on the GH response to GHRH (1.0 microm/kg i.v. at 0 min) was also studied. MEASUREMENTS: Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -30 up to +120 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels were assayed after ghrelin administration alone and during SS infusion. RESULTS: The GH response to ghrelin (hAUC0'-->120' 2695.0 +/- 492.6 microg min/l) was higher (P < 0.01) than that after GHRH (757.1 +/- 44.1 microg min/l). SS infusion almost abolished the GH response to GHRH (177.0 +/- 37.7 microg min/l, P < 0.01); the GH response to ghrelin was inhibited by SS (993.8 +/- 248.5 microg min/l, P < 0.01) but GH levels remained higher (P < 0.05) than with GHRH. Ghrelin induced significant increases in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels and these responses were not modified by SS. CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin, a natural GHS-R ligand, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans and this effect is only blunted by an exogenous somatostatin dose which almost abolishes the GH response to GHRH. The stimulatory effect of ghrelin on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion is refractory to exogenous somatostatin, indicating that these effects occur through pathways independent of somatostatinergic influence.