On reducing hand impact force in forward falls: results of a brief intervention in young males.

OBJECTIVE: To test the working hypotheses that after a brief (10 min) intervention, (a) young adults can volitionally reduce fall-related wrist impact forces, and (b) no difference in impact force would exist between intervention and control groups at 3-weeks or 3-months follow-up. BACKGROUND: The wrist is the most commonly fractured site in the body at any age, most often as a result of impact with the ground while arresting a forward fall.Methods. Twenty-nine healthy young male volunteers participated. A 3-month intervention group (n=10) performed five standardized forward falls before and after a 10-min instructional intervention aimed at reducing wrist impact forces during the baseline visit. They, along with a 3-month control group (n=11) who did not receive the intervention, were remeasured in five trials at 3-weeks and 3-months follow-up, without intervening practice. A baseline control group (n=8) performed the five trials, then repeated them at the baseline visit without receiving the intervention. Unilateral body segment kinematics and bilateral hand-ground impact forces were measured and the hypotheses were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: At the baseline visit, a significant group-by-trial-block interaction was found (P=0.02): the 3-month intervention group reduced their average maximum impact forces by 18% from initial values (P=0.002); the baseline control group did not do so (0.5% increase, P=0.91). The 3-month intervention (20 falls) and control (15 falls) groups did not differ at the 3-month follow-up (P=0.62); however, when the groups were combined their maximum impact force had decreased significantly (8.9%, P=0.04) over that time. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy young males learned in 10 min to significantly reduce wrist impact forces in forward falls, but retention was poor at 3-weeks follow-up. Irrespective of group, however, after the 5 falls at 3-weeks subjects had taught themselves to reduce their impact forces at the 3-months follow-up. RELEVANCE: A brief educational intervention can significantly reduce forward fall-related impact forces in the short term. However, with or without the brief intervention, the experience of performing between 5-10 forward falls 3 weeks apart apparently resulted in decreased impact forces over the next 2 months, thereby reducing the risk of injury in these forward falls.

Fall-related upper body injuries in the older adult: a review of the biomechanical issues.

Although the epidemiology of fall-related injuries is well established for the elderly population over 65 years of age, the biomechanics of how, when and why injuries do and do not occur when arresting a fall have received relatively little attention. This paper reviews the epidemiological literature in the MEDLINE data base pertinent to the biomechanics of fall-related injuries, including data on fall rates, fall-related injury rates, fall directions and types of injuries available. It also covers primary sources not listed on MEDLINE, along with the pertinent biomechanics literature. Many falls in older adults are in a forward direction, and as a result the upper extremities are one of the most commonly injured structures, presumably in protecting the head and torso. In this review emphasis is placed on what is, and what is not, known of the biomechanical factors that determine the impact forces and injury risk associated with upper extremity injuries in forward falls. While decreased bone mineral density may be contributory, it is not a reliable predictor of fracture risk. Evidence is presented that fall-related impact forces can be reduced by appropriate volitional arrest strategies. Further theoretical and experimental research is needed to identify appropriate fall-arrest strategies for the elderly, as well as the physical capacities and skills required to do so. Inexpensive interventions might then be developed to teach safe fall-arrest techniques to older individuals.

Fall arrest strategy affects peak hand impact force in a forward fall.

We measured the peak hand impact force involved in bimanually arresting a forward fall to the ground from a 1-m shoulder height in five healthy young males. The effects of three different subject instruction sets: "arrest the fall naturally"; "keep the head as far from the ground as possible"; and "minimize the peak hand forces" were studied by measuring body segment kinematics, ground reaction forces, and upper-extremity myoelectric activity. The hypotheses were tested that the (a) arrest strategy did not influence peak impact force, (b) arm configuration, impact velocity and upper-extremity electromyography (EMG) levels correlate to the peak impact force (c) and impacting the ground with one hand leading the other does not increase the impact force over that obtained with simultaneous hand use. The results show that these subjects were able to volitionally decrease the peak impact force at the wrist by an average of 27% compared with a "natural landing" (p=0.014) and 40% compared with a "stiff-arm landing" (p<0.0005). The magnitude of the peak unilateral wrist force varied from 0.65 to 1.7 body weight for these moderate falls onto a padded surface. Peak force correlated with the elbow angle at impact, wrist velocity at impact and with pre-EMG triceps activity. The force was not significantly higher for non-simultaneous hand impacts. We conclude that fall arrest strategy can substantially alter the peak impact forces applied to the distal forearm during a fall arrest. Therefore, the fall arrest strategy likely influences wrist injury risk independent of bone strength.

How quickly can healthy adults move their hands to intercept an approaching object? Age and gender effects.

BACKGROUND: The upper extremities are often used to protect the head and torso from impact with an object or with the ground. We tested the null hypotheses that neither age nor gender would affect the time required for healthy adults to move their upper extremities into a protective posture. METHODS: Twenty young (mean age 25 years) and twenty older (mean age 70 years) volunteers, with equal gender representation, performed a seated arm-movement task under three conditions: Condition 1, in which subjects were instructed to raise the hands upon cue as quickly as possible from thigh level to a shoulder height target; Condition 2, in which subjects were instructed as in Condition 1 with the addition of intercepting a swinging pendulum at the prescribed hand target; and Condition 3, in which subjects were instructed as in Condition 2 but were asked to wait as long as possible before initiating hand movement to intercept the pendulum. Arm movements were quantified using standard kinematic techniques. RESULTS: Age (p <.01) and gender (p <.05) affected hand movement times. In Conditions 1 and 2, the older women required 20% longer movement times than the other subject groups (335 vs 279 milliseconds; p <.01). In Condition 3, shorter movement times were achieved by young men (20%; p =.002) and older women (10%; p =.056) as compared with their respective performance in Conditions 1 and 2 because they did not fully decelerate their hands. The other groups slowed their movements in Condition 3. CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, and perceived threat significantly affected movement times. However, even the slowest movement times were well within the time available to deploy the hands in a forward fall to the ground.

In vivo kinematics of the rabbit knee in unstable models of osteoarthrosis.

The effects of osteoarthrosis inducing surgery on the kinematics of the rabbit knee were evaluated in vivo. A video motion analysis system was used to track reflective markers attached to two pins fixed in both femur and tibia, and from these data knee kinematics were computed. The control for all measurements was the gait after pins were implanted, but the knee was unaltered. Both a release of the anterior cruciate ligament and a partial medial meniscectomy were then performed, and the animals' gait was recorded at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after knee surgery. Knee kinematics were described by three translations and three rotations and were analyzed in terms of maximum and minimum values and range of motion. Statistical comparisons of these data between control and operated knees were made using Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results showed an initial increase in maximum anterior displacement which returned to normal after 12 weeks. In addition there was a persistent increase in knee adduction and an increase in the minimum value of external rotation over the 12 week period. At 12 weeks after surgery there was no change in range of any measurable kinematic parameter. Overall, the changes in joint kinematics following partial medial meniscectomy and release of the anterior cruciate ligament were small, suggesting that altered joint kinematics might not be a critical factor in the development of osteoarthrosis in this animal model.