Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Cir Esp (Engl Ed) ; 101(4): 238-251, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36427782

RESUMEN

Surgical site infection is the most frequent and avoidable complication of surgery, but clinical guidelines for its prevention are insufficiently followed. We present the results of a Delphi consensus carried out by a panel of experts from 17 Scientific Societies with a critical review of the scientific evidence and international guidelines, to select the measures with the highest degree of evidence and facilitate their implementation. Forty measures were reviewed and 53 recommendations were issued. Ten main measures were prioritized for inclusion in prevention bundles: preoperative shower; correct surgical hand hygiene; no hair removal from the surgical field or removal with electric razors; adequate systemic antibiotic prophylaxis; use of minimally invasive approaches; skin decontamination with alcoholic solutions; maintenance of normothermia; plastic wound protectors-retractors; intraoperative glove change; and change of surgical and auxiliary material before wound closure.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Preoperatorios , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Consenso , Higiene de las Manos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos
2.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(3): 189-195, mar. 2017. graf, tab
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-162138

RESUMEN

The incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is expected to increase in the coming years. PJI has serious consequences for patients, and high costs for the health system. The complexity of these infections makes it necessary to organize the vast quantity of information published in the last several years. The indications for the choice of a given surgical strategy and the corresponding antimicrobial therapy are specifically reviewed. The authors selected clinically relevant questions and then reviewed the available literature in order to give recommendations according to a pre-determined level of scientific evidence. The more controversial aspects were debated, and the final composition was agreed at an ad hoc meeting. Before its final publication, the manuscript was made available online in order that all SEIMC members were able to read it and make comments and suggestions


Se prevé un incremento de la incidencia de infección de las prótesis articulares (IPA) en los próximos años. Las IPA plantean graves consecuencias para los pacientes y un alto coste el sistema sanitario. La complejidad de estas infecciones hace que sea necesario organizar la inmensa cantidad de información publicada en los últimos años. En estas guías se revisan específicamente las indicaciones para la elección de una estrategia quirúrgica dada y el tratamiento antimicrobiano correspondiente. Los autores seleccionaron las preguntas clínicamente relevantes y revisaron la literatura disponible con el fin de proporcionar recomendaciones de acuerdo con un grado de evidencia científica predeterminada. Los aspectos más controvertidos fueron debatidos y la redacción final se acordó en una reunión ad hoc. Antes de su publicación, el manuscrito estuvo abierto a comentarios y sugerencias de los miembros de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , Prótesis Articulares , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
3.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 35(3): 189-195, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28215487

RESUMEN

The incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is expected to increase in the coming years. PJI has serious consequences for patients, and high costs for the health system. The complexity of these infections makes it necessary to organize the vast quantity of information published in the last several years. The indications for the choice of a given surgical strategy and the corresponding antimicrobial therapy are specifically reviewed. The authors selected clinically relevant questions and then reviewed the available literature in order to give recommendations according to a pre-determined level of scientific evidence. The more controversial aspects were debated, and the final composition was agreed at an ad hoc meeting. Before its final publication, the manuscript was made available online in order that all SEIMC members were able to read it and make comments and suggestions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/terapia , Humanos
4.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 31(4): 199-204, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22819389

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance has been recognized as a worldwide problem. Our aim was to assess the perceptions of Spanish residents about antibiotic use and resistance. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted on all resident doctors in five teaching hospitals (September to November 2010). A link to the questionnaire was e-mailed to 844 doctors. The questionnaire collected demographical characteristics, residents' knowledge about microorganisms of known clinical relevance, their habits in the antibiotic prescription process, and their perceptions on the activities aimed to improve antibiotic use. RESULTS: We received 279 responses corresponding to 33.05% of all targeted residents. The response rate was higher among junior than among senior residents (39.95% vs. 26.12%; p<0.05). Residents of all hospitals, specialties and seniority mostly considered that antimicrobial resistance was a significant problem at national level (94.3%), at their institution (91.3%), and for their daily practice (83.8%). Residents considered their training regarding antibiotics insufficient, although up to 86.5% had prescribed antibiotics in the last month. They preferred the availability of local antibiotic guidelines (65%), specific teaching sessions, specific antimicrobial management teams or readily accessible advice from a group or an infectious diseases specialist, to improve antibiotic prescribing, rather than other restrictive interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Most residents at the hospitals surveyed believed that antibiotic resistance was a serious problem. The results of this survey provided very important information to optimize adherence to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs). Educational strategies and non-restrictive aids are the most valuable interventions, which ASPs should capitalize on to improve antimicrobial prescription.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Internado y Residencia , Médicos/psicología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada , Infectología/educación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevalencia , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(8): 786-95, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20524852

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term impact of successive interventions on rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization or infection and MRSA bacteremia in an endemic hospital-wide situation. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, interrupted time-series analysis. The impact of the interventions was analyzed by use of segmented regression. Representative MRSA isolates were typed by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. SETTING: A 950-bed teaching hospital in Seville, Spain. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the hospital during the period from 1995 through 2008. METHODS: Three successive interventions were studied: (1) contact precautions, with no active surveillance for MRSA; (2) targeted active surveillance for MRSA in patients and healthcare workers in specific wards, prioritized according to clinical epidemiology data; and (3) targeted active surveillance for MRSA in patients admitted from other medical centers. RESULTS: Neither the preintervention rate of MRSA colonization or infection (0.56 cases per 1,000 patient-days [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.49-0.62 cases per 1,000 patient-days]) nor the slope for the rate of MRSA colonization or infection changed significantly after the first intervention. The rate decreased significantly to 0.28 cases per 1,000 patient-days (95% CI, 0.17-0.40 cases per 1,000 patient-days) after the second intervention and to 0.07 cases per 1,000 patient-days (95% CI, 0.06-0.08 cases per 1,000 patient-days) after the third intervention, and the rate remained at a similar level for 8 years. The MRSA bacteremia rate decreased by 80%, whereas the rate of bacteremia due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus did not change. Eighty-three percent of the MRSA isolates identified were clonally related. All MRSA isolates obtained from healthcare workers were clonally related to those recovered from patients who were in their care. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that long-term control of endemic MRSA is feasible in tertiary care centers. The use of targeted active surveillance for MRSA in patients and healthcare workers in specific wards (identified by means of analysis of clinical epidemiology data) and the use of decolonization were key to the success of the program.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Enfermedades Endémicas/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Personal de Salud , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , España , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...