Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Legal Med ; 134(4): 1409-1417, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31696311

RESUMEN

A synthetic head model developed to reproduce military injuries was assessed in two different scenarios involving shooting through intermediate targets (a laminated vehicle windscreen in scenario 1 and a military helicopter windscreen in scenario 2) with 7.62 × 39-mm mild steel core (MSC) ammunition. The injury patterns resulting from the two scenarios were assessed by a military radiologist and a forensic pathologist with combat injury experience and found to be clinically realistic.


Asunto(s)
Balística Forense , Patologia Forense , Traumatismos Penetrantes de la Cabeza/patología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/patología , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza , Humanos , Modelos Anatómicos , Polímeros
2.
J Clin Pathol ; 60(4): 419-21, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16775122

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: On 1 June 2005, amendments to the Coroners Rules 1984 were introduced in England and Wales. These principally cover the retention of tissues from autopsies and their subsequent disposal. This study assesses regional variations in the interpretations of the amendments, and their impact on local autopsy practice in Oxford. METHODS: A questionnaire was circulated to pathologists in 120 coronial jurisdictions, addressing conditions under which histological material could be retained. A local review of autopsy practice was conducted before and after the introduction of the amendments. RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 71 coronial jurisdictions. 35 (49%) coroners provided written guidelines on their interpretation of the amendments. In 52 (73%) jurisdictions, pathologists are authorised to retain material to confirm/refine causes of death from natural causes. In 77% of jurisdictions, coroner's officers are responsible for obtaining instructions from the next of kin on subsequent retention, use or disposal of retained tissues. In Oxford, there has been a reduction in the proportion of cases in which histology is taken, but an increase in the proportion of cases in which a histology report is issued. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable regional variation in the interpretation of the 2005 Coroners Rules Amendments. These variations have potentially important implications for clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Autopsia/legislación & jurisprudencia , Médicos Forenses/normas , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Autopsia/normas , Inglaterra , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Patología Clínica/legislación & jurisprudencia , Patología Clínica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Práctica Profesional/normas , Manejo de Especímenes/normas , Consentimiento por Terceros , Gales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA