Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol ; 49(10): 736-743, 2021 10.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33636412

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is associated with high mortality and often managed first with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by debulking surgery. Laparoscopic surgery with or without robotic assistance (Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS)) may represent a beneficial option for these patients. The objective of this literature review is to clarify the place of MIS in the management of advanced EOC for selected patients. METHOD: Pubmed, Cochrane and Clinicaltrials.gov online databases were used for this review, to select English or French published articles. RESULTS: We selected 11 original articles published between 2015 and 2020, 6 of which compared MIS and laparotomy. Among these 11 studies, 8 were retrospective cohorts, 2 were phase II trials, and one was a case-control study. In total, there were 3721 patients, of which 854 (23%) were treated with MIS. The robotic assistance was used with 224 patients (26%) of those MIS patients. Looking specifically at MIS patients, the laparoconversion rate was 9.5%, the rate of complete resection (CC-0) was 83.4%. Finally, the MIS complication rate was 1% intraoperatively and 12% postoperatively. The rate of complete resection, postoperative complication, as well as overall survival (OS) were comparable between patients treated with MIS or laparotomy. One study found an improved disease-free survival (DFS) in MIS versus laparotomy (18 months versus 12 months; P=0.027). CONCLUSION: MIS seems feasible, effective, and reliable in comparison to laparotomy for the completion of cytoreductive surgery after NACT without compromising oncological safety. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the role of MIS in advanced EOC.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Ováricas , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Femenino , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 158(3): 666-672, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32624235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors are rare tumors, affecting young women with a generally favorable prognosis. The French reference network for Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) aims to improve their management. The purpose of this study is to report clinicopathological features and long-term outcomes, to explore prognostic parameters and to help in considering adjuvant strategy for stage I patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with MOGCT registered among 13 of the largest centers of the TMRG network were analyzed. We report clinicopathological features, estimated 5-year event-free survival (5y-EFS) and 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) of MOGCT patients. RESULTS: We collected data from 147 patients including 101 (68.7%) FIGO stage I patients. Histology identifies 40 dysgerminomas, 52 immature teratomas, 32 yolk sac tumors, 2 choriocarcinomas and 21 mixed tumors. Surgery was performed in 140 (95.2%) patients and 106 (72.1%) received first line chemotherapy. Twenty-two stage I patients did not receive chemotherapy. Relapse occurred in 24 patients: 13 were exclusively treated with upfront surgery and 11 received surgery and chemotherapy. 5y-EFS was 82% and 5y-OS was 92.4%. Stage I patients who underwent surgery alone had an estimated 5y-EFS of 54.6% and patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy 94.4% (P < .001). However, no impact on estimated 5y-OS was observed: 96.3% versus 97.8% respectively (P = .62). FIGO stage, complete primary surgery and post-operative alpha fetoprotein level significantly correlated with survival. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival in stage I patients. Active surveillance can be proposed for selected patients with a complete surgical staging.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Espera Vigilante , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Coriocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Coriocarcinoma/patología , Coriocarcinoma/cirugía , Coriocarcinoma/terapia , Disgerminoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Disgerminoma/patología , Disgerminoma/cirugía , Disgerminoma/terapia , Tumor del Seno Endodérmico/tratamiento farmacológico , Tumor del Seno Endodérmico/patología , Tumor del Seno Endodérmico/cirugía , Tumor del Seno Endodérmico/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/cirugía , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Teratoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Teratoma/patología , Teratoma/cirugía , Teratoma/terapia , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA