Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 6(7): ofz251, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31334296

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Echinocandins are recommended as firstline therapy in patients with candidemia. However, there is debate on their efficacy in survival outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the choice of initial antifungal therapy improves mortality in patients with candidemia in relation to the presence of septic shock. METHODS: Patients with candidemia hospitalized in internal medicine wards of 5 tertiary care centers were included in the study (December 2012-December 2014). Patient characteristics, therapeutic interventions, and outcome were reviewed. Propensity score (PS) was used as a covariate of the multivariate analysis to perform a stratified analysis according to PS quartiles and to match patients receiving "echinocandins" or "azoles." RESULTS: Overall, 439 patients with candidemia were included in the study. A total of 172 (39.2%) patients had septic shock. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with septic shock (45.3%) compared with those without septic shock (31.5%; P = .003). Among patients with septic shock, the use of echinocandins in the first 48 hours, compared with azoles, did not affect 30-day mortality in the PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-1.59; P = .48), the PS-stratified analysis, or the logistic regression model in matched cohorts (adjusted HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.51-1.63; P = .77). CONCLUSIONS: Echinocandin therapy seems not to improve the outcome of non-intensive care unit patients with septic shock due to candidemia. These findings support the urgent need of further studies in this patient population.

2.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 51(1): 12-22, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30590969

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) due to Gram negative bacilli (GNB) represent a major concern among nosocomial infections, since they are noticeably associated with a high mortality rates, increase of healthcare costs and prolongation of hospital stay. METHODS: Over a 12-month period (2014-2015) all the adult patients admitted to a university-based Italian hospital were monitored for development of BSIs due to GNB. Multiple logistics regression models were performed to assess the impact of patients' risk factors on the in-hospital and 14-day mortality. RESULTS: During the study period 208 patients were diagnosed with at least a BSI due to a Gram negative species for an incidence rate of 12.8 cases/1,000 admissions (95%CI: 11.2-14.7). Multivariate analyses showed that multiple organ dysfunctions along with immune deficit and inadequate therapy in the first 48hrs were associated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough evaluation of both immune status and organ dysfunction at the onset of septic events, along with adequate antimicrobial therapy appear to be the most reliable factors in predicting the outcome in these infections. SOFA score can be efficaciously substituted to the single organ dysfunctions analysis in predicting mortality after these events.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/microbiología , Bacteriemia/patología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/patología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/mortalidad , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Am J Infect Control ; 43(11): 1178-83, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26253805

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) from multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria cause morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients worldwide. This study investigated the incidence of BSIs in 5 adult general ICUs in Rome, Italy, and evaluated the mortality rate and risk factors associated with these infections. METHODS: Over a 12-month period, 1,318 patients were enrolled. Demographic characteristics, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), comorbidities, and BSI isolate data were collected. After stratification for the outcome, statistical analysis was performed to assess the impact of patient risk factors on in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: There were 324 BSIs in 175 patients recorded, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 46%. Univariate analysis revealed that SAPS II, cardiac comorbidity, and Klebsiella pneumoniae BSI were significantly associated with a higher risk of death. Having a K pneumoniae BSI and cardiac illness at admission were both confirmed to be associated with death by multivariate analysis (P = .0162 and P = .0158, respectively). Most of the K pneumoniae isolates showed high resistance rates to carbapenems. CONCLUSION: BSIs caused by K pneumoniae and cardiovascular comorbidity in ICU patients are associated with a higher risk of death. Thorough surveillance for MDR pathogens and stratification of the patients' risk on admission into the ICU are key to improving the outcomes of these infections.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Anciano , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Ciudad de Roma/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...