The role of maximal inspiratory pressure on functional performance in adults with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Exercise intolerance is common among adults with heart failure (HF) and is a strong prognostic indicator. We examined maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) as an indicator of maximal and submaximal exercise capacity in older HF patients. METHODS: Fifty-one patients age ≥ 50 years with HF underwent MIP testing via the PrO2 device. Peak oxygen uptake (VO2), 6 min walk distance (6MWD), 30 s sit-to-stand test (STS), gait speed (GS), grip strength and lower extremity muscle strength [one-repetition maximum (1RM)] were measured. Correlation and exploratory multiple regression analyses investigated relationships between MIP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), age, body mass index (BMI) and physical function. MIP was then stratified by median (64 cm H2O), and endpoints were compared between median groups. RESULTS: The median age was 69 years [interquartile range (IQR): 66-73], and the median LVEF was 36.5% (IQR: 30%-45%). Regression identified MIP as an independent predictor for grip strength, 6MWD, 1RM weight and 30 s STS after adjustment for age, BMI and LVEF. MIP greater than the median (n = 25) independently predicted and reflected greater peak VO2 [14.2 (12.8-18.1) vs. 11.5 (9.7-13.0) mL/kg/min; P = 0.0007] as well as 6MWD, 1RM, 30 s STS and GS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The analysis demonstrates that MIP is a novel biometric for exercise tolerance in adults with HF. Assessments of MIP are safe and convenient, with the potential to enhance routine HF surveillance and provide novel biometrics to guide HF therapeutics.

Modified Application of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Older Adults (MACRO) Trial: Protocol changes in a pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are at higher risk for cardiovascular disease and functional decline, often leading to deterioration and dependency. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) provides opportunity to improve clinical and functional recovery, yet participation in CR decreases with age. Modified Application of CR in Older Adults (MACRO) is a National Institute on Aging (NIA)-funded pragmatic trial that responds to this gap by aiming to increase enrollment of older adults into CR and improving functional outcomes. This article describes the methodology and novel features of the MACRO trial. METHODS: Randomized, controlled trial of a coaching intervention (MACRO-I) vs. usual care for older adults (age ≥ 70 years) eligible for CR after an incident cardiac hospitalization. MACRO-I incorporates innovations including holistic risk assessments, flexible CR format (i.e., helping patients to select a CR design that aligns with their personal risks and preferences), motivational prompts, nutritional emphasis, facilitated deprescription, enhanced education, and home visits. Key modifications were necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, including switching from a performance-based primary endpoint (Short Physical Performance Battery) to a patient-reported measure (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Computerized Adaptive Testing). Changes prompted by COVID-19 maintain the original intent of the trial and provide key methodologic advantages. CONCLUSIONS: MACRO is exploring a novel individualized coaching intervention to better enable older patients to participate in CR. Due to COVID-19 many aspects of the MACRO protocol required modification, but the primary objective of the trial is maintained and the updated protocol will more effectively achieve the original goals of the study.

Differences in Comorbid Conditions Among Older Adult Participants in Cardiac Rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Most older adults eligible for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) do not participate or participate with low frequency, although it is a standard of care for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Identifying the barriers to older adult participation is key in improving CR efficacy. METHODS: A range of patient characteristics was analyzed in relation to on-site frequency of participation in a CR program by older adult patients. These characteristics included demographics and indications for referral, as well as CVD and non-CVD diagnoses. The prevalence of these characteristics was compared among three patient cohorts, ranging from high contact frequency to minimal contact frequency of on-site participation in CR. RESULTS: Among the three participation frequency cohorts, no differences were noted in demographic factors, indications for referral, or CVD diagnoses. However, patients with hearing impairment (OR = 4.15: 95% CI, 1.32-13.08) or visual impairment (OR = 4.11: 95% CI, 1.46-11.59) at time of enrollment were more likely to be found in the minimal contact cohorts than the moderate or high contact frequency cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Whereas differences in CVD had little bearing on frequency of CR participation in older patients, differences in hearing and visual impairment varied significantly. Patients with hearing and vision impairments attended less frequently. Sensory impairment has previously been demonstrated to impact health care utilization by older adults, but is rarely considered in the treatment of CVD or CR. As sensory impairments are extremely prevalent among geriatric patients, further study of these potential barriers to care might open possibilities for older adult participation in CR.

Cardiac Rehabilitation Is Associated With Improved Physical Function in Frail Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.

PURPOSE: Frailty is highly prevalent among older adults with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and is associated with greater than 2-fold risk for morbidity and mortality, independent of age and comorbidities. Many candidates are not referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) under the assumption that they are too frail to benefit. We hypothesized that CR is associated with similar benefits for frail adults as for intermediate-frail and nonfrail adults. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of CVD patients who completed a phase II CR program. Patients classified as frail by meeting ≥2 frailty criteria and intermediate-frail by meeting 1 criterion, including 6-min walk distance (6MWD) <300 m, gait speed ≤0.65 m/sec or 0.76 m/sec normalized to height and sex, tandem stand <10 sec, Timed Up & Go (TUG) <15 sec, and weak hand grip strength per Fried criteria. Changes within and between groups were compared before and after completion of CR. RESULTS: We evaluated 243 patients; 75 were classified as frail, 70 as intermediate-frail, and 98 as nonfrail. Each group improved in all measures of frailty except for tandem stand. There were no significant differences in pre- to post-CR measures for 6MWD, gait speed, tandem stand, or hand grip strength between groups. Frail patients showed greater improvement in TUG than the other groups (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Among frail patients, CR was associated with improvements in multiple domains of physical function. Gains achieved by frail adults were similar to or greater than those achieved by intermediate-frail and nonfrail patients. These data provide strong rationale for referring all eligible patients to CR, including frail patients. Those who are most physically impaired may derive gains that have proportionally greater ramifications.

Enhancing Functional Risk Stratification in Contemporary Cardiac Rehabilitation: RESPONDING TO PATIENTS WHO ARE INCREASINGLY OLDER AND MORE PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED.

PURPOSE: Current American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation guidelines rely primarily on cardiovascular disease (CVD)-centered metrics to stratify risk and guide care. Yet, contemporary CVD patients are often older and are more likely to have risks attributable to rudimentary functional impairments that can have disproportionate bearing on management and prognosis. In this study, we stratified risk using novel indices of physical function as well as traditional indices of CVD in patients enrolling in phase II cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We hypothesized that risk stratification (RS) using functional criteria would be nonconcordant with CVD RS in a significant number of patients, thus inferring the conceptual value of CR management priorities that are better tailored for distinctive functional risks in many patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a comprehensive quality improvement database with 489 patients. Risk stratification using novel functional indices (ie, gait speed, Timed Up and Go, hand grip, sit to stand, tandem stand, and a 6-min walk test) was compared with RS using traditional CVD criteria. RESULTS: Using functional RS, 97 patients were determined to be high risk versus 235 at low risk. Using CVD RS in the same cohort, 227 patients had high risk versus 161 who had low risk. Functional RS was consistent with CVD RS only 42.9% of the time. CONCLUSION: Functional RS and CVD RS varied in the same patients. Enhanced assessment of functional risks adds important prognostic refinement and greater potential to tailor exercise therapy, nutrition, and other CR caregiving priorities.