Vegetable parenting practices vary by feeding styles among middle class mothers of young children.

The optimal approach to feeding preschool children balances expectation setting (demandingness) with responsivity to the child (responsiveness), and ideal feeding practices use environmental structuring and covert, non-directive control strategies while maintaining responsiveness. However, research has not examined the extent to which demandingness and responsiveness in feeding style is concordant with structure, responsiveness and control (directive and non-directive) in feeding practices. We classified the feeding style of 122 parents of preschoolers as authoritative (high demandingness/high responsiveness), authoritarian (high demandingness/low responsiveness), indulgent (low demandingness/high responsiveness), or uninvolved (low demandingness/low responsiveness). Parents reported on their frequency of use of 31 vegetable parenting practices (VPPs), that were classified into the domains of structure, control and responsiveness, and subcategorized as effective (likely to obtain the desired change without increasing child obesity risk) or ineffective (unlikely or increases risk) by expert consensus. We hypothesized that parents with an authoritative feeding style would have the highest effective structure, responsiveness and control VPPs, and the authoritarian style would differ with less responsiveness VPPs. We also hypothesized that the indulgent feeding style would have low levels of structure and control VPPs and high ineffective responsiveness VPPs. As expected, we found that parents with an authoritative feeding style reported using more effective structure and responsiveness VPPs. Surprisingly, parents with an authoritarian feeding style did not have VPPs which differed from those with an authoritative feeding style, and parents with an indulgent feeding style had surprisingly high effective control VPPs. Further research into the similarities and differences between parents' overall approach to feeding and their use of feeding practices related to specific foods is warranted, which may help inform the design of more effective interventions aimed at improving child dietary quality.

Selection and use of vegetable parenting practices did not vary by parent feeding styles: Mixed methods investigation.

Parents influence their child's vegetable intake through their feeding style, i.e. the emotional tone established around feeding, and vegetable parenting practices (VPPs), i.e. the specific behaviors employed to influence their child's vegetable intake. A model of precision food parenting proposes that child healthy dietary intake could be optimized by the selection and implementation of effective food parenting practices. Parents use and learn from these complex interactions with their child, which are reflective of feeding style. Intervention research has targeted VPPs in general without a delineation of which practices were selected, which were used, or why they were selected. It is not clear how these users were influenced by feeding style, nor what the parent learned from the interaction. The current study used mixed methods wherein middle socioeconomic status parents of 3-5 year old children were categorized within feeding style groups (n = 122), asked to select two VPPs, implemented them for a week (n = 63), and qualitatively interviewed about their experience. Responsiveness VPPs were most commonly selected, primarily due to their perceived ease of implementation. Parents believed there would be long term positive outcomes, e.g. more vegetable intake from using the practices selected. Frequency of use depended in part on opportunity, e.g. food purchase parenting practices could only be employed during intermittent shopping events. Few differences were detected by parent feeding styles in the types of VPPs selected, frequency of use, or effectiveness. Food parenting interventions can encourage selection of specific VPPs to employ and do not appear to have to tailor the types of VPPs offered to parent feeding style. Research is needed with larger, socioeconomically diverse samples to assess optimal categorization into feeding styles and confirm the present results.

Use of a Rubric to Improve the Quality of Internal Medicine Resident Event Reporting.

Introduction: As frontline providers, residents report patient safety events and provide crucial safety feedback. Specific ACGME and AAMC requirements for graduating residents include active participation in event reporting and patient safety investigations. However, formal training on what information a quality event report should include to effect real change in the health care system is lacking. Methods: This practical, interactive, case-based workshop educates residents on the key components of a quality event report in a 1-hour time frame. The scoring rubric offers quantitative feedback on the quality of information provided in residents' own event reports. The materials include a presentation template, sample teaching points, pre- and posttraining patient safety cases for residents to complete their own event reports about, and a standardized rubric to score event reports for feedback. Results: During the fall of 2019, 198 internal medicine residents completed the workshop, and 143 matched pre- and postcourse surveys were reviewed. Residents' ability to correctly identify the key concepts of an event report improved from a median score of 4 to 8 (p < .001). After completion of training, residents reported increased knowledge regarding the content of an effective event report (p < .001) and increased confidence in their ability to write one (p < .001). Discussion: Residents' knowledge of key event-reporting concepts and confidence in reporting improved after completion of the workshop. This brief interactive training and its novel rubric can be used as a standardized tool for patient safety curricula in academic training programs.