Knowledge, perception, and protective measures of Turkish pregnant women towards COVID-19 pandemic and their effects on anxiety levels.

The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge of pregnant women regarding COVID-19 while evaluating the ability of protective measures and their effects on the level of anxiety during this pandemic. Using a prospective cross-sectional survey, 304 pregnant women attending prenatal polyclinics were included in our study between June 10 and July 10, 2020. The mean age of participants was 29.2 ± 6.0 years. The median gestational week was 25, ranging from 25 to 40 weeks of gestation. There was no significant correlation between a gestational week or complicated pregnancy and anxiety. Most participants possessed adequate knowledge and practical skills concerning Covid-19. Women with adequate knowledge were found to be statistically related to a high practice skills score and lower anxiety levels. Good knowledge levels are related to good practice skills and lower anxiety levels. Although pregnancy is not currently considered a risk factor, we believe it is vital to inform pregnant women about COVID-19 since they are naturally prone to mental problems and respiratory infections during pregnancy. Therefore, healthcare professionals should be encouraged to play an active role in this issue, replacing social media, a common source of misinformation for this target demographic.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? The prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant women increased significantly after the declaration of human-to-human transmission and the increasingly rapid spread of COVID-19.What do the results of this study add? Pregnant women with good knowledge of COVID-19 were found to have adequate practice skills and lower anxiety levels.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The act of informing pregnant women is essential in reducing anxiety levels and taking more accurate measures against COVID-19 because high levels of anxiety and depression can have long-term effects on maternal and foetal health. To minimise the potential for information pollution on social media, health professionals must play a more significant role in informing pregnant women and provide evidence-based information to pregnant women about the effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy.

Comparison of Intrauterine Device Insertion-Related Pain and Ease of Procedure at Different Times During Menstruation.

Objective: Fear of pain during the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) insertion may lead patients to reject this highly effective birth control method. The aim of this study was to investigate the pain scores associated with IUD insertion and the ease of procedure at different times during menstruation. Method: In this prospective cohort trial, eligible women received IUD at three-time segments of menstruation: Group I, at 0.5 to 0.69-time segment (n=53); Group II, at 0.7 to 0.89-time segment (n=67); and Group III, at 0.9 to 1-time segment (n=72). The time segments during menstruation were calculated for each participant by dividing the menstrual cycle day of IUD insertion to total number of menses days. The score of pain experienced at different steps of IUD insertion during and five min. after the procedure measured by Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBS) and the ease of insertion were compared among groups. Results: There were significant differences in age (p=0.011) and time since the last delivery (p=0.017). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the mean WBS score and the ease of insertion were not statistically significant among groups, respectively (p=0.664 and p=0.149). The most painful step was observed as uterine sounding (median, 4 [interquartile range {IQR}, 2]). No significant correlation was observed between WBS scores, the ease of insertion, and main characteristics of the participants. Conclusion: The most painful step of IUD insertion was observed as uterine sounding. IUD insertion-related pain and the ease of procedure do not appear to be different at any time in the second half of menstruation.

Comparative Analysis of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of Pregnancies Complicated and Not Complicated with Hyperemesis Gravidarum Necessitating Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancies complicated and not complicated with hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) necessitating hospitalization. METHOD: A total of 386 women with singleton deliveries between March 2015 and January 2018 were included in this retrospective single-center study. Of 386 women, 186 women (mean±SD age: 30.7±5.9 years) who were hospitalized with HG within the first 20 weeks of gestation comprised the hyperemetic pregnancy group, while 200 women without HG during pregnancy served as a control group. RESULTS: No significant difference was noted between the HG and control groups in terms of maternal characteristics, gestational age (median 38.6 and 39.0 weeks, respectively), type of delivery (normal spontaneous delivery in 78.0% vs 80.0%), fetal gender (female: 53.2% vs 48.5%), birthweight (median 3250 g vs 3275 g) and 5-min APGAR scores (≥7 in 97.3% vs 97.5%, respectively). Adverse pregnancy outcomes were also similar between groups including preterm birth (8.1% vs 11.0%, respectively), SGA (5.9% vs 9.5%), hypertensive disorder (5.4% vs 7.5%), placental abruption (1.1% vs 0.5%,), stillbirth (0.0% vs 0.5%) and GDM (3.8%vs 2.5%). Weight loss during pregnancy was evident in 91.3% of women in the HG group, while none of women in the control group had weight loss during pregnancy (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that HG may not be related with adverse fetal and prenatal outcomes and this conclusion needs to be clarified with large-scale investigations.

Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with breech presentation undergoing spontaneous or induced vaginal delivery, or cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Breech presentation is the most common form of malpresentation, and associated with perinatal asphyxia and mortality, and maternal morbidity. Data associated with labor induction in breech presentation are limited. The aim of this study was to compare maternal and fetal complication rates in induced and spontaneous vaginal, and cesarean delivery with breech presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pregnant women with breech presentation were grouped: spontaneous vaginal delivery (Group 1, n = 72) induced or augmented vaginal delivery (Group 2, n = 32), and cesarean delivery (Group 3, n = 253). Fetal complications were as follows: clavicle fracture, femur fracture, humerus fracture, brachial plexus injury, cephalic hematoma, pneumothorax, need for intensive care unit (ICU), and 5th minute APGAR <7. Maternal complications were as follows: vaginal hematoma, deep vaginal laceration, perineal injury (≥3rd degree), decline in hemoglobin level (>2 g/dL), and postpartum endometritis. Data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The highest fetal complication rate was in Group 2, and the lowest in Group 3 (p = 0.001). Clavicle fracture was significantly less in Group 3 compared with the other groups (p = 0.024). The rate of lower APGAR scores at the 5th minute was similar in all groups. Maternal complications were significantly higher in Group 2 compared with the other groups (p = 0.001). Fetal complications were 5.66-fold higher in Group 1 than in Group 3 (p = 0.002). Fetal and maternal complications were 9.48-fold and 7.48-fold higher, respectively, in Group 2 than in Group 3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study is the first in literature to have investigated and analyzed neonatal complications in breech delivery according to different delivery modes including induced vaginal delivery. Due to possible complications, the risks and benefits of a specific type of delivery should be considered in breech presentation.